RUMOR: Golden State Warriors head coach Don Nelson would have traded Monta Ellis to Memphis Grizzlies for O.J. Mayo + Hasheem Thabeet "in a heartbeat"
1,890 GSoMers voted and 78% of them were down to trade Golden State Warriors supposed "FUTURE" Monta Ellis to the Memphis Grizzlies for O.J. Mayo and Hasheem Thabeet- see Polling GSoM: Monta Ellis to Memphis Grizzlies, O.J. Mayo + Hasheem Thabeet (+ maybe Hamed Haddadi) to Golden State Warriors- Are you down?
O.J. knows how to put a little extra mayo on his passes. [photo via via www.reclinergm.com]
When the Warriors were offered this trade by the Grizz what did they do of course? Nothing, absolutely nothing.
Well don't blame Nellie. JUMP for the 411!
Over at SFGate Bruce Jenkins investigates why this trade that has been rumored to be offered by the Grizzlies on more then one occasion didn't go down:
As yet another depressing season winds down, it is becoming clear that Don Nelson no longer runs the Warriors. If he gets shut out of major trade discussions, that's the only conclusion one can draw.
Two sources close to the Warriors told The Chronicle that when the club rejected a trade-deadline deal that would have sent Monta Ellis to Memphis for O.J. Mayo and Hasheem Thabeet, Nelson wasn't even consulted. It's not clear who made the decision, but it was news to Nelson, who hadn't even heard the Grizzlies' proposal.
Not only that, the two sources said, but Nelson would have made the deal. "In a heartbeat," said one.
A few things I'd like to point out:
- Don Nelson is no fool.
- When people talk about the Warriors front office and management- more like MISS-management- they usually refer to them as one monolithic entity. That's a mistake. Let's break it down. Chris Cohan is the owner of this franchise. During his majority ownership this franchise has MISSED the playoffs 16 out of 17 times -hence MISSmanagement. Robert Rowell is the most unqualified president of a nearly half billion corporation that you'll find in entire 50 states. Neither of these guys know hoops and the more basketball decisions they attempt to make the longer 7000 Coliseum Way will be the NBA's home to a hoops purgatory. Nellie and GM Larry Riley are hoops veterans and know all aspects of the game. 9 times out of 10 (if not higher) they're going to make a good move.
- This reveals that there's even a chance that Riley isn't perfectly in sync with Nellie here and doesn't run everything by him.
- There even exists a possibility that the current Warriors GM and legendary head coach don't get to call all the basketball shots. What if they didn't even know this trade was on the table from the Grizzlies for whatever reason. That would be very strange, but honestly that shocking. I mean we are dealing with Cohan and Rowell here. But why do Cohan and Rowell pay them the big bucks if they're not going to let them do their job? Who knows.
Shoot, on names alone I do this trade.A Curry & O.J. or Curry & Mayo backcourt? Stef-fun and O.J. putting on a Mayo Clinic regularly against other backcourts across the association by 2012? Thabeet rejecting shots in Oaktown like Adonal Foyle?
Here's some other variations of the trade to pursue if Cohan and Rowell actually decide to consult with their rich hoops resources at hand before rejecting trades that the vast majority of their fanbase are more than down for:
Ellis for Mayo and Thabeet [ESPN Trade Machine]- Again, it looks good for both squads. Not that it means much in the overall picture, but it would be amazing to see the Warriors convert a 2nd round pick from the 2006 NBA Draft into a 2008 #3 1st round pick and a 2009 #2 1st round pick. When you abstract away from the actual players involved that's pretty neat. But I will note that you can't take that at face value. I mean the #3 guy could easily be someone like Adam Morrison and the #2 player could be Darko Milicic. Ellis for Mayo, Thabeet, and Marcus Williams [ESPN Trade Machine]- Maybe the Grizzlies could trade Chris Mullin trade bust Williams back to Nellie and the Dubs (via sign and trade) just for some more cheap laughs- see: Polling GSoM: Are you going to miss Marcus Williams? Hey, we'd be laughing. Ellis, Brandan Wright, and Ronny Turiaf for Mayo, Thabeet, Marc Gasol, DeMarre Carroll, Darrell Arthur, andSam Young [ESPN Trade Machine]- The trade could be expanded to give the Dubs a very nice young big man and the Grizzlies a talented lottery pick forward that didn't quite get much airtime in the Bay Area along with another shot blocker in Turiaf. Ellis and Andris Biedrins for Mayo, Thabeet, Gasol, Darrell Arthur, Hamed Haddadi, DeMarre Carroll, and Sam Young [ESPN Trade Machine]- The Grizzlies would never do this (just like the above trade), but the Warriors could finally dump those absurd dreams that Ellis and Biedrins were a tandem worth building around. Sigh, that would be a relief. Again, where are all those people now who were clamoring for the Warriors to dump salaries right after WE BELIEVE spring 2007 to build around a young Ellis and Biedrins with their (mythical) insane upside and preaching patience because these guys were the "FUTURE"? (We can hear the crickets chirping, but we can't hear you.)
102 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Really?
MY impression from most interviews is he thinks Monta is overrated. I’ve heard countless interviews and whenever he’s asked about Monta’s breakout as lead scorer he kind of shrugs it off. Says Monta is doing well, nothing more. In contrast here him speak of other all star caliber players around the league and he is full of praise. Nellie is not dumb. I think he’s fully aware you could sub in many players and get Monta’s production with these results.
He’s also generally critical of Monta, when he never makes those same comments about say…. Steph Curry?
by tafkasam on Mar 6, 2010 12:46 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t recall him being critical of monta this season. He’s always said he needs him and that hes been spectacular. I remember people were suggesting we are better without Monta, and he got very angry and ended the interviews.
banned like chris andersen
by MDB on Mar 6, 2010 2:09 PM PST up reply actions
Nelson
Think Nellie will be included in the decision making this time around?
No, I hope he is gone by then.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Mar 6, 2010 9:12 AM PST reply actions
Those of you who want Don Nelson gone
Who do YOU want replacing Don Nelson at head coach? Serious options.
Just remember Chris Cohan decides who replaces Don Nelson, so think through the perspective of Cohan’s "great’ hires.
"I never watched baseball on TV. It's slow and boring. I'm not a fan. Never was." - Jeff Kent
by Yoyo on Mar 6, 2010 9:35 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Head Coaching Options
We discussed this not too long ago, actually.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Mar 6, 2010 10:01 AM PST up reply actions
We discussed...
not Cohan,he’ll probably hire Mike Montgomery again.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Mar 6, 2010 2:00 PM PST up reply actions
I want Nellie gone from coaching too
But I think he would make a great GM.
You know I spit technique to the freshest freak
Gimme a call you will see results in just a week
With the soul of a LOST HAWK
Is there a heaven for a Rap Cat, let's talk
Why isnt this atma guy blasting our GM
He always did when Mullin was gm, now Riley gets a free pass from him though……..funny.
It's hard to imagine Riley vetoing Nellie or more so, not even consulting him.
It’s likely this trade was never offered is my impression. But idea Riley said no without at least discussing with Nellie just seems farfetched.
I still am skeptical that such an offer was made. A straight trade for Monta? I don’t think that happened. If it did, and Nellie would do it in a heartbeat, somebody needs to get fired.
Welcome to the Pit of Despair! Don't even think about trying to escape.
somebody needs to get fired.
basically, Rowell cares more about what the STHs think than what’s best for the franchise & the majority of them love Monta.
by homer simpson on Mar 6, 2010 10:34 AM PST up reply actions
If he gets shut out of major trade discussions, that's the only conclusion one can draw.?
or draw the more likely one that this trade was never really offered and the rumors are crap?
Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 6, 2010 10:45 AM PST reply actions
Bruce Jenkins is full of [it]
Before your post gets deleted, I’ll note that Jenkins is one of the best respected, most thoughtful, and least sensationalist sportswriters in the Bay Area.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Mar 6, 2010 11:01 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Who are you responding to?
banned like chris andersen
by MDB on Mar 6, 2010 2:11 PM PST up reply actions
all true
but whats even more tru is BJ is one of the least connected sportwriters also. He does not get out and get around enough to know what the street is saying.
by StinkyFingers on Mar 6, 2010 2:54 PM PST up reply actions
Not so fast...
If Don Nelson is for the deal, then I am against it. He would end up hating OJ Mayo in two weeks. What a fat dumb bastard that guy is!!!
Other teams would be interested in Monta Ellis and Andris Biedrins who’s in Nelson’s dog house and does not like it here in GSW-land anymore. Let’s not deal Ellis or Biedrins so fast when teams like PHX and Toronto could lose Amare or Chris Bosh for nothing. Or what if New York does not end up with two max free agents? Or Miami to pair someone with DWade? Somebody will pay for Ellis and Biedrins and we could get a nice young big man in return. We already got a SG in CJ, Morrow or Azubuike, so why duplicate the position?
"Go ahead. Make my day."
Other teams would be interested in Monta Ellis and Andris Biedrins who’s in Nelson’s dog house and does not like it here in GSW-land anymore.
Is there really a huge market for $11 million per year undersized scoring 2guards with many limitations? I think we’d have contenders considering him as there 6th man offering us maybe a draft pick and expirings. Thats about it.
Biedrins again, his value is at an all time low. Two injury plagued years, horrible production this year. Free throw record
The "free throw record..."
…thing is a bad joke. He’s 4-for-25, averaging less than one free throw per game. People’s percentages, in NBA terms, generally don’t count when you have that few attempts. If Devean George goes 20-25 on three pointers next season, he won’t be given the three point percentage crown.
The lack of attempts is what’s most troublesome, but the hysterics about his percentage aren’t worthwhile. I hope he’ll get back to his normal rate of drawing fouls and general good health after this offseason.
To be clear...
…I didn’t mean to imply that low sample percentages don’t count literally, simply that awards and “records” are never broken on their backs.
Nonetheless
it’s quite an embarrassment and AB should be practicing every waking moment.
It should be in players contracts – if you shoot less then 60% from the line, you must try granny for 10 games.
I...
…will maintain that his lack of attempts overall, as well as his general lack of touch from the line, is rightly called an embarrassment. I really don’t think his present percentage is anything special, though. It’s almost certainly an anomaly from a stretch of particularly brutal shooting, as his career numbers would suggest. The fact that it’s hurt the rest of his game, and his confidence, is an issue. But look at it this way- he’s about nine missed free throws off his career average. If he’d shot a hundred of them by now, we wouldn’t even be having this discussion (about the “record,” I’m sure we’d still prefer better than .519).
I won’t be surprised, if he comes back with a normal (for him) FT% for the rest of the year… or we may have to wait until next year for him to get his FT% back.
Welcome to the Pit of Despair! Don't even think about trying to escape.
I won’t be surprised, if he comes back with a normal (for him) FT% for the rest of the year
That’s generally a good way of thinking when you’re talking about projecting the future. On average, guys play at their “true talent level” going forward.
by Missing Barry on Mar 8, 2010 9:53 AM PST up reply actions
There's no reason to think Biedrins FTs won't return to form next season.
Not that 60% is that exciting, but it’s enough to make Biedrins dangerous.
Other teams would be interested in Monta Ellis and Andris Biedrins who’s in Nelson’s dog house and does not like it here in GSW-land anymore.
Have you talked to Andris? Did he tell you he doesn’t like it here anymore?
(I’m not a fan of completely unfounded speculations like that)
by Missing Barry on Mar 8, 2010 9:54 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
This trade could be made in the off season if there was any validity to it in the first place:
Right after the trading deadline we found out the experirment is not working out, it’s to bad they didn’t pull the trigger and let OJ and Curry have this season to work together to build chemistry..I still like Monta but I question weather he’s a good fit with Curry at the point, and weather or not he is happy playing second fiddle..
If we get 1 or 2 in the draft then Monta will be traded,…If we get 3 or 4 Monta may still be here next year…this franchise is like the rest of the politicians out there, They can’t make a good decision….no matter what they do it backfires…There’s some bad juju going on around here…
this franchise is like the rest of the politicians out there, They can’t make a good decision…
So you are saying our front office goes against our best interests cause they are bought off by lobbyists?
Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 6, 2010 3:18 PM PST up reply actions
O.J. Mayo is nothing special, though. Monta is special…ish. I hope we can get something better than just Mayo. I think maybe Memphis offered Mayo and Thabeet for Monta plus more, like Morrow, Wright or Randolph.
Welcome to the Pit of Despair! Don't even think about trying to escape.
Why do you think that?
I haven’t seen that reported, just Mayo+Thabeet for Monta.
by Reverend_Randy on Mar 6, 2010 4:46 PM PST up reply actions
How is Monta more 'special' than OJ
Flashier? yes. Special implies something else in my mind. Not And1 balling ability but actually game changing ability like Dwayne Wade, Dwight Howard or Kevin Durant (picked 3 random names, but they all are “special” in different ways).
Personally I don’t find either Monta or Mayo “special” Monta is the better individual, Mayo is a better team player. Mayo being in his second year also has higher upside. I would have pulled the trigger on this ‘theoretical offer’
Well, Monta does have a special ability to get to the rim – if he can improve his decisionmaking and tighten up his ballhandling a bit, offensively, he can be a pretty big time impact player, and even if he doesn’t, as long as he’s used right he’s still a solid player….I’m just less sure about Mayo having much room for development, and not sure he really does have more upside – it seems to me the things Monta needs to improve on are things that players can plausibly improve on, whereas Mayo’s tend to be more along the things players don’t tend to improve on….
by Missing Barry on Mar 8, 2010 10:02 AM PST up reply actions
Mayo
The guy would just be a junior in college right now. The potential is still there, so I would consider him something special to a degree.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Mar 7, 2010 9:51 AM PST up reply actions
I really don’t see a whole lot of potential in Mayo, besides just being young. And let’s keep in mind he was always old for his grade – sure, he could just be a junior in college in terms of his class, but he’s also 22 years old and, if he was a normal age for his class, would be either graduated already (assuming 4 years to graduate) or a senior.
by Missing Barry on Mar 8, 2010 10:03 AM PST up reply actions
Trade Monta in the off season
He is clearly not a leader. A leader has to have some cerebral qualities and Monta is well…… not the sharpest tool in the shed. Curry on the other hand has 1/2 the athletisism as Monta but is wayyyyyyyy more skilled overall due to his smarts and a high b-ball IQ. trade Monta, draft Evan Turner, get a big ugly down low and we will be a nightmare for apposing teams and a strong playoff team.
Eh, talent tends to win games. Leadership….much harder to quantify, identify who has it, and what actual impact it has on improving the team….
by Missing Barry on Mar 8, 2010 10:04 AM PST up reply actions
Perhaps no basketball moves shall be made because Ellison is preparing to buy and he’s ordered a freeze on all transactions?
Love Warriors, Hate Cohan! - Sell the team! Save us Mr. Ellison!
by JustSomeName on Mar 6, 2010 12:07 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Stop hating on Monta...
Monta single handedly kept the Warriors in games during the 1st half of this season. The kid sells tickets and is a terrific shooting guard. Thank god Nellie wasn’t in control to make this trade. Thabeet is a bust and a non-factor. So it’s really Monta/Mayo trade. I don’t do this. I also don’t want Monta being the leader on this team. It’s not in his dna. Just let him play.
It's...
…much too early to condemn Thabeet. His rebounding and shot-blocking is strong, and he’s huge. That’s more than enough to take him as an essential toss-in in the trade. Also, I think it’s a stretch to say Mont “sells tickets.” Flashy players on losing teams don’t generally pack the house. I wouldn’t be surprised if more people have specifically come to see Curry by this point than Monta. But that’s just a hunch.
My thoughts exactly. If Thabeet turns into a shot-blocking unstoppable force, every team in the league will be jealous. He’s also not TOO tall. The guy could turn out to be a defensive beast… although, he could also be a bust. Way too early to tell.
Welcome to the Pit of Despair! Don't even think about trying to escape.
I do believe
Michael Jordan drew enough crowds as a rookie that the losing Bulls were second in league-wide attendance to the Sixers (who still had Dr. J).
People actually do research on this stuff. Winning drives attendance, star players, not so much – and the few exceptions tend to drive road attendance, not home attendance.
by Missing Barry on Mar 8, 2010 10:05 AM PST up reply actions
With you on Thabeet.
His main problem right now statistically is that he’s fouling a ton. Even in his D-league appearance against BJ Mullens, the kid fouled out in 31 minutes. But his rebounding has been more-or-less legitimate at the NBA level.
(The irony is that the player Memphis bumped past Hasheem on the depth chart, Haddadi, is no kind of defender and actually was committing even more fouls for every minute on the floor. Haddadi was worst in the league when they sent Thabeet to the D-league.)
"It has come to the editor’s attention that the Herald-Leader neglected to cover the civil rights movement. We regret the omission."
Monta single handedly kept the Warriors in games during the 1st half of this season.
He also single handedly shot the Warriors out of more games than he kept them in…..
by Missing Barry on Mar 8, 2010 10:06 AM PST up reply actions
This is a deal that would make sense for the Warriors. However, it’s a deal that would make more sense in a world where Nellie wasn’t the coach. A Curry/Mayo backcourt, under the “guidance” of Nellie, would be one of the worst defensive backcourts ever assembled. And while Thabeet’s not yet ready to contribute much, I wouldn’t trust Nellie to play him even if he gets there.
Also, is there any reason to believe that Rowell was involved here? All reports have been that Riley’s been in charge of basketball decisions all season. I know we all want to believe he’s a sane man in an insane world, but it sure sounds like Riley’s the one who foolishly turned this down.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
Nellie wants to get rid of Monta
that’s why he played him 48/game before the deadline. max his numbers and his trade value.
endgame for Riley/Nelson has ALWAYS been to get Monta off the team, but get something of value for him.
And PLEASE, when discussing this trade, let’s put a moritorium on discussing Thabeet’s contribution to the team. He was salary cap ballast. In the old pre-cap days, the trade would have been Mayo for Monta straight up. Thabeet is irrelevant because he’s going to be a complete bust – he makes o’bryant and darko look like solid players on his best days.
It's really...
…too early to put that judgement on Thabeet. I think dismissing a player strictly for reasons of reputation (he got sent to the D-League) and personal stigma (surely we haven’t had the best luck with big men around here) isn’t the way to go, you need to look at the specific contexts f each individual player. In Thabeet’s case, he’s stuck behind a guy in Marc Gasol who he almost certainly wasn’t going to beat out. Add Zach Randolph’s semi-resurgence and the frontcourt time gets a little thin. Additionally, Memphis wants to try to put some wins up this year, so giving minutes to who they consider a project center likely isn’t their gameplan. I know that in the minutes he did get, he wasn’t unproductive. He fouled a ton, that’s the most concerning thing. 2 fouls in a little over ten minutes, that gets you kicked out by 36. Still, he was keeping a 10 per game rebounding pace, as well as blocking shots at a very impressive clip.
It may be too early
But why would Memphis trade OJ and him for Monta then? Seems suggestive.
We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…
Hey...
…they got bad management, just like us. Not to say that the trade is a slam dunk win for the Warriors, but I certainly do like it. One possibe reason is that they feel so secure at the center spot with Gasol. So, as alluded to, they might believe shedding Thabeet, while embarrassing, to be a moot point. So it becomes a Mayo/Monta swap to their minds, and they must think Monta would be a more assertive option for them as they try to push out some wins. Truth be told, I don’t know what they’re thinking; I really don’t think Monta would fit well surrounded by Gay, Randolph and Gasol. But, hey.
Also, Monta grew up just a couple hours outside Memphis… it’s possible that they think he could help a bit with ticket sales. I doubt he actually would, but as you say, they’ve got dumb management.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
because they are already being killed by local press for picking Thabeet over Tyreke, Curry, Jennings... heck DeJuan Blair too....
I can’t blame the fans and media for saying it. But Thabeet is now subject to a lot of hate/unfair criticism. Unfair to fact he was never going to be a force off the bat.
But why would Memphis trade OJ and him for Monta then?
If Memphis is fooled by Monta’s per game numbers and not looking deeper, they might legitimately think he’s an undervalued star they can get on the cheap right now. I have no idea if they do think that, but if they do, that trade makes a lot of sense for them, given that mindset.
by Missing Barry on Mar 8, 2010 10:08 AM PST up reply actions
Career averages per 36 minutes:
O’Bryant: 12.8 PTS (.514 TS%), 8.8 REB, 1.7 AST, 2.9 TO, 1.3 STL, 2.8 BLK, 9.0 PF
Darko: 11.5 PTS (.481 TS%), 8.5 REB, 1.5 AST, 2.2 TO, 0.8 STL, 2.6 BLK, 4.3 PF
Thabeet: 8.9 PTS (.606 TS%), 10.0 REB, 0.3 AST, 1.6 TO, 0.7 STL, 4.0 BLK, 6.8 PF
In his limited minutes so far, Thabeet has not just been better than POB and Darko, he’s been much better. He’s rebounded a good bit better than they have. They’ve both blocked a lot of shots, but he’s blocked a lot more… while blocks can be an overrated part of defense, a truly elite, league-leading-level shot-blocker is a big asset. Most importantly, he has scored with extreme efficiency, while they’ve scored inefficiently (wildly so in Darko’s case). And remember, this is comparing his rookie season to their entire careers… POB and Darko were even worse than this in their limited minutes as rookies.
Those two just aren’t good comparisons for Thabeet. A much better one is Andris Biedrins, who put up very similar numbers in his few minutes as a rookie: good rebounding and scoring efficiency, mountains of fouls. Andris was much younger, of worse, but Thabeet hasn’t been playing basketball for very long… I don’t know that there’s a huge developmental difference between the two as rookies.
Thabeet is not without his warts. His passing numbers are scary bad — only four assists in his 516 minutes — and that’s a real problem; even defensive-minded centers would ideally be able to move the ball a little bit. On the other hand, it’s not like he’s the only big man with this problem. Robin Lopez only has five assists in his 810 minutes; Joel Przybilla only had eight in his 681 minutes before getting hurt. Serge Ibaka and DeAndre Jordan are both stuck at ten assists, and they’ve both played more minutes than Thabeet. All four of those guys are highly valued by their teams all the same, because of the other things they bring to the table and, in the case of the three young ’uns, because of their potential to improve with experience.
The point is not that Thabeet will definitely become a good NBA player. The point is that he actually has played pretty well when given the chance, and that the odds are consequently pretty decent that he could become good. The Grizzlies seem down on him, but so what? We’re supposed to trust the opinions of a franchise that traded Kevin Love and Mike Miller for O.J. Mayo?
Thabeet’s not ballast… he’s a gamble. And a pretty good one.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
You also forgot they traded Gasol for Kwame and Marc.
banned like chris andersen
by MDB on Mar 6, 2010 2:28 PM PST up reply actions
Thabeet’s low FG attemps suggest he hasn’t had the ball much on offense. If you look at assists relative to how often he touches the ball on offense and how often he scores or gets a pretty good shot, I suspect he’s pretty benign on that front.
Welcome to the Pit of Despair! Don't even think about trying to escape.
Right… there’s no way to spin his passing numbers as good or even decent, but if he just takes a high-percentage shot when you pass it to him, it’s not the end of the world. And I would imagine this is something they’re having him focus on during his D-League tenure. He has four assists in his first five games down there… that’s not much, but it’s something.
Incidentally, for all the mockery the Grizzlies have gotten for sending the #2 pick down to the minors, it seems like a perfectly fine decision to me. If you want to get a guy court time and have him work on developing new aspects of his game, why not send him down for awhile? I’d imagine that, over time, D-League relegations will not have as much stigma as they currently do. It seems like a good tool for a franchise to use.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
there’s no way to spin his passing numbers as good or even decent, but if he just takes a high-percentage shot when you pass it to him
how was our own Hawkeye Dre’s passing when he was a rookie? I don’t think you get 7+ footers to make them assist guys? Do you??
Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 6, 2010 9:11 PM PST up reply actions
Incidentally, for all the mockery the Grizzlies have gotten for sending the #2 pick down to the minors, it seems like a perfectly fine decision to me. If you want to get a guy court time and have him work on developing new aspects of his game, why not send him down for awhile?
It actually looks like a smart decision to me. It’s no different than keeping a prospect who’s blocked in the majors in the minors longer in baseball, which teams do all the time. Especially for a team that thinks it’s contending for a playoff spot – what good does having a guy with tons of potential on the bench do? Get him reps – which is exactly what they’re doing. From a developmental standpoint, seems like a smart move to me, especially since he’s not contributing much to the NBA club at the moment. Basically – it’s smart not because of Thabeet being a bust – it’s smart because there’s just not a place for him on their NBA franchise right now and they’re doing what’s best for his long term development.
by Missing Barry on Mar 8, 2010 10:15 AM PST up reply actions
And while Thabeet’s not yet ready to contribute much, I wouldn’t trust Nellie to play him even if he gets there.
Really???
He seemed to do a fine job with Biedrins who was a no minute backup with Nelson came.
Indeed he did. But the Nellie of 2010 is not the Nellie of 2006.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
Class Action SHOUT out to GSOM attorney's
Is it possible for a community to sue ownership of a sports franchise for fraud? Or revoke their charter?
Obviously I’m no legal mind, which will become evident VERY quickly…
- Corporations get charters to serve the benefit of the community (this is true, though frequently forgotten)
- A sports team sells to the public an “intention to win”. rebuilding years come with the “building to win next year” caveat.
- When a team makes decisions that are an obvious detriment to winning or building – are they defrauding the paying public? Especially season ticket holders who have no recourse for refunds…
It’s an interesting question and would be interesting leverage.
The only franchise that equals the W’s in futility and mismanagement over the past 15 years is the Clippers – and frankly, the Clippers have tried. Sterling is an a-hole, but he paid to keep FA’s, and paid to get FA’s and for the most part their trades were made with the intent to better the team. THey’ve just had some bad luck - and a jerk of an owner. But the good faith is there.
There is no good faith with Warriors ownership. Here’s the evidence using 2010:
- expiring contracts – extremely valuable in getting a player of quality. Instead they just expire. with the reduction is cap space this won’t free up money for next year to make a run at a FA. this will keep them under the cap. if they’d use the expirings for a player, then they could go over the cap with that players salary without paying the lux tax (i think).
- Mayo/Ellis trade: Most think this trade HEAVILY favored the W’s. A younger/healthier player than Monta that would have fit the offense w/Curry at point. (makes team better). Even if one thought Monta was better for the W’s, this would reduce payroll obligation 10M for 4 more years – which would give the team more flexibility to make moves (makes team better).
- Jackson trade: raja bell, for all he’s saying, isn’t going to resign with the w’s. and raja for sjax wasn’t even close to fair value (even at Jax’s lowered value).
Every move is about cutting real money payouts over this and the next year or two. It’s like a company saying “cut payroll 20%”. But most companies do this to strengthen themselves, weather the storm and live to fight another day. The W’s get in worse and worse shape, but Cohan saves a extra $.
Again, it’s seems plain as day the ownership is defrauding the buying public of the product they’re putting out for purchase and consumption.
thoughts?
- Jackson trade: raja bell, for all he’s saying, isn’t going to resign with the w’s. and raja for sjax wasn’t even close to fair value (even at Jax’s lowered value).
Honestly, that was a good trade. Jackson has one of the worst contracts in the league and we managed to get rid of it. Also we made our team slightly worse so we could contend for a top 3 pick. So instead of having terrible cap situation for the next few years while seemingly not getting top 5 draft picks, we get salary relief and the ability to truely rebuild.
And next year Vlad is a valuable expiring contract. If he expires so be it, we get alot of cap space. If we trade him, i’m sure we can get a valuable piece. This was a good trade.
banned like chris andersen
by MDB on Mar 6, 2010 2:32 PM PST up reply actions
I agree totally
It was never about getting equal value. Jackson was a cancer here, he was a cancer in Indy and San Antonio dumped his ars for the same reason. Mr. Jackson has a short shelf life wherever he goes. His days in Charlotte are numbered. Odds are he is gone in a year or less.
by StinkyFingers on Mar 6, 2010 2:44 PM PST up reply actions
Corporations get charters to serve the benefit of the community (this is true, though frequently forgotten) - A sports team sells to the public an "intention to win".
Intent to win means they just have to make an attempt, it’s doesn’t specify if they actually have to succeed at the intent?
Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 6, 2010 3:33 PM PST up reply actions
The only franchise that equals the W’s in futility and mismanagement over the past 15 years is the Clippers – and frankly, the Clippers have tried. Sterling is an a-hole, but he paid to keep FA’s, and paid to get FA’s and for the most part their trades were made with the intent to better the team. THey’ve just had some bad luck – and a jerk of an owner. But the good faith is there.
If you’re looking at the last 15 years, I completely disagree. Sterling’s last 15 years is a tale of two halfs – in the first, he pocketed tons of money, didn’t spend anything on the team, put out a horrible product because he refused to pay anyone, and was the biggest joke in sports. It was the exact opposite of good faith. The second half I’ll give you – he has made a more respectable effort – but just because it’s more recent doesn’t mean you should ignore what happened in the first half.
by Missing Barry on Mar 8, 2010 10:19 AM PST up reply actions
I wouldn't do it...
Mayo will at best be Monta,and I’m sure he will demand more money in the future.
Thabeet has no future in the NBA.
I’d like to see more established talent back,if it was Biedrins and Monta for Marc Gasol and Rudy Gay,then yes.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Mar 6, 2010 2:08 PM PST reply actions
Well
we’d be giving Mayo a big contract after the new CBA, so it might not be a very big contract. And I don’t see how you can compare the two- they’re nothing alike, unless you just meant quality wise.
by Reverend_Randy on Mar 6, 2010 4:49 PM PST up reply actions
It's likely he'll get a smaller one after new CBA
Teams in the NBA lost around $400 mil last year. No way the new CBA will expand player contracts. Owners are likely to lock out the players to be honest…..
Yeah, that's what I was trying to say
Mayo’s big contract will be smaller than Monta’s or even Biedrins, most likely.
by Reverend_Randy on Mar 7, 2010 2:52 AM PST up reply actions
By the way...
OJ Mayo,Monta Ellis,Ronnie Brewer,Zach Randolph and Andris Biedrins.
As for the Warriors…
Stephen Curry,Rudy Gay,Corey Maggette,Brandan Wright and Marc Gasol.
Along with our bench,this team has a shot at a low playoff spot.
The salaries probably won’t match but I’m just throwing out some ideas.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Mar 6, 2010 2:22 PM PST reply actions
You think you’d be crazy with Monta’s selfishness and bad shot selection?
Wait till you see Rudy Gay and his long mid range jumpers and terrible passing!
banned like chris andersen
by MDB on Mar 6, 2010 2:33 PM PST up reply actions
He can rebound...
plus he shoots a higher percentage than Monta,the good thing is he shoots less.
I’m not too sure about the other parts in his game having another 6"8 forward that can run will definitely help.
New starting 5…
Stephen Curry,Kelenna Azubuike,Rudy Gay,Brandan Wright and Marc Gasol.
Also,Monta gets his wish to play in his hometown.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Mar 6, 2010 2:42 PM PST up reply actions
Monta gets his wish?
Elaborate
We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…
Monta's from Mississipi...
who wouldn’t want to play in their hometown?
I know he wants to.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Mar 6, 2010 2:53 PM PST up reply actions
Well...
Jackson,Mississippi is his hometown but Memphis is the closest thing.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Mar 6, 2010 2:55 PM PST up reply actions
Oh I see what your saying
But I’m not sure where your getting I know he wants to. Unless your friends with him… What I’m saying is that your assuming he wishes he was in Memphis. And I wish I was in disneyland but I’m not.
We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…
who wouldn’t want to play in their hometown?
Someone from Bakersfield?
Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 6, 2010 3:35 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I see where you're going with Rudy Gay,
because it would give us a tall athletic swingman to complement Stephen (reminiscent of Baron and J-Rich), but who’s to say that he would even resign this offseason? Even if he did, we would still have to give him a long term deal, which a player of his efficiency is not worth (Maggette anyone?). If we traded for Mayo, we would at least have the two years remaining on his rookie contract to determine his worth.
by golden_solitude on Mar 6, 2010 2:54 PM PST up reply actions
If he wishes to leave...
so be it.
It’s a win-win for us…
If he stays,we fill that swingman spot.
If he leaves,we’ll have money to sign other players including resigning our own,Anthony Morrow.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Mar 6, 2010 2:58 PM PST up reply actions
Who are we realistically going to get?
We won’t get anyone in free agency we already know this no matter how much money we have.
We all love the Warriors..
We all hate Cohan as an owner of this franchise…
I just realized something...
This is Monta and Curry’s first year together.
Let’s give them time to develop some chemistry.
I keep on thinking Monta and Curry have been playing together for years.
by Cpt. Jack in the Box on Mar 6, 2010 3:06 PM PST up reply actions
I’d take Gay. He’s a good prospect.
Welcome to the Pit of Despair! Don't even think about trying to escape.
I’d take Gay
Haha, after all that bitchin and moaning? No way mister, you’re not getting any of that now.
Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Mar 6, 2010 9:18 PM PST up reply actions
Here's why I don't like this trade:
I think, at the end of the day, the best player in the deal is Monta Ellis.
Look, I’m not a Monta defender. The guy has been horrible this year, but has scored enough points that most fans don’t see it. But he clearly has the capability to be a top-25 player in this league (and I think he’s been one in the past).
Neither Mayo nor Thabeet have that sort of potential.
As a rule of thumb, in the NBA, it seems like the team that gets the best player in the deal wins the deal. Yes, I think that Thabeet+Mayo helps us put together a squad that makes more sense … but it also costs us talent. And I’m not crazy about talent-losing trades.
I don’t disagree with your logic – if Monta really is the best player in the trade by a fair amount, I completely agree with you, I guess my disagreement is just on how much better Monta is than them. I’m not as optimistic on him really turning into an impact player. If the trade was offered, which I’m still not sure I believe, that had to be the reason Memphis wanted it – they see Monta as the best player in the trade.
by Missing Barry on Mar 8, 2010 10:24 AM PST up reply actions
It's way too early to say anything conclusive on Thabeet
Right now, it looks like he’s a decent rebounder, a fabulous shot blocker, and he’s 7’3", athletic, and long. Mayo seems to have peaked at “OK NBA player.”
There’s potential for Thabeet to turn out to be the best of the three, unlikely though it may be. Monta is going to need to improve a lot to become a “top 25” player.
I’d probably do the trade, mostly because though it’s probably a slight talent loss, it might be a coup if we get a quality big out of it, and it’s a big financial coup already.
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Mar 8, 2010 4:23 PM PST up reply actions
I wouldn't put it past Nellie to...
… reject the trade and then come out and say he would have gladly traded Monta. That seems like a head-game Nellie would find amusing.
Quit making the theiving Wall Street Fat-Cat Bankers even richer.
moveyourmoney.info

by 




























