Flights of fancy....
As many of you will recall, we had a season ticket holder meeting with Robert Rowell at the end of the season this year, where some very interesting things came to light and quite a bit of interest was generated in the overview thereafter....
With the events of the last few days, something suddenly clicked and I asked myself.... "what if....nah....surely not....."
One of the key things Robert Rowell said during the meeting was; "SIGNIFICANT changes were going take place over the summer".... he advised that no one in the front office was happy with the season we just had and were just as disappointed as fans and so there "has to be significant changes..."
So lets look at that shall we....has this off-season produced "SIGNIFICANT" changes to the GSW team? I would have to say no....
This therefore lead me to my moment of question and disbelief above.......
What if....part of the major changes that needed to occur were indeed the possible trade of Andris, which has yet to/may not happen and WHAT IF..... the front office advised Stephen Jackson that he was likely to be traded?
Now I have been pretty disgusted with Jackson if this is in fact his decision, but MAYBE, just maybe... he has been told something that no one else yet knows....
If you were him and you had found out that you may be traded having agreed a deal to stay at the club just last year, wouldnt you be just a little ticked off with the organisation? Therefore.... you would want to make the first public move, to make it seem like it is "HIS" decision to leave, rather than the clubs?
So this takes us back to the FO.....who to be honest, wont look good in either case below, no matter what the outcome for the following reasons:
1: If they have told him he is outta here at the first opportunity, is this really sensible? considering you just granted a huge contract extension just last year!!!!
2: The FO has such a poor read and understanding of it's players that it does not realise it is being played by the players? In which case....that's simply embarassing....
OR..... and here is the kicker....
The FO is taking the hugest gamble of all in the next few weeks... where they create a package or packages of players like "Andris, Claxton, George", and another one of "Jackson, Wright, Law, Moore" etc (create your own versions) in order to try and go for TWO reasonably big name players to compliment our young guns in Randolph, Ellis, Morrow and Curry?..... So far this offseason the FO really has not done anything of any major significance and maybe just MAYBE we have yet to see a HUGE trade deal that truly changes the face of the Warriors this year....
Optimistic.....maybe....likely? Probably not..... But if the FO was in fact the group that has created this latest drama by advising Jackson is going to be traded... then Jackson can hardly be blamed for his actions...
IF, however he (Stephen Jackson) has indeed played this club for the cash and is now looking to take the money and run......it is a sign that no matter how "Pimp" the suit may be...once it comes off, all you are left with, is a punk that has chosen to thumb his nose at the very fanbase that adopted him as their own, when pretty much every other fan in the NBA could not stand him...
So yes this may be "flight of fancy" or "pipe dream".... but the front office is either going to prove it means to stand by it's words.... OR.... we can chalk it up to yet another Robert Rowell BS statement where his Front Office's "Business" skillsets have just been given the crossover and now are not only flat footed but stumbling into the front row ...bloodied....battered....bruised and just a little sore in the rear.....
While this is a lot of IF's, BUT's and MAYBE's...has anyone else thought this may in fact be part of a wider picture we have yet to see???
Is this the precursor to a huge trade deal before or in the early part of the season? thus possibly needing more credit than we might have otherwise given them to date.....
Or.... did Rowell and co.... just get punked.....AGAIN! In which case Mr Cohan.... do you REALLY want to become known as the owner of the most incompetant Front Office in sports history??
Time will tell.....
Oh and one last thing.... would it really be that hard to get a freaking mascot again this year? Paint the damn blue suit Gold, Give him a blue streak on his head and call him "Lightning" Son of Thunder!! Is it really that hard to see such a simple solution???? Answer to the second question above may also in fact answer this question as well.....
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
6 recs |
25 comments
Comments
Hmmm
Hey Brit – always love your posts. Very interesting indeed. I had to go back to your original article with Rowell to talk about it… and I’m sure a lot of the Warriors Front Office are reading this same story too (I’ve confirmed it with many of my sources).
The Front Office knew about this… at least before Jackson made it public that he was seeking a trade. What’s even more interesting to me is the fact that Stephen Jackson has yet to officially comment on all of this. Could it be damage control? Or could the Warriors actually be brewing something?
I really think that Stephen Jackson had these sort of things recently. I think that he looked at everything the teams have done in the offseason and realized… “WOW the Warriors are getting younger and I’ll have to wait a few more years before any potential take-off.”
Stephen Jackson owes the Warriors. We gave him money when he had TWO YEARS LEFT on his contract. As much as I applaud his defense and ability to make the big shot, I’ve lost all my respect for our so-called “CAPTAIN” if all of this is true.
Golden State Warriors fan since 1984. The Filipino sensation!
The loudest Warrior fan in Section 208, Row DS, Seats 15-16.
by RayAlmeda on Sep 2, 2009 1:05 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hmm..
Stephen Jackson owes the Warriors.
I can’t agree with that. It isn’t necessarily true on it’s own, nor is it true at all if I look at it in an NBA business reality perspective. I believe I’ve read that this request has already been floating around in Warriorland, just not out in the public. It probably came to a head like you said.
On 5/7, the best part of waking is up LOLDGERS in my cup.
by GameSix on Sep 2, 2009 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just a few quick hits
So lets look at that shall we….has this off-season produced “SIGNIFICANT” changes to the GSW team? I would have to say no….
I’d say the Amare deal was an ATTEMPT at a significant change. It all fell apart when some kid named Curry dropped to our spot.
WHAT IF….. the front office advised Stephen Jackson that he was likely to be traded?
I doubt it. Riley seemed surprised by Jack’s outburst. Either Riley was out of the loop, or Jack wasn’t going to be traded.
Or…. did Rowell and co…. just get punked…..AGAIN!
Yeah, that’s my take on it. The only way this isn’t on Rowell is if somehow Jack threatened to cause trouble, like demand a trade or make a locker room mess, forcing Rowell to make the extension. But that doesn’t make sense because Rowell could have just traded Jack back then and be rid of him. Therefore, it seems more likely Jack duped Rowell into the extension.
Hey, keep us in touch with the next Rowell meeting. You are our eyes and ears!
by IQofaWarrior on Sep 2, 2009 1:06 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes time will tell...
As to another meeting? Ha..its funny, I have made several requests to various different people and gotten NADA back….
While the Warriors FO does not like the stance certain journalists take with them, when they get an opportunity to have a one on one which Robert said he would have at anytime…suddenly now it seems not so much.
I’ll happily do another interview with him…. for nothing more than… “Just the facts….” I wont hold my breath though..
It's about heart, It's about fight, It's about being a Warrior!
by BritWarriorGSW on Sep 3, 2009 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does anyone else have the sinking feeling that the FO is going to let most if not all the expiring, well expire? Then tell us that they had to do that in order to have the money to sign AR to a big extension and retain Morrow.
I would love it if there were two big trades coming just to shake things up and maybe give us some sort of direction but idk.
There's a party in my mind.
And I wish that I was there.
by qin on Sep 2, 2009 7:33 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, I have the feeling they are, but not the sinking feeling. Financial flexibility is nice, and while they should be exploring options with the expiring contracts, maybe they don’t find an option they think is great. Oh well. If we hadn’t extended Jack and signed Maggette, we’d be in a great position right now. Those are the deals messing things up.
by Missing Barry on Sep 2, 2009 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
TWO reasonably big name players to compliment our young guns
Who needs a big name player to do that? Take me for example: Curry sure is handsome! Morrow has an excellent haircut!
I hate those normal-sized midgets. What are they called again? Oh, yeah. People.
by Naticus on Sep 2, 2009 7:41 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I loved the post....
Right up until the point you began talking about a mascot.
The product on the floor should speak for itself, we don’t need a stupid-ass, blue, buffed up mascot to help fans figure out when to cheer. Good riddance Thunder….we don’t want you back!!
by SmittytheCutman on Sep 2, 2009 8:22 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Amen. However, I am still mad our mascot was stolen, simply on the principle of things. Who does the NBA/Thunder think they are just stealing a name already in use like that? That’s garbage.
by Missing Barry on Sep 2, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We need another mascot, to let them know we’re not just going to take this injustice. Forget Lightning. Give me some monstrosity that looks like the Thunder mascot, only a little bigger, a little better looking, a little bit better name, etc. I don’t care if we blatantly rip the name but change all the c’s to k’s or whatever (I have no idea what their mascot is called, we could change the s’s to z’s or f’s to ph’s, whatever it is). And then let’s see what happens.
by belilaugh on Sep 3, 2009 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about we call our new mascot the Supersonic and see what happens?
"Hold it. The Schwarzenegger Library?" - John Spartan after hearing Arnold became President, from Demolition Man
by 61st Amendment on Sep 5, 2009 9:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He did help get the crowd pumped up
UNTIL OKC STOLE HIM!
"IT'S GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!!!"
by Curry on Sep 2, 2009 5:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How many games have you been to?
I totally disagree. Those guys in the orange jump suits are not even close to how entertaining Thunder was. In my opinion, professional sports aren’t the same without a mascot. It adds to the whole atmosphere. I’m not a perv, but it’s just like not having cheerleaders. Watching Thunder have boxing matches with other mascots, do cartwheels around the court, running up and down the stairs, how can you not miss that? And most of all that big inflatable Thunder that would headbutt the refs and security.
by Captain Jack on Sep 2, 2009 7:53 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
call him "Lightning" Son of Thunder!!
Then we have to call Oklahoma Daddy?
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Sep 2, 2009 8:29 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It should be “Lightning” Predecessor of Thunder!! Since the speed of light > the speed of sound! So Warriors > Oklahoma.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Sep 2, 2009 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I feel like
it is only convenient wishful thinking to believe that Jackson wouldn’t abandon us like this. After all, it is much easier to blame the front office that we already despise than our, until now, golden boy. I have to believe that it is Jackson wanting out because otherwise I believe we would have picked up on something in the Warrior’s response to his disgruntlement indicating that they wanted to dump him.
by livingthedream on Sep 2, 2009 10:33 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs



















