Can you explain THIS?
Hakim Warrick signed with the Milwaukee Bucks. rather than the Cleveland Cavaliers, Philadelphia 76ers and Charlotte Bobcats.
huh?
3 months ago
hardcore
10 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Hmm....
I cant see why he wouldn’t go to Cleveland. I guess Hakim doesn’t want a championship.
It was the shoes!!
by LighTz707OuT on Aug 1, 2009 6:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
your link is broken
should be jsonline, not jsonlin
by IQofaWarrior on Aug 1, 2009 7:35 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
He wants playing time and he’ll get that in Milwaukee. The guy wants to play.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Aug 1, 2009 9:25 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Has to be for playing time
He only has a one year contract so he probably wants to earn a big time contract next offseason by playing a lot for the Bucks
This is our year
by DaymanCometh on Aug 1, 2009 9:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He won't get a huge contract next year with all the stars that are also out there.
Maybe they offered him more money?
Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "Your a rookie"
by dubzfan on Aug 1, 2009 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah
He could probably develop better in Milwaukee and have a chance at an even bigger contract later.
But being LeBron’s teammate kind of gets a player more recognition for some reason. Hakim Warrick would have been a bigger name as a Cavalier and probably could have gotten more money.
Like if Morrow played for the Lakers last season, he probably would have been more known and got invited in the 3 point competition just for being a Laker.
by Precise Films Productions on Aug 2, 2009 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think u nailed it on morrow
he would have been in 3pt contest if he ran with lakers
by farid on Aug 2, 2009 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heck, we should have signed him, we need a quality SF.
There's a party in my mind.
And I wish that I was there.
by qin on Aug 3, 2009 11:42 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

















