Monta needs to step up and be the man by letting Curry be the man
MDB's post helped me put this thought together, so thank you for your post.
Remember when the Celtics landed Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen? Their stats went down and the Celtics won a championship because they deferred to each other and had confidence in each other. Now, the Warriors obviously do not have the talent level the Celtics had back then or have currently, but there's something to be learned here.
The Warriors' situation is different: Monta Ellis was given a contract to be the man. Then he got injured by his own doing and the team had a horrible year. The following summer, the front office probably told him and ex-Captain Jack that they would be adding more veteran players to get back to We Believe. That didn't happen and Jack decided he's had enough and worked his way out of town while Monta still had something to prove. To be the man.
He had a rocky beginning this season, even publicly displayed frustration towards Don Nelson during that practice in NY. Then people, including the mother of his child, told him to just forget everything and be the man.
His mission has lead him to become the 6th leading scorer in the league. It's also resulted in some inequitable +/- stats compared to other players of that scoring caliber resulting or not resulting in loss after loss after loss.
All the while, the "can't do it" kid, Stephen Curry, has been blossoming into one the top rookies in the league. He has proven he can run the (sinking) ship much better than Monta, despite Monta having superior statistics in almost every non-metric category (correct me if I'm wrong, I haven't checked this).
So, while the season is lost, the Warriors and more specifically, Monta Ellis, are at a cross-roads here. In one hand, Monta has been putting forth tremendous effort to shoulder the load of a injury-ridden, poorly constructed roster that reeks of ownership frugality and front office incompetency catapulting his individual level of play to All-Star worthy discussions. Who can blame him? He's only doing what he's asked to do and perhaps more.
In the other hand, we have a player in Monta who is trying to do too much for a (literally) losing cause.
Forget trade talks and coaching changes and the injury excuses. Given that there is no way another team would offer an equitable asset for ANY of our players (except Curry), we need to stop proposing trades, firing of the coach (while it may help a little), and putting a positive spin on things ala Bob "I do as Cohan says" Fitzgerald.
The most important thing that needs to happen by next season is a change in mindset by Monta Ellis.
What he needs to do is accept, embrace, and have confidence in "can't do it" Stephen Curry so he becomes "can do it."
It must be hard for Monta watching a rookie blossom into the player that everyone hoped Monta to be. Overly mature, charismatic, humble, popular with the media and the league, and comes from a high-pedigree, high-class background.
Instead of fighting it, which is apparent in Monta's body language and play on the court, Monta just needs to take a step back and realize that Stephen Curry might be the best thing since Baron Davis, if not better.
My message to Monta:
Stop being a volume scorer and go out of your way to initiate a play for Curry even if it means you don't get an assist. Swing the ball so it eventually reaches Curry in the corner or set the screen that allows Curry curl to the top of the key so either he can score or make the easy dish to Biedrins for the dunk. Salvage your energy so you can make that shot play to win the game willed purely by your freakish athletic ability or killer instinct.
I believe the Warriors will win more games if this can happen more than anything else.
Compound this with smart moves and healthier players and we may have something to cheer about again regardless of who is coaching or who owns the team. Although, Larry Ellison wouldn't hurt, sometimes you need to work backwards too; and that starts on the court with the players.
When Kevin Garnett came to the Celtics, he still let Paul Pierce be the man, even though Kevin Garnett by all virtues was the better player. Because he deferred his own ego in order to win games, he was rewarded with a championship. We can't expect a championship but I think it's not too much to ask for a few more wins. In this case, it's up to Mr. Monta Ellis.
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
199 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i like this
they’d be better if monta was working WITH him versus going off on his own.
though Curry needs to develop consistency, too.
+1
It’d be better if Monta was working with ANYONE on the team. He’s a scorer, an incredible one at that, but with that comes his flaws of making people around him better; the only person he fully trusts his Corey. Curry seems to trust who ever is open! Unfortunately, I don’t see Monta giving up the reign of the team.
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
You realize it is a COACHES RESPONSIBILITY
to decide who should have the ball….
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
It’s also a player’s responsibility to understand what assets he has on the team other than himself. Monta’s best has proven to not be good enough. He doesn’t realize that his best would be to have confidence in Curry like the entire Suns team has in Nash or the Hornets in Paul.
Am I saying Curry is like Nash and Paul? Yes, yes I am. Am I basing it on his triple-double game? No, not at all. That has nothing to do with it other than affirming that the kid can play.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 9:32 AM PST up reply actions
Thank you
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 9:41 AM PST up reply actions
I see your point, and it is interesting and debatable
You lost me at “, Stephen Curry, has been blossoming into one the top rookies in the league. He has proven he can run the (sinking) ship much better than Monta, despite Monta having superior statistics in almost every non-metric category (correct me if I’m wrong, I haven’t checked this).”
One great game by Steph hasn’t proved he can run things better then Monta.
Besides that you have some good points, but I still just don’t think Monta has much to work with. Everyone is overreacting to one great game by Steph, but he hasn’t been able to do that consistently. I really don’t have a problem with the way Monta has been playing, and actually think that he is playing great.
ALSO, even if what you are saying is true, and Monta should let Curry have more time with the ball, you’re blaming the wrong person. Nelson is the one who is telling the guys what the game plan is and he is obviously relying on Monta big time. If its best for the team to get Curry the ball more, Nelson has to implement that strategy, not Monta.
I still just don’t think Monta has much to work with
This argument has been “debunked” a number of times, and I think it just needs to die.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 13, 2010 2:26 AM PST up reply actions
What are you talking about???
How can you debunk that when he has been playing with 3 d leaguers on 10-day contracts!!!!!??!
by freerandolph on Feb 13, 2010 11:18 AM PST up reply actions
Cause he's also playing with Beans, Curry and Morrow
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 13, 2010 3:49 PM PST up reply actions
And we all know what a powerhouse those three players are, what team wouldn't want them!?!?!? (sarcasm)
by freerandolph on Feb 13, 2010 11:46 PM PST up reply actions
PLUS!!!! Beans has been injured most of the year and Morrow has for a good chunck of time.
Curry has been good, but hes been inconsistent until the past month.
by freerandolph on Feb 13, 2010 11:47 PM PST up reply actions
You don't have to run ISO plays for a player to be a reliable scorer
in fact, running ISO plays is a bad thing.
I even forgot about Maggette, who is good for 20 points a game and can create his own offense easily.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 13, 2010 11:53 PM PST up reply actions
You guys never acknowlege my points about players being injured and not that good after you say that Montas supporting cast is good...
by freerandolph on Feb 14, 2010 10:42 AM PST up reply actions
Well
Curry has played more games than Monta. Morrow and Maggette have been there basically the whole time. When he didn’t have Andris, he had Randolph. He hasn’t had everyone, but he’s had enough. Our argument(s) hinge primarily on him having 4 guys that can be legit, and he’s had at least 3 of them at any time, except these past week or so.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 14, 2010 6:03 PM PST up reply actions
Ok you're just not actually stating the facts here.
I was going to find the numbers but I can’t seem to, and I don’t want to spend too much time on this. I would be interested to see the actual numbers but these are my estimations.
Magette has missed 5 games
Morrow has missed 8 games
Beans missed 14
Ronny missed 12
Randolph missed 10
BW out whole season
Buike out most of the season
So those are some estimates on the key players who are Monta’s supporting cast.
I feel silly now cause I have no idea if my numbers are correct… haha.
Someone who knows how to find out the right numbers should, but I don’t think my numbers are outrageously far off…
by freerandolph on Feb 15, 2010 8:33 PM PST up reply actions
Huh
now, which of those estimations directly contradicts what I said?
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 15, 2010 9:40 PM PST up reply actions
hmmm
MDB, how do you know what freerandolph wants? You, rev randy and missing barry are totally ganging up on him, and it’s totally weak. I can’t believe that there are people that think the warriors have credible offensive players surrounding monta. the team sucks really bad. 5 less shots for monta? that means the team doesn’t suck as bad??
"We're Menudo," -BB
You, rev randy and missing barry are totally ganging up on him
I can’t believe that there are people that think the warriors have credible offensive players surrounding monta. the team sucks really bad. 5 less shots for monta? that means the team doesn’t suck as bad??
It might be because there has been a lot of credible evidence presented that yes, we do have credible offensive players around Monta (at least at times), and that yes, them shooting more and Monta shooting less probably will make us a better team. Not good, but better than we’ve currently done. Like the fanpost “The True Monta Ellis”, for instance. We have guys who score more points per shot than Monta – so we should try to create more shots for them, and less shots for a guy who’s scoring less points per shot than them. I really don’t see where the opposition to this idea comes from…
by Missing Barry on Feb 17, 2010 8:44 AM PST up reply actions
The opposition for me comes from the fact that this is mostly the coaches fault and not Monta’s fault.
Nelson is putting Monta in a position he shouldn’t be in, in a position to fail. Monta is not a PG nor is he someone who should be the primary ball handler. He also should not be being forced to take last second shots when no one else can initiate an offense.
I GUARANTEE the efficiency and per shot point totals will go up significantly for Monta once Nelson realizes that Monta is best utilized by having him off the ball and have Curry at the point rather than making Monta make plays for himself and others.
Monta is not the best passer by any means, and his vision is not even good once he starts his iso moves. He is best used off the ball where he can slash up a defense, he becomes far more unguardable than having him go 3v1.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
I’m not concerned with who is at fault, it just has to change.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 17, 2010 6:19 PM PST up reply actions
I don't see how what I'm doing is ganging up on him
I just think that you disagree with us and want to make us out as the bad guy.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 17, 2010 6:18 PM PST up reply actions
Great point Rev. We aren’t being mean, we just disagree, and put out a fact/logic based argument as to why we think that way.
banned like chris andersen
You guys have some good points, but you're exageratting to make your points
If you think Monta should shoot less, fine. Thats a valid oppinion, and I might even agree with that. I don’t think it will make us much better, but maybe a little bit. BUT, I just don’t like it when people blame Monta. Its the coaches that come up with game plan, and Monta has been playing his heart out for this team. I just want him to get some respect for that. Its ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS to argue anything then that Monta has had a terrible and often changing supporting cast this season though. Your points can still be valid without that being true though, so you can stick to feeling Monta takes too many shots and acknowledge that his supporting cast straight up has sucked this season.
by freerandolph on Feb 21, 2010 4:19 AM PST up reply actions
As I always say
I’m not concerned with who is at fault, it just has to change.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 21, 2010 5:20 PM PST up reply actions
Monta has been playing his heart out ...
… but he’d be helping us more if he was playing with his head a bit more.
You can’t blame the game plan when the team runs a rotation designed to get Morrow an open look, Morrow is wide open, and Monta chooses to shoot one on three instead.
That’s not the coaches fault (except insomuch as they should bench him for it so he realizes he needs to stop doing it). It’s his fault.
And he does it all the time.
You can not blame your supporting cast when you have one of the league’s best 3-pt shooters open at the 3-point line and you don’t pass him the ball.
well...
First of all, I disagree with your assessment of the above situation as being an adequate supporting cast for Monta.
Second of all I think you made it sound like Morrow and Mags haven’t missed as many games as they have.
Third, you made it sound like having Randolph (when Beans, Turiaf and Wright were injured) should have made those injuries not be a big deal, which I disagree with. Also, its not even true!!!!!!!!! Randolph and Beans have both been injured for quite a few games.
by freerandolph on Feb 21, 2010 4:13 AM PST up reply actions
Randolph and Beans have both been injured
but, more often than not, we had at least one of them. There were several games at the beginning of the season where we had neither. Then we got Randolph back for a long while, then we got Andris back before Randolph wrecked his ankle.
I disagree with your assessment
What’s so bad about these other players? They’re all pretty good at putting the ball in the hole.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 21, 2010 5:22 PM PST up reply actions
sometimes... but there is much more to the game then that anyway...
For one, defense. Defense is half the game…
Are you really saying that D-Leaguers like Hunter Toliver and Karl, along with Vlad, and George who have all got significant playing time this season aren’t that bad… You could even add CJ to that list. He has had a few good games lately but hasn’t been very good overall this season. These players have been decent and have had their moments and I don’t mean any disrespect to them for giving a great effort. But they’re about as bad as NBA players get…
by freerandolph on Feb 24, 2010 12:56 AM PST up reply actions
Are you really saying that D-Leaguers like Hunter Toliver and Karl, along with Vlad, and George who have all got significant playing time this season aren’t that bad…
am I really saying what? I never mentioned those players, by the way. I was focusing on the actual good offensive players that we do have, like Curry and Maggette, and the competent finishers we have.
For one, defense. Defense is half the game…
Okay… but we’re only talking about offense. I don’t see how that is relevenat.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 24, 2010 1:17 AM PST up reply actions
I thought
we were just talking about Monta’s supporting cast in general. And I though we were talking about how good the team is and how good Monta is, which would include defense not just offense.
Nobody is saying Curry/Biedrins/Morrow are amazing players. What we are saying is that they have valuable offensive skills and replacing a few of Monta’s low percentage shots with their high percentage shots will make us a better team.
by Missing Barry on Feb 14, 2010 9:11 PM PST up reply actions
I just don't think its that simple is all...
I think if those players were relied upon too much more heavily their numbers would start getting worse. Its worth a try though.
by freerandolph on Feb 15, 2010 8:34 PM PST up reply actions
And I agree if they were relied on too much, they’d struggle, but that’s why I’m only talking a couple extra shots for them. Take Biedrins, for example. This year he’s averaging 8.7 points per 36 minutes. Last year he averaged 14.2 on pretty equal efficiency. He was taking 4+ more shots per 36 minutes last year, and we’ve added Curry and Monta and lost Jackson. It doesn’t seem it should be too hard to get him 2 more shots, or even 4 more shots a game. So that’s the premise – Monta is taking a lot of difficult shots, other guys, while limited, do have very useful skills….instead of Monta taking tough shots, he should be looking to take advantage of what guys like Morrow, Curry and Biedrins bring – an ability to finish (Biedrins inside, the other 2 outside) if Monta just gets them the ball.
by Missing Barry on Feb 15, 2010 9:20 PM PST up reply actions
One great game by Steph hasn’t proved he can run things better then Monta.
I didn’t once mention his triple-double game. I just said Curry has been blossoming into a really good player, a top rookie. I wouldn’t say that based on one great game. He’s consistently shown that he can handle the PG duties and he has the maturity and the smarts to take on a bigger role than Monta. Monta just needs to realize this.
Nellie realizes this and has continually praised Curry’s game, saying he’s the smartest player he has.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 9:35 AM PST up reply actions
ALSO, even if what you are saying is true, and Monta should let Curry have more time with the ball, you’re blaming the wrong person. Nelson is the one who is telling the guys what the game plan is and he is obviously relying on Monta big time. If its best for the team to get Curry the ball more, Nelson has to implement that strategy, not Monta.
I don’t disagree with you but if you watch the games closely, Monta will affirmatively NOT pass the ball to Curry several times throughout the course of a game. Not only does Curry put others in great positions he also puts himself in great positions to score. His hands are always ready to catch and shoot. Morrow is similar but Curry is actually better at putting himself in a position to score. He’s quicker and faster and understands how to use screens more effectively than Morrow.
All that being said, sure, it may be up to Nellie instruct Monta to find his other players, but Monta’s instincts are to score first. A lot of his assists come from the fact that his first option to score has failed and he has to pass the ball.
Monta can also help Curry by trusting Curry that he’ll get him the ball IF Monta puts himself in that position. Again, I believe Curry is better at putting himself in a position to score off a pass.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 9:39 AM PST up reply actions
"One great game by Steph"
Curry, 21, started all 15 games in January, averaging 19.1 points, 4.4 rebounds, 5.1 assists and 2.00 steals in 39.5 minutes per contest, while shooting 48.0% (109-227 FG) from the field, 48.6% (36-74 3FG) from three-point range and 89.2% (33-37 FT) from the line. Among Western Conference rookies last month, he ranked second in scoring, first in assists, first in steals, first in minutes, second in three-point percentage, third in field goal percentage, third in free throw percentage and fifth in rebounding.
by randolphforpresident on Feb 13, 2010 1:29 PM PST up reply actions
Nelson has to implement that strategy, not Monta.
Coaching is a part, but players are the ones ultimately making the decisions out on the court. Monta has some responsibility for decisions that are made on the court….
by Missing Barry on Feb 14, 2010 9:12 PM PST up reply actions
Monta’s game is kind of built for being “the man.” For example, he doesn’t have good range- he can’t stretch the floor, limiting his effectiveness off the ball. Another thing I’ve noticed is his shot- high lift, slow release. Whereas Curry finds space for a lot of open midrange jumpers, Monta’s jumpers are almost always contested. His point guard instincts are suspect as well. People say “Monta should find Morrow when he’s open” but Monta’s not Steve Nash- his pass will take longer to get there and Morrow probably won’t be open anymore; now Morrow’s got the ball in the corner with the clock winding down.
I don’t know what to make of Monta. 6’3 shooting guards without 3-point range aren’t exactly a hot commodity in the NBA. On the other hand, he can play (or the Mavs wouldn’t be running 2 defenders at him when he crosses halfcourt). Maybe a sixth man role?
If this is what his game is built for
then he has no business playing in the NBA. If he has has to be the best player on his team, he’ll never accomplish anything.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 13, 2010 3:08 AM PST up reply actions
There are lots of first-option type dudes in the NCAA; 99% of them have to take on different roles in the NBA. Monta’s obviously good enough to play in the league as he is. At the worst he can be a better Nate Robinson/Ben Gordon type (which isn’t saying much). I’m just skeptical as to how playing him in a full-time support role (whatever that entails) will work out.
If his ego could take it, I’d love to see Monta as the a 30-35 minute, instant-offense 6th man.
Curry
Morrow
Evan Turner (with a little luck; if not Azubuike)
Randolph
Biedrins
—
6th man: Monta
7th-10th men: Maggette, Wright, Turiaf, Azubuike (or first-round pick)
I’ll keep saying it: not a terrible-looking team.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Feb 13, 2010 4:53 AM PST up reply actions
Theres no way in h e double l
that Monta would be cool with being a sixth man! It’s very simple, for us to win Monta has to become more of a team player. He’s surrounded by scorers on this team at every spot except C. He either needs to realize that and start moving the ball better or if he shows an unwillingness to do so by seasons end then we should look into moving him to another team. Here’s the thing though, if we wait till seasons end it’s gonna be hard to get a usefull player for him and impossible to get cap space either, if we find a way to let him go now even if we can’t get a usefull player in return we can at a minimum get 11 mill in cap space that we can choose to use or not use this offseason. We can keep Maggs and use him as our 6th man next year while allowing a core of Curry, Morrow, Buike, Randolph/Wright, and Beans to grow together. We’re most likely looking at a top 3 pick so Cousins or Turner should be available for us. That gives us Maggs, Turiaf, Cousins/Turner, Wright/Randolph, and Watson/FA backup PG to work with. That would be a very fun team to watch that would work very well together then during/after next season we will know what needs to be addressed for us to make the next step. We are too young as a whole to be expecting playoffs next season so we should be focused on gaining chemistry as a group and the wins will come as our experience grows.
Surrounded by scorers?
If by “scorer” you mean “guy who can score efficiently” then I guess he is surrounded by scorers (though I don’t know why you would exclude Biedrins). But the guys he’s surrounded by aren’t scorers in the traditional sense. Morrow, AR, and Beans aren’t guys who can go out and get buckets on their own- that’s just not their skillset. On the other hand, it’s probably not Monta’s game to be the setup man that they need. So it may just be a case of square peg/round hole.
If Monta dutifully feeds AR in the post, or swings it to Morrow to work 1 on 1, he is being less of a team player, not more.
My bad
guess i should have said players with the ability to score? Yes scorers! Curry, Buike, Morrow, Maggette can score 20+ points on any given night, AR4 was getting there before he got hurt. Being a scorer doesn’t mean you have to be good at creating your own shot. It means that given the opportunity to get shots that play to your strengths, that you are able to convert on your opportunities. Monta’s game doesn’t make any of his teammates better! That’s the biggest concern right now. There are serious questions as to whether or not Monta fits with the rest of the team. He’s the only one who never seems happy when he makes a play for a teammate. The only player he’s really cool with is Maggs, but everyone on the team is cool with Maggs.
Yes scorers! Curry, Buike, Morrow, Maggette can score 20+ points on any given night
This is a cliche that needs to die.
Being a scorer doesn’t mean you have to be good at creating your own shot. It means that given the opportunity to get shots that play to your strengths, that you are able to convert on your opportunities.
If you define “scorer” like that you take most of the meaning out of the word. Biedrins becomes a “scorer.” Jason Kapono becomes a “scorer.” It becomes rather hard to find an NBA player who’s not a “scorer.” It’s more useful to define “scorer” as “someone who can create for himself.”
Monta’s game doesn’t make any of his teammates better! That’s the biggest concern right now. There are serious questions as to whether or not Monta fits with the rest of the team.
I guess we’re in agreement here. But whereas you blame it on Monta not being “cool” with teammates, I think it’s more likely that he’s just not such a natural point.
He's not running the Point!
Curry is but Monta makes sure he gets the most touches and Curry being a rookie can’t do much about it. Of course Biedrins and Kapono could get 20 points if given the ball enough but they’re not considered scorers because their not counted on to score that much, although I would consider Kapono a scorer because he sucks at everything else. My definition of a “scorer” is a player who first off is a better scorer than anything else and is expected to score more so than distribute, rebound, block shots, be a defensive stopper. Morrow and Maggs are simply scorers cause it’s what they do best. Curry, Buike, and Randolph can all do more than just score, but the fact is though that any one of them could lead the team in scoring on any given night. So yes we have SCORERS, your “cliche” as you call it can not be a cliche when it’s a fact.
He’s not running the Point!
I guess I meant “natural passer” instead of “natural point.” Who is running the point is more of a semantics issue.
My definition of a "scorer" is a player who first off is a better scorer than anything else
The way I’ve usually heard it used is for a player who can score on his own without help, like Al Jefferson, Ben Gordon, JR Smith, etc. Your definition is valid but it specifies a whole different set of players. “Scorer” is kind of a silly word anyway, since the meaning is so ambiguous that everyone interprets it differently so it ends up meaning nothing at all.
So yes we have SCORERS, your "cliche" as you call it can not be a cliche when it’s a fact.
Sure it’s a fact that different players can lead the team in scoring. The cliche is in extrapolating some kind of significant conclusion from this fact (which is true for pretty much any team) regarding the structure of the offense. It’s a cliche because people bring this up constantly: “he’s a threat to drop 20 every night!” Yet this says almost nothing about the player himself or how he should be used. Most cliches are, in fact, true- they’re still cliches.
The only point this post
is trying to make is that Monta needs to allow Curry to shoulder more responsibility. If monta would realize the fact that he has “scorers” all around him we’d be a better team. The same goes for Maggette, too much individual, not enough team play.
It’s more useful to define "scorer" as "someone who can create for himself."
You’re right but I think there are players who don’t have the “tangible” abilities such as ball handling and athletic ability that can be labeled a scorer too. Remember Reggie Miller? He’s someone who found his own shot but not with the ball in his hands. He came off screens better than anyone. The way he got himself open was an art.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 11:43 PM PST up reply actions
When a PG has TWO of the best shooters in the NBA and only averages
5.4 ast. in 42 minutes something is wrong with him.
When we say PG
we really mean ballhandler. Someone on here (onlxn?) figured out that Monta handles the ball on great majority of possessions.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 14, 2010 6:09 PM PST up reply actions
not a terrible-looking team.
offensively, but that is a terrible looking defensive team. turner being a rookie will definitely be a liability in team defense and thus far the other 4 have not shown themselves to be good NBA defenders. and switching Monta for Morrow won’t help that.
depends on how good Turner is, but that team still is probably 11-13 in the west. the Clippers have played without Blake Griffin this season and could be scary if they were to win the rights to Wall. unless Gay leaves, Memphis is probably better.
by homer simpson on Feb 13, 2010 12:38 PM PST up reply actions
DEFENSE? Were talking about defense with a Nellie led team?
Anyways that team would never be because Monta will never consent to being a sixth man.
? i’m just saying that the idea that the above is not a terrible looking team is not true in terms of defense.
and Nellie has had plenty of good defensive teams – he’s had 14 teams that were in the upper half of the NBA in terms of defensive rating (although 8 were during his stint with the Bucks). Still, even some of his recent teams have at least been 16th through 23rd or something like that – not good, but certainly not the atrocious defense that a Curry, Monta or Morrow, Rookie, AR & AB defense will probably end up being.
and i did write “switch Monta for Morrow”.
by homer simpson on Feb 13, 2010 5:12 PM PST up reply actions
Either way
any team that Monta is on that does not have an above average defender at the point and SF is not gonna be very good defensively. With the players we have we need to be more concerned with offensive efficiency than defense anyways. Unfortunately we don’t have any non bigs that will ever be much defensively. AR4 and AB could form a real nice defensive tandem down low when Randolph gains “adult” strength. He’s still 2 years away though.
I’d love to see Monta as the a 30-35 minute, instant-offense 6th man.
I feel the exact opposite of this. Monta is a horrible 6th man candidate. If you’re expecting your 6th man to come off the bench and play relatively more of his minutes alongside other backups, where his role is to be the primary option during that time, I don’t ever want to see Monta doing that. That’s exactly what he’s doing right now, and it’s not effective. I’d rather have Monta out on the floor with our best distributor/ball handler, playing off the ball, where we’ve already seen how effective he can be (when he was playing next to Baron).
by Missing Barry on Feb 14, 2010 9:15 PM PST up reply actions
Monta’s game is kind of built for being "the man." For example, he doesn’t have good range- he can’t stretch the floor, limiting his effectiveness off the ball.
I don’t know where this is coming from, considering Monta’s best year came when he played off the ball. He’s one of the best offball offensive players in the NBA. He moves well, he cuts well, he finishes well off his cuts. He has a quick release on his jumper (though it doesn’t seem like it because he elevates on it as much as he does). There are many ways to be effective off the ball – shooting 3’s is the obvious one, but what Monta lacks in that department he makes up for with some of the better off ball smarts in the NBA. He knows how to play, and be effective, in that role.
by Missing Barry on Feb 14, 2010 9:19 PM PST up reply actions
Wow, this post seems like a nicer, more coherent version of my post.
Rec.
banned like chris andersen
Dude, you know what, I woke up this morning thinking back about your post and realized that my post may seem plagiarized. That was totally not my intention and I apologize for even appearing that way. Either way, your post helped some in formulating my post. So, we’ll just call it a collaborative effort. Besides, your thread is more popular. LOL
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 10:24 AM PST up reply actions
No, yours is fine. They do have the same point/formatting but yours is well done. If mine helped you formulate the idea, its no problem. No plagiarizing that i can see.
banned like chris andersen
I edited my post at the top to reflect this.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 10:35 AM PST up reply actions
Cool.
Back on the topic.
I’ve seen way too many players be efficient scorers and low turnover guys, then the team wants them to be the man, and the player loses his understanding of what made him great, and starts to become a low efficiency, high volume player.
I don’t think we are going to be able to reverse this course of thought by Monta and our F.O.
Only way i see it improve is trading Monta when his value is sky high for an actual ‘star’, or trade for someone who has the reputation of a star, and then maybe Monta backs off . This player doesn’t need to be a top 10 player, but maybe someone with this reputation. Not sure who this would be, but that is how it look’s in MDB’s world.
banned like chris andersen
Agreed
Posted almost exactly my thoughts as well.
I do not know how much success a Curry-Ellis backcourt can have in the future, but for right now, I think it can be much better with Curry the primary ball handler. IIRC, the Dallas game had Curry handling the ball a lot, and we looked good until the very end.
So let me get this straight... Maggette is the healthy guy.
"Winning is not enough. All others must lose." - Larry Ellison
It's the coaches problem
DON NELSON is the one that tells Monta to control the ball.
DON NELSON is the one that tells Monta to shoot a lot.
DON NELSON is the one that tells the team to pass to Monta when there is 10 sec left if they haven’t found their shot so he can make one.
DON NELSON is the one that tells Monta to bring the ball up.
The coach is the one responsible for what a player does….
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
We all know Nellie sucks
but until Cohan is gone Nellie will still be here.
Then don't blame Monta...blame Cohan or Nelson...
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Feb 13, 2010 11:36 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Strongly agree with LostHawk on this one.
by freerandolph on Feb 13, 2010 2:31 PM PST up reply actions
I aint blaming Monta
he’s just playing his game. The thing is it doesn’t mesh with the players around him. He needs to be the focal point of an offense while playing with strong defenders at the point and sf who look to create shots rather than look for their own shot. Curry is a scorer who is also a very good PG who’s shown to be a pass first PG. Problem with that is Curry is more efficient with the ball in his hands than Monta while Monta needs the ball in his hands to be effective. So this is what you get when you mix 2 guards who are at their best when the ball is in their hands, the difference is Monta has below average passing skills/vision(or at least thats what he wants us to believe based on his TO/shot selection) so he hurts Steph’s game with his. Monta was right when he said they couldn’t play together, he just didn’t know that the offensive end would be as much of the problem as the defensive end.
Monta isn't actually best with the ball in his hands
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 13, 2010 3:55 PM PST up reply actions
He isn't the best decision maker
with the ball in his hands but he is a 1 on 1 player whose instincts are to attack the rim or take the jumper. He’s a very good scorer who just needs the ball in his hands less to be more efficient but still needs the ball in his hands to do what he do. Nonetheless he has not shown a willingness to take a backseat to Curry so he either needs to adjust his game accordingly or we have to make a move. He wants to be “the man” but the way this team is constructed him being “the man” is counter-productive. Actually he may not want to be the man but Nellie and the organization are asking him to be and he is failing miserably. 26-5-5-2 but not selected as an All-Star by the coaches! That should tell us and him something!
26-5-5-2 but not selected as an All-Star by the coaches! That should tell us and him something!
It should tell us that per game averages without the appropriate context aren’t that useful. It should tell us that 26ppg doesn’t help a team win when it takes 22 shots to get the 26 points, and that 5 assists in 42 minutes played from a guard with the ball in his hands much of the time isn’t all that impressive especially if it comes with a side order of 4 turnovers. But I fear that for most it doesn’t tell us that, and the real reason was just that the Warriors stink. However, part of the reason the Warriors stink is because of those extenuating circumstances around the 26-5-5-2. If he scored 26 on 19 shots and had 5 assists with only 2 turnovers, we’d be a better team. It’s not entirely his fault, but his 26-5-5-2 aren’t really making us a whole lot better either.
The way he’s getting his 26-5-5-2 suggests that if everyone on the team played about that level, the team would lose 75% of their games. Lo-and-behold! This suggests that he’s not dragging us down much from what we’d be without him, but it’s also not like he’s out there playing winning basketball and being sabotaged by his teammates.
It does tell everyone that
his numbers aren’t equating to wins period. Which is why he’s not an All-Star. Yes the injuries have been overwhelming but he’s not playing team ball and the coaches around the league know that. For the Warriors to get better he has to understand that less is more when it comes to his shot selection and decision making. I’m hoping he can figure that out but not holding my breath.
They (analysts) are saying to the uneducated public that if Monta had help, that he would be in this game. I’m surprised none of them are saying,
Maybe Ellis doesn’t deserve to be there because, maybe he doesn’t help the team win games.
Its creating a lot of people with uneducated opinions thinking Monta is a star on a terrible team, when its more like, he’s on a decent team, and he’s hurting them.
banned like chris andersen
Monta plays best off the ball...period.
He showed that with Baron.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
i think you are underestimating how good of a point guard Baron Davis is.
If you think simply playing him off ball will help, i’m not sure it will. Unless we have an amazing playmaker, i’m not sold it’s going to work.
I’m also very concerned with how little chemistry and friendship there appears to be between Monta and Steph. It seems like Curry is always laughing with everyone, then with Ellis, he immediately calms down, and starts acting like he is under pressure. It seems like the only guy Monta tends to associate himself with, is Corey Maggette. I don’t think you need to be good friends with your teammates, but you all have to get along, and have some comradarie.
banned like chris andersen
i think you are underestimating how good of a point guard Baron Davis is.
Maybe, but I also think you’re undestimating how good Monta is off the ball…
by Missing Barry on Feb 14, 2010 9:21 PM PST up reply actions
I disagree. A coach instructs his player on what he should do. Then the player decides how to channel that instruction. I do not think Monta is given the green light for everything. I think team basketball is emphasized, as much as many people won’t accept that any coaching whatsoever is happening in GSW land. I think Monta understands this but once he’s on the court, he lets his instincts get the better of him.
He thinks:
1) he is the fastest player in the league
2) that he can score 50 points on any given night
3) he is the leader of the team
Because of these reasons, he is using his God given ability to score. When the opportunity to score isn’t there, he is forced to pass. He doesn’t pass because it’s the right play. He does it because it’s the only play. Not every play, but a lot of plays. IMO.
Not everything falls on the coach. Some things can be and should be remedied without coaching.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 12:12 PM PST up reply actions
Just because I’m saying doesn’t mean I think Nellie is the right coach for this team. There are many variables, but my post is pointing to one that is being overlooked.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 12:13 PM PST up reply actions
Here's the problem:
Monta is making a decision, on his drives, to shoot instead of to pass, despite the fact that he’s going 1-on-3 and other guys are open.
Now, maybe he doesn’t have the ability to make that pass. But I really doubt that Nellie has ever told him, “DOn’t pass to the open man, go 1-on-3 instead.”
Nellie deserves plenty of blame for the mess the Warriors have become … but Monta is not blameless here.
Are you serious? Other than providing the structure of a system, the decision making is all on the players. For example, no coach advocates pull up 3’s, but plenty of guys take them. The staff has even mentioned in the past they didn’t allow Monta to shoot in practice in order to increase his vision and this season they’ve supposedly pointed out via film to Monta instances where guys are open.
If anything your argument should be that Don Nelson gives his players too much freedom within his system. According to Tolbert’s conversation on knbr with Curry, Hardaway was even allowed to call plays at times to speed up their attack (instead of looking to the bench for the call every time). When they understand their limits, guys like Jack & Monta flourish with that freedom – only when they try to do too much does that freedom start bringing negative returns.
But no coach controls players – this is especially true in the NBA where the players make more money & have more real power than the coach (b/c it’s so much easier to fire the coach than the players).
This is the reverse of 06-07 when everyone thought Nellie was coaching great but all he really did was play Andris over Foyle and Barnes, Pietrus & Monta cut into Dunleavy, Murphy & an injured JRich’s time. The real coaching atrocity this season (also committed by Keith Smart) was playing Mikki (and to a lesser extent Vlad) over Randolph (& to some extent Hunter) when AB, RT & BW were out.
I’m okay with that b/c despite what happened with Joe Smith & Dunleavy, this team needs to stop picking in the 6-14 range & start picking in the 1-5 range if they’re ever going to be anything more than a fringe playoff team (not that it can’t be done – just stating the obvious – that it’s a lot easier to find superstars at the top).
by homer simpson on Feb 13, 2010 2:02 PM PST up reply actions
Not true at all
Even on a team like the Warriors a lot of plays are called by the coach. Also, the players follow a game plan and practice certain things. If the team runs iso plays for Monta then he is going to shoot a lot. If the team gave the ball to Curry more or ran more plays for Curry then he would get more shots and have the ball more.
Monta does make decisions on his drives, but Monta is the kind of player who is going to shoot most of the time when he drives. Unless its a set play where a spot up shooter is going to be open, I don’t think its really that easy to find open players on drives.
by freerandolph on Feb 13, 2010 2:35 PM PST up reply actions
Which part isn't true at all?
His whole post?
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 13, 2010 3:56 PM PST up reply actions
Also, the players follow a game plan and practice certain things.
no, it’s not like football where you install a game plan over the course of a week. game plans are put in during shoot around. most times you don’t have time to install anything elaborate. it’s a how are you going to defend them & how they tend to defend certain things. sometimes they point out where might the other team might be vulnerable (mismatches, what areas on the floor that teams give up open shots from, etc – but it’s mostly going over the scouting report).
that’s also why a lot of vets can skip shoot around b/c it sounds like most of them understand defensive principles (which primarily involve rotations) & have an understanding for what their game is and where their shots are going to come from.
it’s all amazingly vanilla. where head coaches really earn their stripes is in the playoffs where they can actually prepare & adjust to a certain team.
I don’t think its really that easy to find open players on drives.
? of course it is, that’s one of the big advantages of having a system – to know where your teammates should be based on how the defense reacted to your drive.
btw, i’m not sure you understand what an iso play is. a two man game between Corey & Monta is not an iso. when they swing the ball back to Monta on the weak side from strong side action is also not a true iso – since their is that initial ball/screen action in order to get the defense moving & discombobulate their rotations.
and plenty of iso plays like post ups or drives are designed to create an open shot for a teammate when the initial player is doubled.
by homer simpson on Feb 13, 2010 4:57 PM PST up reply actions
Nellies been an atrocious head coach besides one series.
where head coaches really earn their stripes is in the playoffs where they can actually prepare & adjust to a certain team.
Nellie has given himself 4 years of coaching security by simply doing a great job for a week and half by gameplanning against Dirk and Co.
banned like chris andersen
coaching in the reg. season is really about who you play & for how many minutes. other than that coaches don’t matter.
Nellies been an atrocious head coach besides one series.pretty much. though did help in 06-07 b/c he played Andris over Foyle, cut a guaranteed to keep Barnes & cut into Murphleavy & Diogu’s mins with Barnes, MP & ME. also, pretty safe to assume that Mullin wouldn’t have traded those 3 had Nellie not come to the conclusion that they sucked.
in 07-08, he was largely ineffectual. should have played Wright more (but there aren’t many coaches (if any) that would’ve played him under those circumstances). don’t buy the high minutes whining of most fans since BD was barely 5th in mins, Monta was 11 & Jack was 31. the highest triumvirate, DH, Shard & Turk were fine. anyway, probably didn’t matter, but if it did and they got the 8th seed, they’d be picking 20th and would have lost out on Randolph.
he starts losing it from here, but oddly, his sub-par coaching has actually continued to help the team in the grand scheme of things.
in 08-09, again did not play BW enough & made the mistake of playing Corey at the 4 while also playing Jack at the 3. That combo was a disaster & probably cost them. getting Jamal for Al probably cost them some wins too. but Al would have been gone after this season anyway & it’s not like the W’s would have got anything for his expiring. Anyway instead of winning somewhere near 40 games, they stunk, allowing them to pick 7th instead of picking 13th?( just below PHX who won 45 games), netting Curry instead of James Johnson or Earl Clark. Morrow, Kurz & Demarcus would probably never make the roster under most other coaches (hard to believe, but KAz couldn’t make the Cavs or Rockets rosters).
in 09-10, biggest atrocity was playing Mikki & Vlad over Randolph & to a lesser extent Hunter & yeah he doesn’t play AB enough & plays Monta too much – but again, what does this change? 22 wins instead of 27? anyway it should help them get a better player (hopefully the superstar this team so desperately needs).
at worst he’s here for 10-11, but i’d be shocked if the W’s were anywhere close to the playoffs. even if 2 teams slip, Houston & New Orleans are waiting (especially with Yao returning). Memphis is decent & if Blake Griffin really is an athletic Boozer, the Clips will also be improved.
by homer simpson on Feb 13, 2010 9:56 PM PST up reply actions
I’m being honest. Its hard to say him costing us the playoffs wasn’t a big deal. Lets say we lost in 6, 7 games to the Lakers that season ( we were only 7 games behind them in the standings), i would still have thoroughly enjoyed that much more than getting Randolph. Maybe BD stays, Wright starts to get more minutes, Al becomes 6th man, Biedrins becomes better. For a team that never makes the playoffs to make it back to back years would be great for the fans. Maybe Nelson would have retired after that ( hooray!) .
Logic vs. Heart ….. i don’t know which one i would take.
banned like chris andersen
if you look again i stated “in the grand scheme of things”, but more so than coaching your anger should be directed at Mullin for trading JRich for Wright which was the biggest factor in that season or Rowell if he really vetoed a Mike Miller for the exception like TK claims – though it doesn’t guarantee they make the playoffs either. depends how they would’ve played and who they were in for.
like i posted above, BD was 5th overall in minutes – it’s not like he was playing unheard of minutes (most guys play more + playoff minutes and are fine), Monta was 11th & Jack 31st. there’s no guarantee they would have been fresher (especially since their losses on MLK vs Twolves & whatnot coincided with BD & crew partying the night before) and won more games at the end. just like there was no guarantee that they wouldn’t have lost more games earlier on had they rested. personally, i think it was a pretty lame excuse. Denver was just better (the stats on bball-reference say they were equivalent to a 51 win team & the W’s to a 47 win team).
by homer simpson on Feb 15, 2010 1:06 AM PST up reply actions
coaching in the reg. season is really about who you play & for how many minutes. other than that coaches don’t matter.
Its pretty significant though.
banned like chris andersen
it can be, but often isn’t – and in the dubs case it hasn’t been.
by homer simpson on Feb 15, 2010 12:52 AM PST up reply actions
Unless its a set play where a spot up shooter is going to be open, I don’t think its really that easy to find open players on drives.
How often do you watch guys like Chris Paul and Steve Nash? Or Rondo? Players that drive effectively, have their head up looking to pass (Monta does not do this at all)…..once they beat their man, open shooters start popping up all over the place. It’s basic basketball strategy – beat your guy, defense rotates, someones open.
If the team runs iso plays for Monta then he is going to shoot a lot.
Sure, on an iso, but iso’s are a losing strategy and rarely get employed because it’s a crappy play. 1 on 1 basketball is losing basketball. It can be effective with someone like Maggette at times, but it’s still not as common as you think, and not that many players can do it often effectively. On other plays, just because a play is “called for you” (which is misleading, as set plays have multiple options since the defense can take away any one option anytime they choose and it’s a read and react to the defense going through the options – think of a QB going through his progressions in football), doesn’t mean you have to shoot it. You can still pass if a guys open and you aren’t.
by Missing Barry on Feb 14, 2010 9:26 PM PST up reply actions
Great Post
I have been saying this since day one, the only way they could appease Monta was to try to say it was his team, and if you watched him in first two years he was ignored by Barron and Jack, he had to earn everything….and that’s the way he’s treating Curry.
Monta needs to understand he’s not a PG and can’t see the whole floor and abdicate in a little more in every game to Curry, we need Monta to understand Curry needs him until the transition is complete….It will take this season to get there and by next year the team will start to gel…
Anyone notice in the rook game how Curry conforms to his role rather than exert himself? this is what he’s been doing all year with Monta, it’s not in his nature to take the keys from anyone, he will wait until there given him…so it’s up to Nelson and Monta to allow him to ease into that leadership role for the sake of the whole team…
You could see in summer league that Curry was going to be the floor leader, he controls the tempo and looks to make others around him better, so we give him this year to make the transition without trying to put all the pressure on his shoulders for now…this is where Monta can help..
These guys that say he had one good game in Monta absence just don’t have an eye for talent, this game demands one’s ability to assess talent, you don’t have the luxury of waiting to see the fruit on the tree, you have to see it in the bud long before it matues…
“Kid Curry” by next year will be able to carry this team and Monta will still get his numbers…
No what I have noticed in combo back courts in the NBA between a rook and a vet?
That the vet feels as though he has to do everything, most vets do this. Baron even did it to Monta. We should have saw this coming. Nellie doesn’t trust rooks to much and vets want to be the man and never want to say " this rookie is the guy". Next year will be different. It’s a mindset of establishing dominance, but it’s also a mindset that doesn’t last very long
Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"
Lost
We all know Nelson pulls most of the strings,but it’s obvious he don’t want to offend Monta, he’s been biding his time until Curry matures…
But Monta himself needs to understand his real role and allow Curry to emerge as the floor leader…Nelson knows Curry is on his way to being the leader of this team, but he also understands it takes time and you want a smooth transition, Monta just needs to understand that Curry is going to be the floor leader by next year and help him ease into that role…
but it’s obvious he don’t want to offend Monta
you know this, how?
Nelson is lazy. He plays a dumb form of ball, where he wants quick shots if it’s in the half court. The highest percentage player for a quick shot where he can make his own shot is Monta. Anything else would require actual coaching.
THE COACH CONTROLS EVERYTHING THE PLAYERS DO. HE CAN SAY WHAT SHOULD BE DONE. Look at other teams, they are willing to leave their best player high and dry if they don’t do what the coach says.
If Nelson is really worried about what Monta thinks, THEN ITS NELSONS FAULT. HE IS THE COACH.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Feb 13, 2010 11:56 AM PST up reply actions
Your argument is based on too many absolutes. A coach coaches. He doesn’t control.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 12:16 PM PST up reply actions
wtf is coaching if its not controlling!?!?!
Nellie chooses plays to run, he has the team practice certain things, he comes up with a game plan and tells the players what style of play they are going to play. The coach chooses all those things. Thats what coaching is! I’d say that sounds like a lot of control to me.
by freerandolph on Feb 13, 2010 2:36 PM PST up reply actions
You can’t control anyone. The type of people that try to control are called control freaks. It’s a flaw, not a teaching method.
Did your teachers in high school or professors in college try to control you to learn?
Does the CEO of a company control his employees?
Those that try, fail. Micro-managers, control-freaks, whatever you want to call it, you don’t control a basketball team. You manage and teach. It’s up to the players to execute a game plan and to play fundamentally sound basketball.
The Warriors suck at rebounding because they fail to box out more often than not. If Nellie was controlling the team, he would be out on the court trying to push the guys into the right position.
The better wording for you would be, “Don Nelson fails to effectively communicate to his players the importance of fundamental team basketball, which results in poor rebounding and selfish play.”
But, it’s ultimately up to the player to decide if they want to play the right way or the narrow-minded way. You can only teach a person so much.
The fact that this hasn’t clicked in Monta’s head isn’t Don Nelson’s fault and it’s not even Monta’s fault. It’s no one’s fault. It’s just a process of maturity that Monta Ellis has to make.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 3:25 PM PST up reply actions
If they don't trade him
we all hope that you are right!
Well, I don’t think I predicted anything.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 11:38 PM PST up reply actions
Look...
I know this point is outplayed but,Monta Ellis does not really have much to work with!
I mean seriously,he’s been working with 10 days contracts and an injury depleted roster this whole year.
We can’t jump to conclusions already.Say whatever you want but this is my beliefs and I’m confident Monta can be “the man” when this roster heals.
Here comes the bashing,I’m ready for it.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Feb 13, 2010 12:16 PM PST reply actions
You’re right. Monta can still be the man but he still needs to adapt his role to the players on the team. Curry is the only player to play in every game. The asset for Monta to become a better player is right under his nose. He just needs to realize and accept it. I’m not saying it will happen, but it has to happen based on Curry’s level of play.
This has nothing to do with coaching and everything to do with the growth of Monta and Curry together.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 12:19 PM PST up reply actions
They can play side to side...
like Baron and Monta in the 07-08 season.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Feb 13, 2010 12:26 PM PST up reply actions
They can. I think what happened was that a) Monta grossly underestimated Curry’s abilities, b) Nelson and Riley confused Monta by saying he needs to be a PG, he needs to be a leader, etc. and c) Monta felt tremendous pressure to reclaim the support of the fans after his injury (his first season as the franchise guy).
Once Monta realizes he doesn’t need to shoulder so much and defer more to Curry (as he did with Baron), things may change.
At the same time, Curry also needs to continue to grow and defer to Monta as well. I don’t see that as a problem.
I do see Monta deferring to Curry as an obstacle though.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 13, 2010 12:34 PM PST up reply actions
i completely agree, Monta will be representing the Warriors
OWENS! OWENS! OWENS! OWENS!
- Joe Starkey
by 9ersDubsGiantSharks on Feb 13, 2010 12:29 PM PST up reply actions
Injuries are a factor, but ...
Monta Ellis does not really have much to work with!
Nonsense. He has one of the league’s best 3-pt shooters. He has one of the league’s best guys to dish to when you’re at the end of a drive.
The notion that Monta is doing the best that he can doesn’t hold much water when you actually watch the game, and see Monta drive rather than pass to Morrow.
Ok so 2 guys...that's a lot of help.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Feb 13, 2010 1:01 PM PST up reply actions
I mean that is help...
but those guys has been banged up all season.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Feb 13, 2010 1:01 PM PST up reply actions
Also Corey Maggette
and they could probably run the pick and roll with Andris a bit more.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 13, 2010 3:59 PM PST up reply actions
Morrow and Beans really aren't that good!
They are above average role players who are valuable, but its definately not the same as have a Gasol, Ginobli, or a Rondo as supporting players!!!!
by freerandolph on Feb 13, 2010 2:39 PM PST up reply actions
Whether or not they're "that" good isn't really the point.
The point is if they’re player capable of helping Monta, by, say, finishing when he dishes to them after a double-team.
And the answer to that is a resounding yes. They are, in fact, almost the perfect players for Monta to dish to in that situation. Gasol isn’t any better than Biedrins at finishing a dump off. Ginobli and Rondo aren’t any better than Morrow at draining the open long-range 3 after the defense collapses.
In fact, those players are probably worse at those particular skills than Morrow or Beans. They’re better players because of other skills. Gasol’s got a great post-up game (one of the 2-3 best in the league). Those skills are not relevant to the discussion of whether or not Monta should pass the ball or shoot after the defense collapses on him.
How much truth is in the whole “Monta should pass to Morrow instead of going against a double team” that gets thrown around here?
Isn’t it contingent on Morrow’s man being the doubler, as well as being too far to recover in the second-and-a-half that it takes for the pass to be thrown, caught, and the shot to go up? Not to mention Monta being able to make the pass in the first place?
Defenses collapse so hard on Monta because they know he’s very likely to shoot. What if he drives, turns to pass, and can’t find the open man? It takes a very special point guard to simultaneously be a threat to pass well AND score efficiently on the drive. Can Monta do that?
For example, this set from the Warriors/Mavs game last week. It’s Monta’s last drive before he goes down with his injury. At 5:50:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRR6O5RnB7A
Monta gets the handoff from Turiaf, who rolls to the rim. Monta gets the step on Terry, but Dirk follows him on the drive, Gooden leaves Beans (who’s apparently spotting up for a 12 footer). Monta has Morrow on the wing, but the spacing is such that Howard can take a swipe at the ball and still recover if Monta tries to kick it out. Monta ends up taking a running layup, which goes in.
In real time, your eyes follow the ball until the shot goes up. Then you notice that Monta is surrounded by blue jerseys and Morrow looks to be wide open in the corner. The fan is pissed and immediately blames Monta for his ego. However, the decision to pass or shoot was made before the shot went up, and at that point Morrow wasn’t open. Add the fact that Monta is going 100 mph and there are hands everywhere, most of which are trying to knock the ball away. Finally, we know that Monta and the rim have a great relationship- as in good things happen when he goes to it. All in all, I’ve got no problem with Monta’s decision making in that particular situation.
One could argue that it’s the coach’s fault for putting Monta in that situation. It’s not a great looking play. The spacing is awful. Pretty much every Warrior gets in the way of Monta’s drive. Monta doesn’t have the angle to hit Turiaf on the roll. Biedrins is completely useless when he’s not the screener- he tries to float out along the baseline ostensibly to shoot a jumper? (Turiaf/Biedrins frontline doesn’t always work out) Curry looks like he cuts late; he (and Kidd) are in the lane during Monta’s drive. It’s pretty amazing we got 2 points out of this play. Thanks Monta.
If someone gets doubled, someone is open
It doesn’t really matter who it is. We have lots of good outside shooters on the team. We have guys like Beans who can finish. Monta not passing to the open man is on Monta and no one else.
One could argue that it’s the coach’s fault for putting Monta in that situation.
I think you’re greatly overestimating Nellie’s influence.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 13, 2010 6:30 PM PST up reply actions
If someone gets doubled, someone is open
This isn’t necessarily true. For someone to be open, the pass needs to be available and the defender needs to be unable to recover in the second or so it takes to pass, catch, and shoot. For example (and you might disagree) in the video I linked Monta’s drive is impeded by Turiaf and Morrow’s man, but the pass to Turiaf is too difficult and Morrow’s shot would probably be contested by his man, who is in position to recover.
Monta doesn’t get doubled in the sense that Howard or Duncan get doubled. When we say Monta goes 1 on 2 or 1 on 3, it usually means there are players (usually bigs) waiting at the end of his drive. It’s not like Monta has the ball and a live dribble, and some wing just drops down to double him, leaving Morrow wide open.
Almost everyone wants to blame Monta for his selfishness and the coaches for letting Monta’s tunnel vision go. I’m just saying on this one play (and probably others as well) the passes that the “armchair point guards” want him to make are really quite difficult to execute.
The fan is pissed and immediately blames Monta for his ego. However, the decision to pass or shoot was made before the shot went up, and at that point Morrow wasn’t open.
I disagree. Freeze frame at 5:52 on that link.
At this point, Monta has beat his man. Morrow’s man is in the paint, and his eyes are on Monta. At this point, it is clear that Morrow should be open on the play.
Fast forward one second to 5:53. Monta has one foot just outside of the free throw line and is picking up his dribble. At this point, Morrow’s man has collapsed onto Monta, he’s moving in, so he wouldn’t be able to get back in time to stop the shot. 5:53 also makes it clear that Turiaf’s man has stepped up – Turiaf has his hands up to Ellis and is calling for the ball.
In short, Monta has three players on him as he picks up his dribble. He has TWO open men to pass to, although the pass to Turiaf be hard, Morrow’s man has been telegraphing his intention to double Monta on the drive, and Morrow is wide open long before Monta is committed to shooting.
This is bread-and-butter basketball. Monta should have passed to Turiaf or Morrow, and it was clear as the play was developing. Your analysis is just wrong.
Freeze frame at 5:52 on that link.
At this point, Monta has beat his man. Morrow’s man is in the paint, and his eyes are on Monta. At this point, it is clear that Morrow should be open on the play.
At 5:52, both Morrow and his man (Howard) are in the paint- Morrow is not open.
Fast forward one second to 5:53. Monta has one foot just outside of the free throw line and is picking up his dribble. At this point, Morrow’s man has collapsed onto Monta, he’s moving in, so he wouldn’t be able to get back in time to stop the shot.
This is why freeze frames can be deceptive. One may pause at 5:53 or 5:54 and see 3 players “collapse” on Monta. In real time, though, Howard has merely taken one step away from Morrow to swipe at the ball. Monta’s momentum is carrying him in the opposite direction away from Morrow; it would be incredibly hard for him to fire a quick, accurate pass to Morrow. Howard would almost certainly be able to give a good contest by the time the shot goes up or even deflect the pass.
Incidentally, Howard is not the “doubler.” Dirk is the doubler. Howard’s entire defensive involvement is one swipe at the ball. He’s probably been told to stay close to Morrow.
5:53 also makes it clear that Turiaf’s man has stepped up – Turiaf has his hands up to Ellis and is calling for the ball.
Dirk steps up to double Monta, but he largely stays in between Monta and Turiaf, making the pass very difficult throughout the drive. Curry is cutting through the lane, barely avoiding Turiaf, and dragging Kidd along with him. Gooden is also beginning to step into the paint since he can leave AB on the baseline. The pass is certainly possible, but Monta would be threading the needle through several defenders.
Morrow is wide open long before Monta is committed to shooting.
You assume you know when Monta commits to shooting. Morrow appears to be wide open only after Howard’s swipe sends him stumbling away from Morrow, and by then Monta has taken his second step and is going up for the layup. There are certain point guards who can drive full speed to the basket, take the two steps, go up for the layup, and instead fire a perfect pass to a shooter spotting up behind them.
This is bread-and-butter basketball.
This is not bread-and-butter basketball. These passes are available to be made, but they are incredibly difficult. Considering how fast Monta was going and how congested the lane was, these passes would be highlights, not simple fundamental passes. I don’t see any use berating Monta for not being Nash, CP3, or one of the handful of points in the world who can make passes like that accurately and regularly.
by antihero on Feb 14, 2010 7:26 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
If Monta is committed to shooting at the point when he picks up the dribble ...
… with one foot at the FT line, then that in itself is the entire problem with his game. He shouldn’t be commited to shooting at that point. He should be aware of what Morrow’s man is doing – telegraphing his intent to collapse – and be prepared to pass.
One may pause at 5:53 or 5:54 and see 3 players "collapse" on Monta. In real time, though, Howard has merely taken one step away from Morrow to swipe at the ball. Monta’s momentum is carrying him in the opposite direction away from Morrow; it would be incredibly hard for him to fire a quick, accurate pass to Morrow.
I disagree. Watching it in real time, it’s abundantly clear that Howard is paying more attention to Monta than Morrow. If Monta were more court-aware, he would see this as he came around the screen … that’s what the best players do. As they beat their man, they are looking at the basket and at the men between them and the basket.
I agree with you that the pass to Turiaf is hard.
However, Howard doesn’t just “swipe” at the ball. As Morrow drifts of, Howard stays in. That pass is there. Monta has to make it. The pass to Morrow wasn’t difficult – and it was clearly potentially there from the moment Monta came off the screen.
Heck, I’d go further and suggest that the play is probably designed with the idea of forcing Howard into making a difficult choice there. It’s going to be very hard for Monta’s man to stay with him through the pick, so the play is really designed to make Howard commit. So Monta should be aware of where Morrow is supposed to be before he picks up his dribble.
That’s speculation on my part, obviously, but it’s pretty standard stuff in five-man basketball offense.
If Monta is committed to shooting at the point when he picks up the dribble …
… with one foot at the FT line, then that in itself is the entire problem with his game. He shouldn’t be commited to shooting at that point. He should be aware of what Morrow’s man is doing – telegraphing his intent to collapse – and be prepared to pass.
Most guards going that fast and hard at the rim have a singular focus to finish/draw contact. Coaches are, by and large, okay with that. Monta may be the quickest guard on the planet; his entire drive takes about 2 seconds, and from his picking up the dribble to releasing the shot maybe half a second. Half a second. It’s too easy to point at freeze frames and say “THERE! He should have dished to Morrow RIGHT THERE.”
it’s abundantly clear that Howard is paying more attention to Monta than Morrow
He should be aware of what Morrow’s man is doing – telegraphing his intent to collapse – and be prepared to pass.
This might have been the case if Dirk had stayed with Turiaf- instead, Dirk plays both the passing lane to Ronny and helps on Monta; he is the main doubler throughout the play. Howard knows this; Monta knows this. When Monta reaches Howard-level, Howard takes one swipe at the ball. Only then does Morrow start drifting to an open spot (again, this is happening in less than a second and Monta is moving 3 times faster than anyone else in the play). Howard even keeps his left foot planted (the one closer to Morrow) as he lunges with his right leg, which leads me to believe he can recover to Morrow if the pass is made.
Only after Monta has blown past Howard does Howard let his momentum take him away from Morrow. Here, I suspect, is when the fan wants Monta to make the pass, since Howard is stumbling about in the lane and Morrow is open. But Monta is already going up into his shooting motion; for him to then twist and fire a perfect pass backwards is a lot to ask for.
Heck, I’d go further and suggest that the play is probably designed with the idea of forcing Howard into making a difficult choice there. It’s going to be very hard for Monta’s man to stay with him through the pick, so the play is really designed to make Howard commit.
That’s probably what the play was designed for. The problem was that Dirk stayed with Monta so Howard didn’t have to get his body between Monta and the basket- in fact, he never does or even really tries to. Also, Morrow was a little slow getting to his spot and Curry was late.
Keep in mind Monta’s exact path, and the decision to “shoot or pass”, aren’t the only possibilities here. Monta could have attacked Howard instead of the rim/entire Dallas defense. He could have timed his drive better, let the spacing clear itself out, used a hesitation, attacked Gooden while Biedrins slipped the baseline for a dunk, tried to draw Dirk out…..there are lots of possibilities, and just because it looks difficult/impossible to make the right pass doesn’t mean there aren’t better possibilities than what we saw. Good players do a better job reading the defense, creating passing lanes, attacking the defense and drawing the help, and creating quality shots/space for their teammates than that play shows. As for the spacing of that play, I’ll just say the timing/spacing is definitely off, I think it’s fair to call it a broken play. Does that make Monta’s decision the right one? Well, how often do you think he’ll finish a layup like that? If it’s under ~54%, then it’s probably the wrong decision.
by Missing Barry on Feb 14, 2010 9:46 PM PST up reply actions
Monta could have attacked Howard instead of the rim/entire Dallas defense.
What do you mean? Monta was being doubled by Dirk and Terry, Howard doesn’t get between Monta and the basket at all.
He could have timed his drive better, let the spacing clear itself out, used a hesitation,
Maybe, but a point guard has a limited window of opportunity right after he gets the screen and the play starts. Hesitating would have meant letting Terry catch up and really getting in trouble. As it was Monta had the step on Terry and half a step on Nowitzki.
attacked Gooden while Biedrins slipped the baseline for a dunk
On this particular play Gooden didn’t have to come out too far to contest, so there wasn’t really room for Biedrins to slip inside. That play does work pretty often but it wasn’t meant to be on this possession.
Good players do a better job reading the defense, creating passing lanes, attacking the defense and drawing the help, and creating quality shots/space for their teammates than that play shows.
Yeah, Monta can’t do some of these things that well. He’s got a somewhat different skillset, as we know. Personally I’ve never been too high on him- at least in the role he’s being used in now.
As for the spacing of that play, I’ll just say the timing/spacing is definitely off, I think it’s fair to call it a broken play. Does that make Monta’s decision the right one?
I think the goal was either to have Dirk help and Monta passes to Ronny, or have Howard help and Monta passes to Morrow. As it turns out, Dirk helped but still cut off the pass to Ronny, so good for him. Monta made the decision to use the screen and drive, the Mavs played good defense, and at that point he doesn’t see a pass opening so he goes ahead and takes the shot. It’s not a great shot but it looks like he could have gotten a foul call. He might have been tripped up- he’s not usually this out of control at the end of a drive.
When I say attack Gooden or attack Howard, it implies changing the angle of the drive. From what Monta actually did, yeah, it would have been difficult, but he could have taken a wider angle to go more towards Gooden or Howard, for example. You force the defender to commit completely to either help D or his man, or get caught in no mans land where he doesn’t accomplish anything. Monta didn’t do that, and it could have gotten his teammates open looks.
Maybe, but a point guard has a limited window of opportunity right after he gets the screen and the play starts. Hesitating would have meant letting Terry catch up and really getting in trouble. As it was Monta had the step on Terry and half a step on Nowitzki.
Watch Nash or Paul play. They do it at a much slower pace, more in control. It’s ok if the defense catches up, as long as they don’t recover fully; when you’re as quick as Monta, all you need is to keep your guy on the side of you and you can still get by him at will. Terry would have gotten back somewhat, but Monta still would have had the advantage on him, and it’s fine. Not saying it’s always the appropriate thing to do, sometimes just going hard to the basket is fine, but many times, it can open up the floor for your teammates, get them open, and create passing lanes – that’s how guys like Nash/Paul are so effective.
Most guards going that fast and hard at the rim have a singular focus to finish/draw contact. Coaches are, by and large, okay with that.
And if Monta was doing this efficiently, it’d be fine, but he’s not, so that’s a problem that needs to be solved. Our point is to try to suggest solutions to it.
by Missing Barry on Feb 16, 2010 6:26 AM PST up reply actions
Watch Nash or Paul play. They do it at a much slower pace, more in control.
This is an important point. Antihero, you’re right that Monta is moving very quickly, even by NBA player standards. But because of the pick, maybe he doesn’t NEED to move that quickly. Monta doesn’t need to go at full speed to make this play work – the pick costs his defender a step and Dirk can’t stay with him regardless.
This isn’t a case where Monta is beating his man from a standstill without help, in which case it’d be easier to argue that he needs his full speed. But, of course, that’s why teams isolate players to go one-on-one … so that the help isn’t there when they beat their man.
Also, ultimately, Antihero, I’m not sure what you’re arguing for.
If you really believe that this play is impossible for Monta to make, that is very damning of Monta as a player. It means he’s unlikely to ever be much better than he is this season. He’ll go down in the books as a spectacular player who missed too many shots to really help his team be competitive against the best.
Isn’t it contingent on Morrow’s man being the doubler, as well as being too far to recover in the second-and-a-half that it takes for the pass to be thrown, caught, and the shot to go up?
No. It’s basic basketball – once you beat your guy, someone has to play help D. The rest of the defense is responsible for rotations. Maybe Morrow’s guy has to rotate down to Biedrins guy when Biedrins guy helps on Ellis. There are a lot of possibilities, but they all have one thing in common: when Monta beats his guy, someone is open. When you force the defense into rotations and mismatches, it becomes less effective. It’s much harder to guard a player when you’re closing out hard on them, recovering from help D, then when you have position when they receive the pass. All offensive strategy is built around putting the defense at a disadvantage, whether it’s a pick and roll, or simply swinging the ball, the defense has to move, close out, rotate – in short, they’re at some sort of disadvantage. The question at that point is does the offense effectively take advantage of it? My concern is with Monta handling the ball, too often the answer is no.
by Missing Barry on Feb 14, 2010 9:40 PM PST up reply actions
Well, defensive rotations are meant to hide the offensive player who’s open- leave open the guy who is farthest away/least likely to make it. I don’t think Morrow’s guy would run all the way from the wing/corner to Biedrins in the paint- more likely than not, it’s the second big who gets there. (It would be stupid to leave Morrow open for a 3 anyway- just as bad as allowing an open dunk.) I’ll start paying more attention to this but it seems like the help defense on Monta is usually a big, either doubling on the pick and roll or stepping up to contest the layup, and it seems like Monta finds the open big man pretty consistently for an easy slam.
Plus, Monta’s speed cuts both ways: it’s obviously advantageous, but it makes it harder for him to take advantage of any defensive adjustments- the defense has less time to help properly, and Monta has less time to make the decision to pass.
And if the defense doesn’t rotate/help in time, it should be easy buckets, so in that case I’m completely ok with the ball never making it to Morrow…
by Missing Barry on Feb 16, 2010 6:27 AM PST up reply actions
Ellis' ego is too big for him to let a rookie take over
He already hated on curry before he even played his first NBA game what makes anyone think Ellis is gonna play 2nd fiddle now. Just watch the games. Watch Monta’s body language when Curry shoots.
by GoldenSt8OfMind on Feb 14, 2010 11:06 AM PST reply actions
I think it has do a lot with Curry’s background and Monta’s.
Curry lived a very privaledged life , while Monta lived a bad life.
Monta seems jealous/envious of this.
banned like chris andersen
Whatever it is Monta would never look Curry take over this team
by GoldenSt8OfMind on Feb 14, 2010 1:44 PM PST up reply actions
Is that the new argument?
Ellis said a small back court like them can’t win. THEN in another interview after they played there first couple games he took it back and said he underrated him. The whole back ground thing to me is stupid. And I never remember Monta ever having an ego, he’s a pretty quiet easy going guy
Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"
People on this site
are super bi-polar.
One day they love a guy, next day they hate him. Both times, they make up outrageous arguments that have no solid foundation rather than looking at things in a more general perspective and actually seeing that the real blame falls on management and coaching.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Feb 14, 2010 6:54 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Fans, in general, are like that
but seriously. Do you actually think that Don Nelson and Keith Smart are demanding that Monta takes 22 shots a game?
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 14, 2010 6:59 PM PST up reply actions
Not in that type of context
But more like telling him he needs the ball in his hands all the time and calling tons of sets for him. They won’t tell him how many shots to take but more like not controlling what he does. Like if you gave the ball to Kobe a couple years ago without telling him what to do or giving him a guideline of what to do he’d try to score. The coaches let him and Maggs do whatever while taking out guys like AR if they do the smallest thing wrong.
Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"
Don Nelson has said it himself
That he wants Monta to be the primary ball handler b/c it would be too hard to get him the ball if he was off the ball.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
That doesn't mean he's demanding that Monta shoot on 30% of our possessions
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 14, 2010 8:58 PM PST up reply actions
It does mean that he is not telling Monta NOT TO SHOOT THAT MUCH. He’s the coach. A good coach on any of the playoff teams has control over their players. Monta is not a PG…Nellie making him be the primary ball handler MAKES Ellis take a lot of shots, he’s a SG.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
Nellie making him be the primary ball handler MAKES Ellis take a lot of shots, he’s a SG.
I think this is ridiculous. Yes, Nellie has a role in what we’re seeing, and it’s probably fair to put some blame on him. Monta is the one making the end decision, though. You can’t just absolve him of all blame. He has a pretty clear role in what happens, too.
by Missing Barry on Feb 14, 2010 9:50 PM PST up reply actions
And Monta is the player on the court
who is shooting way too much.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 14, 2010 10:07 PM PST up reply actions
If he has the ball all the time
b/c nellie puts it in his hands….and he’s not a PG…what does nellie expect him to do?
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Feb 15, 2010 11:16 AM PST up reply actions
You don’t have to be a PG to make sound decisions. Somehow guys like Roy, Wade, Kobe, Joe Johnson, and even Captain Jack at times manage to be more effective with the ball in their hands than Monta’s been, despite not being PG’s. You don’t have to be a PG to make sound decisions, and that’s one of Monta’s problems, he doesn’t consistently make sound decisions, and he’s responsible for that. Like I said, I think it’s fair to put some of it on Nellie, I just don’t see how you can deny Monta has a role in his own poor decisions with the ball.
by Missing Barry on Feb 15, 2010 11:46 AM PST up reply actions
Nellie is putting Monta
in a position to fail. You can see the games, it is clear Nellie just tells them…put the ball in monta’s hand and let him do his thing against 3 guys…the other guys don’t even put a good effort into getting open or slashing to the basket when he is finishing…
I put full blame on Nellie for not using Monta effectively, off the ball with Steph Curry being the floor general.
If this was Buki being the player handling the ball, also not passing effectively, it would be clear to people that it is Nellie’s fault for putting the ball in the wrong persons hands. I don’t see how this is ANY DIFFERENT.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Feb 15, 2010 11:49 AM PST up reply actions
Monta’s talented enough that I blame him for his poor decision making. I do agree Nellie’s not utilizing him well or correctly, and probably encouraging rather than discouraging his high volume ways, but at some point, a guy with Monta’s talent is responsible for his own poor decisionmaking. Otherwise it’s always the coaches fault for everything.
by Missing Barry on Feb 15, 2010 12:05 PM PST up reply actions
Yes
Monta does have blame to take, but until we see how Monta does when he is utilized correctly…There is no reason to be blaming Monta for our losing ways, or not being a better team.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Feb 15, 2010 12:19 PM PST up reply actions
The problem is a lot of his low-percentage shots come when he doesn't pass out of a double-team
And that has nothing to do with being a PG or a SG, it has nothing to do with how much ball-handling Nelson has him do in the open court.
Monta SHOULD be driving about as often as Nellie has him doing so. He just needs to be dishing more at the end of those drives. That’s on Monta, not Nellie.
Although Nellie is responsible for the amount of ball-handling Monta does in the open floor – so it’s not like he’s blameless. He’s responsible for how many minutes Monta is playing, which will wear him down and may have contibuted to his most recent injury. And he’s responsible for not enforcing discipline when a player shoots to much, and I think we can definitely blame Nellie for that since Jackson did the same thing, and Nellie never too him to the woodshed for it.
Pass the ball when double-teamed.
That’s what you expect all players to do.
I personally think the PG/SG distinction is being made too big a deal.
Monta commits to his shot too soon, he isn’t aware enough of the players around him to make the pass to the open man. I think/hope that this is an attitude thing that can be changed with better coaching, but I don’t know.
So you don’t think Monta have a big ego? Remember when Monta said he wanted a trade if we DRAFTED a PG. Sometimes you gotta just look at the big picture and stop overvaluing all our players
by GoldenSt8OfMind on Feb 15, 2010 11:39 AM PST up reply actions
He never said that...
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
by LostHawkGSW on Feb 15, 2010 11:49 AM PST up reply actions
This
He said he does not want us to draft someone who is incapable as a guard. Basically a small guard who can’t defend. Which he later took back after playing with Steph. Steph even said he doesn’t understand why people say they hate each other
Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"
If you don’t think Monta has an ego, you haven’t been watching the past 2 seasons. I don’t think he is a bad guy really, but it seems he is very easily influenced by bad people. If we hadn’t traded Jackson, he may have demanded a trade already.
banned like chris andersen
How do you know this?
You know him? He was mad cause we threatened him and kept treating him like a four letter word and kept saying if you screw up were voiding you. He has a right to be a little mad and frustrated. So your saying if your FO treated you like feces you’d just sit there and be okay with it or would you but mad about it? And where are you getting this two years ago thing? In 2008 he was part of a great team, and was quiet. Than made a stupid choice which he regrets and hasn’t really done anything wrong since. Your blow stuff put your backside now. No evidence of a bad ego.
Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"
Well, Dubzfan, he destroyed our entire season last year by falling off a moped.
If i did that, i wouldn’t think the FO was being unfair by telling me
If you don’t recover from this, we will void your contract.
banned like chris andersen
They were extremely shady to him
They dangled it over his head like a toy. The FO was acting way out of line, and how did he ruin the year if we were going to suck and everyone else got injured as well?
Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"
Well
riding mopeds is forbidden by his contract, and he lied to the organization about it. It’d expect them to be pissed about it.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 16, 2010 4:30 PM PST up reply actions
I expect them to be pissed as well
But they still didn’t handle the situation very well
Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"
I don't think they were the ones in the wrong
Monta really did screw them
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 16, 2010 11:15 PM PST up reply actions
They screwed each other
Neither one of the to were right
Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"
As much as you seem to want it to...
The world does not operate in black and white. Just because Monta breached his contract doesn’t give the Warriors organization carte blanche to screw him over without consequences. They behaved poorly in response to Monta’s unsavory actions. Two wrongs don’t make a right, yadda yadda yadda. Do you seriously not understand this?
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Feb 18, 2010 9:49 AM PST up reply actions
I know that the situation isn’t so black and white, I was just taking on the con opinion for the sake of argument.
Two wrongs don’t make a right, yadda yadda yadda. Do you seriously not understand this?
No, I definitely completed kindergarten.
by Reverend_Randy on Feb 18, 2010 5:04 PM PST up reply actions
So...
You were arguing for the sake of arguing with somebody? Slow day at work, huh?
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Feb 18, 2010 5:06 PM PST up reply actions
But they still didn’t handle the situation very well
The NBA is a funny place. Things don’t happen as they would in real life. Suspending him and subsequently taking 3M from his salary might be considered “unfair” but he also cost the Warriors a lot of revenue for the entire season. We’ll never know how the numbers would have worked out, but I think the suspension was fair. The injury was not a typical ankle injury so I can understand why the FO was taking its precautions. Remember Jay Williams? That guy was supposed to be a superstar, and would have been, if he didn’t get on that Yamaha R6 he didn’t know how to ride and wasn’t supposed to ride. That cost the Bulls a lot of money for a lot of years.
As much as I hate Rowell, he did the right thing. Also, there is no evidence that Monta is mad at the FO for doing what they did. All he has ever said about the incident is that it’s in the past and he wants to move forward and I think that has happened.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 16, 2010 11:39 PM PST up reply actions
Monta
Jack
Maggette
Al
Biedrins
Bench:
Buike
Turiaf
Wright
Randolph
CJ
Marco
Thats a decent team.
You take Monta off, then you have to have guys playing out of position, getting hurt, being less effective, leaving us with no real guard who can handle.
banned like chris andersen
Al was going to be gone either way
It’s a decent team but no where near the playoffs.
Rookie: "Why did you bench me?"
Nellie: "You're a rookie"
It’s a decent team but no where near the playoffs.
That’s an oxymoron.
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Feb 18, 2010 9:50 AM PST up reply actions
"Thats a decent team."
Is it?
There’s no point guard. You’ve got Monta playing point, which we’ve all seen this year doesn’t work. If not, you’ve got Jack playing PG, and that works even less well.
Al Harrington isn’t a real power forward, he’s a big small forward. He doesn’t rebound well enough, and doesn’t really have an inside game.
That’s not a playoff team.
You’re telling me that team can’t win 35-40 games. I think so. I’m probably wrong but that team seems like its alot better than last years team or this years team.
banned like chris andersen
I think it's worse than our current team:
The backcourt of Jackson and Monta is worse than our backcourt of Curry and Monta – it lacks a distributor and is going to jack up a gazillion low-percentage shots. A frontcourt of Harrington and Maggette is better – for Nellie-ball – than what we’ve been running out there this season, but with a normal coach I’d prefer Maggette and Wright/Randolph with Biedrins.
Is it a lot worse than our current team? No – but remember we’re probably ten games worse than we should be because of injuries. That team distributes the ball worse, turns it over more, shoots a lower percentage, and rebounds worse than what we’d have with who we have, with everyone healthy.
According to BB-Ref, our pythag record is 21-32, even despite injuries…
by Missing Barry on Feb 18, 2010 11:21 AM PST up reply actions
Well, maybe, but not necessarily. Pythag is just based on points scored/allowed. Sometimes you just get unlucky and lose more than your share of close games, or blow teams out and lose a lot of close games. Eventually, those things tend to even out….
by Missing Barry on Feb 18, 2010 4:58 PM PST up reply actions
A lot of good points
But Monta just isnt smart enough or emotionally intelligent enough to pull this off with this team. Maybe some of the blame falls on Nellie for not being able to coach Monta effectively, but that’s what you get from a kid with little to no education and tons of butt kissing as a teanager. It takes a very special person to grow up under the same circumstances and turn out like a Kevin Garnett instead of a Monta Ellis.
The Warriors are eventually going to have to move on from Monta.
But Monta just isnt smart enough or emotionally intelligent enough to pull this off with this team. Maybe some of the blame falls on Nellie for not being able to coach Monta effectively, but that’s what you get from a kid with little to no education and tons of butt kissing as a teanager. It takes a very special person to grow up under the same circumstances and turn out like a Kevin Garnett instead of a Monta Ellis.
The Warriors are eventually going to have to move on from Monta
A lot of the blame has to go to the front office for constructing this roster and eventually making it Monta’s team by default. Monta flourished with Baron Davis. I mean, let’s be honest, he was the key to all the success we had those two very brief seasons. It was the big reason for Monta’s success and supposed maturity. Without that veteran presence, he’s been given the keys to a rudderless ship and he’s proven that his best efforts can’t steer it the right way.
Again, he has a choice to defer more responsibility to Curry. Is he capable? Don’t know.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 15, 2010 10:48 AM PST up reply actions
Personally, I’m not big into the idea of projecting how some guy none of us know (Monta) thinks and feels and will react to certain situations. We might get some evidence pointing one way or another, but we should probably hold off on the definitive statements, unless you’re actually close with Monta and have real insights into his personality, of course….
by Missing Barry on Feb 15, 2010 11:12 AM PST up reply actions
Personally, I’m not big into the idea of projecting how some guy none of us know (Monta) thinks and feels and will react to certain situations. We might get some evidence pointing one way or another, but we should probably hold off on the definitive statements, unless you’re actually close with Monta and have real insights into his personality, of course….
I agree but all we can ever do is speculate unless we got a hold of Monta’s psych report. There’s been only media evidence of Monta’s behavior and that’s all we’ll ever get.
Monta has publicly said that he likes playing with Curry, but we can all agree it’s not the same as when he was playing with Baron, who he had respect and confidence in. I think he played much better as the scoring option during 06/07 and 07/08 than he is playing as the #1 option this year.
I haven’t seen one bit of (media) evidence that shows Monta taking over Baron’s role nor have we seen one bit of (media) evidence that shows Monta accepting Curry’s blossoming leadership role.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 15, 2010 6:04 PM PST up reply actions
The real problem I see with it is none of our speculation is actually based on anything. We get statements about how “Monta has no relationship with Curry” out of…..nothing, really. The closest it seems to come to being founded on anything are general, bogus opinions like “do you see Monta’s body language?!” It’s one thing ot speculate on a situation where we have lots of rumors floating around about Captain Jack asking for a trade, it’s another to speculate based on…..nothing at all.
by Missing Barry on Feb 15, 2010 7:11 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
The real problem I see with it is none of our speculation is actually based on anything. We get statements about how "Monta has no relationship with Curry" out of…..nothing, really. The closest it seems to come to being founded on anything are general, bogus opinions like "do you see Monta’s body language?!" It’s one thing ot speculate on a situation where we have lots of rumors floating around about Captain Jack asking for a trade, it’s another to speculate based on…..nothing at all.
Well, what do you think all the beat writers base it on? They speculate just as much as fans do. They’re the ones writing columns that “Monta needs to be traded.” At least we’re discussing a different angle based on the same things. No?
If everyone displayed the same amount of logic as you do, there would be no discussions about the Warriors ;-)
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 15, 2010 7:30 PM PST up reply actions
Well, I like hearing it from beat writers who are actually closer to the situation and get access to behind the scenes stuff, to locker room stuff, who talk to the players, talk to the coaches….basically, they’re in a much better position to actually have a real opinion on this stuff. If any of you guys had that kind of access, I might have some actual interest in it, you know? Now, don’t get me wrong, that doesn’t mean I find anything someone like say….Tim Kawakami says worthwhile, but you get the point. ;)
Anyways, I guess I just don’t see any interest in the tabloid/celebrity BS side of basketball. I’m here to talk basketball. I love conversations like the one Philthiest started – analysis/fact based on how we can improve as a team, so for me personally, those are the discussions I like to see. It lead to some disagreement analyzing film, which was great. More of that kind of thing!
by Missing Barry on Feb 15, 2010 7:54 PM PST up reply actions
Point taken. It wasn’t my intention to stir any sort of pot and I didn’t think I needed any sort of statistical analysis. I thought watching the product on the court was good enough assessment to come up with this.
For me it’s pretty simple: Monta is a good player that can be better (on this team) so the team can win more games. I guess the only statistics I used was the win/loss column.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 15, 2010 9:07 PM PST up reply actions
Ha, I’m really expressing some frustration towards the general community as a whole, this conversation is just a convenient way to do it. :)
I just get tired of people talking about Monta’s leadership, his ego, how he would react to certain situations, how he gets along with his teammates, etc without any substance behind their opinion, you know?
by Missing Barry on Feb 15, 2010 9:23 PM PST up reply actions
you know?
Yep
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 15, 2010 10:32 PM PST up reply actions
The blame should be put on everyone
by GoldenSt8OfMind on Feb 15, 2010 7:52 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
There is a lot of substance to these discussions
There is also a lot of bologna, but we all watch a lot of games and there are certain things that can be presented as facts.
The most important one is that Monta is not a leader on the floor and this season he has not been a facilitator. We need those two qualities badly with this roster.
I think the FO went to Monta and said, OK its your team now if you want it.
Monta probably said I can handle it. He wants to be the man whether he can be the man we need or not.
The FO should have known better, but hindsight is 50/50 and there was no way to know how mature Curry would look as a rookie. Hell, who knew he would get so many quality minutes?
I am in favor of letting Curry grow as a the PG, which inherently has a leadership role as distributor, and then adding a low post player who will be the team leader we need.
This is not an easy thing to accomplish, and it might not happen in 2010, but the moves to get there may need to start now.
by warriorsvictim on Feb 16, 2010 9:32 AM PST up reply actions
@ Doctor Kajita – You see how issues of “leadership” are presented as facts? Illustrates my point…
by Missing Barry on Feb 16, 2010 10:41 AM PST up reply actions
@ Doctor Kajita – You see how issues of "leadership" are presented as facts? Illustrates my point…
I fail to see it. I’m not sure if your initial criticism was for me or for the “general community” as you later put it.
Was my post speculation on the tabloid/BS side of basketball?
I didn’t think so. But, I am open to criticism.
I just don’t really understand what you’re talking about other than you like fact/analysis based discussions and why you’re directing an example as me.
I feel like I wronged you LOL.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 16, 2010 2:45 PM PST up reply actions
*and why you’re directing an example TO me.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 16, 2010 2:47 PM PST up reply actions
I guess I’m just not very good at clearly making my point. Oh well.
I just get tired of people talking about Monta’s leadership, his ego, how he would react to certain situations, how he gets along with his teammates, etc without any substance behind their opinion, you know?
there are certain things that can be presented as facts.
The most important one is that Monta is not a leader on the floor and this season he has not been a facilitator. We need those two qualities badly with this roster.
I just directed at you because you were the one I was having the conversation with where I said the first thing. I thought it appropriately fit into that conversation. If I wasn’t clear about it, none of the previous conversation we had was really addressing your actual fanpost, the only reason they were really replies to you is because you were part of the conversation started by warriorsvictim….
by Missing Barry on Feb 16, 2010 3:30 PM PST up reply actions
Got it.
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
by Doctor Kajita on Feb 16, 2010 8:24 PM PST up reply actions
Curry-Ellis
I spoke earlier on another post that this combo needed more time to evolve,
but what I’ve seen lately is that the role of leadership on the floor has tilted in Curry’s direction.
And this probably caps off his grownth and maturity this season.
He has come from a person that was not wanted by some teammates, (one spoke about it but we don’t know how far that influenced other players) to a main player,
To the floor leader.
That could have been enough to destroy his confidence early on but he was not only able to over come that , but to become a standout.
If Ellis by now can’t trust the fact that he has someone on the floor that can make his life easier, then maybe he will never get it.

by 





























