Warriors Head Coach Don Nelson Speaks Before Training Camp 2009
On Friday Warriors head coach and NBA coaching legend Don Nelson sat down to talk with the local and national media at large.
Jump for some links!
Nelson said he approached Jackson LAST YEAR to see if Jackson might want to be traded, knowing that many losses were coming with the rebuilding project, so he wasn’t too surprised by Jackson’s feelings now. And he said he’d try to accommodate Jackson, but only if it works for the Warriors–tellingly, Nelson said the trade of Al Harrington, under similar circumstances last year, did not work out well and he wishes he didn’t do it. Oh, it’s also telling because it’s Nelson all but confirming that he’s the real GM. He asked Jackson if he wanted to be traded last year, with Chris Mullin still around, and he’s running the trade show now, with Larry Riley supposedly installed as the GM.
And now his [Anthony Randolph's] work ethic's as good as anybody on the team. You know, he and Morrow are my hardest workers right now.
And he was about the laziest rookie I ever had last year. But he's learned his lesson and he's developed and I don't have that problem with him. He's been in the gym all summer. So I feel good about that.
Oh well. Here’s Part 2 of the Don Nelson pre-camp media session, and yes, this includes the part where he says he offered to work for free in 2011-’12, at the end of his current two-year deal. My quick view: Nice symbolic gesture, but it won’t mean a thing if the team is sold or is terrible, in both cases, Nelson’s services will hardly be needed, for free or otherwise, three years from now. It’s also probably an indication that Nelson believes this team might not win for while–and that he’d like to be coaching it in three years, when Anthony Randolph and Stephen Curry are in their primes.
Nelson not worried about Jackson - NBA - Yahoo! Sports
"Isn’t that funny?" Nelson said. "The most beautiful place in the world other than Maui. I just don’t get it. I guess we just haven’t been good enough for long enough. I think we can change that. I hope so."
Kawakami: Nelson's work-for-free offer not bad for harmless grand gesture - San Jose Mercury News
It's quite a rebate: Buy two extraneous years of Don Nelson, get the third one free! Actually, as far as harmless grand gestures go, this one wasn't too bad. After working through this and next season for $6 million apiece, Nelson says he'll work for free in 2011-12, if Chris Cohan remains the Warriors' owner and still wants Nelson around by then.
Don Nelson Tells Warriors He'll Work for Free in 2011-12 -- NBA FanHouse
"I told Bobby a week ago that after this contract is up, I would like to give the Warriors one more year," Nelson said. "It will cost the team nothing. Whatever they want me to do, for one more year, and not take a salary. Whatever it is. If it's coaching, I'd do that. Carrying bags, whatever. But I would give them one year at the end of this to say 'Thanks.' I appreciate that extension they gave me. They didn't have to do that."
Some Nellie links from the past
- Monty Out, Nelson In
- One Million Reasons for Nellie to Take the Warriors to the Playoffs this Season
- A Picture Says a Thousand Words
- The Town Going Retro: Past, Present, and Future
- EXCLUSIVE: GSoM @ THE Press Conference
- Nellie vs. Nelly
- Don Nelson Mania on the Web!: Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
He would never coach for free as the head coach.
Strangely enough I think he would be a great assistant coach/ adviser or some such capacity in the NBA under the condition that he canNOT be the elephant in the room. Unfortunately the chances of that are slim to none.
Still, one can dream.
Chris Cohan and Robert Rowell? Oh no hide the children!
by Nuck Chorris on Sep 26, 2009 3:30 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Not that he wouldn’t, but that the team would not fly with that.
Chris Cohan and Robert Rowell? Oh no hide the children!
by Nuck Chorris on Sep 26, 2009 3:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kawakami is incredibly negative regarding the Warriors. I read him regularly, but hadn’t noticed how badly he spins things for the Warriors until today. I’d noticed his take was generally negative and comments on his blog were often even more so, but this is just ridiculous. TimK takes a nice gesture, an admission of a mistake (Harrington trade), an honest assessment of the teams talent, and a reasonable plan for the future and somehow come up with articles and blog posts that portray the Warriors as the worst franchise ever. Low class, Tim.
by toddaverth on Sep 26, 2009 4:29 AM PDT reply actions 2 recs
I’m not saying there are not reasons to be skeptical, nor that Nelson is an angel and the front office admirable. I am saying that it looks like they are starting to do things better and getting over some of the mess that was last year (a mess they were a substantial part of creating.)
Give credit to people when they do right. It helps them to tell the difference between that and the other option.
by toddaverth on Sep 26, 2009 4:33 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1+1
And a rec for both comments.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Sep 26, 2009 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Id work for free
Because it just be really cool to work as a head coach in the NBA!
I hate Cohen and Rowell though, but if they gave me the opportunity I’d take it. I’d like to think of it as an Internship. :)
The Time Is Now! Win Warriors Win!
by ballin on Sep 26, 2009 9:53 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't do it for free
Well, I would if I had some say in the trade decisions. I wouldn’t wanna be backlogged with a roster that is made up with 10 backcourt players and 3 frontcourt players (not that the Warriors are like that…)
"I always believe there's a reason why you go through everything." -John Elway
by LACK on Sep 26, 2009 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t have any problems with Kawakami being negative on the Warriors since they haven’t exactly been a great franchise for the last 15 years (barring the 1 playoff year which they bamboozled).
As for Nellie volunteering for a year, I have two theories on why he would say that. The first one, which is a little bit of a stretch, is that Cohan will probably sell the team within the next two years and Nellie, being privy to more information than any of us, knows that. The second and more reasonable one is that in this league, players don’t respond to having a lame duck coach. Thus by stating he’ll be around for the immediate long term no matter the costs is an indirect message to his players that as long as he’s here, it’ll be his way or the high way.
by ThermoElectro on Sep 26, 2009 10:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
interesting sign of things to come? - and that have been debated heavily hereabouts:
He said Ellis, Jackson, Anthony Randolph and Andris Biedrins will start. At which position Ellis, Jackson and Randolph start is up to the play of Curry, Kelenna Azubuike, Anthony Morrow and Brandan Wright, Nelson said.
Corey Maggette will be the sixth man. If Curry starts, Ellis plays the 2; if Azubuike starts, Ellis plays point and Jackson plays the 2; if Morrow starts, Ellis plays point and Jackson plays 3; and if Wright starts, Randolph moves to the 3 and Jackson plays the 2.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/09/25/SPA819SVGG.DTL#ixzz0SEhUNFNe
by hardcore on Sep 26, 2009 11:03 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
all these options sound like a 25-30 win season
by tafkasam on Sep 26, 2009 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So you’re saying that having Monta healthy for the season and Randolph improved at least over what he was at the beginning of last year means that the team won’t improve more than a game and may actually be worse?
by jae on Sep 26, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
may actually be worse?
Must be the Jamal Crawford factor? or is it the loss of Marco and Rob Kurz??
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Sep 26, 2009 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the absence of “the jamal crawford factor” should make us better.
heart of a champion, will of the warrior.
by cap'n hack on Sep 26, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or maybe “Gramps” ages 50 years overnight?
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Sep 26, 2009 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Gramps" ages 50 years overnight?
Is his new hobby amateur fireworks manufacturing?
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Sep 26, 2009 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kawakami likes to hate
He correctly recognizes that he gets the most attention with his constant negative spinning. Consider it his trademark and sadly it works well for him.
by TheGerman on Sep 26, 2009 3:44 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
more maneuvering going on behind the scenes
http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/netsblog/breakdown_of_the_nets_picks_for_QVIdJbiRxApwcoJtQ39XCO
on the face of it, it doesn’t sound like much but in context it suggests something’s brewing – don’t be surprised by a move soon – expirings, vets, etc. are all in play now, according to Nelson, “if a deal makes sense” …
by hardcore on Sep 27, 2009 12:02 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
























