Golden State Of Mind: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: MLB Trade Deadline: Phils, Astros complete Roy Oswalt deal

Asking GSoM: Why the Golden State Warriors are so bad + Stephen Curry and Monta Ellis co-existing + Keys against Toronto Raptors

UPDATE (10:42am): Make sure to check out the flip side- Blogging With The Enemy - Taking It To the HQ Community where we rap it up about how former Warriors and now Raptors Marco Belinelli and Patrick O'Bryant are doing as well as the chances Chris Bosh bolts Canada this offseason.

===========================

It's a been awhile since we aired one of these segments, but thanks to the good folks at Raptors HQ in preparation between this Saturday's showdown between the Golden State Warriors and Toronto Raptors here in the Bay Area we're bringing it back!

Bosh_medium

Interesting, but bizarre... very bizarre.

JUMP for the Q's and my 20 cents.

Star-divide

Raptors-xl_medium

Our friends at Raptors HQ are Asking GSoM:

1. Just what has happened to the Warriors this year? On paper this team has some good talent yet they have been unable to piece things together. Biedrins has been AWOL, injuries have piled up and unless they are at home they have little chance to win. This can't be all ownership's fault can it?

2. Talk about Steph Curry and the season he has had. Can he and Ellis co-exist?

3. What are the keys to the game for the Warriors to get a win against the Raps?

Post your thoughts in the comments.

My 20 cents...

1. The #1 reason the Warriors have the 3rd worst record in the league in injuries. This roster is just banged up. I'm not going to discount the role of the front office and management in trading for injured players who weren't even expected to play, but there's a bunch of fluke injuries that have hit this roster hard- particularly Brandan Wright and Anthony Randolph's.

But pay attention to the wording above. Injuries are not the #1 reason this team is bad. Even without the injuries this team wasn't any good. Don't believe the hype. It's not that talented. It's filled with overhyped pieces who haven't really done much in the league. Here's the 2 keys:

  • Supposed All-Star snub Monta Ellis has never led a team to the NBA Playoffs (he was just a peripheral piece in that 2007 WE BELIEVE run), yet this team decided to hand him the keys to the franchise back in the summer of 2008. What he has led is the NBA in turnovers at over 4 game. He has ultimately been a failure at the point guard position and has morphed into a high volume scorer. 
  • The Warriors other supposed franchise cornerstone, center Andris Biedrins is not a shutdown defender by any stretch, so he needs to give the Warriors something consistent offensively to make up for his softness on that side of the ball. Holding the NBA record for worst free throw % of all-time and seeing a drastic scoring dropoff from 11.9 ppg in 2008-2009 to 5.0 ppg this season is not a good start. Being injury prone the past 2 seasons hasn't helped either. I still can't believe some folks in Dubs land didn't want to trade Biedrins and Wright to the Suns this past offseason for Amare Stoudemire, because they claimed Amare was too injury prone.
Breaking it down, the #1 reason this team is bad is because they (meaning former GM Chris Mullin, Robert Rowell, and Chris Cohan) foolishly thought it was a bright idea to build around these two good, but deeply flawed players, who barely hold their opposing matchups from getting career nights every night.

2. Stephen Curry is having a fantastic rookie season. He's one of the few reasons to keep watching this team besides dubious pursuits such as Ellis going after the all-time turnover record and Biedrins going for the worst free throw percentage in a season in NBA history. Curry has been playing extremely heavy minutes (including back-to-back 48 minute nights) and for the most part he's responded. He's up to 16ppg (45.5% FG, 41.7% 3pt, 87.8% FT), 5.4 apg, 4.2 rpg, and 1.8 steals, but look at how he's gotten here (from Yahoo! Sports):

 Situation G Min  M A Pct   M A Pct   M A Pct   Off Def Tot   Ast TO Stl Blk PF PPG  
 October 2 37:23  6.0 10.5 57.1   1.0 2.0 50.0   0.0 0.0 N/A   0.5 1.5 2.0   5.5 2.5 2.5 0.0 3.5 13.0  
 November 14 29:06  3.6 8.6 41.7   1.1 2.8 38.5   1.6 2.0 78.6   0.4 2.9 3.2   5.3 2.5 1.3 0.4 3.1 9.8  
 December 15 33:47  5.1 11.5 44.5   1.5 3.9 39.7   1.7 1.9 89.7   0.5 3.9 4.4   3.7 2.7 2.3 0.3 3.5 13.5  
 January 15 39:30  7.3 15.1 48.0   2.4 4.9 48.7   2.2 2.5 89.2   0.4 4.0 4.4   5.1 2.7 2.0 0.2 3.5 19.1  
 February 12 39:23  8.2 17.5 46.7   2.1 6.0 34.7   3.1 3.4 90.2   0.7 4.7 5.3   7.3 3.8 1.6 0.1 2.7 21.5  
 March 5 41:06  6.8 16.8 40.5   3.0 6.2 48.4   2.4 2.6 92.3   0.6 3.0 3.6   7.2 4.4 1.4 0.0 2.2 19.0  

What rookie wall?

I'm in the minority, but I actually think Curry and Ellis can co-exist. They'll need to make some big strides on defense and cut down those turnovers, but both seem doable. Well turnovers are just something we're all going to have to live with for Ellis, but there's hope for Curry. They are currently the highest scoring backcourt in the league. It's not like a smallish backcourt hasn't worked for hoops mastermind Don Nelson in the past. No one was complaining about Steve Nash and Nick Van Exel back in Dallas. It can work, but the Warriors need to upgrade at the 4 and 5 spots desperately. Whether that can happen from in-house player development remains to be seen.

3. It's really simple and it's the only way the Dubs can win any games from here on out in 2009-2010. The Warriors have to catch fire.

Basketball_20hot_20shot_medium

via www.wholesalemedals.com

Poll
Can Stephen Curry and Monta Ellis co-exist on the Warriors?
YES: Like peanut butter and jelly!
404 votes
NO: Curry should be the one to go
51 votes
NO: Ellis should be the one to go
816 votes

1271 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 169 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Totally agree w/your number #1 AB1

And I want to highlight what you say here:

Even without the injuries this team wasn’t any good. Don’t believe the hype. It’s not that talented.

I don’t know that most people here would agree with this, but it is as true this past offseason as it is now. Do not believe any hype about our “talent.” This organization needs to be wiped off the map and started anew, in San Francisco. Make Stephen Curry a player/coach, and trade everyone else away for draft picks. Hope that the draft is good to us. Rinse and repeat. There is no superstar sans Dwight Howard that will make this team a contender. No one is coming to save this team.

by GameSix on Mar 10, 2010 9:25 AM PST reply actions  

This organization needs to be wiped off the map and started anew, in San Francisco. Make Stephen Curry a player/coach,

 Haha, Curr-bury is apparently a heavy duty christian? I doubt his fans would want him to be know as the leader of a team of “san francisco warriors” ?
 Naw, I think we should put together some kind of deal,(with other teams involved) to move him to charlotte at great profit to us. Turn the hype to our advantage and play it for all it’s worth.

Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 10, 2010 9:40 AM PST reply actions  

I voted that Curry-Ellis can coexsists, but with a caveat. A Curry-Ellis backcourt will only work if they have a dominant player in the front court, and no I do not think Amare was/is that person.

So let me get this straight... Maggette is the healthy guy.
"Winning is not enough. All others must lose." - Larry Ellison

by Badly Browned on Mar 10, 2010 9:42 AM PST reply actions  

+1 yep a dominant player down under is the need....

Amare is mute anyway as he would not have signed with us and doubt that we would attract a star dominate trade as well….need to draft that guy.

by Only In Fairfax on Mar 10, 2010 10:24 AM PST up reply actions  

Amare is mute anyway as he would not have signed with us

 If he’s mute he’d have to sign to communicate on the court?

Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 10, 2010 2:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Curry and Ellis can coexist, and thrive, provided they are surrounded by big athletic wings who can defend and rebound. A Gerald Wallace, Shane Battier, Tayshaun Prince, Andrei Kirilenko-type would be ideal.

In the offseason I proposed a Maggs for Tayshaun trade that most on this site thought was a good idea but that Detroit would not go for. Given the year that Maggette had, and the Pistons desperate need for some offense, I wonder if this might be revisited? Detroit might be reluctant because Maggs has 3 more years under contract, but it seems not so far-fetched.

Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!

by Supafishal on Mar 10, 2010 9:51 AM PST reply actions  

Not Talented?? Im not sure about that...

I will agree that some of the talent on the team has not developed as fast as we all would hope but a lot of that has to do with injuires and Don Nelson chasing the wins records he claims he doesnt care about. Why else would he not start Randolph EVERY GAME! Seeing as he is one of our best pieces we have on the team. To me we need to get rid of Nelly. Hopefully he gets his wins record this season and next season we can wipe the slate clean with a new coach. We can then actually play a line up that we can actually see our young talent on display and hope that we dont have another injury prone season like this one. I believe with the line up below the Warriors future will actually be looking pretty good. With some good additions we could be one our way. All the teams in the West are getting older and with the Warriors young players we could be the new Atlanta Hawks of the West in a year or two…

PG- CURRY
SG- MORROW
SF- WRIGHT
PF- RANDOLPH
C- BIEDRINS

obviously this line up would mean Monta and Maggette would have to be traded but I believe this would be the best thing to do going forward and build around the young talent we have and get back to the run and gun Warriors that everybody loved. We should be able to get a decent big man for Monta and getting rid of Maggettes current contract is a win for the Dubs….

God Willing...

by RunTMCfan on Mar 10, 2010 10:07 AM PST reply actions  

Wright at SF?

ok. But what do we get for Monta/Maggette?

Curry/Monta/Turner/Morrow/Buike/Maggs/AR/Wright/Goose/Turiaf= Wins

by danielholl on Mar 10, 2010 10:22 AM PST up reply actions  

i know Wright is not a SF but the line up in general i think is a good line up….We would have lenghth for rebouding and defense but still be able to run and gun

God Willing...

by RunTMCfan on Mar 10, 2010 11:34 AM PST up reply actions  

not sure what we could really get for them but at least a big man who can rebound…Hopefully 2! We already have enough players who can score….

God Willing...

by RunTMCfan on Mar 10, 2010 2:06 PM PST up reply actions  

In some ways an "about to retire coach" like Nellie should be the perfect guy to develope a young team.

He has nothing to lose really..plenty of experience to pass on etc……a new coach with a future career to consider will be under tremendous pressure to have immediate success and that does not bode well for the “sacrifice wins for young player experience” ….that fact is the true irony of this year where normally vetran injurys at least give the young players the opportunity to grow…..in our situation the young players are injured(along with the vets) resulting in a bizarre totally wasted year……imagine BW at least having this year without injury….at least we would know if he is a keeper…..same with Randolph…..I was waiting to see him kick in when he went down…really bizarre deal here at this time…….but even if they were heathy and wowing us with their potential finally showing …it is obvious that we need some muscle under the basket and a SF for the future….Basketball Gods please give us Turner + the right big man……

by Only In Fairfax on Mar 10, 2010 10:52 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm cool with that line-up BUT...

… I’m on the fence about Biedrins nowadays. I think his confidence may be shot. I know the injuries may be big part of this but after watching him game after game avoid the hoop, I don’t know if he’ll be as good as was when he throwing double doubles out like it was nothing! I hope I’m wrong but I wouldn’t mind if Goose got traded. Then again, because he is a Warrior, he’d probably go on to have an all-star career.

Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Type the words RUN TMC in Ebay!
Pacquiao fans type MANNY CHANT in Ebay!

by JonDoe on Mar 10, 2010 1:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed!

but hopefully during the off season Beans can get his SWAGGER back cause somebody jacked it from him…If not we still got Turiaf and Beans can come of the bench

God Willing...

by RunTMCfan on Mar 10, 2010 2:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I think he'll make a comeback.

He’s pretty much been injured the entire season.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 4:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Why else would he not start Randolph EVERY GAME!

  To postpone the stickman injuring himself is the most obvious reason? Everyone including nellie could see he was a crash just waiting to happen?

Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 10, 2010 2:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe a new coach

will help. Even Dunleavey lost his job as a GM it is all about coaching and finishing games

Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........

by mykelala01 on Mar 10, 2010 10:13 AM PST reply actions  

What's wrong with the warriors?? LOL that's a trick question right??

A million things are wrong with the warriors!!! Where do you want me to begin….Let me see….No chemistry, dumb ownership, horrible GM, nobody knows how to evaluate talent and blend that with a player who has character as well. And its not that the players aren’t developing, it’s that we’re not developing them. Don Nelson can not coach up a young kid, all Don knows how to do is teach a kid to run, outscore the opponent, don’t worry about D! That’s the Don nelson philosophy. I said it two years ago after the Warriors beat the Mavericks and then got whooped by Utah….need to get rid of nelson because he can only create a one upset and done scenario. His style has never won a championship, and never will win a championship because he doesn’t know how to teach his players how to play defense. So the #1 problem, DON NELSON!!

Second, yes we have two good guards in curry and ellis, and two solid offesnive backups in watson and morrow. But we can’t have a curry and ellis back court if we want to succeed. I’ll say it again and again, even though know warrior fan buys it, WE WILL NEVER WIN WITH MONTA ELLIS AS A STARTER!!! PERIOD! he’s not ever going to be a dominating 2 guard fora championship team, he could be a GREAT guy to come off the bench or to compliment other players, but he just does to many dumb things, doesn’t have a high enough basketball IQ, and makes too many turnovers to ever be a focal point for a championship team. Keep Curry, trade Ellis. Could get a TON for a guy like ellis from a dumb GM who thinks guys like Ellis win championships, but guys like Ellis don’t win championships. Guys like Ellis are just pieces to the championship. Carl Crawford lets take for example, same type of player as ellis except for the fact he can’t jump out of the gym. But that guy is as pure a scorer as there is in this league, No questions. He gets traded from the warriors to a back up position on the hawks, and now he’s considered for the 6th man award. There’s certain guys franchises need to recognize can’t be focal points to championships, Curry is one, Ellis is not. And considering the amount of money we are paying Ellis, he is never going to see himself in a complimentary role on this team, so the only thing to do is to trade him.

by ntfarell on Mar 10, 2010 10:43 AM PST reply actions  

doesn’t have a high enough basketball IQ

Specifics – when you say this, what exactly are you referring to? This phrase doesn’t seem to have much meaning on it’s own at this point in time.

But that guy is as pure a scorer as there is in this league

I’m assuming you’re talking about Jamal Crawford and Carl was just a typo. Anyways, efficiency matters. If you’re scoring but you’re not efficient, you are not “as pure a scorer as there is in this league”.

he could be a GREAT guy to come off the bench or to compliment other players

No team has 5 great starters. Even if you don’t think Monta is a star, there is room for a guy like him to be a solid starter on a championship team. Throw Lebron James on the Warriors and give us Gasol instead of Biedrins, and we’re a championship caliber team, and that’s with Monta Ellis as a starter. I think you can go into some more specifics why the only thing to do with Monta is trade him if he can’t be a superstar…..

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 10:51 AM PST up reply actions  

...

1. he just doesn’t pay attention to the smaller details in a basketball game. He runs into traffic and picks up his dribble without thinking, doesn’t look to find a man to box out when the ball is in the airbecause is automatically looking to run on offense rather than to stay back on defense. Makes tons of dumb turnovers, and overall just doesn’t play smart.

2. LOL baseball season coming up, carl crawford is just in my head for some reason lol. and Jamal crawford is efficent, that’s why he’s up for the 6th man award this year. He wasn’t efficient on the warriors because of the way the warriors tried to use him. Ellis could be efficient, but not as the star of this team is all I’m saying.

3. I never said he had to come off the bench, I was just saying he’s better suited as a complimentary player is what I said. He could compliment players, but he can never be the star. And how are you going to bring in guys like Gasol and Lebron when you’re paying Ellis as much as we are. I’m considering the amount we’re paying him for the production he produces as well. I’m not saying he is going to be a sixth man like crawford because i do believe he is better than Crawford. I’m just saying he’s better suited as a complimentary player, and we can’t afford to bring in other guys when we’re paying Ellis so much to be our “star”.

by ntfarell on Mar 10, 2010 10:57 AM PST up reply actions  

and like i started....

all these factors can be situated with a new head coach…a lot of ellis faults are because of the way he was taught by Nelson. I just believe that Ellis can not be our focal point, and because we’re paying him so much, we can’t afford to bring in another focal point to make Ellis a more complimentary player, so my only thought is, we trade him.

by ntfarell on Mar 10, 2010 11:00 AM PST up reply actions  

I wasn’t actually disagreeing with most of your points just looking for some elaboration, in case it didn’t come off that way. I guess all I really have to say in response is one point I like to make is that Ellis isn’t really paid like a star, and is paid more like a decent complementary piece, and his contract isn’t really that big of a deal – if somehow we found a star player we could acquire, he could fit in with Ellis + Biedrins and our salary situation would still be fine (well, other than Maggette’s contract)….

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 11:12 AM PST up reply actions  

+1 Barry...hit the "nail square on the head" there.

Add an elite SF and elite power talent under the basket and we are a different team completly……if that miracle happened we would be out there looking for a driving/scoring 2 like Ellis to complete the package….

by Only In Fairfax on Mar 10, 2010 11:00 AM PST up reply actions  

I see you're point, but 2 guards are easier to find then SF and PF

Guards are the easiest position to fill, just look at the warriors….they have tons of good guards who can slash and score…and considering how much more we’re paying ellis, they are a much better deal. Not to mention Ellis has already shown displeasure with the warriors after the Stephen Jackson trade. If the warriors stay this bad, you never know if we might get another situation like that next year or in the future.

by ntfarell on Mar 10, 2010 11:03 AM PST up reply actions  

Question is though would we actually be able to get big man whose talent at PF/C is the equal of Monta's talant as a 2.

I doubt that. Could work though if in addition to monta we could add expirings/others not in the plan. I still doubt if we could aquire the big man star lie Bosh etc. even if we skuttled the team.

by Only In Fairfax on Mar 10, 2010 3:48 PM PST up reply actions  

is there?
No team has 5 great starters. Even if you don’t think Monta is a star, there is room for a guy like him to be a solid starter on a championship team.

He’d need a back court mate who is defensively sound and can guard 2guards at times. I know you keep harping on if we have a guy like Raja Bell (younger version) on the bench we’re fine, but we’re not when you get into playoff scenarios. You’re starting PG and SG (if monta is the SG) will expect to play over 30 minutes. Probably over 36. Meaning they will see majority of the action and the back court will be worked. Having 2 sub-par defenders in back court is suicidal. I actually just thought of a good defensive mate- Delonte West. Capable of handling and playing off ball, and a rugged defender. But even he and Mo Williams couldn’t hang defensively vs.Orlando last year. How do you expect it to work vs. Kobe, Brandon Roy and others? You can’t just trade baskets. At some point you need stops.

My ultimate point- one of monta/curry need to go to make this a better TEAM capable of playoff runs. Even when they both fulfill there potential, it’ll still be a .500 team because of such defensive deficiencies.

by tafkasam on Mar 10, 2010 11:07 AM PST up reply actions  

word...

i think we get rid of one two, my argument just takes it further and i believe curry is a better piece because of his ability to create than ellis…that and he takes care of the ball far greater then ellis as well.

by ntfarell on Mar 10, 2010 11:13 AM PST up reply actions  

....
  • “i think we get rid of one TOO (not 2)” lol

by ntfarell on Mar 10, 2010 11:14 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree

Mostly because I think it’s easier to find a SG than a specific PG that will tailor to Monta

by tafkasam on Mar 10, 2010 11:15 AM PST up reply actions  

let me ask you this...

what makes you think ellis can help win as a warrior?? considering how much we’re paying him as well? What’s your plan to bring in talent with contracts on Ellis and Curry like they are??

by ntfarell on Mar 10, 2010 11:08 AM PST up reply actions  

What’s your plan to bring in talent

Draft high upside guys, get rid of Maggette’s contract if we can and don’t part with real talent to do so, and be willing to trade anyone and everyone to acquire a star that makes sense for us long term. It’ll take some waiting/patience, and it sucks because we’ve been losing so long, but there’s no easy fix for this team.

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 11:14 AM PST up reply actions  

lol yeah

maggette was a joke when we signed him, was SOOO pissed when we did. Livei n the LA area, so i was sick and tired of watching him as a Clipper, he was horrible for he was being payed there as well….definitely agree with you there. and of course draft high upside guys, i’m not suggesting we don’t do that. But who can we trade to acquire for a star that makes sense long term though?? who is going to take any of the warrior players?? I think Ellis is our “best” player, and as our “best” player I believe we could get a couple good young pieces (not that ellis isn’t young) for the price of one because of how highly thought of Ellis is for the rest of our league. You don’t trade Ellis unless you get solid pieces of course. You don’t just trade ellis because he doesn’t fit with Curry, that’s not what i’m suggesting at all. But considering Ellis hasn’t been happy since Stephen Jackson was traded, and we are paying him so much, do we want to risk waiting for him to turn on us? and then we get the stephen jackson deal where the entire league knows the player doesn’t want to be there, therefore we have less bargaining during trade talks. I see your point though Barry, This is just my opinion on Ellis. I love the guy, but not as much as I love the Warriors. I want to see the Warriors win more than anything, and I just don’t see how we can pay Monta Ellis to be our “star” player. I can’t ever see him being the “star” of a championship run. And because of how much we’re paying him, it’s just difficult to ever see him taking a backseat considering he has, like a lot of NBA players, a fairly large ego.

by ntfarell on Mar 10, 2010 11:23 AM PST up reply actions  

Not sure if that star is available for us right now. Bosh could have made sense, but he seems intent on hitting free agency. We might just have to wait for one to become available. Every once in a while a guy like Pau becomes available, but you might have to wait a couple years for the right one to come along.

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 11:47 AM PST up reply actions  

The problem with part of your argument, as was stated before, is that Monta is not getting paid like a “star” player. A non-increasing $11 mil/yr isnt a bad contract at all for the production he can bring (put in the right position provided). Its not even in the top 60 highest contracts in the league.

by FitzPRSpin on Mar 10, 2010 2:07 PM PST up reply actions  

note:

when i say “best” player, i just mean perception from around the league, that he’s our “best” player

by ntfarell on Mar 10, 2010 11:24 AM PST up reply actions  

+1 Preach on!

God Willing...

by RunTMCfan on Mar 10, 2010 12:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Chris Bosh

Would look so good in a Warriors uniform.

by Owner on Mar 10, 2010 10:54 AM PST reply actions  

I agree with you

I love Chris Bosh, it would make biedrins that much better as well

by ntfarell on Mar 10, 2010 10:59 AM PST up reply actions  

...but how do we get a elite star like Bosh to sign a long term contract with the Warriors?

…only way that possibly might happen—big if—-would be if Ellison bought the Warriors before the end of the season and create some major …NEW ERA IN THE BAY AREA…type headlines around the league…….gotta get a top rapper on board as well ha!

by Only In Fairfax on Mar 10, 2010 11:23 AM PST up reply actions  

I like it

lets sell it to the owners…

by ntfarell on Mar 10, 2010 11:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Who needs a top rapper...

We’ve got the entire Bay reppin da Warriors.

E-40 would suffice though. Maybe too short as well.

by Owner on Mar 10, 2010 1:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Breaking it down, the #1 reason this team is bad is because they (meaning former GM Chris Mullin, Robert Rowell, and Chris Cohan) foolishly thought it was a bright idea to build around these two good, but deeply flawed players, who barely hold their opposing matchups from getting career nights every night.

We are bad because we don’t have top talent. GameSix said the only player that can make us a contender is Dwight Howard, but that just isn’t true. We could easily surround Lebron with as much talent as the Cavs can. Duncan would make us a good team. Any superstar would, really. The problem is having a superstar really is the difference between one of the best teams in the league and one of the worst – top talent has that big of an effect in the NBA. We didn’t build around Biedrins and Monta – we gave two young, solid players contracts fairly in line with their production at the time, and neither are paid like superstars, they’re paid for what they are. We aren’t building around them as much as keeping them in our future plans. We’re still searching for that superstar.

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 10:56 AM PST reply actions  

A stretch
We could easily surround Lebron with as much talent as the Cavs can.

We have much more OFFENSIVE talent than Cleveland. they have better talent overall. Delonte and Parker are better defenders than anything we have on perimeter. all 4 of there post players are better than anything we have. They know how to move without the ball, play defense, and play with in there limitations. Lebron would make us a playoff team. but he can’t guard all 5 guys or box out all 5 guys for rebounds (even if it seems like he can)

by tafkasam on Mar 10, 2010 10:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Eh, there’s probably some negative correlation between defensive effectiveness and offensive usage rate – I’d expect our role players to play better D with Lebron on this team, especially guys like Ellis who will use a lot less energy on offense and have more energy for defense. Plus a winning culture and some coaching that actually cares a bit about D and our performance would be a lot better. Back in the “We Believe” era we actually went through stretches where our team played decent defense. I honestly don’t think the Cavs minus Lebron are any better than a Warriors team that doesn’t lose all its bigs to injury and has a coach willing to play our best players.

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 11:17 AM PST up reply actions  

<blockquoteI honestly don’t think the Cavs minus Lebron are any better than a Warriors team that doesn’t lose all its bigs to injury and has a coach willing to play our best players.>

You need to watch Varejao, Shaq, Big Z, Hickson (not counting Jamison) again if you think our bigs are better. higher upside? Sure. Better, not a chance. Varejao is ultimate glue big, playing quality D, rebounding, constantly moving on offense. Big Z may be slow, but he’s a defensive presense, rebounder etc. edit: NVM I don’t need to tell you…

by tafkasam on Mar 10, 2010 11:20 AM PST up reply actions  

...and the only way really to get one without totally blowing up the team is to draft one...

…..and reality wise no superstar would come here anyway…especially if we traded away what talent that we have…..just dont understand why people dont understand this?

by Only In Fairfax on Mar 10, 2010 11:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Offensively there has been no problem with Monta and Curry

The problem is of course defense. It’s not only Monta and Curry but the whole team. Even without Monta the Warriors can score 130 points easy. At some point the Warriors need to make a decision to trade some offensive players for more defensively sound ones. Some people still want to defend it but it won’t work.

I’m sure in 2002; Nash, Iverson, Ray Allen on the perimeter would have been an offensive nightmare but still would have struggled to reach .500 because of how easily they could be killed defensively. And I’m almost positive Curry, Monta, Morrow will never reach levels of those 3

Summing up: I’m not saying become the spurs. But would it be so bad to have someone like Iguodala instead of Monta, or if you wanted to trade Curry, have someone like Russel Westbrook. Someone who can defend, has good but limited offensive skill but makes the team overall much better. The same can be said at other positions too.

by tafkasam on Mar 10, 2010 10:56 AM PST reply actions  

Offensively there has been no problem with Monta and Curry

If only this were true. With Monta off the floor, the offense has scored around 113 points per 100 possessions… only Phoenix posts an offensive efficiency that’s higher than that. But the Dubs have been a downright bad offensive team with Monta on the floor. They’ve scored 104.6 points per 100 possessions when he’s played, a figure that’d place them 22nd in the league in offensive efficiency.

I don’t know that there’s anything that would prevent Curry and Monta from gelling offensively at some point; with a better approach and better coaching, Monta could well become effective again, no matter who’s playing alongside him. Long-term, I’d agree that defense is probably the bigger question mark. But right now, defense is the least of our worries. These guys don’t even score well together.

Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis

by onlxn on Mar 10, 2010 4:21 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

With Monta off the floor, the offense has scored around 113 points per 100 possessions

  That’s mostly because the other teams usually don’t need to take us seriously when Montay is sitting. Either they have a big lead and are coasting against our scrubs or if Montay is hurt they get complacent when they look at a starting line up of all the D leaguers . The games Montay plays are more tightly contested cause unlike most of his own fans the other players respect him.

Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 10, 2010 4:32 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

+1

Players know how good he is, I bet everyone we have played at least have had to ask themselves who that guy was on our bench only to find out he’s from the D league. It’s the mindset of players that make a difference

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Apparently they do need to take us seriously

because 113 points per 100 possessions is nothing to ignore.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 5:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Apparently they do need to take us seriously because 113 points per 100 possessions is nothing to ignore.

   Well, our record says most of them don’t need to take us seriously but obviously the teams we beat when shorthanded or starting D leaguers needed to get ttheir act together :>)

Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 10, 2010 11:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Record Shmrecord

  Haha, That why they go out there. The teams with a chance for the playoffs are hoping to win, the others if they are smart are hoping to lose.

Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 11, 2010 10:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Randolph + Biedrins is too lightweight though

Can’t see either ever being able to man up on Bynum/Gasol, Howard or other beefy bigs. Both are (potentially) excellent weak side defenders though

by tafkasam on Mar 10, 2010 11:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Ageed tafkasam.

We need a force in the mix there.

by Only In Fairfax on Mar 10, 2010 11:38 AM PST up reply actions  

The Big One -- No D Is Good D?!!!

All of what Altima say is true — but he missed a big reason for thi team’s problems. The team refuses to play defense. Night in, night out we watch oppopsing teams run past W’s players as they jog back up the floor for open jumpers, cuts to basket for dunks, or layups. This was true before all these supposedly first string players got injured and its’ true now. No team has ever won a championship — much less made it to a conference finals — without playing defense. Hmm.. you say the W’s haven’t made it to a conference finals in how long?

Curry is a nice player, but he gets taken to the cleaners routinely by bigger, more physical guards. This limitation in his game – unlikely to ever change — could be addressed if the team played “team” defense and helped out. But they don’t. Nobody on the team takes it seriously. Curry gets backed in down low, gives ground and nobody appears to help out. One presumes their on-court action reflects the priorities of the coaching staff, which is also apparently uninterested in defense.

Truth is that it does deeper — the organization does not insist upon and demand excellence at all times from its players and has not attracted players that can live up to this standard. The other “truth” to this is that there are few NBA teams that do seem to demand excellence night in/night out. Many teams — more than half of which appear only semi-competently run — also just have their guys run up and down the court with no real grit and determination. It’s what sets players like Ginobli, Bryant, Nash and others apart from the Baron Davis’s of the league.

I got off on a bit of a tangent — the point is that on-court failure reflects organizational failure. The W’s have obvious organizational problems that, like the Clippers and a few other teams, go way back. Winning and success are the exception, not the rule. This season is just like many of the seasons of the past decade. The we believe team was an aberration — albeit a nice one.

Until the organization starts trying to changes its organizational culture, get serious, and build players that can exemplify a more professional approach it will fail.

by James Russell on Mar 10, 2010 12:14 PM PST reply actions  

Question to those who said no

Is it because you think he dislikes him? Or do you honestly think he all of sudden is not a good player?

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 1:45 PM PST reply actions  

The main reason I want to trade Monta is that he is way undersized for his position.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 5:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Did you want to trade him from 2006-2008?

Or is it just now your finding a huge issue with his size?

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 5:45 PM PST up reply actions  

It wasn't an issue with BD, obviously.

Last season, they were trying him out at point, so it wasn’t an issue yet.
Now we have to face facts- Monta is too small to guard most 2s effectively (inb4 Brandon Roy), and a pretty poor ballhandler.
If we want to keep Monta and Curry, we’ll continue being one of the worst defensive teams in the NBA.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 5:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Curry would be the ball handler so thats a non issue

He doesn’t get nearly enough credit for his defense. Players know he’s a good defender, writers , analysts etc. And to have a top defense it’s more important to have a front line. The Cavs last year started Delonte West and Mo Williams together and it was a non issue cause of there front court. Also it’s about effort, as a team there is no effort here. Also look at the first half of the year his defense looked great and you have to think playing all these minutes don’t help him on defense. Most players who play heavy minutes conserve energy on defense and playing 42 or more minutes a night won’t help. I don’t disagree that they would have there issues but so does every back court.

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 6:03 PM PST up reply actions  

West and Williams are much better defensive players than Monta and Curry….

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 6:10 PM PST up reply actions  

West yes

Mo, very debatable

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 6:36 PM PST up reply actions  

I like Mo as a defensive player against PG’s. SG’s….not so much.

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 7:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Thats where you have an elite defender in West.

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 10, 2010 7:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Curry would be the ball handler so thats a non issue

You misunderstand. I was saying that we were playing Monta at 1, so he was defending other 1s and actually having a 2 defend 2s. Now we know he can’t play 1, so he has to defend 2s, which he’s bad at.
Fitz says he’s a good defender. I’ve been impressed by his defense maybe 3 times this season- the first game against BRoy (which didn’t happen next time), against Granger (who didn’t just shoot over him for some reason), and he had some clutch D against Joe Johnson a couple weeks ago.
Who in their front court is an elite defensive player? Varejao is pretty good, and Z is tall, but that was about it. It was a non-issue because West is a very good defender, and Mo tries.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 6:11 PM PST up reply actions  

West is their best defender…. Lebron has more potential to guard multiple positions though.

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 10, 2010 6:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Fitz isn't the only one is who likes his defense, and I don't care what Fitz says

MT2 does, again like I’ve said before other players do, Spears called him a great defender and other analysts like his defense. West is a great defender and a better one than Monta but that shouldn’t take anything away from Monta. And Z’s defense is solid, they had Ben Wallace for a little bit and Varejoa like you said. There all good defenders

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 6:40 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m curious as to when MT2 said Monta was a good defender.
He’s made strides, but he isn’t a good defender.

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 10, 2010 6:45 PM PST up reply actions  

They're good defenders

but they’re not elite defensive players, and Ben Wallace was pretty bad when he was in Cleveland. They never had Ben Wallace in his prime, KG, Tim Duncan, Zo, or Howard or something. Being able to play West and Mo is because West is a good defender and can guard 2s effectively, whereas Monta really can’t.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 6:49 PM PST up reply actions  

True maybe not elite but still pretty good

And they had some good defenders off the bench like Terrence Kinsey who’d play some SF when LBJ was at the 4.

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 7:00 PM PST up reply actions  

When you got the best player in the world

It takes a lot of pressure of them when you have a force on both ends like that. I never said they have elite post defenders but very good ones. And Varejao by some is considered an elite post defender, I don’t but many do. I agree you need to have great post defenders to win and that’s one of the reasons why they lost to ORL. But they still were a great defense despite 2’s shooting over there guards.

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 7:09 PM PST up reply actions  

No I just don't believe he's an elite defender you make him out to be

Just a good one

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 8:42 PM PST up reply actions  

I never said he was elite

that was just MDB. I said he was good to very good. They were able to run Mo and Delonte because Delonte is a good defensive player, not because of Z and Varejao down low, which is what you were arguing.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 11, 2010 12:43 AM PST up reply actions  

West is one of the elite on-ball defenders in this league.

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 11, 2010 6:37 AM PST up reply actions  

Kinsey barely played.

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 10, 2010 7:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Still a good defender none the less and was used in the games in defensive situations

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 7:03 PM PST up reply actions  

It wasn’t an issue with BD, obviously.

See, I don’t see this line of thinking, because it still was an issue with Davis around. Davis isn’t big enough to guard 2’s, either – we still had a mismatch. It worked better, no doubt, but it still was far from ideal. Ideal would be more along the lines of Stuckey or Tyreke type size at the point next to Monta.

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 6:13 PM PST up reply actions  

You're mostly right

but I can’t seem to find BD’s wingspan. I think that would be a pretty good indicator, because I know that BD had the bulk for it.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 6:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Let’s just assume BD had good length, I’m pretty sure of that. But yeah, Stuckey is still an inch and a half taller than him with good length. Baron’s problem was always height – SG’s could still shoot over him. Not as easily as they can shoot over Monta, but still easily enough for it to be a concern.

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 7:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah

it was a problem, but BD was probably one of the 3 or 4 best point guards to pair with Monta, after Stuckey and Kidd.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 7:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh I definitely agree, I guess one of the things is it highlights just how difficult getting an ideal matchup there is with Monta playing SG….

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 7:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Truth

which is why I think he has to go.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 8:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Ownership could be better, but its not to blame.

1) Injuries hold a young and developing team back in as severe way. We also have a coaching staff that would thrive with quality veteran players (for reference look up Warriors 2006-2008). The problem is our only quality veteran than has been healthy enough to play is Maggette. Granted, Corey has had one of his better seasons as a pro.

As much as I would like Ellison to buy our club, the front office of this team has actually assembled a decent roster that will only improve as the years go on. Unfortunately, we’ve now had 2 years in which injuries have crippled us from seeing what this lineup can do.

Just once can I see a regular season game that has Monta Curry Azubuike Wright and Biedrins starting, with Watson Morrow Maggette Randolph and Ronny off the bench, and all of them be at least 80% healthy. Before any trades that’s what I want to see.

2) Steph’s rookie season has obvioulsy been tremendous, if it wasn’t for Tyreke he would win R.O.Y. hands down. T.O’s should come down a little bit, but other than that he has impressed. YES!!!!!! Monta and Steph can work. If Monta from 2 years ago and Baron Davis can work, these two can certainly work. Offensively its a no brainer, with Monta rarely being at 100% this season, they are the heighest scoring backcourt in the league. Now that Monta knows he is the offguard, my hope is that he focuses in on the defensive end. We’ve already seen it this year that he’s learned how his quickness, athleticism and speed can make up for size and strength. He had very good man on man games guarding people like Melo, Roy, and Joe J. Having Azubuike healthy to guard the best wing players is also something that will benefit the two of them.

Obviously turnover’s are a small cause for concern. Monta just needs to trust Steph more and realize his growth as a player will make him that much more efffective transitioning back into the role he fulfilled as B.D.‘s sidekick. Part of me thinks he’s just giving Steph a hard time because he’s a rook with a lot of confidence and he wants to keep him humble, I remember him saying something about how Baron and Fisher did that to him when he first came in. If this team can just learn to use it’s quickness in tandum on the defensive end, we can hold our own. Or at least hold opponents to -110ppg.

When healthy 111 points for to 107 points against seems reasonable for this team. Those would be better numbers than our 48 win team had in 07-08, health is the key. No international ball this summer Beans. AND NO MOPED’S!!!!!!

3)Shoot 70% from the field.

by myk on Mar 10, 2010 1:45 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

recd
Just once can I see a regular season game that has Monta Curry Azubuike Wright and Biedrins starting, with Watson Morrow Maggette Randolph and Ronny off the bench, and all of them be at least 80% healthy. Before any trades that’s what I want to see.

Seriously.

by WheresMyChippy on Mar 10, 2010 2:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Also there should be another option in the poll

Something like : Let me see this team healthy before judging

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 1:57 PM PST reply actions  

That would be a dream but we live in reality

To wait for this team to remain healthy is just a dream. Reality, its been two season now that we faced injuries, Wright never played half a season in his life, Biedrins hasn’t done much lately and seems to be in the dog house. AR is not a star yet, he has a huge potential but who knows what kind of player will he become maybe a Lamar Odom or maybe Tyrus Thomas or maybe Joe Smith, basically, he hasn’t shown anything like he did in the summer. Ellis is not a good fit to play with Curry, I would do like the Thunders did with Westbrook. Have a guy like Sefolosha play next to him, a defensive minded SG would complement Curry’s game. What this team needs is some scoring from C/PF and rebounds, i would trade Ellis for a big man like Lee or Boozer.

Waaaarriors

by puffylove on Mar 10, 2010 2:42 PM PST reply actions  

reality is all too easy to stray from

and the devotion of the team’s fans make them vulnerable. Projecting anything from Randolph’s summer was a good example: the level of competition allowed him to re-live his school memories of being the best player on the court (even if the actual best player was deferring to him), and Smart fed the fantasy by abusing the unlimited foul rule. If either Wright or Randolph want to get regular minutes rather than situational match-ups, they have to show either offensive or defensive consistency plus rebounding. We don’t even know if Randolph can remember and adhere to his assignments on both ends for any length of time.

by the.monk on Mar 10, 2010 2:58 PM PST up reply actions  

the level of competition allowed him to re-live his school memories of being the best player on the court

Ha, it’s funny because even in high school Randolph wasn’t the best player on the court, at least based on how poorly his high school team did despite having him on the team….

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 6:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Isn’t that saying something that all his high school teams sucked with a talent of his caliber?

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 10, 2010 6:21 PM PST up reply actions  

rookie wall

Am I the only one who looked at Stephen Curry’s stats in March so far, and said, “Shooting percentage down to 40% and TO up over 4!”

Isn’t that the rookie wall right there?

by Evanz on Mar 10, 2010 3:21 PM PST reply actions  

Small sample size.

He has 2 sets of 2 back to back games. Played 48 min in two of them.

You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk

by LostHawkGSW on Mar 10, 2010 3:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Turnovers

Ellis is averaging over 4 TO when he has the bulk of the minutes at the point. In the last couple of months, Curry has also turned the ball over much more (3.8 in Feb, 4.4 in Mar!), since he has assumed the bulk of the point responsibilities. Ellis is a very young player still who was basically forced to play out of his natural position. If he goes back to SG, there’s no reason to worry about TO, because he won’t handle the ball as much. Curry is the one that we need to be concerned with. He is also a very young player, and is also learning to play a new position. The reasons Ellis had a lot of TO are the very same reasons Curry is and may continue to have in the near future.

Just seems like everyone is so amped to take Ellis down, and prop Curry up. This is really counter-productive. Ellis is by far the most talented scorer (RIGHT NOW) on the W’s. He’s 6th in the entire NBA, if one needs reminding. Curry has potential. Let them play together. Ellis will still get his point, and his TO will go down. Curry can focus on playmaking and taking smart shots. Get everyone else healthy, and we will have a shot at winning games.

by Evanz on Mar 10, 2010 3:28 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

REC'd

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 3:58 PM PST up reply actions  

We will have a shot at being a .500 team with our whole lineup healthy. We won’t be a playoff contender. That would, admittedly, be much better than what we’ve got now, but let’s not kid ourselves.

Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!

by Supafishal on Mar 10, 2010 4:13 PM PST up reply actions  

We'd have to see how they develop

We don’t know how good this team is together and may never

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

You seem to emphatically agree with anyone who ever states they like Monta.

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 10, 2010 6:11 PM PST up reply actions  

true

and Monta could come back and score 101 pts. breaking Wilts record and you’d say he didn;t rebound well, had 4 turnovers and we should trade him. Your not objective whatsoever when it comes to Monta. Wasn’t it you who said Delonte West was better than Monta? That one sitll makes me laugh. hahahhaha

8th alias and on probation
I promise to be kinder and gentler

by StinkyFingers on Mar 10, 2010 7:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, the past 2 years West has been better than Monta.
 Effective might be the better word though.

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 10, 2010 7:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Well

Ellis is too small to legitimately match up with 2s.
He’s 6th in PPG, but his combination of efficiency and volume is very poor. I’d take probably 7 of the next 10 scoring leaders for just what they bring to offense, to say nothing about defense and off the court stuff.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 5:55 PM PST up reply actions  

hmm...

You’re a genius! Why didn’t I think of getting one of these guys. So, which one should we go for?

7. Dirk Nowitzki
8. Chris Bosh
9. Amare Stoudemire
10. Joe Johnson
11. Zach Randolph
12. Derrick Rose
13. Stephen Jackson (oops, already had him – what a smart move, eh?)
14. David Lee
15. Tyreke Evans
16. Chauncey Billups
17. Rudy Gay

by Evanz on Mar 10, 2010 6:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I’d take all of them over Monta except Jackson, Randolph, and Gay.

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 10, 2010 6:22 PM PST up reply actions  

How would you get them?

by Evanz on Mar 10, 2010 6:23 PM PST up reply actions  

My point wasn't that we should trade for them

but saying that Ellis is “6th in scoring” is kind of a misnomer.
You also left off Kevin Martin, who I would absolutely trade for.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 6:22 PM PST up reply actions  

You realize he’s shooting 40% right? I mean, when he’s healthy.

by Evanz on Mar 10, 2010 6:26 PM PST up reply actions  

40% what?

but he’s AMAZING at getting to the line and is also a very good three point shooter. Check his TS% for his career- he’s an amazing scorer. Monta has been in the past, but this year he’s strictly a volume scorer, which is no good when you have a lot of other efficient scorers.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 6:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Players tend to be less efficient as they take more shots. That’s why Monta had a better SP early on. If the rest of the guys can take some of load off of him, Ellis won’t have to shoot so much. And his SP will go back up. Problem solved.

by Evanz on Mar 10, 2010 6:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I don’t think he ever had a high TS% this season. He started the year out badly before Jackson was traded.

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 10, 2010 6:47 PM PST up reply actions  

He's talking about FG%

Monta has had a good season FG% wise, but his TS% has been feces.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 6:49 PM PST up reply actions  

He avg.s 3.8 rebounds per.

ur small point guard avgs. that or better. As I said No D. No rebounds hardly any assists. That is one dimensional. Just score and at a 40% clip. That is not good.

8th alias and on probation
I promise to be kinder and gentler

by StinkyFingers on Mar 10, 2010 7:15 PM PST up reply actions  

TS% is the stat you’re looking for. It’s the measure of how efficient a player is offensively. ~54% is average. 60%+ is elite. Yes, Kevin Martin is elite when it comes to scoring efficiently, and he does it at a high volume. Nobody is arguing he’s a great all around player, mostly that his one skill he does have is useful and he’s very, very, very good at it.

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 7:20 PM PST up reply actions  

kevin martin?

The one dimnesional Kevin Martin? The one who is called the worst defender int he league? The Kevin Martin that couldn;t play with Tyreke Evans? That Kevin martin?

8th alias and on probation
I promise to be kinder and gentler

by StinkyFingers on Mar 10, 2010 6:55 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think he's the worst defender in the league

certainly a very bad defender, but not the worst. Offensively, he’s better than just about everyone in the NBA.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 6:57 PM PST up reply actions  

That one dimension is a pretty nice dimension, though. He’s as good of a scorer as any other wing in the NBA.

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 7:07 PM PST up reply actions  

and that is why Sac. traded him?

8th alias and on probation
I promise to be kinder and gentler

by StinkyFingers on Mar 10, 2010 7:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Because he didn’t fit with Evans and they made the same move I would have to go forward with Evans? What’s your point. They got Landry, which was nice, a big expiring contract so they can go into this offseason with max money…..yeah, it made a whole lot of sense for Sac to trade him. If you really want to think about it, think about this – Houston is probably the best run franchise in the NBA, and they just traded FOR Martin. What does that tell you?

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 7:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Houston is the best-run organization in the NBA? By what standard exactly? They’ve been mediocre for years now.

by Evanz on Mar 10, 2010 8:23 PM PST up reply actions  

The way they compile talent and coach it. If they had Yao, healthy for the last few years, they could have made a title run.

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 10, 2010 8:35 PM PST up reply actions  

You know how baseball had a couple of teams that were running circles around everyone else from an analysis standpoint about 10 years ago, ultimately leading to Moneyball? That’s Houston right now. Their GM is incredibly well respected, their FO does stuff that is widely respected throughout basketball circles – from writers to coaches to analysts. They’re way ahead of the curve in their statistical analysis of the game. They’ve made the playoffs 5 of the last 7 years (including this year as one of the two years they didn’t make it) despite not having a Lebron James type superstar, and for how good McGrady and Yao are, they’ve been oft injured yet Houston has still been successful. They’re still above .500 without a game from Yao or McGrady this year, despite the rest of their payroll not including those 2 being around $30M (around half of what the average team spends)…..they’ve managed to find guys like Brooks and Landry recently in the draft despite having low picks…..

If you do your research, you’ll find why they’re so highly regarded. Since Morey took over in 2007, well….we’ll be seeing some evolution in basketball evaluation/front offices, kind of like baseball went through over the past decade.

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 9:11 PM PST up reply actions  

=….Bengie Molina? How is Sabean still our GM. :(

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 9:13 PM PST up reply actions  

oh how much you wish you had our management, and we wish we had your money……

bay area baseball is cruel

by tafkasam on Mar 10, 2010 9:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Honestly, I don’t even wish I had your management. I wish I had the Mariners management, or the Rays management, maybe even the Marlins management, Red Sox management for sure, Pirates management….I’m not so sold on Beane anymore. Reflecting on Moneyball, I think Beane’s biggest asset was his openness to new ideas and ability to surround himself with some people that had new good ideas and actually listen to them, and his willingness to reevaluate the system and change it……but I think a lot of his compettive advantages are gone, and I don’t necessarily think he’s all that great without them. For all the praise he got for using statistics, he himself doesn’t really have a good understanding of them at all….I dunno, I’d take Beane, I don’t think he’s bad or anything, I just think at this point in time we could do better. :)

I have never understood how, after all the A’s success at the beginning of the decade, we didn’t just walk over there, tell Beane we’d pay him more, give him more resources for his FO, and for his team, AND he wouldn’t have to move (that’s why he declined the Red Sox offer)…..seems like it would have been a no brainer for both sides.

by Missing Barry on Mar 11, 2010 7:08 AM PST up reply actions  

LOL

(please mods, I know its OT but i can’t not respond to this)

I’m not so sold on Beane anymore

Beane is without a doubt the best GM in baseball. If you look at what he’s done for our farm system, you’ll see. In 2-3 years we should be better than Rays and co. I think last year we had 6 of top 10 minor league pitchers (before Cahill, Anderson and co started in bigs at too early an age, turning 21 in spring training). And as of right now, 2 of top power hitters. In-site from Beane who recently said ‘power is too expensive a commodity for the A’s so they must acquire it in different ways.’ He has a great understanding of statics. Problem is things like OBP and such are no longer overlooked and now expensive commodities. He is on a tight payroll. If you notice the new undervalued asset he’s banking on is speed and defense. He’s hinted at it, look at team he’s assembed. All the while, trying to grab power thru the minor league system.

 The A’s have had 3 poor years, still they went to ALCS in 2006. And while everyone gets on him for trading Ethier, that Ethier trade brought Milton Bradley who was fundamental to the playoff run, so in the end it was worth it.
 I’m gonna throw some stats at you:
Beane became the GM in 1998, How many 90 loss seasons has he had?
ZERO

What was his worst season? His first (74-88)

How many seasons over .500? 8 (out of 12)

How many of those over 90 wins? 6 (the other 2 were 87 and 88)

Even in midst of a gigantic rebuild, and having huge injury crisis (like the whole pitching staff in 2008, Chavez and others), he was able to make many moves to keep the A’s somewhat respectable and finish around 76 wins, which is not to say ‘great’ but unlike other sports, there is very little gain from tanking a season.

As for the Red Sox- you give Beane that pay roll you get same results. While Epstein and co is intelligent, ask him who is idol is.
Pirates? Yes they have done anything.
Rays and Marlins have good management, but not as successful as Beane

I have never understood how, after all the A’s success at the beginning of the decade, we didn’t just walk over there, tell Beane we’d pay him more, give him more resources for his FO

He’s invested in A’s as a part owner. Has been for a while. He’s a loyal guy.

quite simply without Billy Beane. The A’s are the Royals/Pirates and other irrelevant franchises.

http://mlb.fanhouse.com/2010/01/26/2010-farm-system-rankings/

The only reason A’s aren’t #1 is because they called up 3 of there biggest pitchers last year (and all were HIGHLY ranked by all major publications)

to sum it up: IN BILLY WE TRUST

by tafkasam on Mar 11, 2010 8:56 AM PST up reply actions  

Eh, just not sharing the optimism. If you read any details about Beane (like Moneyball) and look for it, you’ll see he’s not a statistician. I also know he’s a part owner, but like I said, he almost took the Red Sox offer, there was a time he wasn’t the owner and we could have easily offered him a better situation than the A’s. We did not, for the same reason Sabean is still our GM.

Just wait on the Pirates, Huntington has only been there a couple years, and basically has to rebuild an entire franchise from scratch because it was so poorly run before him.

My main point was on the before and after with Beane. Yes, he was great before. His compettive advantage isn’t there anymore, though. Now there are lots of good FO’s, and many with more resources than him. He’s also lost some of his own people. 3 straight losing seasons, no offense….this isn’t the A’s of the beginning of the decade. Like I said, at this point in time, we could do better. ;)

by Missing Barry on Mar 11, 2010 9:20 AM PST up reply actions  

You'll see

BTW Eric Chavez, comeback player of 2010 ;)

by tafkasam on Mar 11, 2010 10:52 AM PST up reply actions  

http://projectprospect.com/article/2009/02/25/oakland-athletics-top-5

All 14 players on this list are arguably among the top 200 prospects in all of baseball, the majority of which are top-100 types.

That’s a stockpile of talent. I like A’s chances

by tafkasam on Mar 11, 2010 10:54 AM PST up reply actions  

Beane is without a doubt the best GM in baseball.?

  Haha, But all it takes is one Derrick Jeter to offset that.

Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 11, 2010 10:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Or one Jeremy Giambi…grrrr

Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!

by Supafishal on Mar 11, 2010 11:22 AM PST up reply actions  

Getting rid of

J-Rich was the start of this teams destruction – what has Brandon Wright done for this team other than get injured every year? NOTHING

by Razzmataz on Mar 10, 2010 4:13 PM PST reply actions  

Disagree

The start of this team’s destruction was when we missed the playoffs after going 48-34. It wasn’t our fault, but it all went downhill after that.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Mar 10, 2010 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

what has Brandon Wright done for this team

 He gave us the term “brokenwing” for a tall fragile player?

Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 10, 2010 4:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Ah yes, because at the time we obviously knew Wright was going to get injured and not contribute. For all we knew, it could have been JRich getting hurt and not contributing. At least Wright isn’t costing us $14M to do that or whatever Richardson would have.

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 6:17 PM PST up reply actions  

If...

We did the oj mayo deal and were fully healthy this would be our rotation
Pg curry/Cj watson
Sg Oj mayo/raja bell/morrow
Sf Corey maggette/Azibuike
Pf Randolph/wright
C biedrins/turiaf
That is an ok team
plus add a top 5 draft pick and possibly thabeet(part of the oj deal) then that could be a 40-45 win team

by thegoldenstate on Mar 10, 2010 4:22 PM PST reply actions  

Biggest weakness there

That is one of the softest more perimeter oriented teams possible. If we did the OJ trade it would make our offense much more predictable and make us purely an outside team. Losing Monta takes away from one of our only slashers other than Maggs. We don’t need outside guys like OJ, we need better inside scorers like Monta and guys who score in the paint. Were to perimeter oriented , if we did this our offenses biggest weakness would go from bad to not only worse but dreadful

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 4:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Still soft

And that won’t help us, especially if we have 0 slashers

We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…

by dubzfan on Mar 10, 2010 6:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Not actually that soft

OJ’s softness is way overstated on here. He’s been pretty committed to defense.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 6:07 PM PST up reply actions  

huh???

So we have the same team, and 10 less points/night? Are you by any chance Cohan’s younger brother?

by Evanz on Mar 10, 2010 6:12 PM PST up reply actions  

and 10 less points/night?

just because Mayo scores 10 ppg less than Monta means we are losing those points. As we have seen, this team has no problem scoring without Monta, so it is an addition by subtraction.

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 10, 2010 6:14 PM PST up reply actions  

The team actually scores more with Monta off the court than on

we’d be trading this offensive drag for a player that might be able to contribute.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 6:23 PM PST up reply actions  

By shooting the same percentage as Monta?

by Evanz on Mar 10, 2010 6:25 PM PST up reply actions  

He shoots the same FG%

despite being a three point shooter.
Look at their TS% to get a better idea of their actual scoring ability. FG% is a flawed stat.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 10, 2010 6:26 PM PST up reply actions  

We need another 3-point shooter?

by Evanz on Mar 10, 2010 6:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I recall Ellis playing a big role in the playoffs a couple of years ago. Did Sactown win with Martin?

by Evanz on Mar 10, 2010 6:45 PM PST up reply actions  

I recall him barely playing in the first round series, and when he did, he was terrible.
Oh wait, i just looked at the stats to figure that out.

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 10, 2010 6:46 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

add a top 5 draft pick and possibly thabeet(part of the oj deal) then that could be a 40-45 win team

  Keep everyone healthy and assuming wright or rudolf can score about three times a game inside at crunch time we’ll be a 45 win team as is?

Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 10, 2010 4:35 PM PST reply actions  

1. I’d give Belinelli a solid B. He’s been inconsistent on the court, but he’s also received inconsistent playing time from coach Jay Triano. You have a guy like stats guru Wayne Winston who thinks Belinelli (and Amir Johnson) should be receiving more minutes based on their contributions, so obviously he’s doing something right in limited minutes.

From Raptors HQ Mod.
Sums it up perfectly.

Nellie needs to go! but while we suffer....John Wall or Evan Turner please!

by MDB on Mar 10, 2010 6:20 PM PST reply actions  

1. Just what has happened to the Warriors this year? On paper this team has some good talent yet they have been unable to piece things together. Biedrins has been AWOL, injuries have piled up and unless they are at home they have little chance to win. This can’t be all ownership’s fault can it?

It’s not all anyone’s fault… there’s plenty of blame to go around. The biggest reasons we’re 17-46, in no particular order:

Injuries. Bad luck is largely to blame, but not entirely. The front office should take some flak for signing an injury risk like Maggette and burning so many roster spots on middling cap commodities. Nellie should take some flak for overplaying Monta to the point of making issues more likely. Everybody’s to blame for forcing Ronny out there on such a bum knee and ankle. And at this point, you have to point fingers at Tom Abdenour. When guys are repeatedly going down with injuries in the same areas, the trainer is probably not doing a very good job.

Lack of talent, at the top of the roster and on the defensive end. One could blame bad luck for the lack of a superstar… it’s not like the Warriors have passed one up in the draft or let one slip away. But Riley, Nellie et al are to blame for the utter lack of defensive talent. The pieces also fit together pretty poorly, much of which is the fault of the current regime, some of which may be on Mullin’s head.

Monta’s playing losing basketball, dominating the ball in a way that stifles the offense and sinks the team’s chances. This is largely on Monta, but Nellie certainly hasn’t done anything to address the situation, and in fact exacerbated it by giving Monta such an ungodly number of minutes early on.

Biedrins is out of sync, due largely to his fear of the free throw line, and partly to the guards’ refusal to involve him in the offense. Mostly on Beans, but again, Nellie did nothing to help the situation. Which leads us to…

Terrible coaching, both from Nellie and Keith Smart. Lazy and misguided decision-making has made a bad situation much, much worse. These guys have used the wrong players (Mikki, Vlad), overused smallball, screwed up end-game situations repeatedly, and let big, basic problems go unaddressed for weeks at a time. Awful, awful stuff.

2. Talk about Steph Curry and the season he has had. Can he and Ellis co-exist?

He’s had an excellent rookie season. Not perfect — his defense and playmaking could both use some work — but given that he was a small-conference shooting guard just a year ago, you’ve got to give him a big thumbs-up. It’s not yet clear if he and Monta can co-exist, but as I see it, that’s more an issue of Monta’s game this season being dysfunctional in general, not just with respect to Curry.

3. What are the keys to the game for the Warriors to get a win against the Raps?

Shoot well from distance and stay out of foul trouble, so the Raptors can’t live at the line like they normally do.

Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis

by onlxn on Mar 10, 2010 6:23 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

I will note that I remember you advocating a trade for a useful backup big early in the season. We really could have used that….(or not if our goal is JOHN WALL BABY!)… ;)

by Missing Barry on Mar 10, 2010 7:09 PM PST up reply actions  

ONLXN brings up a point I have been mulling since Jackson was traded, namely…

Has Nelson’s laziness ruined Monta? That is, after Jack was traded, Monta started playing at a very high level. With all the injuries, Nellie decided that rather than actually coach the team, he would hand the keys to Monta and ride him into the sunset. Now obviously playing him so many minutes (all 48 in some games) has had a detrimental effect on his offensive efficiency and his ability to give maximal effort on the defensive end every trip down. But there is little reason to believe that with his minutes curtailed and the ball in his hands less he won’t return to his previous high level of play (seen in 07-08 and in the immediate aftermath of Jack’s departure). What is of concern is his ability to convince himself that the team is better off if he isn’t shooting so much. Once someone develops a Michael Redd complex, it can be difficult to shake it off. Now, this gets into a character issue and given that I do not know Monta personally I really can’t speculate, but if this does end up being the case, I put the onus squarely on Nellie’s swollen head for his failure to recognize the long-term ramifications of his extremely short-sighted “strategy.”

Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!

by Supafishal on Mar 11, 2010 8:00 AM PST up reply actions  

19 people voted to cut Curry loose?

Is that 19 haters?
Is that 19 trolls?
Is that 19 guys who have no clue about basketball?
Even fans of Monta should recognize Curry’s talent.

8th alias and on probation
I promise to be kinder and gentler

by StinkyFingers on Mar 10, 2010 6:36 PM PST reply actions  

What about Buikeeeee?!

Watson and Buike! Woooohooooo! best bench in the NBA.

by Smolt on Mar 10, 2010 9:27 PM PST reply actions  

Stop the Hate!!! Better Poll question: 'Curry is 21 and our centerpiece, do he have the right complements going forward?'

Option 1: Yes
Option 2: No
Option 3: Haven’t had a good look at the team, can’t say yes or no

Sure when we pose the question in this manner we don’t instantaneously get the ‘juicy’ Monta v Curry battle of words, however we do attack the actual problem, is this team right for Curry. Before I address that issue, I’d like to address the whole Steph and Monta ‘problem’

*Seeing as how this was/is built as ’Monta’s team’ this transition in perception can be a bit tough for players, front office and especially us fans. But what we need to remember is that this is a TEAM game, and that these players have been playing this TEAM game since they were very young, some of them all their lives. Everyone on a team knows that the ultimate goal is to win as much and as often as possible. Sure some ego’s are bruised when the "Supastar’ has to relinquish control to the better player, but that doesn’t mean that the player who was option 1 on the team is upset when the team aquires a better option 1. The team becomes better and has a better chance of winning. Did Melo get pissed when the Nuggets grabbed A.I. or Chauncey? No because he still understands that he is their scorer. His role is to put points on the board in a diverse way, the PG’s role is to throw the offense off guard by being a threat to pass or score.

That’s why when people say “this can’t work” they are being disingenuous. What they should say is “this won’t work because Monta doesn’t want it to work because he doesn’t like or respect Stephen.” To that I say, “show me some proof”. Sure at the beginning of the season he was pissed at the front office for lying and not getting a SupaStar over the offseason. Specifically the Amar’e trade, which lead to Jax wanting out. We of course declined the deal because we drafted Steph, so it would be reasonable for Monta to take the position he did with Steph. “You prevented us from being a playoff team, you made my best friend leave, so you better show me something.” Which Monta expressed by challenging Steph’s ability to run the point alongside Monta. How did Steph respond?

Well if it wasn’t for the LeBron of PG’s, Tyreke Evans, he put on an undisputed R.O.Y campaign. The kid has absolutely shined. Sure he makes mistakes, but for a 21 year old rookie who’s had to deal with all of the injuries this team sustained, the uncertainty of personnel, and just the general BS that was involved with our team this year, he has impressed everyone in the organization. I guess except Monta?

That logic just doesn’t make sense to me. Everyone in the NBA is impressed with, and respects Steph Curry, everyone. So to assume that his backcourt-mate who practices with him everyday and has played tons of games alongside him is the only person in the NBA who doesn’t like Steph as a person and player seems pretty stupid. You’re saying that Monta is pissed at Steph for stealing his role, for being the playmaker. That’s silly, Monta didn’t want to be a PG in the first place! He knows he’s better playing next to a guard who is going to let him get work for open space and then hit him with a sick pass. What seems to be Monta’s favorite offensive play to run? I would say it is the play where he backs down his defender then spins around him to get hoopside position to put home the alley oop. Monta knows Steph is one of the 2 best passers he’s ever played with.
Now a question that needs answering I guess, is Monta actually Pissed?

Hell Yeah!!!!! But he isn’t pissed at Steph or us, he’s pissed at the front office. He hates the same folks we do. The same people who lied to his face, and to Jack, about aquiring an all star big man this offseason. The same folks that dismantled the We Believe squad for him and Andris, even though Monta knows he’s not ready, which is why he wanted Jack and Amar’e with him.

See, there seem to be some people here that think Monta prefers to be the “Supastar” over being a winner. That to me is not only an unsubstantiated lie, it is also an attack on the character of a young man who has devoted his livelyhood to playing a TEAM sport. Doesn’t make sense.

As for the team.
Steph is going to be a pg we haven’t seen before, kind of a more athletic Steve Nash who has a more diverse way of scoring. So he’s going to need some complements. First he needs other scorers, that’s more than taken care of. He needs rebounding and defense as well.

To me we have some of the most athletic players in the league for their positions, we just need to have the right coaches here to teach them to use that speed, quickness, and athleticism on the defensive end as well.

To me we are very comparable to Portland, Steph is BRoy Monta is LMA. I don’t think they have a Maggette, maybe Rudy in terms of being 6th man extraordinaire. We don’t have an Oden, we do have a #3 pick though. Pryzbilla=Ronny or AB. Batum can be compared AR, lots of potential talent, still young, raw, injury trouble, guess BWright works there.

What I’m getting at is that we have the potential to be a good team. Patience is a virtue, unless it’s dealing with Cohan selling.

by myk on Mar 10, 2010 10:57 PM PST reply actions  

I think we should be able to have poll questions like this without it being called hate
Seeing as how this was/is built as ’Monta’s team’

This team is not built around Monta. He isn’t surrounded by players that compliment his abilities. This is a team without an identity, like the Kings last season, except that Kevin Martin is an efficient scorer

That’s why when people say "this can’t work" they are being disingenuous. What they should say is "this won’t work because Monta doesn’t want it to work because he doesn’t like or respect Stephen.

I still don’t see it working defensively. It’s too small to really go anywhere. Monta needs to be paired with a big 1 or a ball dominant 2/3. I really don’t care about how they feel about each other, and it sounds like they do kinda like each other at least a little, but Monta is too small to guard 2s, and is also a very bad ballhandler.
Steph is going to be a pg we haven’t seen before, kind of a more athletic Steve Nash who has a more diverse way of scoring.

1. Curry is no more athletic than Steve Nash, and isn’t as good of a penetrator.
2. Nash has a pretty big bag of ways of scoring. I don’t think it’s fair to assume Curry will become better than Nash. That’s just setting yourself up for disappointment.
Trailblazers comparison

I really don’t like this comparison. It seems kinda forced. Their top talent is spread around through out the roster, whereas Monta is an undersized 2 playing alongside a player who is the same size, basically. Fernandez has a pretty varied skillset. He’s good for more than scoring off the bench. I’m 90% sure that Batum doesn’t have the potential of AR, but they really don’t need him to. Hell, AR is more comparable to Oden than he is to Batum. I don’t see how Joel Przybilla (old, good rebounding center) is comparable to Ronny (high energy back up center) or Biedrins (young, elite rebounding center). He’s more comparable to Andris, but he’s old.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 11, 2010 12:59 AM PST up reply actions  

Whoops

That was supposed to be

Trailblazers comparison

and the rest was not a quote.

by Reverend_Randy on Mar 11, 2010 12:59 AM PST up reply actions  

curry ftw

the deal for amare didn’t go through for two reasons:
1) amare refused to re-up with the dubs
2) the suns wanted us to throw in curry (along with wright and beans)

seeing as how curry is currently the brightest spot in our lineup, i’m happy the deal fell through.

as for the reported mayo+thabeet for monta trade… too bad. i mean even if you don’t think that mayo would be a better overall fit for the team; clearing an overpaid ellis from the books would have been a huge boon for the warriors.

ezra crow
www.ezracrow.org

by ezra crow on Mar 12, 2010 4:52 PM PST reply actions  

Ellis and Curry can co exist

If Curry will take over and Ellis trust his team mates. We witness that when Ellis is out they have a better ball movement. Then when Curry is on the bench Ellis can score tons of points. Because he end up with the ball most of the posesion or pass when the only option is to pass.

But when both Curry and Ellis is on the floor every possesion the first option when Curry bring down the ball is to pass it to Ellis. Which scout, coach, and player already knew, where turnover happens. It is like when you are the newest guy on the job and you try to impress your supervisor.

Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........

by mykelala01 on Mar 13, 2010 7:42 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

Start posting about the Warriors »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

021010curryfull_small
Xavier Henry Movement
Subs_small
Guesstimation: Warriors Salary Situation + Pargo etc.
Peter_griffin_bird__custom__small
The Cultural Significance of Jeremy Lin
Logoprimary_300x329_small
Warriors to sign Jeremy Lin to two year deal
Small
W’s at a Crossroad: Team Building / Understanding Nelson & Riley

Recent FanPosts

Small
Legit Trade?
Small
The rise of the Super Teams
Montadaboss_small
Reggie Williams nickname
Small
Grace Period Please!
Small
Observations and assessments Team USA...
Goldenstate49ers_small
Stephen Curry Tweets
Small
Monta Ellis
Monkey-smoking3_small
Fun: Compile your wishlist
021010curryfull_small
2011 All-Star Weekend

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Ads

SPONSORS

Most Commented

Small
GAME THREAD - US Blue vs White - Las Vegas
021010curryfull_small
Xavier Henry Movement
Small
Monta Ellis
600px-olympic_rings_square
Warriors Sign Guard Jannero Pargo
Monkey-smoking3_small
Fun: Compile your wishlist

SBNation.com Recent Stories

 LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh of the Miami Heat speak after being introduced to fans during a welcome party at American Airlines Arena on July 9 2010 in Miami Florida.  (Photo by Doug Benc/Getty Images)

How Good Will LeBron James And The Miami Heat Be In 2011? Hint: Very Good

Lorenzen Wright 
(Getty Images) +6 updates

Lorenzen Wright's Body Found In Memphis, Police Conduct Homicide Investigation

Chris Paul LeBron James

'The Miami Model': Why Greed Is Good, And The NBA's Superteam Era Will Be Great

More from SBNation.com >


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

T_small Tony.psd

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Small jae

Small IQofaWarrior

Drmlg_logo-gmail_small Poor Man's Commish

Nellie2_small Feltbot

600px-olympic_rings_square olympicmike