2010 Offseason/Trade Deadline
by monta ellis on Jan 10, 2010 10:32 PM PST
Email
Print
As we all know, there are going to be some big names in the 2010 offseason. I think if the Warriors front office shows their committment to winning, that along with our extraordinary fan base will be enough to win over the top free agents. What we have to do first is trade for an expiring big name player so that we have the ability to add a couple of names.
We would start off this year before the deadline by trading Maggette and Raja Bell for Lebron James. Maggette's recent tear has been given some national exposure, and it's no secret that the Cavs are interested in him. They're going to lose Lebron next offseason anyway, and this would be the best way to at least get something for him.
After that we can trade Radmanovic and Beidrins to the Raptors for Chris Bosh. Toronto would be all over this because they have a very european team with Calderon, Bellinelli, Bargnani and Turkoglu, and Beidrins and Radmanovic would fit right in. The Warriors would be losing their faithful center, but gaining a great player in Bosh.
Finally the Timberwolves have been shopping Al Jefferson around, and I think the Warriors should trade for him. They can package something like Claxton, George, and Azibuike for him. This would give the T'wolves expirings, and the Warriors would get a solid center.
Our lineup would look like this:
Curry
Ellis
LeBron James (Yeah, I know, WOW!)
Bosh
Jefferson
Bench:
Turiaf
Watson
Morrow
Randolph
Wright
We should also figure out a way to get Steve Nash to mentor Stephen Curry and pass the torch on to him, but I haven't figured out how to do that.
Any suggestions? I think this is our best shot at winning it all!
EDIT: It's been brought to my attention that Steph Curry and Lebron James are good friends, and they exchange text messages all the time. Drafting Steph could've been the key to getting Lebron NEXT YEAR!! Warriors front office must of known something was up.
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
126 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Why bother going after Al Jefferson when a player who’s actually good (something Jefferson is not) is out there in Chris Paul (who’s a lot more than just good)?
we need a center and if we can land Steve Nash we don’t need Paul!!!!
by monta ellis on Jan 10, 2010 10:37 PM PST up reply actions
Bosh/Turiaf/Randolph can form our primary big men, Lebron can play big at times pretty well…screw getting Steve Nash, Chris Paul is better than him. And Al Jefferson sucks. Maybe we can convince the Heat they aren’t holding onto Wade while we’re at it. Paul Wade Lebron Bosh and…well, who cares who else is still on our team at that point, we’re winning the championship. Maybe Morrow so we have some shooting to balance everything out.
by Missing Barry on Jan 10, 2010 10:50 PM PST up reply actions
the thing is I like Curry alot, but Paul would dominate the minutes leaving Steph to play spot minutes, plus, I have to be realistic, right?
by monta ellis on Jan 10, 2010 10:53 PM PST up reply actions
Well I’m sure Curry would be part of the trade to get Paul, so no need to worry about that.
by Missing Barry on Jan 11, 2010 7:56 AM PST up reply actions
You are Kidding, right?
because these are ridiculous trades that would never, not in a million years happen
You must be really crazy if you think any of these are possible
Are you Rain Man?
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
who’s Rain Man? ridiculous trade poster?
by monta ellis on Jan 10, 2010 10:52 PM PST up reply actions
He bankrupt the casinos
and he was a ratard.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Jan 10, 2010 10:55 PM PST up reply actions
Brendan Wright would have to be thrown in as well, of course
by monta ellis on Jan 10, 2010 10:58 PM PST up reply actions
Dogg
everyone knows nash is the best offensive point guard in bball. numbers don’t lie. to make up for his defensive shortcomings, we will flank him with shane battier and dwight howard. then we will surround him with Danillo Gallinari and Ray Allen on the drive and dish. and then we will have bosh running the pick and roll, and his options are..
A) lob to bosh
B) lob to superman
C) pass to Gallo for wide open 3
D) pass to Ray Ray for 3
E) drive in for easy layup
i see this team going 82-0 in regular season and 16-0 in playoffs.
LGW!!!!!
Bellineli, Gallinari, and Radman are my heroes!!!
Monta PPG> Monta IQ
Lakers Fans= Terrible
Go C's
Giants need to sign Barry Bonds outta retirement.
how do you supposed to do that?? you are crazy!! we have a better chance of getting Lebron than Gallinari, why would the Knicks trade their star youngster??
by monta ellis on Jan 10, 2010 11:05 PM PST up reply actions
True, but Nash isn’t that much better than Paul offensively, and Paul is so much better than Nash defensively…
Plus offensively, with Wade, Lebron and Bosh, we don’t really need Nash’s additional offense over Paul’s.
by Missing Barry on Jan 11, 2010 7:59 AM PST up reply actions
First off...
Lebron has shown that he’s not going anywhere.
Chris Bosh is not going anywhere for that package.
Alas,the Al Jefferson trade is just hilarious.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Jan 10, 2010 11:23 PM PST reply actions
what’s wrong with the Jefferson deal? they have the option to resign the players if they want to, or save 4 years @ 12MM on a ok player
by monta ellis on Jan 10, 2010 11:49 PM PST up reply actions
Jefferson sucks, that’s what’s wrong with it….
by Missing Barry on Jan 11, 2010 7:59 AM PST up reply actions
Beans doesn’t suck. He rebounds. He scores efficiently. He plays some D (not great, but adequate). He’s a great role player. Beans + Nash pick and roll = awesome. Beans + Lebron pick and roll = awesome. Beans will contribute a lot to a team like that. It’s not like that team is going to need him to create shots for himself, anyways…
by Missing Barry on Jan 12, 2010 1:49 PM PST up reply actions
Yes, Beans sucks. Sorry.
He plays no D. Most NBA caliber big men can rebound, and he isn’t the most amazing rebounder ever. He never shoots, so of course he “scores efficiently.” If his role were backup center, he would be a good role player.
Most NBA caliber big men can rebound
If this is true, then most big men in the NBA are not “NBA caliber”. Very, very, very few NBA bigs rebound as well as Biedrins does. This is not opinion. It is a fact.
He never shoots, so of course he "scores efficiently.
Most big men, even the ones who “never shoot” are not so efficient. This is also not opinion, but an empirical fact.
Yes, I realize I’m feeding a troll of a Laker fan, but perhaps there’s people out there who actually do think who read this stuff and I don’t like to see false assertions go uncorrected.
by jae on Jan 15, 2010 6:19 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
When is this thread going to be deleted? Any bets? I say 12:30am
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
why?
good ideas are contagious? lets hope it doesnt!
by monta ellis on Jan 10, 2010 11:49 PM PST up reply actions
I'm not puttin you down or anything...
props to the post but ideas like this leads to criticism.
Like what I said earlier,by the way,the Jefferson deal is hilarious because 12m will just make them lose Jefferson for no reason.
If I were the Wolves,I would like to get something that’s on his level…for example Danny Granger.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Jan 10, 2010 11:58 PM PST up reply actions
Granger is way better than Jefferson.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Jan 11, 2010 12:11 AM PST up reply actions
Expiring contracts are probably pretty close to Jefferson’s level, given his contract. Al Jefferson is not very good.
by Missing Barry on Jan 11, 2010 7:59 AM PST up reply actions
I am an Al Jefferson hater, I freely admit to this. I hate him for being such a horrible passer and black hole on a basketball level – I just don’t enjoy watching a guy like that play. I hate him for shooting a lot to score (which doesn’t win basketball games), but shooting enough to score a lot of points and thus make people think he’s good. I don’t necessarily blame him for that one – it’s on the people who buy into him being good. He’s been in the league long enough to where he probably isn’t going to change much, and very likely won’t change into a different kind of player….so yeah, he is what he is, which is not very good. If he becomes efficient, I’ll give the man his due.
by Missing Barry on Jan 12, 2010 1:51 PM PST up reply actions
24 is past the point where “he’s only ” stops being terribly meaningful. Players can, and some do continue to improve after 24, but for most players, they’re at or near their peak level of production sometime around 24-25. He probably won’t decline much for several more years, but it’s a fool’s bet to think that a player with flaws at 24 will mature out of them. It’s a better bet to consider him a near finished product.
isn’t that what we’re hoping Monta does? or are we convinced he’s the best player he’s going to be? I think the front office has settled on Monta being the foundation for this franchise, but if he’s near finished, we have to look to adding a bigger name to our team. If we ever have a normal coach, and Monta’s rate inflated stats come back down to earth, this team might be in the gutter for quite a while.
I think we have some conflicting things with Monta – on one hand, he WAS the efficient scorer we wanted in the past, so he’s shown that ability. He lost a year – so he’s really only had two full seasons of PT now…I dunno, a lot can happen with Monta…hopefully he goes the direction we want.
by Missing Barry on Jan 12, 2010 7:16 PM PST up reply actions
I’d say that the distraction of “he’s the point guard” was a colossal failure. He won’t ever be a point guard, not even the “score first” variety ala Tony Parker. And he quite clearly does better off the ball much of the time with an aggressive floor general who can get him the ball where he has the best chance of returning to being a high percentage offensive weapon. Unfortunately, that guy doesn’t exist here yet. And the interim plan seems to be for him to force the issue at every opportunity.
I’ve begun to realize this, too. I was all for continuing the Monta is a PG experiment before the season, but I’m quickly concluding that he’s such a great off ball player and not necessarily so great on ball that he just isn’t a fit for PG. Well, at least not until his ballhandling goes from passable SF quality ballhandling to legitimate, “run the offense through me” PG ballhandlging, at least. I really think his dribbling issues are at the root of most of his problems – not seeing the floor, turning it over, not creating for his teammates, passing in general, in terms of his passing ability and the timing of his passes, settling for bad shots at times….all these would be improved in a significant way if he could dribble the damn basketball, in my opinion.
by Missing Barry on Jan 13, 2010 3:02 PM PST up reply actions
If we’re hoping for him to make a quantum leap and become a radically different player, that’s a strategy that’s doomed for failure.
I don’t think that Monta can be the “foundation of a franchise”, not if you want that franchise to ever be a contender for anything more than a borderline playoff spot. He can be a very, very good secondary (“complementary”) player, but he’s not good enough to build a contender around. There’s only a half dozen or so of those guys in the league though, so we’re not alone in that need. To ever move into the realm of contender, we need to add a better player.
On the plus, while he’s the highest paid player on the team, he isn’t paid like a ‘franchise player’. He’s paid commiserate with a very good supporting player.
do you think you’re ever going to see this franchise stack the roster with high salary players? i feel like the FO assumes 10 million is a high salary and is oblivious to the rest of the league at the moment… another thing we have to be careful of is Monta gaining the superstar exposure and making this his team, no matter how bad it may be, because he won’t want to go back to being a secondary player… most players wouldn’t have it that way, especially at age 25
IF the the Lakers...
can get Pau Gasol for Kwame Brown and Javaris Crittenton then ANYTHING is possible.
The fix just has to be in…
except you forget
we are the Warriors and we have a bad FO.
Warriors never get lucky or catch breaks.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Jan 11, 2010 12:40 AM PST up reply actions
i don't think you guys are taking me seriously!!
am i the only one who wants to win?!
ALL
I know. Is this post had to be pure comedy…. we’re you drinking when you did this… how about we have the dream team line up come out here and play. TRADES!!! is a yes but be in reason lets stop going for bigger names with one year left on there contract that don’t want ti play here. we would have them and they would leave.. look at baron davis… how about we just put a team together of good pros and young stars.. and not think about what could be Curry Monte Randolph fine… the rest of the team can reworked… Its not that i don’t like the other players and I’m not mentioning names because I am a fan and winning is more important than we think we have a good player.. would i trade monte for lebron if i was a executive yes!!! thats the name of the game.. if we had done better in the draft and got a star like MONTE out th 2nd round then we would be in a lort better shape.. how bout we hope that in the off season we keep monte curry maggette and randolph and get a center or a big free agent or draft a sf/sg wesley johnson so that we have a line up that will compete for a top spot. I have more to say but it hard to explain.
Wouldn't work....DEFINITELY
You must be pretty crazy if you think the Cavaliers would trade LeBron for Maggette or Bell….or in general. LeBron is the best player in the game. He scores efficiently, rebounds, plays tremendous defense, blocks, knows how to handle, passes, and makes play. Even if the Lakers tried to trade Kobe for LeBron, it wouldn’t work. LeBron is better than Kobe is mostly every category (scoring efficiency, rebounding, passing, defense, etc…). The only thing Kobe is better than LeBron at is clutch moments (although Kobe did missed some). Anyways, I’m just saying that LeBron is untouchable as a player can be, and I don’t think that the Cavaliers would want Maggette and Bell for him, or anyone on the Warriors roster for that matter.
Onto the Jefferson trade. You serious? Jefferson = overrated. People praise him for scoring so much and rebounding, but his scoring efficiency is horrible. I wouldn’t say he sucks, but I wouldn’t see he’s that good either. Definitely has many flaws to his game. Playing him and LeBron probably wouldn’t work because he’ll take more shots than Lebron does.
The Chris Bosh trade is impossible too. No way would they want Biedrins and Rad-man. Rad-man just sucks, and Biedrins isn’t close to Bosh’s level of playing. If you wanted to trade for Bosh or even Lebron in that matter, you’d have to put Randolph and Ellis somewhere in the package, which you didn’t because you’re a true homer.
These trades would never happen.
I think they are a basis for some trades
I do want to keep Randolph and Ellis, but i’ve figured it out so that we don’t have to give them up. Look at this if you’re cleveland, Raja Bell comes off the books next year, you have a lineup of Mo Williams, D. West, Maggette, Jamison, JJ Hickson, I think they would be happy with that since they will not be able to get big free agents playing in a small market.
From Barnett and Fitz
“If Lebron joins a franchise, he would make the team so much better. If he leaves a franchise, he’ll destroy the team.”
You don't get the point
Why would Cleveland let LeBron be traded? It would destroy their team. Shaq + Zydrunas are expiring next season, so other than Mo Williams the Cavs will have nobody. There’s no need for Maggette and Bell because compared to LeBron their not worthy. If the Cavs let Lebron go, that franchise is not going to be known anymore. It’s like your living in a fantasy world, thinking that you can get/keep anyone you want. In reality, no one on the Warriors’ roster is worth LeBron. So I don’t see why you think it’s so easy getting these players. Don’t you think the Dubs’ would have already made these kind of trades?
Maggette has been gaining NATIONAL EXPOSURE lately… do you know what that means? NATIONAL, as in ESPN has been commenting on how good his play has been. Honestly I see a little bit of Lebron in Maggette and if he could work on his charisma, he could be the superstar Lebron is.
Obviously you just don’t get it.
by Missing Barry on Jan 12, 2010 7:22 PM PST up reply actions
I know Maggette is on a roll
But why would the Cavs want him? They have a solid chance at winning a championship right now. If they pulled off a trade for Bell and Maggette, there not going to have that chance. I know Maggette has been playing well lately, but Lebron has already proven that he’s the best. I rather go with a proven superstar than a small forward with “potential”. Yes, Maggette’s value is raising, but until he can pass, rebound, play defense, carry a team like LeBron does then I don’t see why the Cavs would want him.
and all the people would renew their tickets for playoff tickets
Bellineli, Gallinari, and Radman are my heroes!!!
Monta PPG> Monta IQ
Lakers Fans= Terrible
Go C's
Giants need to sign Barry Bonds outta retirement.
by monta.da.boss on Jan 12, 2010 8:46 PM PST up reply actions
please stop replying to this post..
it’s so ridiculous that it doesn’t deserve comments…
A team with Lebron AND Cartier Martin
That’s what dreams are made of
By far Nash is best offensive point guard in the league. His TS% is the best in the league, and his assists is ridiculously high.
Bellineli, Gallinari, and Radman are my heroes!!!
Monta PPG> Monta IQ
Lakers Fans= Terrible
Go C's
Giants need to sign Barry Bonds outta retirement.
Well, I dunno about “by far” just because Chris Paul is so good, himself, but yeah, Nash is the best offensive PG in the league.
by Missing Barry on Jan 11, 2010 7:43 PM PST up reply actions
so we’ve decided that Nash would be the better fit? we have to act soon, trade deadline is coming up.
Nope Paul still because the team is loaded on offense, Nash won’t really provide much more than Paul, but Paul will provide a lot more than Nash defensively.
by Missing Barry on Jan 12, 2010 1:52 PM PST up reply actions
that’s true, but Monta has proven to be our stopper at times. are you suggesting a lineup of:
Paul
Wade
James
Bosh
Howard
would be our best bet at winning? I like that, but being a true homer, I do not want to lose Ellis…
Hmm…I haven’t figured out how to get Howard, yet. I think that might just be too unrealistic.
by Missing Barry on Jan 12, 2010 7:17 PM PST up reply actions
That lineup is horrible. Why would we ever want that? Bosh hasn’t shown he can play alongside a real center and Howard hasn’t ever shown he can play alongside a real PF. They’d crowd each other out and suck. James and Wade both drive too often and would get in each other’s way, and Paul isn’t a “winner”. What has he ever won?
And maybe we can get Jerry West to come in and manage the front office
by warriorsvictim on Jan 12, 2010 10:42 AM PST reply actions
wow
if u think cleveland would trade lebron ur crazy. any of the elite players like (lebron, kobe, wade, howard) would never be traded unless they asked to be traded. but players like bosh abd jefferson r possible to get with the right price
yeah, but i’m thinking clevland realizes theyre going to lose Lebron, and trades him for a player of equal value.
like speedy claxton
Bellineli, Gallinari, and Radman are my heroes!!!
Monta PPG> Monta IQ
Lakers Fans= Terrible
Go C's
Giants need to sign Barry Bonds outta retirement.
by monta.da.boss on Jan 12, 2010 8:47 PM PST up reply actions
Ur the most optimistic man on the planet
We get Lebron and Bosh and get to keep randolph, wright,ellis, and curry. If you could pull off a deal like this you should use your powers on more important task like world peace or ending poverty. But i’m not mad, cause this post did give me a chuckle.
one step at a time bro, one step at a time
by monta ellis on Jan 12, 2010 12:57 PM PST up reply actions
Re: "I think if the Warriors front office shows their committment to winning..."
You could already tell this was a BS post w/ that line! Plus, even IF the Cavs couldn’t keep Lebron, why would they trade him for Maggette and Bell? Don’t you think other teams would have way better pieces to trade?
I know New Year’s just passed, but I didn’t know it was already April Fool’s Day!
Geeez Louf*ckingweeez!!!
by scottiepimppen on Jan 12, 2010 11:59 AM PST reply actions
Maggette has been gaining NATIONAL EXPOSURE lately… do you know what that means? NATIONAL, as in ESPN has been commenting on how good his play has been. Honestly I see a little bit of Lebron in Maggette and if he could work on his charisma, he could be the superstar Lebron is. If the Cavs trade for Maggette they’ll basically be getting Lebron just a little cheaper and not as well know.
Basically Maggette = Lebron.
Raja Bell would be a great throw in for them.
by monta ellis on Jan 12, 2010 12:59 PM PST up reply actions
ARE YOU SERIOUS?!
Maggette = Lebron?! Don’t get me wrong, I’ve always liked Maggette in terms of his nack and ability to score and get to the line, but other than that, I don’t think he’ll garner a trade involving anyone named Paul, Duncan, or Howard, let alone Lebron!
I’m not discounting that Maggette has been on a tear lately, but there is no way in Hell, Heaven or Earth, that the Cavs will make that trade. We always over-value our own players because we’re fans, but we have to remember to be realistic and consider other teams’ perspectives, not just ours!
But you know what…if you can get the Warriors to trade Maggette and Bell for Lebron, I’ll push for you to be the Warriors GM!
Geeez Louf*ckingweeez!!!
by scottiepimppen on Jan 12, 2010 1:48 PM PST up reply actions
Maggette has been gaining NATIONAL EXPOSURE lately… do you know what that means? NATIONAL, as in ESPN has been commenting on how good his play has been. Honestly I see a little bit of Lebron in Maggette and if he could work on his charisma, he could be the superstar Lebron is.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a more true statement in my life.
by Missing Barry on Jan 12, 2010 1:53 PM PST up reply actions
Re: "I don’t think I’ve ever seen a more true statement in my life."
As true a statement as it is, which I’m not arguing, SO WHAT?! We live in reality, and maybe, just maybe soooooome teams would be interested in him. But…BUT, Monta’s proposal was Maggette for Lebron…MAGGETTE FOR LEBROOOOOOOOON! Hahaha That’s it…nuff said!
Geeez Louf*ckingweeez!!!
by scottiepimppen on Jan 13, 2010 9:28 AM PST up reply actions
BUT, Monta’s proposal was Maggette for Lebron
Interesting. You know, thinking about it a little more in depth, I can see where you’re coming from. Why would we give up Maggette, who’s signed for multiple more years, for Lebron, who’s only signed for this year? I think you’re right, we’re definitely better off keeping Maggette.
by Missing Barry on Jan 13, 2010 10:57 AM PST up reply actions
Oh Yes this makes total sense
they trade the best player in the NbA for Corey maggette and raja bell
I am sorry, dude are you high?
Why the hell would the Cavs do that
If the Cavs wanted to trade Lebron, don’t you think they could do better
and why would the Raptors trade Bosh for Beans
also why the hell would Minnesota just give Al Jefferson away
This is soo damn stupid
Christ you must be as high as a kite
this could so totally happen man!!!
especially if you just assign the players to the team at the beginning of the game!! like where it says manage roster or create a player!!!! what a genius i wonder why noone has thought of this before!! we must move fast, quick, to the xbox!! ok ok sarcasm aside this would never in a trillion years happen man!! id luv to see it but talk about walking on water….. next proposal!!
I think it's been adjusted to IDEALLY:
PG: Chris Paul
SG: Dwyane Wade
SF: Lebron James
PF: Chris Bosh
C: Dwight Howard
Coach: Don Nelson
Bench 1: Steph Curry
Bench 2: Anthony Randolph
Bench 3: John Wall
Bench 4: Blake Griffin
Bench 5: Al Jefferson
Bench 6: Tyreke Evans
Bench 7: Kobe Bryant (just so he doesn’t play anymore)
whatt???
what happened to monta? is he on IR?
by gogoldenbears on Jan 16, 2010 11:01 PM PST up reply actions
we traded him for ellis…. WHY aren’t you following.
by monta ellis on Jan 17, 2010 12:37 AM PST up reply actions
i think i'd fire don nelson and hire coach K
and then we’d replace the us national team with the warriors, and we would just tour the league all year as a circus.
and i think al jefferson would be great as the 11th man off the bench. now he can score efficiently.
Bellineli, Gallinari, and Radman are my heroes!!!
Monta PPG> Monta IQ
Lakers Fans= Terrible
Go C's
Giants need to sign Barry Bonds outta retirement.
why dont we
just bring red aurbach back to life and let him coach this “wet dream” team. let’s get foyle back too, for those garbage minutes, him coming in the game can be the official victory celebration of each game!
YOU KNOW WHAT?
I think we should bring back Michael Jordon to our lineup!
*Jordan
and also bring back some Larry Bird + Magic Johnson?
honestly...
you remind me of the warriors front office, i’m trying to fix the franchise while you sit there makind unhelpful remarks… MJ cannot play at a high level anymore, maybe come back to coach Wade once we get him…
did anyone else see the game tonight?
Wade handled us. Period. We have to make these trades ASAP.
You really think this type of stuff is possible?
How about we trade our whole team for the Lakers?Sound good?
Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"
Not a single Laker is good enough to make our team, sorry. Well, possibly Gasol instead of Bosh…
by Missing Barry on Jan 14, 2010 7:38 PM PST up reply actions
Other than Gasol vs. Bosh, what Laker would be good enough to crack the starting lineup on a team consisting of Chris Paul, Dwayne Wade, Lebron James, Dwight Howard, and Bosh?
by Missing Barry on Jan 15, 2010 7:13 AM PST up reply actions
Well there’s your problem right there, because it is. Kobe could come off the bench, sure, but given how good our starters are already, I think I’d rather have a lesser player that didn’t rape someone instead…
by Missing Barry on Jan 15, 2010 9:57 AM PST up reply actions
i would keep Bosh just because he has more years left in him
by monta ellis on Jan 15, 2010 11:38 AM PST up reply actions
We would already have Wade, Bron, CP3, Bosh, Howard
That’s almost too much talent already.
by Reverend_Randy on Jan 15, 2010 4:39 PM PST up reply actions
Kobe would be the 6th option...
at best… i would still dish it to Steph over him.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"
Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
Featured Stories
Most Commented
In Association With
Ball Don't Lie - NBA - Yahoo! Sport
- Days of NBA Lives: Wherein Roy Hibbert tap-dances to Maine
- Grizzlies Valentine’s Day cards are the key to love
- Kevin Love would like the NBA to take the MLB’s approach on All-Star games
- Kobe Bryant fires a few hilarious salvos at Jeremy Lin
- Brandon Jennings states the obvious regarding his 2014 free agency, everyone goes nuts
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
