Warriors Media Day + 1st Practice 2009- Dubs Know Drama
The good news: GSoM got to have its first "game thread" of the 2009-2010 Golden State Warriors season-- See: OPEN THREAD: Warriors Media Day 2009
The bad news: Everything else.
Jump for everything else.
Let me pass to mic to my main man DT from the mighty Fear the Beard:
Fear The Beard " Blog Archive " Hater Tuesday: Warriors media day special edition.
Welcome back to our collective delusion. For more than a month, we have been dormant, hoping for the hope to return. Instead, we have a dejected Stephen Jackson as the Grinch who stole media day. As well documented as media day was, I’ll keep this brief only slightly longer than necessary. But today does beg at least one question.
What the hell kind of team can’t even get media day right? Show up, look happy to be a well-compensated professional, say some nice things to move some tickets, and go home. But no. Not our Dubs. They’ve got to make this into a public spectacle of dysfunction. And at the center of the storm? The team’s two best players. First, you’ve got Captain Grinch telling us that, yes, he still wants out. Then you’ve got Monta telling us that, no, he doesn’t think Nellie’s backcourt plan will work. Great. Where do I sign up to give Chris Cohan that disproportionate share of my disposable income for my delusional "great time out?"
Amen.
My bitterness is one thing, but in all seriousness I’ve got a little council for Mssrs. Jack and Monta. Forget for a moment that the team that currently employs you did, in fact, regenerate or foster your current relevance. Loyalty? Fine. Throw it out. But riddle me this Grinch. What NBA franchise is going to look at today’s press conference and say, "Yep. That’s the piece of the puzzle we’re looking for. A disgruntled Santa Claus who delivers ill-advised threes by the sleighload and rebels after playing one season of his most recently negotiated deal? Let’s do this!" C’mon Jack. There must be a circuit missing. Brain and mouth faster than the internal editor? Even if you want out, this makes zero sense. Monta? At least get through a backcourt fail or two before blasting the thinking.
Exactly.
Day 1 of the Warriors amp;rsquo; Season: Not a Good Start | Fast Break
Media day is usually a routine and heavily scripted affair — full of talking points, cliches, and vague optimism (regardless of whether it’s justified). Two years ago, the most exciting part was Jackson’s new tattoo. But this year, Monday’s event was far from routine. Stephen Jackson and Monta Ellis stepped up the the microphone and unleashed an unvarnished torrent of doubts and concerns. The honesty was equally thrilling and appalling. On one hand, it’s a deep vindication to hear two team captains express the same misgivings over the direction of the team as average fans. On the other hand, neither captain had any idea how to fix — or expressed any sense of personal accountability for — those issues. In the end, it’s an all-too-familiar story: lots of problems, few answers.
Last year it was all about Mo Moped Mo Problems. This year it looks like it's going to be Mo Problems Mo Problems.
Stephen Jackson, unplugged: "We’ve been taking steps back since we beat Dallas" | Talking Points
Summary: Jackson didn’t back off of his trade request, though he didn’t say those words in order to avoid another NBA fine. He also went on to detail the reasons why–he has watched in frustration as Jason Richardson, Baron Davis, Al Harrington and many others were subtracted from the 2007 playoff team. He said he doesn’t feel bad about the surprise nature of the statement. "You’ve got to hear it some way. You want me to send an email, Facebook or something?" Jackson said. He also said he doesn’t feel it’s disloyal to sign a three-year extension (which doesn’t kick in until next season) then a year later ask out. Why not? Because the Warriors didn’t have to give him the deal. They chose to. Jackson’s right. He can be blunt. He can be undiplomatic. But he’s right in almost every way. Don’t blame him for being 10 times smarter than Rowell. Don’t blame him for wanting to play with Baron and Harrington, and for knowing how upset Monta Ellis is with the franchise. Don’t blame Jackson for desperately wanting the Warriors to acquire Amare Stoudemire, only to see that, too, fall apart, partly because Stoudemire, like Jackson, wanted nothing to do with the Warriors’ organization.
How about we blame him for being unprofessional?
We've been taking steps backs since that year we beat Dallas. I don't think we've been making progress. Everybody's entitled to their own opinion and that's my opinion. I'm not always right. I'm not trying to be right. I'm just speaking my mind on how I feel and how much I have passion for this game and I want to win.
Did Jack just hijack my mic? I've been saying this sort of stuff (and getting yelled at) since that dumb Jason Richardson salary dump.
-Q: You signed your extension after Baron and Al were gone, do you feel like you were committing yourself to this team at that point?
-JACKSON: Well, who's going to turn down that money? It's only right. I'm not stupid. I mean, I didn't go to college but I've got a lot of common sense. I'm not going to turn down that money.
I'm 31 years old now. My contract will be up when I'm 35. So that was a good position for me. I've got to look out for myself before anybody else does. I think it was the right decision for me and my family.
I'm definitely appreciative of it. But at the same time, I've got to look out for myself, because nobody else will.
I want to give Jack props for ripping off Robert Rowell and Chris Cohan, no doubt. But he signed up for The Suck. That's on him.
-Q: If this team had acquired Amare Stoudemire, would that have made things different for you?
-JACKSON: That'd been a big difference, and everybody knows that. Having an All-Star on the team, a guy that we can count on to get points in the paint, that would've been big for us. That's not disrespecting anybody on the team, but I mean, let's look at his stats and what he has done.
-Q: At a pretty critical position...
-JACKSON: And after knee surgery, after big-time knee surgery, he still came back and made the All-Star Game.
It is what it is. We didn't make the move, OK, so be it. I would've been happier with it, but who's trying to keep me happy?
Newsflash Warriors homers: No player is dying to play with the likes of "franchise cornerstone" Andris Biedrins. Someone like Amare Stoudemire? Now we're talking. That would have prevented a lot of this drama.
Stephen Jackson Not Happy With Direction of Warriors -- NBA FanHouse
"Coach (Don Nelson) said the same thing to me about getting that fine (that it was ridiculous)," Jackson said. "But we're not going to beat a dead horse. They know they were wrong. I've got to deal with it. I can't beat the NBA so I've got to roll with it."
It was ridiculous, but even more ridiculous is whining about a contract and a situation that he signed up for.
Well at least someone out there thinks that Robert Rowell inked Jack extension never happened:
Miami Heat | Sun-Sentinel Blogs: Camp preview: Five burning questions
However, if there are more than a few missteps before the Feb. 18 trading deadline, the Heat has enough expiring contracts to try immediately to make things right with its franchise player. That, in essence, could have Quentin Richardson, Jermaine O'Neal, Dorell Wright, Udonis Haslem and several others with lapsing deals on notice. Should the Raptors struggle early, there could be another run at Chris Bosh. Should Carlos Boozer (pictured at right) continue to grumble, there could be a move for the Jazz power forward. Even disgruntled Warriors swingman Stephen Jackson could enter the equation, if Riley believes doubts are building from Wade.
Expiring contract? Well would you look at that!
No regrets for Golden State Warriors' Stephen Jackson, even '04 brawl - ESPN
"I don't have a regret about anything I've done. I don't have a regret about going in the stands with Ron Artest," Jackson said. "I say what I want to say when I feel like it, regardless of what the consequence is. That's just always been me."
I've seen 13 year olds more humble and apologetic about their mistakes than this. "Captain" Jackson is making it harder for the Warriors to get a reasonable trade deal every second he gets says what he wants to say when he feels like it. Very immature and very dumb.
Inman: Brats Ellis, Jackson rock boat - ContraCostaTimes.com
Monta Ellis and Stephen Jackson spoke Monday like two spoiled brats trying to run the Warriors franchise. Or trying to run away from it. Ellis brazenly said he can't coexist in the same backcourt with newly drafted point guard Stephen Curry. Minutes earlier, Jackson didn't back down from a recent trade request and proceeded to rip the franchise's direction. His ego also ran the fast break: "I'm made for the playoffs and championships. That's what I play for. I'm Big Shot Jack." Both players are out of line. They may be speaking the truth, but these so-called "big shots" came off so selfish that it paints another dark cloud over a futile franchise. ... But they're talking like All-Stars when the Warriors haven't had one since 1997. It's not Ellis' place to say he can't share a backcourt with Curry. Coach Don Nelson thinks they can, and he will see that one way or another soon enough.
Anyone find it a little amusing that Stephen Jackson refers to himself as "Big Shot Jack"?
I'm thinking something along the lines of "Big Turnover Jack" or "Big Whiner Jack" or "Big Jack- - -" (I'll leave that to your imagination)
" Blog Archive " Stephen Jackson takes the microphone (part 2 of 2)
Q: You mentioned Amar’e not wanting to be here, and obviously you. Baron left, and Al …
SJ: Jason, Matt (Barnes), (Mickael) Pietrus, keep going.
Actually pretty funny.
"He could have not shown up today, but he's here and that shows his leadership and his accountability to his teammates," forward Corey Maggette said.
The standards aren't really that high around here are they? Seriously how does a guy get props for that?
Jax still wants out; Monta drops bomb - Inside the Warriors - with Marcus Thompson
Jackson stood by them, fairly emphatically, all but overtly questioning the Warriors desire to win. He cited the constant dismantling of the organization that upset Dallas as the primary reason for his discontent. He didn’t say he wanted out again because he didn’t want to get slapped with another $25,000 fine from the NBA. But he did say he sticks by his earlier comments, his relationship with President Bobby Rowell has changed, and he stands by his statements because "he wants to win." Then Monta came out. He was usually dismissive and, thus, boring until he was asked if he could see himself and rookie guard Stephen Curry sharing the backcourt.
It's abundantly clear that Cohan and Rowell aren't that interested in winning. But it's also clear that Jackson doesn't care all that much about winning either. If he did he wouldn't have signed that crazy extension last summer. Just like Warriors loyalists- he signed up for The Suck.
Warriors' Monta Ellis Says He Can't Play Alongside Stephen Curry -- NBA FanHouse
Someone then jumped in and said to Ellis: "Do you understand, they (the Warriors and coach Don Nelson) say you can?" "They say you can?" Ellis repeated. "They say you can ... but you can't. I just want to win and you're not going to win that way." Nelson had said on Friday that he envisioned Ellis and Curry playing together despite their collective lack of size. Nelson said that the team planned to do a lot of scheming to help Ellis and Curry at the defensive end, but that the Ellis/Curry tandem was going to get a look. In fact, Nelson had said that the idea to use Jackson more at shooting guard this season, which was his intent at the end of 2008-09, had basically been scrapped.
Way to give rookie Stephen Curry a warm welcome Monta! (sarcasm)
-Q: When Riley and Nelson visited you, did they tell you they wouldn’t draft a guard similar to you?
-ELLIS: I don’t remember.
Riiiight. Anyone still doubting this rumor or trying to blame Tim Kawakami for making that up?
Ellis pointed out other backcourt combinations that he thought would work, like him and Anthony Morrow (6-foot-5) or him and Jackson (6-8). That seems to indicate that Ellis sees himself as the starting point guard and Curry as his backup. If an Ellis-Curry combo wouldn't work because of their size, it doesn't seem that Ellis would be able to move to shooting guard with any of the Warriors' other options at point guard. Speedy Claxton is 5-11, C.J. Watson is 6-2 and Acie Law IV is 6-3, the same as Curry. Interestingly, Baron Davis, the point guard with whom Ellis was paired during his breakout season two years ago, is listed at 6-3, 191 pounds. Curry is listed at 185.
How about Stephen Curry and Anthony Morrow as the starting backcourt combination? It's a lot easier and more enjoyable rooting for those two cats than "Captain" Moped.
Too many guards, too few minutes
When Curry was asked whether he or Ellis would defend bigger shooting guards, such as 6-foot-6, 220-pound Kobe Bryant, he said, "The whole team will guard him." It's not like Nelson and Riley are oblivious to the situation. They simply chose their words a little more carefully. "There isn't room for five point guards," Riley said. "We'll probably attempt to address the point-guard situation. You're right on it." "There are a lot of things I don't know yet (regarding the backcourt)," Nelson said. "What I do know is we'll be very small, so we'll have to compensate defensively for some of those things. "There are problems that we'll have to solve, and I don't know all of the answers at this point."
The funny thing is this the first time Monta's seemed to care about defense since 2006. Let me direct you to the 2008-2008 WWDY voting.
Blog Archive " Monta Ellis takes the microphone
Q: Stephen (Jackson) talked about since ’07, when there was so much hope, you lost Jason, you lost Baron, you lost Al, that he was frustrated. Do you have any of the same feelings?
ME: This is a business. You’re not going to come back — there’s faces in here now that wasn’t on the team last year. That’s just a business. That was two years ago; we’re moving on to the 2009-2010 season. That’s what we’re talking about. The pieces that we have now. We can’t worry about what happened two years ago. That’s in the past. That’s gone. We’re moving on forward. Everybody on the same page, everybody wanna win. We can’t dwell on what happened two years ago, with the playoffs, or with the players that we have or we don’t. We’ve got to work with what we’ve got right now.
Survival instincts: Jackson and Ellis outwit and out-smart Warriors management | Talking Points
Jackson and Ellis, good friends, were making a key point: They’re both 10 times smarter than team management and they don’t care if any of us know it.
Um, we're in serious trouble if those two guys are smarter than team management.
Warriors Will Have Real Trouble if Nelson Agrees With Ellis -- NBA FanHouse
Yes, it's a problem that Monta Ellis said on Monday he can't play alongside rookie Stephen Curry. But there's likely a bigger problem looming: coach Don Nelson might start to think Ellis is right. Not only were Ellis' comments a shot at Curry, whom the Warriors selected with the No. 7 pick in the June draft, but he also seemed to be sending a clear message to Nelson. What Ellis essentially said was that the strategy Nelson was planning on employing this season was destined to fail. And to a larger extent, it very well may have come across to Nelson, entering his 31st year of coaching in the NBA, as a slap at his offensive philosophy, of which small ball is a significant part.
Welcome to Golden State Warriors mess, Stephen Curry - Ann Killion - SI.com
Stephen Curry is about as fresh-faced as a NBA rookie can be. The 21-year old is soft-spoken and thoughtful. His lone tattoo, discreetly inked on the inside of his left wrist, is the motto of Davidson, the small college he guided to the Elite Eight in 2008. "T.C.C.": Trust, Commitment, Care. Curry might want to look into laser tattoo removal because he's a Warrior now. And "Trust, Commitment, Care" is most certainly not in the Warriors' vocabulary.
Nelson and Ellis had a conversation about the comments before the guard addressed the media Tuesday. "The only way we'd be able to play together is match ups," said Ellis, who, like Curry, is 6-foot-3 and in the 180-pound range. "That's the only way." Ellis was sure to explain that he didn't have any problems with the Warriors selecting Curry and that he knows his place his place in the organization's hierarchy. "Coach makes those calls," Ellis said. "I just play basketball."
Shouldn't that read: "I just play basketball, crash mopeds, lie about it, give a weak apology, cost the Warriors an entire season, and act like a diva"?
Nelson, Ellis and Curry Attempt to Find Common Ground in Warriors' Backcourt -- NBA FanHouse
Nelson made certain to leave plenty of wiggle room when it came to how much that twosome would play together, likely knowing full-well that it might not be the best strategy in the world to announce that Ellis and Curry would be starting opening night. "Certainly matchups will determine that," Nelson said. "We're pretty small in the backcourt. We can't expect them to play together when we play the Lakers when one of them would have to guard Kobe (Bryant) or something like that. But there will be plenty of times where they will play together, and that's a matchup situation. "There are a lot of teams that don't post their two-guards, there are a lot of teams that have small guards who play together. So that will be < script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.sbnation.com/javascripts/vendor/tiny_mce_3_0_7/themes/advanced/langs/en.js?v=307"> // --> a matchup situation. I've normally done pretty well at matchups. They will play together some but not always."
Seems like common sense.
Camp Day 1: Monta-Curry-Nellie Triangle - Inside the Warriors - with Marcus Thompson
Warriors world was much more tame Tuesday as training camp opened. Obviously, the hot topic was Monta’s comments. Nellie and Curry’s reactions were the most coveted. It was very clear that the Warriors sought to nip this in the bud as everyone was ACTUALLY ON THE SAME PAGE, save for a few opportunities to extract some read-between-the-lines, conspiracy theory type of drama. All three held their ground without really dissing the other. Monta was the strongest, though much more toned down. He still doesn’t sound like he’s planning on being best buddies with Curry. It sounds to me like (and this is some read-between-the-lines analysis I’ve conjured up) Monta just wants some respect.
He has a very funny way of earning it.
The Golden State Warriors are an entertaining circus act off the court
Happy days are ahead for the Warriors (sarcastically speaking). Training camp begins Sept. 29th and the season opener is October 28th vs. the Houston Rockets. With turmoil like this, don't expect a winning season from these malcontents....A 35-47 record is what I predict. Let's hope for Warrior fans, the numbers are reversed.
Golden State Warriors: John Hollinger's 2009-10 NBA forecast - ESPN
Nelson seemed determined to avoid using Mullin's draft picks as well. He kept Brandan Wright locked away at the end of the bench despite his undeniable production when he played and engaged in similar tactics with rookie Anthony Randolph for half the season.
Nellie made Wright a starter and played him big minutes till he got injured. Randolph was a flat out disaster for most of last season. Might want to do a little homework there instead of taking random shots at Nellie and heaping unwarranted praise on the random media martyr Chris Mullin. It's too bad Hollinger had to ruin a pretty solid piece with this shallow piece of analysis.
Here's a shocking stat: Only three Warriors in this season's likely rotation finished in the top two-thirds at their position in assist ratio last season. Two of them were centers who moved the ball a bit better than their peers but had little impact on the team's overall assist rate. Only Jackson, who ranked fourth among small forwards, is a legitimately good passer. Wright, Ellis, Morrow, Watson, Maggette and Azubuike all finished in the bottom 15 at their positions in assist ratio, while Randolph didn't fare much better.
Not shocking at all if you watched the Warriors last year. This team cannot make the smart pass. Actually from top to bottom they don't do many smart things period.
Warriors extra: Defending "selfishness," Ellis vs. Nelson, Nelson vs. Rowell? | Talking Points
Right off the bat, several commenters have complained that I’m being far too soft on these "selfish" acts by Stephen Jackson and Monta Ellis and far too tough on Warriors management.
I understand why readers/fans would be upset with Jackson and Ellis. Jackson’s statements, in particular, on the face of it, do seem difficult to defend–sweet talk a gullible team president into handing out a three-year extension, then a year later seek to bolt the team.
In real life, that’s a betrayal and maybe true selfishness. But pro sports are not real life, the NBA in particular. The NBA is fantasy, with fantasy rewards, and NBA players work with an entirely separate set of operational values.
Players are supposed to look out for themselves and their families. They happen to be paid enormous sums of money, but you and I are also looking out for ourselves and our families first, right?
We we make 100 or 500 times less than they do, but it’s the same concept: Look out for your best interests, then the institution second.
It’s up to the team–management and coaching–to convince the players at every step of the way that they must, at some point, sacrifice some things and work at other things for the betterment of the larger purpose, that victories will result at the end of the line.
That’s what Mike Singletary has done with the 49ers, what Phil Jackson does with the Lakers (to some extent) and what Al Davis has failed to do with the Raiders for years now.
It’s what Chris Cohan, Robert Rowell and Don Nelson have failed to do with the Warriors since 2007. And you can’t ask proud, good players to support a destructive, political, scheming front office that has already coldly dispatched Jason Richardson, Baron Davis and Al Harrington… Once they see that, it’s every man for himself.
I obviously have a lot of respect for Tim and he's a friend of the fam. He's our guy.
BUT those are very curious words coming from a sharp guy. You don't have to say all that much to convince a Green Party-donating crazy leftist such as myself of the logic of individual welfare over feeding a corporate machine. However, that doesn't excuse people (ahem, "Captains" Jackson and Ellis) from being simply unprofessional. Stephen Jackson and Monta Ellis aren't exactly innocent victims here. Don't get me wrong Chris Cohan and Robert Rowell are both jokes, but Monta Ellis is the #1 reason the Warriors were unwatchable last season and a major reason for all the Warriors current dysfunction. This franchise rescued Stephen Jackson and now he's turning his back on it. This is on them, not Cohan and Rowell.
And of course there's the rumor that Monta Ellis may ask for a trade from the Warriors as well.
Blog Archive " Media Day, 2009: What better time to jump start 48minutes.net?
I’ve been wondering for a few months now when I should emerge from my hiatus and kick off the 2009-10 season of 48minutes.net. Stephen Jackson and Monta Ellis made it clear for me on Monday afternoon.
Well at least there's a silver lining here. Welcome back Geoff!
" Blog Archive " Parsing the captains: Just because you have an agenda doesn’t mean you’re wrong
In the aftermath of the conflagration set ablaze by Stephen Jackson and, even more so, Monta Ellis, now is as good a time as any to note this fact: Just because a player has an obvious agenda when talking to the press doesn’t mean that he can’t still be correct while doing so.
Somehow, Stephen Jackson figures the fans will forgive him for taking insanely big money and then bailing on the East Bay with an eternity left on his deal. In effectively crushing Stephen Curry's spirit, Monta Ellis showed he's about as capable of leading a team as a squirrel. And the Warriors, of course, are back in that vintage Todd Fuller-Latrell Sprewell mode. It doesn't get much worse than that. Jackson is being praised in some quarters for exposing the Warriors' incompetence, but that's a tired, worn-out story, like reminding people we sent too many troops into Vietnam. This is about betrayal, and how to recover from a debacle that gained such awful clarity Monday. The Warriors are in a position where they must trade Jackson, well before the season starts, and Ellis is about one comment shy of riding that same train out of town.
Warriors mired in turmoil - ContraCostaTimes.com
Monday's events have created a buzz heading into training camp, which begins today. What happens when Nelson pairs Curry and Ellis in the backcourt? Will the Warriors appease Jackson and ship him? Perhaps more important, what happens if they don't.
Biedrins can't remember the last time all was right in the Warriors world. "I don't know. That's a good question. I have to think about it," Biedrins said. "It is like it is. We just have to concentrate on playing basketball."
Props to Andris Biedrins, Corey Maggette, Kelenna Azubuike, Stephen Curry, Anthony Randolph, and Anthony Morrow, Speedy Claxton, Acie Law, Ronny Turiaf, Mikki Moore, Devean George, Brandan Wright, and C.J. Watson for not making it incredibly difficult for Warriors fans to root for them over the course of the past two days. (What a concept!)
To be frank, I'm pretty disgusted with this team. Media Day and the 1st day of practice were supposed to be the anual time to hype up delusional Warriors fans and get everyone excited and feeling happy with local fluff pieces. Do Stephen Jackson and Monta Ellis (in particular) realize that it's not exactly easy (especially in this economy) too fork over hard earned dollars (or rack up a credit card bill) to root them on at the Roaracle? Pretty inconsiderate.
Chris Cohan doesn't have a clue. Robert Rowell couldn't buy a clue even if Cohan gave him his pocketbook. It's hard enough rooting for this dysfunctional organization without the "captains" acting so uncaptain-like. Expect a few boos opening night "captains".
Maybe there's hope in the D-League?
Last Year: D-League. This Year: NBA? - Ridiculous Upside
By the way I wonder if all those media folks and Nellie haters alike are willing to step up and admit that they were wrong in demanding that POB or Mullin's other busts get minutes. Honestly Nellie knows hoops way more than you guys do. It's annoying to hear so much whining about gifting minutes to players who don't belong in the NBA or in a decent team's rotation. It's also annoying to see people group Nellie and Larry Riley with the co-heads of suck Cohan and Rowell- but that's a story for another time...
69 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
LGW...still.
the drama queen is in the house.
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Sep 29, 2009 10:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Drama level
I put the drama level at somewhere between Elevated and High. The main drama I had was with Stephen Jackson and his comments, which were arrogant, egotistical, etc that has been covered already elsewhere by most of us.
I didn’t have a problem with Monta’s comments about not being able to win playing along side Curry. Note that I said being able to “win”, not being able to “play”, with Curry. Most of us had that question since summer when we picked up Curry.
I did have a problem with some people interpreting that this is a sign that Monta doesn’t want to play for the Warriors. That makes no sense, because he later said that he thought a combo of Monta + Morrow or Monta + Jack would be better.
I also had a problem with everyone, mostly the local writers, taking Monta’s comments “can’t play” with Curry out of context, without including his explanation about having 2 small guards on the floor being bad. That gives the impression to readers that Monta dislikes Curry, or Monta is jealous of Curry, which wasn’t what Monta was getting at.
Some have said that the timing of Monta’s comments was what made it bad, especially on Day 1. I think I can see that as a valid point. Perhaps Monta should have waited until they tried Monta + Curry for a few games before making his statement. Or talk with Nellie first about the issue before going public. Other than that, I think Monta’s point was valid and solid.
In any case, Jack was and will be the main cause of drama early on into the season. I’m sure a good number of fans will boo him on opening day.
You know, If this team suddenly finds some solid chemistry and actually competes well, I wonder if Jack will backpedal and suddenly proclaim that he wants to stay with the Warriors. You know what we should do? When he backpedals, THEN ship him off. To a losing team. :)
+1
Especially for this:
You know, If this team suddenly finds some solid chemistry and actually competes well, I wonder if Jack will backpedal and suddenly proclaim that he wants to stay with the Warriors. You know what we should do? When he backpedals, THEN ship him off. To a losing team. :)
Don't worry about me Thurgood, I'll be fine. The robbery is what's important now.
Dubs are better without Ellis and Jackson...
better chemistry, better playing, and better at winning.
Give them both away for the sake of the team. They both totally lack integrity. Monte has never taken responsibility for his actions and has enough nerve to be upset?
They are both a pain the team can grow without!
The Warriors are a better team with Monta. Period. They will win more games with him playing (assuming he plays somewhere around the level he played at 2 years ago). I personally believe they are better with Jack, too, though I see some arguments that they aren’t…
by Missing Barry on Sep 30, 2009 7:39 AM PDT up reply actions
Seriously
Get these two boneheads off of my team
by Number22Drew on Sep 30, 2009 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions
Now, photoshop the Warriors logo over the TNT logo
and you have a winner!
by IQofaWarrior on Sep 29, 2009 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions
Because you twisted my arm…

There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Sep 30, 2009 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions
Some days, you can feel like you hate everything about your own favorite team
Today is one of those days.
"I never watched baseball on TV. It's slow and boring. I'm not a fan. Never was." - Jeff Kent
Props to Andris Biedrins, Corey Maggette, Kelenna Azubuike, Stephen Curry, Anthony Randolph, and Anthony Morrow, Speedy Claxton, Acie Law, Ronny Turiaf, Mikki Moore, Devean George, and C.J. Watson for not making it incredibly difficult for Warriors fans to root for them over the course of the past two days. (What a concept!)
Where are BWright’s props??!?!
I’m not worried about Monta, at least not yet. Hell, I liked the Curry comment — at least it shows that Monta has considered the idea of playing defense sometime recently.
Jack’s being a clown, but I don’t think it’ll amount to much. I don’t think anyone’s going to want him, and when it becomes obvious to him that he’s not the prized commodity he considers himself to be, maybe he’ll clam up a little. Jack and the Dubs are probably stuck with each other. Too bad, too… I really think we wouldn’t suffer without him.
I really think we wouldn’t suffer without him
In fact, we didn’t suffer without him late last season. We had a nice little run with that 7 man rotation without Jack.
by IQofaWarrior on Sep 29, 2009 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Ooops, I knew I forgot someone. BW is now added to the list.
Golden State of Mind :: Always keeping it... "Unstoppable Baby!"
by Atma Brother ONE on Sep 29, 2009 11:31 PM PDT up reply actions
good write up...
two qualms ,
1.
Interestingly, Baron Davis, the point guard with whom Ellis was paired during his breakout season two years ago, is listed at 6-3, 191 pounds. Curry is listed at 185.
Seriously? Not buyin it… but even if that’s what the scale reads… baron still = big guard; and Curry still = little guard; though Baron probably plays D just as bad cause he’s so frickin lazy.
2.
By the way I wonder if all those media folks and Nellie haters alike are willing to step up and admit that they were wrong in demanding that POB or Mullin’s other busts get minutes. Honestly Nellie knows hoops way more than you guys do. It’s annoying to hear so much whining about gifting minutes to players who don’t belong in the NBA or in a decent team’s rotation. It’s also annoying to see people group Nellie and Larry Riley with the co-heads of suck Cohan and Rowell- but that’s a story for another time…
Mullin’s busts sucked. Not many sane folk think Mullin was good at GM’ing except when evaluating sleeper second rounders or when Nellie punked him for the reigns. Sure Mullin brought in Nellie, but I doubt his “savvy evaluation of Nellie’s coaching talent” or his “skillfully crafted pitch” had as much to do with it as his begging. Nellie obviously knows more hoops than everyone on the planet except possibly a handful of folks. That doesn’t mean he’s perfect or exempt from having his flaws addressed, does it? Didn’t think so. The man’s brilliant, no doubt. But that’s not always good enough to become a winner. Nonetheless… i will lovingly jump back on the Nellie bandwagon if only he’d do one of the following during any particular season:
1. reign in baron, jack, or whoever is leading the team at the time, from walking it down and hoisting up a trey without even running a play.
2. teach his team to guard the pick and roll.
3. develop a big’s post game in case there was ever a mismatch to exploit it… just once.
4. Stop starting maggs at PF for the first 6 straight weeks if it continually fails, especially if Turiaf or Wright’s available.
5. Dump Jack for nothin but a salary dump. (Addition by subtraction)
6. gets the dubs to the first round of the playoffs.
… dont worry… I ain’t holdin my breath.
Dumping Jackson would be huge FAIL. You can’t do that and get addition. His drama is largely about needing to win. That’s what he brought to the floor every night, which is why Baron said in the We Believe Year to ask anyone, Jack is the heart and soul of this team.
Welcome to the Pit of Despair! Don't even think about trying to escape.
It seems like the only one happy to be a Warrior is Stephen Curry. And I am sure the Roaracle will welcome him with very open arms for that.
And maybe CJ Watson, since he chose to stay here when he could have left, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he starts to regret that decision…
I'm not that worried about this season.
I already knew the Warriors were going downhill ever since they broke up the We Believe team. It was just too obvious.
On the other hand, I actually think our situation right now is still better than last years. The difference this offseason is that our team is actually healthy. Last season, we already knew we were done from the beginning, because Monta was going to be out for a long time.
At least this season, the only problem is that players are worried that we won’t work out. If the Warriors get on that court and do surprisingly well, then the players will loosen up a bit and realize that they’re actually a good team. This is just their offseason jitters and nervousness that resulted into some anger and frustration. They’ll see how it turns out on the court, and the team’s record throughout the season will decide if they get more calm or more mad.
But, if Monta and Jackson end up getting traded, we deserve it. Just shows that it’s stupid to break up a Playoff team when you have no plans for the future. Basically just breaking them up for the hell of it. Thank god we got lucky to get Randolph, Morrow and Stephen Curry to fall to us in recent drafts; otherwise we’d have absolutely nothing to look forward too.
One of the most exciting times I’ve ever had as a Warriors fan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SU1eUmV3Yqs
Goodbye, Jack.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E3ilBP5fcw
by Precise Films Productions on Sep 29, 2009 11:29 PM PDT reply actions
LOVE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!!!!!
yey…one more sucky season and hello mr ellison!!
my code name is "kelenna bahongpuki"
by VonteegoCummings on Sep 30, 2009 2:09 AM PDT reply actions
Dang
I’m so lucky I didn’t renew my tickets this season, I would have been friggin pissed! I still think were going to run on teams though… We’ll be good =)
I don’t understand everyone’s problem with “breaking up a playoff team”…at least from the fans point of view. For Jack obviously he was friends with those guys – Baron, Al, JRich and Barnes especially, so I can see why he’d be upset and let that cloud his judgment on whether it makes sense for the team, but for fans…why can’t we see those moves made sense? The truth is We Believe was founded on a bunch of older, overpaid veterans and simply wasn’t a sustainable team. We gave them another shot and they did win 48 games, so in that sense they were successful, but then again they didn’t even make the playoffs. Newsflash – being an 8th-9th seed in the West is a crappy place to be, and pretty much puts you in no mans land (unless you’re an up and coming team built on young players instead of veterans) with no chance to become a real contender.
So now let’s look at all those moves.
JRich – solid but overpaid SG who doesn’t play much D and duplicates the type of wing skillset the Warriors already have. What we got? A solid, young, cheap big man with loads of potential who has a skillset we could use (mostly being tall, blocking shots, post presence offensively), and most importantly, got us out of JRich’s bloated contract. Good move.
Baron – Do we even need to go here? Did anyone else see what he did with the Clippers last year? You really wanted to hitch your wagon to BDavis? He’s owed $54M over the next 4 years. He’s already 30 years old. He’s played more than 67 games one time in the last 7 seasons (conveniently enough, it was his contract year). To put that into context, Corey Maggette has played more than 67 games 3 times in the last 7 seasons. Just to be less cherry-picking, over that time frame Baron’s played 427 total games to Maggette’s 431, and that includes Baron’s 82 games year and one year of 32 games for Maggette. Not to mention motivation issues, and the fact that Nelson is the only coach he’s ever gotten along with. Thanks for We Believe, Baron, but I also remember what you did under Montgomery, and I have no interest in making a long term, franchise crippling commitment to you.
Al – Al sucks. It’s that simple. We’re a better team without Al Harrington. He doesn’t rebound well enough for a PF. He doesn’t play D. He doesn’t block shots or provide any inside presence whatsoever. At best he’s an average scorer efficiency-wise, at worst he’s well below that. He’s not much of a passer. At best he’s a tweener who shoots 3’s to score at an average efficiency, and provides nothing else of value.
Matt Barnes – I love Barnes as much as the next guy. He’s scrappy, and not a bad defender (on 3’s, that is, or 4’s who play outside…DIRK!), but losing him have any real effect on how good our team is. He’s a bench role player who played out of position at 4 for us and is inadequate there. At 3, if he’s hitting his 3’s (look at his career 3 point% and tell me you have any idea what his “true talent level” is?), he’s alright, but who knows whether he’s gonna do that or not. I wouldn’t have minded keeping Barnes around, but the truth is he’s easily replaceable (see: Morrow, Anthony or Azubuike, Kelenna).
Pietrus: 4 years at $5.3M for a role player is exactly the type of contract that hamstrings a team like the Warriors. The Magic have their core already, so they can afford to take a chance on someone like that, but when you’re still trying to figure out who your top 3 players are and how good they’re going to be, you simply cannot make this kind of decision. Did I mention his health problems? Not a bad move, financial flexibility when you’re not a contender is a good thing.
The We Believe team was not broken up – it was an unsustainable team that wasn’t going to bring us long term success. We made the correct decision to focus on our youth. What we should be pissed off about is the fact that we wasted the good financial situation we created for ourselves by extending Jack and signing Maggette – two stupid moves that didn’t fit with our plans to build around our youth at all. I’ve just had enough of this “We Believe was good, last year wasn’t good, so it must be because we don’t have the exact same team we had 2 years ago” stuff. It’s flat out wrong.
Hopeful silver lining in all this preseason drama – maybe Cohan finally gets sick of this crap and it helps motivate him to finally sell?
by Missing Barry on Sep 30, 2009 8:10 AM PDT reply actions 8 recs
As my old GSoM partner-in-crime Coma used to say: Marry me.
Or at least, please accept my humble offering of an enthusiastic “rec.”
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Sep 30, 2009 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions
Nice analysis
I disagree with the points about Baron in some areas (he could’ve given us at least another couple good years, in my opinion) but otherwise your analysis is dead on.
by ryogahibiki on Sep 30, 2009 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions
We gave them another shot and they did win 48 games, so in that sense they were successful, but then again they didn’t even make the playoffs. Newsflash
Newsflash, They played that 2nd year without JRich who was one of the keys to the playoff success. Not letting them play a full season together was a dumb move from a developmental perspective( get better, go to the playoffs, return stronger…not return weaker). We had plenty of time to deal with the contract issues the next year.
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Sep 30, 2009 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions
How many wins do you really think JRich was going to add to the team? We had Monta already – if anything JRich would have hurt Monta’s development. Basically JRich duplicated what we already had – having him would have provided a minimal improvement at best, and it’s easy to say in hindsight all we needed was a small improvement to make the playoffs, but when you’re making the decision before the season, you don’t have that benefit.
I also strongly disagree we had plenty of time to deal with the contract issues. All it would have taken was a down year from JRich or an injury and he would have become completely untradeable. He was a bad contract to begin with, when someone offers you something worthwhile (which Wright was, also it almost lead to us getting Garnett) for JRich you have to take it. The risk of losing the opportunity to trade him is too great.
JRich will always have a special place in my heart, but the truth is we basically replaced his production and got out of his contract situation. He was not the most important piece of our team and not the type of player you build a franchise around at that point.
by Missing Barry on Sep 30, 2009 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Here's the thing about supporting the J-Rich Trade . . .
No matter what you say or how logically you lay it out, you will not change the minds of people in the “trading J-Rich destroyed We Believe” camp.
I’ve tried bringing up the 48 wins in a tougher western conference and you’d have thought I had just suggested that we improve the team by trading your mother’s beating heart for 10 Mike Dunleavy Jrs.
Logic is going to be of no use to you when it comes to this topic unless of course your stated goal is to claw your own eyes out in frustration.
Reduce your carbon footprint, commit suicide.
by bloodsweatndonuts on Sep 30, 2009 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions
How many wins do you really think JRich was going to add to the team? We had Monta already – if anything JRich would have hurt Monta’s development. Basically JRich duplicated what we already had –
It’s not the results of the move that matter it’s the fact that they went against the logical sequence of building a winning team (assemble the core, get into the playoffs, come back with more experience next year and go farther). JRich did not duplicate what we had, Jason was more experienced than Montay and was more important to that playoff team so removing him was not a high percentage move.
One more year would have made it clear, either we’d have done better or we’d know we did the right thing and failed. The way they did it failed without even trying. One year in the playoffs then re-building an exciting team goes against all sports logic. So what if they won 48 games, with JRich they might have won 50 and made the playoffs again which would have been worth a lot more in terms of team confidence and identity. I’ve heard Nellie say they were worse without Jason so I guess you disagree with the guy who made the move?
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Sep 30, 2009 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Simply put, you’re wrong. The “core” is generally the top 3 players of a team, and everybody else is not nearly as important. We kept our core intact. Getting rid of one non-core player and his bad contract is not rebuilding. It’s planning long term to try to sustain success. Your entire evaluation of the JRich trade is based on hindsight that he would have put us into the playoffs. Because we should have known ahead of time, somehow, that’d we be the team with the most wins in NBA history to not make the playoffs.
Jason was more experienced than Monta
First, I’ll correct your spelling error. Second, a question – what exactly did JRich’s “experience” add that Monta didn’t provide the next season. And I don’t mean fairy-tale mental crap that you can’t show has any impact of the game. What production (stats) did we lose when we lost JRich?
by Missing Barry on Sep 30, 2009 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions
The "core"
Doesn’t have to be the top 3 players, it might be the whole team, it’s a case by case basis, you gotta figure out these things instead of just going by what you hear :>) but the core of our playoff team was Boom, Jason, and Jax if you want to narrow it down to three.
“What production (stats) did we lose when we lost JRich?”
I really can’t believe that anyone who’s participated in sports can’t see the value of experience, chemistry, and the bonds that exist between players who have worked hard together and had it payoff as a playoff appearance? To break it up takes away a lot of the momentum and makes the team wonder if anyone really cares other than them?
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Sep 30, 2009 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions
I really can’t believe that anyone who’s participated in sports can’t see the value of experience, chemistry, and the bonds that exist between players who have worked hard together and had it payoff as a playoff appearance? To break it up takes away a lot of the momentum and makes the team wonder if anyone really cares other than them?
Or maybe I just don’t care much about how people feel when it doesn’t affect the end results? I’m sorry you run on emotion and don’t actually think critically about the situation, but the truth is just because it makes you feel different doesn’t mean it has a significant impact on the important thing – the results.
If you really want to get into this, I’ll give you a little personal example from my own experiences. Back in the day (high school), I spent most of my time playing with my high school team (many of whom were my good friends). We had all that mental stuff you mentioned. I also played a little bit with my AAU team, but not that much, and I wasn’t great friends with them or anything because we all went to different schools. If my high school team and AAU team played, my AAU team would have destroyed my high school team. It has nothing to do with chemistry or anything, even if I enjoyed playing with my high school buddies more – it’s the simple fact that my AAU team was more talented. They would have won at least 90% of the time, easily.
The bottom line is your emotional view of things is completely biased and you make no effort to look at the situation objectively and realize what matters is actual talent. When we lost JRich, our team took a very, very small step back talent-wise, but ended up in a much better financial long term situation, along with a young talented player who filled a need (PF) and could very well end up being better than JRich.
by Missing Barry on Oct 1, 2009 7:29 AM PDT up reply actions
I also meant to add the fact that Biedrins, Davis, Monta, and Jack were all better than JRich in the We Believe season. Also, the first season in Charlotte JRich had one of the best seasons of his career, and it still wasn’t as good as Biedrins, Monta or Baron were that season. So no, he was not one of the top 3 core players. And no, a core cannot be the whole team. If you don’t have anyone on your team that’s significantly better than the10th man on the team (or even 5th best player for that matter), you’re not a very good team. The best players on a team determine how good the team is, not the role players and bench filler.
by Missing Barry on Oct 1, 2009 7:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Trade Jackson + Acie Law XXXIII + Speedy Claxton for...
1) Carlos Boozer + 2nd round pick
2) Amare Stoudamire (throw in B. Wright)
3) AK47 + 1st round pick
4) Manute Bol
5) me
=Gaucho=
Are you LeBron?
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Sep 30, 2009 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions
BTW
I voted GREEN (low) on that panic poll.
I bet the Warriors will win ~45 games this season. I really really really trust in Nelson, he’s still the mastermind he was with the Bucks, Mavericks and ourselves 20~16 years ago.
I really belive that Azubuike and Morrow will step up their games hugely; that Randolph will sprout and grow this year (and average 16/7 as SMALL FORWARD which is where he MUST play) and that Ellis will be a 24ppg+ scorer. This will be good enough to put us on the 8th/7th seed. Perhpas 6th
=Gaucho=
lol
this is laughable
I bet the Warriors will win ~45 games this season
There are just too many unknowns to call this team anything but a last place disaster. You’re not alone, though…there are a lot of folks that seem to think Anthony Randolph will morph into KG + Odom, Monta will suddenly learn to one-on-one defend, and buike/morrow are strictly complimentary players. It’s been said before, but it is true that there is no one to “compliment” on this team. I’ll send you my pay pal information for that bet, if you want.
On 5/7, the best part of waking is up LOLDGERS in my cup.
Bet on table
$100 my initial one.
yours?
someone please act as moderator and write this down. I’ll be rich my May/2010 and the Warriors will upset the 1st place Phoenix Suns in the 1st round of the playoffs.
=Gaucho=
Wait. Did you just say “1st place Phoenix Suns”?
OK now I know your yanking our chain.
This house is full of m, m, madness!
This house is full of m, m, mistakes!
of course my dear
Phoenix will average 130ppg this year, there’s no way they’ll place below 1st ;-)
=Gaucho=
I empathsize w/you. When I was in my younger days I suffered from the same pro-GSW dellusions. Hopefully you’re not a UCSB Gaucho…cuz you’re making us look bad. Keep your money and buy some pupusas.
On 5/7, the best part of waking is up LOLDGERS in my cup.
pupusas
y curtido?
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Oct 1, 2009 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions
i go sans curtido but by all means do your thang
On 5/7, the best part of waking is up LOLDGERS in my cup.
do your thang
Haha, Now I’m hungry, think I’ll make some for lunch, I got loroco in the fridge.
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Oct 1, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions
There are just too many unknowns to call this team anything but a last place disaster.
Now, I also think 45 is a little on the optimistic side, but a last place disaster? Really? We’re a heck of a lot more likely to win 45 games than finish in last place. Are you aware of the fact that we won 29 games last season, which was 12 more than the last place team last season (and 10th out of 15 in the West)? We’re also better than that record indicated – our best player was hurt last year, our young guys are 1 year more experienced (and thus, better) this year, we don’t have to play Al Harrington or Jamal Crawford this season (addition by subtraction), and there’s no reason to think the ridiculous amount of injuries we had last year will continue this year. Everything indicates we’re much better than that 29 win team. Are we a 45 win team or a playoff team? I’m not so sure about that, but I do know we’re much, much better than the worst teams in the NBA.
(I’m also curious why Gaucho thinks Phoenix will have the best record in the West? Seems like a bit of a ridiculous projection to me…)
by Missing Barry on Sep 30, 2009 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Yes, I am indeed aware of the 29 games we won last season. “Last place team” is kind of drastic, admittedly. I guess what I’m supposed to do here is agree with you that we’re a legit Tier 2 team; not a contender, not a bottom feeder. “much better than the worst teams”
I do know we’re much, much better than the worst teams in the NBA.
MB, I dont know whether to laugh or cry about this statement. Not at you…just, that someone has to argue and defend this point.
Help me Anthony Randolph, you’re my only hope.
On 5/7, the best part of waking is up LOLDGERS in my cup.
Help me Anthony Randolph, you’re my only hope.
Well looks like we agree completely. Right now we’re in no-mans land, but we have Randolph, and he looks like he has a chance to be the kind of superstar that turns us into a contender. If that doesn’t work out, we’re back to rebuilding…again…
by Missing Barry on Oct 1, 2009 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions
I’m kind of looking forward to the rebuild, truth be told. If their trade value weren’t so low, I’d ship Monta and Jax on the next train to Charlotte or whatever city would have them.
On 5/7, the best part of waking is up LOLDGERS in my cup.
I’ve had enough rebuilding over the last 15 years. We have a decent team. We have a lot of potential to turn into a team that’s actually good. I want to find out what these guys are capable of.
by Missing Barry on Oct 1, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions
this is laughable
Well, winning 42 would just make us barely average so it’s only laughable that we are excited by the likelihood of being .500 ? I think if we can’t win 42 the whole team and staff should resign, I’d be embarrassed to not be at least average if I was them.
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Sep 30, 2009 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Great Post Atma
Even though I get annoyed with your pessimism at times, you put together the best posts on this blog hands down.
Big Shot Jack
What a joke. I can’t think of someone who missed more big shots during the Jazz series of “We Believe” than Jack.
It is what it is. We didn’t make the move, OK, so be it. I would’ve been happier with it, but who’s trying to keep me happy?
Um, I believe that’s what the Warriors’ FO was trying to do when they signed you to that INSANE extension, well above your market value, Jack, to try and keep you happy while the team went through some rebuilding. Nelson’s quote about finding a deal that is good for Jack as well as the team bothered me as well. Who cares what’s good for Jack at this point? As far as I’m concerned, ship this ungrateful prick to Memphis, pronto.
Don't worry about me Thurgood, I'll be fine. The robbery is what's important now.
I can’t think of someone who missed more big shots during the Jazz series of "We Believe" than Jack.
Total missed shots, 2006/07 Playoffs
Jackson 100
Davis 93
Richardson 89
Harrington 59
Ellis 55
Biedrins 10
Clearly we held onto the right guys… XD
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Sep 30, 2009 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions
Edit: except for Jackson… :,-(
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Sep 30, 2009 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm still excited
for some high scoring, defenseless Warriors games despite all this shenanigans. Playoffs? Very doubtful, but the 41 games at Oracle should be interesting because I think they can beat any team at home at anytime.
We’re about a month away so like the W’s leave your common sense as well as defensive skills at home and enjoy a great time out*.
*Literally, enjoy each timeout Nellie calls and watch the cheerleaders.
Win the inning.
loyalty, doubts, and leadership
Great post! I’m at code orange for the season because what I saw yesterday was the effect of a failure of leadership on the part of Nellie. I mean months have gone by since the draft and summer league, and despite the fact that the roster hasn’t been finalized, we know what we have in the core squad.
Nellie has a vision of how he plans to use these players within his system (e.g., Monta and Curry playing together). As with all of Nellie’s systems, it’s unconventional and as a result there are reasonable doubts as to its success— both in the players’ minds and the fans’ minds. As a leader, Nellie has to get buy-in from his players— they have to believe when they hit the court, and really they should believe heading into media day where they are setting the tone for the season with the media and the fans. The players clearly do not understand Nellie’s vision (as in the case of Monta not knowing that he and Curry were going to play together) and/or they do not buy-in (as in the case of Cpt Jack wanting to be trade to a contender).
The bottom line is that effective leadership could have avoided the fiasco yesterday at media day, and what we witnessed was a failure of Nellie’s leadership. The consequences may be limited or they may extend into the season. The players may still come together to form a competitive squad, but we’re stumbling out of the gate, and so I’m at code orange until I see some indication (hopefully this Sunday) that the players are buying in to whatever Nellie’s plan is for the team.
F**K JACK
Stop defending this crybaby, living turnover, and stupid shot taker, who doesn’t want to be here. I think our team would have better chemistry w/o him anyway. And if Ellis got something to say about it, F**K him too.
Drama Alert Level...
I’m going to go ahead and raise the Drama Alert Level to Orange, but it’s only for political purposes. I have an election coming up…
Thing 2
I voted blue because I feel like the chaos, on and off the court has been normalized into “Warrior culture”. If such a thing exists.
Plus I’ve gotten over the Jackson thing, and the Ellis thing to me was only an issue because he said it to the media. I pretty much agree with him though. Curry should be coming off the bench for most of the year, until the Ellis PG experiment is worked out.
Jackson...
…is being remarkably honest about his motives, you have to give him that. It is, however, coming at the great expense of the team. He’s clearly also got a hyper-inflated sense of his own ability, at least insofar as calling himself “Big Shot Jack” and claiming he brought the Warriors out of the doldrums is concerned.
Jackson wanting Stoudemire (presumably at the expense of Biedrins and Curry or whoever all) does indeed illustrate that he’s not clamoring to play with AB. Then again, Jackson’s decision-making has never exactly been what he’s been lauded for. If he had his way, I’m sure he’d be hoisting 20 shots a game and averaging double digit turnovers. Not a man who appreciates the nuances, is what I’m saying.
I posted this in the Optimistic thread.
Getting away from all the off court stuff and just concentrating on playing basketball was great to see. All you see is exciting young guys playing basketball. I now can’t wait to see Monta, Jack, Morrow (maybe), Randolph and Biedrins on opening night. The second unit looks solid with Curry, Kelenna, Maggette, Wright and Turiaf. I hope that Wright and Turiaf can be effective together. In my opinion it makes sense playing them together, as it sort of duplicates the starting tandem of Randolph and Biedrins. Hopefully the work Brandan put into his jumpshot has payed off. It should really help his post game, turnaround jumpshot, etc.
What I Wrote:
Monta sounded great in his interview with Ray on the Warriors training camp blog. He sounded much better on his interviewing skills and impressive charisma. It also sounds like Monta Ellis won’t be shooting much threes this year. He feels that there are "6 other guys" that can shoot the three. His job is to do the driving. Hopefully he’ll channel his inner D Wade. He also sounds really enthusiastic about defense. He’s saying all the right things after his blunder on Monday.
Other things I noticed:
Curry looks great. I loved the alley-oops to Brandan Wright.
The second unit looks solid with a Curry-Azubuike-Maggette-Wright-Turiaf.
Wright and Randolph definitely look bigger. Wright looks a wee bit stockier. God Randolph is long.
Turiaf still likes getting his teammates involved even in practice.
Curry’s jumpshot is as smooth as advertised. He runs the pick-n-roll pretty well. Could be a better passer though.
Mikki Moore, CJ Watson and I think Devean George were running with 2 other scrubs. Definitely looks like the 3rd team. I guess that means they won’t be playing ahead of Wright.
Morrow is still money.
The dubz must run the most thorough fast break drills of all the 30 teams. Drill after drill after drill after frill was designed to push the tempo.
Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.
The Awesomeness That Is Captain Jack -
Jackson on wanting to be on a winner: "I’m made for the playoffs and the championships. I’m Big Shot Jack. That’s what I do."
Jackson on wanting out after extension: "Who’s going to turn down that money? I didn’t go to college, but I’ve got a lot of common sense."

by 































