Around the Association: 2009-2010 Houston Rockets- Yao-ch!, that's gotta hurt
Houston, we have a problem. Yes, it is a cliche saying, but when your star center and face of the franchise is expected to miss the whole season, when your next big gun last played a whole season in, well, never, things do not look good. Conventional wisdom says that the Rockets will not be able to build on their impressive 53 win season, but look instead to be headed for the abyss.
For better or worse, the Rockets seem to defy conventional wisdom. In an NBA where scorers garner most of the attention, losing Yao and looking to rely on an injury plagued 30 year-old who is himself coming off season ending knee surgery seems to suggest doom. But the wisdom of Rocket's GM Daryl Morey means the Rockets have a chance to remain competitive, and if they do, it will be another dagger in the heart of conventional wisdom.
Rewind:
A year ago, the Rockets won 53 games, good for 2nd in the NBA's Southwestern Division. In the playoffs, they took the eventual champion Lakers to a game 7, this *despite* losing Yao Ming to an injury when already down 2-1 in the series.
Offseason:
The Rockets were without a draft choice. [Note: the Rockets did acquire Chase Budinger in a draft-night trade with Detroit, who had taken former Wildcat with the #44 pick in the 2009 draft.] The big acquisition was Trevor Ariza, a defense-first forward who can guard multiple positions who would appear to replace Ron Artest, an older defense-first forward who can guard multiple positions. Ariza is younger and more productive than Artest who survives more on reputation than on production at this point. Still, this likely upgrade is overshadowed by the loss of Yao.
Outlook:
Did I mention that Yao is unlikely to play? Did I mention McGrady will be playing for a new contract somewhere, and that should be motivation to give it his all, though motivation has not been the problem so much as staying healthy? His age really does not adequately describe the wear and team Mr. McGrady has suffered. His return to his former all-star form, or even regular playing time, is doubtful. The contraction situation would not seem to be as much of a factor in his production as simply being able to get out of the trainer's room. Motivation only goes so far against the reality of microfracture surgery. And if the Rockets wind up going nowhere fast, his $23+ million expiring contract could be a mighty appealing piece for a team looking to shed massive salary and/or looking for a productive piece to put together a championship run.
But the eventuality of collosal failure in Houston may be premature. Houston anchored their 20 Though not equipped with Artest's reputation as a lock-down, Ariza is a fantastic defender who exceeds Artest on the boards and is a much more disciplined shooter. Ariza's performance in LA should not surprise anyone and was unlikely a result of LA's "system". He looked similarly good in Orlando before LA stole him away for next to nothing. Ariza thus joins a team that was 4th in overall defensive efficiency and loaded with players who are simply very good at securing and keeping the ball. Shane Battier's positive effect has been chronicled elsewhere. Luis Scola, Carl Landry and Chuck Hayes can provide bruises and rebounds in the front court and Kyle Lowry and Brent Barry (yes, he's still playing-- yes, he's still playing well) were quietly effective in the backcourt. No, they do not have the dynamite scorer (although Aaron Brooks did seem to rise to the occasion in the playoff) suggesting that the offense, such that it is, may not have a central focus should McGrady not bounce back and without the injured Mr. Yao.
And without the scoring punch, without the all-star firepower to put big points on the board, this will be a test. Can a collection of low-usage but efficient scorers with a knack for controlling possessions really remain competitive? If they can, Daryl Morey more than deserves executive of the year for putting together a solid squad without Yao. If not, then this squad might just be the least entertaining collection of players in the Association.
Oh, and Yao Ming is probably on the bench for the whole season.
Prediction: 43 wins and a whole lot of excuses for why every game they win still doesn't indicate that the conventional wisdom is wrong.
For more on the Houston Rockets check out The Dream Shake:
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
Yao Ming is probably on the bench for the whole season.
Is there an opportunity for the Warriors to buy low on Yao and trade SJax plus who ever it takes for Yao? Jax would probably like to play at houston and they could use someone to replace Yao this season. We could sit on Yao till next year and hope Curr-bury works out as a point guard and that we might then have a chance at respectability? At worst Yao in the bay area would be good press for the Dubs?
Standing on the moon
Where talk is cheap and vision true
Standing on the moon
But I would rather be with you
Somewhere in San Francisco
On a back porch in July
Just looking up to heaven
At this crescent in the sky
by Skeptic con Urquell on Sep 9, 2009 9:27 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
and bad press for houston
Giving up on their star so easy.
I’d say a sjax/extras for McGrady would be more likely.
by mosdl on Sep 9, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
All this really seems like for Houston is a marketing hit. If memory serves me right, the last two seasons when Yao and T-Mac have both missed significant time, the team seems to play a lot better.
by dannyschmanny on Sep 9, 2009 11:18 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Rockets are good with or without Yao.
I don’t think they’ll win 53 games again, but they’ll get into the playoffs as a low seed, only losing a couple more games because of the loss.
They’ve got talent from top-to-bottom and a smart coach/GM/etc.
I support the Tornado Release [See: Joakim Noah]
by Prevenge on Sep 9, 2009 3:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
One intesting thing about the Rockets roster
Is the 11 players between 6-7 and 6-9. If Morey is the Billy Beane of the NBA, and is exposing inefficiencies in the market for players, does that mean that the most undervalued players are oversized wingmen and undersized power forwards? Or is this all just a coincidence?
by philthiest on Sep 9, 2009 6:19 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Adelman underrated coach
I like all this GSOM love for the Rockets. I read a lot of pundits saying this is a lottery team without Yao but I think Jae’s projection of 43 wins and the other posts are more accurate.
I think Adelman is a super underrated coach. He has had great success with 3 teams (Blazers, Kings, Rockets) with completely different rosters and styles and no transcendent bigger than life superstars (Yao, Webber, and Drexler are great players but not Kobe/Duncan/Jordan level.)
The winning streak he had 2 years ago in a tough western conference with Yao hurt for most of it + taking Lakers to 7 without Yao for part of it (as Jae pointed out) are pretty amazing feats. Is this guy a hall of fame coach? I think so. Usually 20+ game winning streaks are achieved by super-dominant teams (I assume I don’t have the #s in front of me). Plus his Kings teams put Euro players and Euro style as a viable NBA style and gave the Lake show all they could handle (+ got robbed by refs). His Blazers were also ahead of their time. A bunch of athletes who would have been drafted a lot higher today who couldn’t shoot jumpers that well but ran, defended and got offensive rebounds like maniacs. Thoughts on Adelman’s legacy?
by gsfool on Sep 10, 2009 12:36 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Yeah and T-Mac was out for that winning streak two years ago as well. so they went on their best streak without their top two players. Adelman is a good coach and for whatever reason, that team works…and better without it’s stars. Appreciation aside, have to add that is it just me or has the last 3 or 4 trips for the Warriors into Houston been some of the worst officiated, bizzare games ever?
Baron’s last season they went in there and in a single period, they called the warriors for soemthing like 12-15 fouls, 2 T’s Nelson and a player ejected. Last season there was another period pretty much just as ridiculous like that and i’ll still never forget the foul that got Nelson ejected. Andris and Yao go up for a rebound, Yao has the inside. Scola comes flying in on the opposite side of Yao from Andris, ties up with Yao and doesn’t come within a foot of Andris…and Andris get’s tagged with a foul on Scola with an And 1. It gets kind of obvious the refs generally aren’t going to cut the Warriors any breaks…but really? The only worse call I’ve seen since then was a Giants Dodgers Series at AT&T where the ump at first Called the runner out at first…when he was actually looking at 2nd to try to correct a call there. The runner at first was safe by a good 3 steps.
by dannyschmanny on Sep 10, 2009 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
so they went on their best streak without their top two players.
While I agree that overall, Yao and McGrady were their top two players, that the team did so well without them, without “stars” should prompt some reconsideration on the value given to “role players” vs. “stars”. The general equation that dictates most analysis is “score more points = is more important”. The Rockets have a collection of players who do things that are undervalued by most fans and they do these things real well. The result of systematically undervaluing almost everyone on a lineup is surprise when the team “overachieves” and a tendency to credit it to mysterious forces like “chemistry”. They rebound well and they play more than solid defense, and they’re reasonably efficient from the field across the board. In a strange way, the lack of a ‘star’ means that the shots that Yao would have taken get distributed throughout a lineup that’s reasonably efficient. If someone else takes all of Yao’s shots, it would probably be a failure, but distribute his 14 or so a game and you’re talking about every player who sees time taking 1 or 2 more shots a game. That’s hardly the sort of burden that suggests an opponent can work expose the “role players”.
Don’t get me wrong. Yao is a very good player and they’d be better off overall with him, but the dropoff to using Scola a bit more, Landry a bit more, and Hayes a bit more isn’t as monumental as it would first appear.
by jae on Sep 10, 2009 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Still no matter how efficient Scola, Landry, Hayes are you wouldn’t expect them to be playing major minutes on a team rattling off a 20+ winning streak unless that team had some major stars playing for them.
When Adelman was coaching Portland to Finals appearances it was said that with Portland’s talent he didn’t have to do much, ignoring the fact that Kersey, Porter, Robinson were second rounders and even Clyde was only the 13th pick in the draft. Not saying those guys weren’t talented but that Adelman may be the coach that finds and makes the most out of the talent he has better than any other. (Golden State experience not withstanding). I think this is the hallmark of a great coach. Nellie’s pretty good but he needs “Nellie players” to fit his system. Chuck Hayes probably wouldn’t see minute one for Nellie.
by gsfool on Sep 11, 2009 11:51 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


























