Nelson and 23 years olds: 2 OLD 2 BE GR8?
Nelson and 23 year olds: 2 OLD 2 BE GR8?
Is this the suit that impressed the Dubs brass?
Ever since the moment the Warriors fell to the #6 pick most Warrior fans and analysts saw the Warriors adding a 20 year old C/PF who could pass with the best of them, make smart basketball decisions, and who had enough size and girth to give us the "beef" we've been looking for. Instead of drafting Greg Monroe, who was theirs for the taking, the Warriors disappointed many fans by selecting Ekpe Udoh despite being by all accounts everything the Warriors need: a big man with an NBA body who is defensive minded, can snag rebounds, defend the rim, and can space the floor on offense with his jump shot. So why did a chorus of boos fill Oracle at the draft party? Because of:
23
As in 23 years old. Which makes him older than our last 3 draft picks: Stephen Curry (21), Anthony Randolph (20), and Brandan Wright (22). Which means he was a man playing with boys in college. Which means his upside is not as high. Which means he can't be a potential superstar like Anthony Randolph. Which means Larry Riley, Don Nelson, Robert Rowell, Chris Cohan, and the Warriors will rue the day they passed on Greg Monroe.
On draft night The Nightmare lived up to his nickname and had Dub fans envisioning Monroe becoming an All*Star big man in Detroit while Udoh becomes Adonal Foyle 2.0. Who cares if 95% of us (myself included) never saw more than a couple games of Udoh or Monroe during their college careers. We were ready to trust Jay Bilas, Chad Ford, and Johnathan Givony that Monroe is the better player over Riley and Nelson who had ranked Curry #2 on their board last year while those guys had Curry behind players such as Jennings, Harden, and Thabeet.
So as a fan who was looking forward to Monroe wearing the blue and gold, I took a look back at previous rookies that were drafted under Nelson at the same age as Epps and the results were not was I was expecting.
THE DATA
All data taken from basketball-reference.com. In chronological order of draft year.
THE DISCUSSION
There are 19 rookies total who were drafted by Nelson (this excludes UDFA) and played their rookies seasons at 23 years of age. In average the rookies were worth 1.42 wins in their rookie year according to WS and for their careers were below average players according to WS48 (avg of .076 vs .100 for average player). However, looking at that number is not fair to Epps and Nelson/Riley because that includes 2nd rounders.
When one looks at the 23 year old lottery picks under Nelson (Benson, Richmond, Rogers, Alexander) those players average 2.25 wins in their rookie years and for their career were a bit better but still below average at 0.89 WS48. So it's fair to say that most 23 year old rookies under Nelson become below average players but the exceptions are the most intriguing.
Alex English. Mitch Richmond. Tim Hardaway. Josh Howard.
That group is 1 Hall of Famer, 2/3rds of Run TMC, and a former NBA All*Star.
So roughly 20% of Nelson rookies drafted at that age have become All*Star level players. In regards to draft position Udoh falls between big man Kent Benson (#1 overall) and Carlos Rogers (#11) who were average players with .103 and .95 WS48 for their careers. The good news for Warriors fans is that the last 23 year old rookie drafted around #6 was Mitch Richmond taken at #5 and we know how that turned out. So I think it's safe to say that Udoh has the floor of an average NBA player and despite our concerns for his age Udoh can still be NBA All*Star!
Also regarding the lack of improvement about being such an old rookie: out of the 19 rookies the 18 who played more than 1 season (Bubba Wells was 1 and done) only 3 out of 18 had career WS48 worse or equal to their rookie year WS48. That means 15 out of those "old guys" improved over the course of their career. Now most may have improved to be not as sucky, but 5 out of 19 (English, Benson, Richmond, Hardaway, Howard) improved to be above average NBA players according to career WS48.
THE CONCLUSION
I was surprised by how many of Nelson's great players entered the league at such an advanced age but again we have to remember why Nelson has earned a reputation as being rough on rookies. Another reason why The Nightmare is becoming more appealing to me is that for the most part the critics like him as a player but the knock on him is that: (1) he is a reach because of his lack of potential and (2) we have similar players in Randolph and Wright. No one ever really knocks his game (Aminu - can't shoot), intensity (Monroe - disappears from games), or drive (Cousins - Crazy?) like the other draft prospects.
So if those are the only two knocks, I have to say Riley/Nelson might have found themselves quite a player. Nelson's history with 23 year old rookies shows that despite the perceived lack of potential due to entering the league at 23 there are players that have developed into All*Star caliber players. Also all the potential of Randolph and Wright has led to the Warriors directly back to the lottery. At some point all their potential will stop being a positive and instead be a negative.
I am also a big proponent of drafting for BPA and if the Dubs passed over Monroe, who can fill a need at C, and instead drafted someone similar to what they have on their roster that screams BPA to me. Just like when they drafted Curry over Jordan Hill with Monta still on the team. The critics may not agree that Udoh was BPA, but not many of those critics would have placed Curry #2 on their rankings last year and less would declare him as a future NBA point guard. So I'm willing to give Nelson/Riley the benefit of the doubt.
The only question I have is how much input did Nelson have in the drafting of Udoh? He admittedly came later than usual this off-season to Oakland and since Udoh has been a Warrior I can't find a Nellie quote about him. Even today at the Q&A sessions it was Riley, Udoh, and a bunch of school age cheerleaders. If I remember correctly Nelson was at the Curry post draft presser (correct if I'm wrong)? So why is he absent at Udoh's? This maybe a moot point since Nelson most likely won't be coach next season, but I do value his scouting acumen and would love to hear his thoughts.
After giving it sometime to settle and reading more about Udoh I can say I'm OK with the pick as opposed to hating the pick. I'm not saying he WILL be great, but after researching I realized there is a chance he can become an All*Star player despite his age which is more than the no chance I gave him yesterday. Hopefully reading this will convince you to give Udoh a chance as well.
Thanks for the REC!
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
96 comments
|
11 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Rec Flax, I am willing to see Udoh as the best pick for us with what we know now untill proven otherwise.
This draft looks to be one of those where there may be a future star or 2 in the later pics and not so sure its Monroe or Aminu our other considerations. I am not into the complaint that Udoh is too similiar to AR and Wright. If all 3 turn out to be busts well we are dead in the water for years. If wright and AR are healthy and studs but having to share time with Udoh because he is a stud as well then……thats a problem we could live with.
by Only In Fairfax on Jun 25, 2010 5:38 PM PDT reply actions
I see Udoh becoming a slimmer Emeka Okafor
They’re both the same height and length, and have very similar games. I think he’ll eventually give us something like 13 ppg, 8/9 rpg, and 2 bpg, which is pretty good. We needed a guy like that. I think as he beefs up a bit, he will become the full time center in the future. Monroe has good skills, but if he can’t consistently knock down a 15-18 foot jumper, he could be in big trouble. He’s not very athletic, quick, or powerful. You look at the really good finesse bigs like Gasol and Duncan, and they are very long (we’re talking around 7’5" wingspans while also being 7’0" and over). Monroe is around 6’11", but has a wingspan of about 7’2", which isn’t short, but for an NBA center who lacks elite athleticism it could be a problem.
He's not Okafor
Per 40 of 15.8 points; 49% FG off of 12.3 shots; 68.5& FT off of 5.1 FTA; 11.1 Rebounds; 3.1 Assists; 0.9 Steals; 4.2 Blocks
OR
Per 40 of 21.8 points’ 59.9% FG off of 15 shots; 51.8% FT off of 7.5 FTA; 14.2 Rebounds; 1 assist; 1 steal; 4.1 Blocks
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
by wallywagon11 on Jun 25, 2010 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions
He's saying they will give similar roles I think
Decent big, projected 4 who will play the 5 and mainly be for defense
When I get older, I will be stronger.
They’ll call me freedom, just like a Waving Flag
I didn't say he put up the same numbers in college
I said they have similar styles of play. And who knows, maybe Udoh will be a better pro than college player and become just as good as Okafor or better.
Udoh would really have to work on his scoring and rebounding if he wants to be near the same level of pro as Okafor, let alone better.
Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?
by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Okafor is overpaid
but at least he’s pretty good.
Pro-Skub for life
by Reverend_Randy on Jun 27, 2010 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions
When his back is functional...
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 28, 2010 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Completely different player
At best I’ve heard Rasheed Wallace without the attitude (and thus probably same edge) and at worse Chris Gatling. He gets alot of Jason Thompson comparisons too…
Either way you’re looking at guy who is comfortable in high post extended
If the worst is Chris Gatling
That’s not so bad.
by Billy Frijoles on Jun 28, 2010 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions
Don't really see Okafor.
I think he’s going to be a role player off the bench. Hopefully he can become a starter, but it doesn’t seem like he has a whole lot of potential. What I like is that he seems to know his role. He knows he wasn’t drafted to be a 20-10 guy. He was drafted to protect the rim and grab us rebounds to start the bread, and because he knows this, I think he can be very successful on our team. He’s pretty redundant for this team, but I think there will be plenty of minutes to go around for everyone.
I think another important question to ask is:
What does he bring that our other player don’t provide?
- Better 1-1 defender at the PF position?
- Better elbow extended shooter?
- Good combination of post moves and face up game?
- Shot blocking specialist?
Added the ? because I’m not sure how good he’ll be at these things, but he did display these skillsets at Baylor. You can kind of see his skills overlapping with some of our other players, but how many of them have all these skills wrapped up into one package? Maybe AR, but he still seems unrefined. Hopefully he polishes up a bit this summer and works on Bigman skills. Please..please…please…
"I thought it was going in," Warriors center Chris Hunter said. "It looked like the invisible man tipped it away at the last second."
The real question comes down to the 2nd and 3rd one on your list.
Because his numbers are pretty low in those areas compared to other NBA pros that were in a similar situation as Udoh. He really needs to show whether her can shoot or score down low if he wants extended minutes, but yeah his defensive and shot blocking look legit. Plus, he’s a nice kid.
Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?
by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions
I misdirected my frustration
Seeing the Kings take DeMarcus right before us no doubt influenced my thoughts of our pick. I guess it’s just difficult to swallow that the Kings tanked going 1-9 the final games of the season…and by squeaking past us, especially with our injury situation, and them getting ONE more stinking loss than us, they end up being rewarded with a potentially game changing, bruising center – a real area of need for us, while we are left with a talent that is not even in the same tier. 6th pick in a 5 man draft is just tough to accept.
I like Udoh, I like his class, his personality, and his willingness to play defense and I’ve come around to give him a chance, because really what other choice do I have? It just really hurts because one single loss might separate the directions of the two franchises.
I blame Chris Bosh… anyone with me??
by JR Repertoire on Jun 25, 2010 6:00 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Sadly, I don't blame Kings... I blame Nellie
All those worthless March/April wins cost us a chance at top 5. I know it felt good at time to win with d-league all stars, but where did it get us now?
As a season ticket holder
It frankly would suck watching a team tank a month of the season. If it GUARANTEED you a great player, then maybe it’s worth it.
Otherwise, watching game after game of tanking, knowing you paid for those tickets, and then having Wesley Johnson or DeMarcus Cousins as a consolation prize doesn’t seem worth it. I dunno, maybe they will turn into stars, but maybe not.
Tanking for the Durant/Oden sweepstakes was probably better, but even there we see that Oden, consensus top 2 pick, is a mega-bust.
by Billy Frijoles on Jun 28, 2010 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd
Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?
by wallywagon11 on Jun 28, 2010 5:43 PM PDT up reply actions
And...
I believe it was really our last chance to get a game-changer/high lottery pick. It’s really unlikely that our team sees THAT many injuries for a third year in a row (you never know with the Dubs) but I think this team is just awesome enough to be constantly at that horrible 11-14 pick.
Sure we got Randolph around there…but he’s still all potential and it would have been nice to add at least one more high-end calibre players (Durant and Westbrook, Mayo and Gay, Bosh and Bargs, Roy and Oden and now Tyreke and Cousins) to go with Curry.
Of couse not all of those have panned out (jury is still out on Oden) but all you can do is give yourself a chance at those top picks when your luck is down. We had to win meaningless games for Nellie instead. We won the battle but lost the war.
I’m not a fan of tanking.
All you have to do is look at who got the #1 and #2 draft picks to see that tanking doesn’t pay. Washington and Philly were better or as bad as us yet they jumped into the Top 2 spots. I mean since 1990 only 3 times has the team with the worst record in the NBA claimed the top spot. So sure if we had lost one more game we would have better chances, but in the long run teaching a young team how to win an NBA is a far more valuable than a couple of percentages points.
The lottery balls just didn’t bounce our way. Not much you can do with that.
In hindsight it sucks because we lost out on Cousins by 1 pick, but at the time you would have never known WAS and PHI (who had equal or worse chances of moving up) BOTH would have leaped into the Top 3. The team should worry about things they control and that is teaching the young guys how to win NBA games.
Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...
http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220
Thank you for accepting him…finally. Udoh will help us one way or another.
[Info on Randolph] Would have been valuable at this time... But our management failed.
by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 25, 2010 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Of course
I’m definitely in the non-tank camp, and feel getting Curry and the rest of an impressionable young team some great wins to head into the summer is really valuable. You can’t predict how the balls will bounce. That being said, Teams aren’t dramatically changed by young players building confidence. The Spurs are a great team but they lucked out in two drafts at the perfect time. Robinson/Duncan is one side, but also being able to scout and draft higher picks like Ginobli and Parker, then George Hill etc is what builds championship team. 5 years from now we won’t remember coming back from 18 to beat the Kings in the third quarter in 2009-10…were possibly just going to remember Tyreke and Cousins keeping us in from getting out of the Pacific Division cellar. Having Point guard and Center locked up for the foreseeable is amazing.
Basketball, out of all sports, is run by Stars and difference-makers. Cousins, to me, seems like a difference maker – so to see us fall short by a single WIN was painful. Them saying Monroe was their guy until the bitter end didn’t help.
by JR Repertoire on Jun 25, 2010 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions
I feel you and agree with what you're saying but...
who is to say that if we did lose 1 more game we would have gotten the 5th pick?
There’s a tremendous amount of luck in the lottery so why even bother tanking? The Dubs are just on a string of bad luck lottery wise, one of these days it will swing in our favor and hopefully then we have a competent ownership/GM.
The extra percentage points matter more if the lottery was drawn multiple times (say 100) but it’s a one time shot and anyone who gambles or plays poker knows that the the lowest % play happens enough not to count it out.
Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...
http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220
Well if we would be third from the bottom up we would only had like 5%
to finish in the 6 spot where we picked Udoh.
nah man
They shouldn’t tank. I’m not saying this should do anything. I’m just saying looking at the numbers and how close we were to Cousins… sucked. Thats it. That was why i reacted the way I did on draft night.
by JR Repertoire on Jun 26, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions
They shouldn’t tank. I’m not saying this should do anything. I’m just saying looking at the numbers and how close we were to Cousins… sucked.
Then they shoulda tanked? which is it? happy & tanked with the Big Cuz or sad and untanked with Uppie-Kudos?
The bottom line is it’s way past being able to fix it now so hopefully they learn and do better next time the opportunity present’s it’s self, and hope is something a warriors fan must cling to with white knuckles.
Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jun 26, 2010 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Hmm..guess I can make this a bit more clear
It sucked missing out on Cousins.
We were really close to getting him.
I am happy we didn’t tank because that isn’t the way the game is supposed to be played.
I am still sad that, in certain ways, he was so close to being ours, though.
These factors effected my intitial reaction to Udoh.
I realize the lottery is a crapshoot. Losing more games doesn’t necessarily mean higher pick. I wouldn’t change anything. Time to move on with a good prospect in Udoh.
by JR Repertoire on Jun 26, 2010 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions
the irony...
If the W’s win just one more game, or if they LOSE the coin toss with the Wizards, then we’re looking at the W’s at the #1 pick.
I don't know if that's necessarily the case
Pro-Skub for life
by Reverend_Randy on Jun 26, 2010 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Definitely true for the coin flip. I’d have to know more about exactly what combo of numbers were drawn to be sure of the other, but I believe it’d be about a 2/3 chance that if they had that spot all to themselves they would’ve gotten it.
That is, unless you’re operating under the assumption that if the W’s had been in that spot it wouldn’t have happened just because it’s the W’s. That actually makes more sense.
I'm not exactly sure of the nature of the coinflip
Should’ve lost one more game.
Pro-Skub for life
by Reverend_Randy on Jun 28, 2010 8:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Wouldn't be too surprised if we blow up the team though (trade Ellis and Beans)
If that happens, we could easily be terrible enough to get a high draft pick again. Not only that, but I could easily see a bunch of the teams that were as bad or worse than us last year (Wizards, Kings, New Jersey, Clippers, Sixers) having a big turn around next year and leapfrogging us in the standings. I think we could be in for another long year. Should be fun to watch though.
I don't get this analysis. I'm sorry but it doesn't make sense to me.
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
Hey where you can you get college per 40 stats? Other than draftexpress. I want to be able to look at players from the 80s.
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
by wallywagon11 on Jun 25, 2010 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Most people hate the Udoh simply because he is 23 years old and/or prognosticators put Monroe ahead of Udoh. Evaluators see being a 23 year old rookie as a negative because it means the player has a low ceiling, won’t improve much, and/or is already a polished player. He doesn’t have as much “upside” as Favors, Cousins, or Monroe.
However, there examples of rookies drafted under Don Nelson’s watch (assuming he has some input in the draft selection) that are 23 years old and have gone onto to All*Star games and even one HOFer. So to hate on Udoh because at 23 he has no upside seems rather ignorant because aside from his age I don’t know what major negatives there are to his game or personality.
Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...
http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220
I don't like the Udoh pick and I think it's pretty silly to compare him to the likes of Alex English, Mitch Richmond, and Tim Hardway without showing what type of numbers they all put up when they were entering the league.
Alex English. Mitch Richmond. Tim Hardaway. Josh Howard.
That group is 1 Hall of Famer, 2/3rds of Run TMC, and a former NBA All*Star.
I don’t understand why you are using these guys as examples that Udoh has potential.
First with English. He was drafted with the 23rd pick in the 1976 draft. Unlike Udoh, all of English’s classmates were playing in college. He was playing against other great 23 year olds of his era. Udoh did not play against the very best forwards or centers of his class or even the classes below him. Kevin Durant, Rudy Gay,Brook Lopez, Jeff Green, Al Hortford, Thompson, Hibbert, Marvin Williams, Hawes, Greene, Hickson, Blair, Magically healthy Oden, DeAndrew Jordan, Blatche, Beasley, and McGee are who the players who come to mind when I think of pretty good players 23 and under (sorry some of those guys could definitely be from a high school class that graduated before Udoh’s did but to be honest I am pretty tired at the moment)
Look at English’s draft. Just the top 10
John Lucas – 23 when drafted
Scott May – 23
Richard Washington – 22
Leon Douglass – 23
Wally Walker – 23
Adrian Dantley – 21
Quinn Buckner – 23
Robert Parish – 23
Armond Hill – 24
Ron Lee – 24
Trust me, if the top members of the high school graduating classes of 2006 and 2007 didn’t come out until this year, Udoh would not have done as well in college as many of them would have. That matters because these are the players he is going to be playing against on the next level.
The second problem is that these players you listed were all better than Udoh was in college.
Alex English Per 40 his Senior Year
55.1 FG% off of 17.3 shots; 70.1 FT% off of 4.96 shots; 23.36 PPG; 10.65 rebounds; 1.03 assists
Mitch Richmond Per 40 his Sophmore Year
51.4 FG% off of 15.32 shots per game (46.9% from 3); 77.5% FT% off of 5.47 FTA ; 25.61 PPG; 7.14 rebounds; 4.19 assists; 0.77 steals
Tim Hardway Per 40 his Senior Year
50.1% FG off of 15.42 shots (36.7% from 3); 74.1% FT% off of 6.91 FTA; 24.58 PPG; 4.47 rebounds; 6.03 assists; 3.15 steals
Josh Howard per 40 (no clue if sophmore or junior year but whichever it was his last)
47.7 FG% off of 17.1 attempts (37.3% from 3); 83.3% FT off of 6.9 FTA; 24.2 PPG; 10.3 rebounds; 2.4 assists; 2.6 steals; 1.9 Blocks
[By the way, I noticed Udoh has a decent 3 percentage but he only took 0.8 3 pointers per game which is waaaaay lower than Mitch, Howard, or Hardaway]
Trying to compare these players to Udoh is like comparing apples to napkins. Udoh is not as talented as the above players where at their respective ages when coming into the league. He simply didn’t produce at their level. That’s great if Nellie ended up helping them have great careers but they were a level above Udoh coming into the league.
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
by wallywagon11 on Jun 25, 2010 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Sorry I'm not trying to rub it in anyone's face
Obviously I will end up shutting up about this. The draft is over, everyone has to move on but it’s one day later and still relevant.
I wouldn’t go out of my way to start thinking about this stuff but I saw this post and the first thing I thought was “This is not how I would approach the question.” That is it. I’m sorry but I didn’t think it was the right approach to the question of whether he is going to be good.
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
by wallywagon11 on Jun 25, 2010 7:23 PM PDT up reply actions
It is not meant to determine if he will be good or not...
I was simply attempting to make the discussion about Udoh’s lack of potential/upside based on his age.
Here’s a perfect example of what I am talking about…
I like Ekpe Udoh and so do a lot of NBA scouts and general managers. But taking him at No. 6 seems like a major reach, especially when you consider the Warriors’ current roster. In previous years, the Warriors have selected Brandan Wright and Anthony Randolph in the lottery — and both are thin, athletic players like Udoh who can rebound and run the floor.
Udoh may be more polished than Wright and Randolph. He’s an accomplished shot-blocker and rebounder, and he has a more sophisticated offensive game. But he’s also already 23 years old, while Wright is just 22 and Randolph is only 20. Given all that, and given the uncertainty in the Warriors organization, Udoh looks like a classic candidate to disappoint.
So Ford and others like Udoh’s game and admit he can rebound and defend and is more polished on offense compared to Randolph or Wright… yet it’s a bad pick because we have younger players who are inferior right now? I don’t get it… doesn’t that mean we improved our team last night even just a little bit?
Now the question of “if he will be good?” is a good one and the answer is I don’t know nor will I attempt to figure it out. I don’t watch enough college basketball to make sense or put the statistics into perspective.
However, Riley/Nelson evaluated Curry correctly IMO that went against the consensus so I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt on Udoh vs Monroe. Those guys have a combined basketball experience of almost 100 years.
Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...
http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220
I get what you are saying (and the block quote up there explains it a lot better). This really is probably neither here nor there, but I just got hung up on this part
for the most part the critics like him as a player but the knock on him is that: (1) he is a reach because of his lack of potential and (2) we have similar players in Randolph and Wright. No one ever really knocks his game (Aminu – can’t shoot), intensity (Monroe – disappears from games), or drive (Cousins – Crazy?) like the other draft prospects.
I understand now that you were more focused on the fact that the two knocks on Udoh that people are talking about don’t really mean much. It’s just that I personally feel that, when comparing him to Monroe and Aminu (not AR or Wright) that he really didn’t separate himself as better, regardless of age.
So if those are the only two knocks, I have to say Riley/Nelson might have found themselves quite a player. Nelson’s history with 23 year old rookies shows that despite the perceived lack of potential due to entering the league at 23 there are players that have developed into All*Star caliber players. Also all the potential of Randolph and Wright has led to the Warriors directly back to the lottery. At some point all their potential will stop being a positive and instead be a negative.
And here I just thought Nellie’s history of 23 year old rookies was one with players who were already impressive and better than Udoh. Now I understand what you were trying to convey. I am not sure why I felt the need to go in depth on it but I did. I jguess I just get nervous throwing in random players from back in the day as a form of comparison. I know you were just focused on criticing the issue of older players with the ability to produce versus younger guys with more potential but I just feel bringing players like Richmond or Hardaway kind of muddles things up.
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
by wallywagon11 on Jun 25, 2010 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Fair enough. Great discussion is always welcome.
Yah I don’t watch enough college basketball to make a decision one way or another. However, once I see him play in the NBA I’d be comfortable making an assessment whether he’s good or not.
Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...
http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220
doesn’t that mean we improved our team last night even just a little bit?
hard to say, Magette out Okie-dokie in? Wait till the end of next season and we’ll have a better idea of the improvement.
Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jun 25, 2010 9:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Well at least from the PF spot we improved....
Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...
http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220
uncalled for. he brings up useful info & you act like a child.
look, it’s not that he’s just 23. that’s 1/2 of it (unlikely to improve much or grow much more physically (no AR or Dwight stories of growing taller).
it’s that he was not good in college. he averaged only 8.1 rebs per 36 min in his college career. for comparisons sake, (despite playing SF his freshman yr (James Johnson was the PF) Aminu averaged 11.2 rebounds per 36 over his career & Cousins averaged 15.0 per 36.
Udoh’s TS% were 49%, 48% & 54%. if he couldn’t dominate college players who he was usually much older than (he’s 5 yrs older than some of these kids like Favors), what does that say about his pro prospects?
he was also foul prone until he got to Baylor where they play zone defense.
on the plus side, his passing #’s are good for a big & he blocks shots.
it’s hard to compare a wing player like George or XHenry, but w/ the big men, even if you ignore Aminu or Udoh or Aldrich’s respective ages, Aminu & Aldrich posted better #’s overall (especially in the key areas) in college. the fact that they were 18,19 & 19,20,21 when they were doing it & Udoh was 20,21,23 only makes it worse.
by homer simpson on Jun 26, 2010 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions
OP is comparing players through the isolated variable of age
With the hopes of proving that age alone will not determine a player’s viability for success. As reasonable as that statement may sound, there are many who have been using age as the predominant reason why Udoh has no potential. So by controlling all other variables and comparing those who have been drafted by Nellie at a similar age, the OP attempts to disprove age as a confounding factor in a player’s success.
This is not a comprehensive comparison and applying other independent variables is far beyond the scope of the OP’s analysis. There is no attempt to compare anything else besides Age.
Randolph is a garbage-point collector and Wright is probably never going to be an NBA starter, not JONeal at all.
LarryLegendofOracle
fair enough
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
by wallywagon11 on Jun 25, 2010 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions
actually wally made a good point
Chad Ford discussed this in his latest podcast. When you’re 23 going up against 18-19 year olds, you should be dominating. Back “in the day”, everyone was “old”. What people are missing here about the age thing, it’s not just that older guys won’t develop as much, it’s that they appear better than they may actually be due to their (increasingly much younger) competition.
i understand the rationale for this
and it sounds good on paper, but I would love to see some statistical evidence for it. I think one could argue you see more 19 year old big men recruited after their their freshmen year turn out as busts than older players who put up good stats against players two or three years younger. Once again, no evidence and frankly I don’t think there’s enough of a sample pool to investigate it yet as the mandatory 1 year college rule has only been in effect for 4 years, but over a longitudinal study I would love to see how younger big men fare against older big men in fulfilling their potential in the NBA
Randolph is a garbage-point collector and Wright is probably never going to be an NBA starter, not JONeal at all.
LarryLegendofOracle
I'm pretty sure
that D Berri has some stuff about it in his book, but I’m not sure. I haven’t seen it specifically, but I’ve seen jae mention that players tend to improve based on age and not how long they’ve been in the league.
Pro-Skub for life
by Reverend_Randy on Jun 25, 2010 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions
I don’t know why, but he reminds me of Brandon Bass. And if his best case scenario is Jason Thompson, then damn…Draft Express are wrong at times, but man does he not have a high ceiling.
Best Case: Amare Stoudemire Meets Antawn Jamison
Worst Case: Derrick Coleman
Best Case: Rich Man’s Brevin Knight
Worst Case: Jacque Vaughn
Best Case: N/A
Worst Case: Devin Harris
Best Case: Samuel Dalembert
Worst Case: Desagana Diop
Best Case: Mike Bibby
Worst Case: Jannero Pargo
Best Case: David Robinson
Worst Case: Emeka Okafor
Best Case: Rudy Gay
Worst Case: Tim Thomas
Best Case: Kevin Johnson
Worst Case: Tony Parker
I mean… are any of these right? Is he ever going to be healthy enough to approach Okafor? Rudy Gay?!?!? Really? I guess they got the work ethic risk of Coleman thing down, but he’s never going to get close to a 20/10. And that last guy is already better than KJ.
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 28, 2010 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions
I think the worst are
the Rudy Gay and Kevin Johnson comparisons. Chris Paul’s best case is closer to “The greatest point guard of all time.”
Pro-Skub for life
by Reverend_Randy on Jun 28, 2010 6:04 PM PDT up reply actions
KJ was actually a pretty great point guard
their stats aren’t all that different at this point in their respective careers.
Yeah, they're pretty close
Paul’s are better, though. Paul’s numbers are just out there.
Pro-Skub for life
by Reverend_Randy on Jun 28, 2010 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions
KJ made complete sense
Very similar players. I know Chris Paul is better but KJ is pretty darn similar.
Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?
by wallywagon11 on Jun 28, 2010 8:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Sure
It’s a fair comparison. But CP3 has indeed surpassed their best case comparison. My point was really that the practice of “best case/worst case” is inane. What bothers me more about the CP3 best/worst is actually the Tony Parker comparison. Really? At worst he performs like a 3 time NBA champion PG with a Finals MVP trophy? Seriously?
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 28, 2010 11:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah but they don't factor in whether someone wins an NBA championship. It is just playing style and to say Chris Paul's low end is Tony Parker is suggesting Paul is going to be one heck of a talent.
The concerns going into the the draft with Paul were that he was a short point guard who scored a lot and whose 3 point shot might not translate. I think Tony Parker is a fair low end version of that.
Besides, Tony Parker was just on his way to winning his 2nd Championship when they made that report (was in the playoffs but still hadn’t won yet). If you remember, Tony Parker wasn’t exactly thought of as a great Spurs player when he got his first ring (they were considering signing Jason Kidd in that offseason). Plus, Tony Parker didn’t win the Finals MVP until 2 years after Paul had been in the league.
Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?
by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions
Tony Parker was pretty darn good. He was the starting PG for two championship teams. At the time, he fell closer to the Derek Fisher end of the “starting PG on a championship team” but he was still a very good player who was still on the rise. Saying he is the “worst case scenario” for a guy who hasn’t played a minute in the NBA is pretty ridiculous. Nowadays they have started saying things like:
Best Case: Russell Westbrook W/ Better Court Vision
Worst Case: 6-4 Version Of Kyle Lowry
Ummm… what does this even mean? He’ll be like player X, but he’s so much better at one thing that he’ll be a vastly different player (i.e. not really like player X)?
I also like their Francisco Garcia:
Best Case: Reggie Miller (better Pass/worse Shot)
Worst Case: James Jones
So he’ll be like Reggie Miller, but won’t have his shot… and he’ll be a better passer. So, he’ll be almost completely different.
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 29, 2010 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions
He was the starting PG for two championship teams.
No he wasn’t. You have to remember, those profiles are done well in advance of the draft. Paul was drafted in June of 2005. That profile at latest would have been late in the 2004-2005 season but more likely very earlier on in the college season or even could have been done during Paul’s first year at Wake Forest. Parker was the starting PG for one championship team. I know he was young and good. I also know the team was at least thinking of going in a different direction. I just wanted to make sure the facts were taken into account.
Saying he is the "worst case scenario" for a guy who hasn’t played a minute in the NBA is pretty ridiculous. Nowadays they have started saying things like:
And yes I know these player comparisons are ridiculous but it’s also ridiculous for us to go out of our way to nitpick them to death like they were terrible choices. I am not trying to throw Rev under the bus but look what he said in this thread.
I think the worst are the Rudy Gay and Kevin Johnson comparisons. Chris Paul’s best case is closer to "The greatest point guard of all time."
Some people are going to say the upside is a bad choice because they didn’t give the guy enough credit. And some will say the lowside is not enough because they gave the guy too much credit. Nobody is ever going to be happy with their picks yet we all still want to compare these players to ones we have already seen. So long as it is sort of reasonable, I say who cares.
And yes I am not a fan of the playor comparisons. Well, not a fan of the ones that don’t show any analysis.
Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?
by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions
Some people are going to say the upside is a bad choice because they didn’t give the guy enough credit. And some will say the lowside is not enough because they gave the guy too much credit. Nobody is ever going to be happy with their picks yet we all still want to compare these players to ones we have already seen. So long as it is sort of reasonable, I say who cares.
Yeah, I understand that they have to cater to the lowest common denominator and give people information that they can quickly relate to… because the vast majority of people are too stupid or lazy to pay attention for more than snippets. In a related story: Twitter is superduper popular!
And remember, my original reasoning for posting these draftexpress bios was because of this comment:
And if his best case scenario is Jason Thompson, then damn…Draft Express are wrong at times, but man does he not have a high ceiling.
by DubsFan408 on Jun 25, 2010 6:20 PM PDT
I wanted to merely illustrate with examples how silly the DE best/worst things are and that they cannot be used to prove anything or definitively state that player X has a high/low ceiling. DE does their best to compare a prospect to a good and a bad player that seem to play similar games, that is all. They should not be used as a reference any more than Chad Ford’s mock draft should be used.
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 29, 2010 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions
lol for the twitter comment
As for the Jason Thompson part, yeah that isn’t really why I dived in to be honest. I just dove in here because Rev said the KJ comparison for Chris Paul wasn’t very accurate. Basically I pulled one of these
And yes I would agree with the DE comparisons overall (I just thought the Chris Paul one was technically not that bad compared to other ones). My one and only comment about the JT comparison is … what? Udoh and JT are completely different players. I almost feel like JT is now the gold standard of “Average player at the PF position who could start on a non playoff team but on a better team is likely the first big off the bench.” Instead of analyzing Udoh’s game I think they just went for someone with sort of the same role (although yeah totally not the same role given Udoh will be there to defend while JT rebounds).
Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?
by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions
Udoh and JT are completely different players.
Whaat? Udoh is just
Best case: Jason Thompson w/ better defense, worse rebounding, more explosiveness and athleticism, more IQ and intelligence, and better ballhandling
Worst case: Hilton Armstrong/ Malik Allen fushion with a blind of Jason Thompson and a dash of Darko
"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh
by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 29, 2010 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh wow DX spelled fusion wrong.
"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh
by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 29, 2010 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions
I don’t know why, but he reminds me of Brandon Bass. And if his best case scenario is Jason Thompson, then damn…Draft Express are wrong at times, but man does he not have a high ceiling.
This is the comment Boston Dubs was referring to and that is the only comment I was talking about.
Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?
by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions
I also know the team was at least thinking of going in a different direction.
Umm… you mean they were thinking of trading for Jason Kidd? Jason Kidd circa 2005 was really, really good and arguably the best PG in the league (Nash had just finished his first year in Phoenix and hadn’t fully established himself there). Any time you have the opportunity to acquire the best PG in the league… to pair with your best PF in the league, you have to do it. And if Tony Parker was going to be the biggest asset you have to part with, then you’re doing back flips. Now, 5 years later you might not be completely happy… but then, they might have won 3-4 championships in those 5 years with Kidd, Ginobili, and Duncan.
And if you’re really suggesting that they were fairly saying that a worst case scenario was a guy who had only played in the league for 2.5 years and might already be the primary asset used to acquire one of the best PGs of the decade, then that’s still a pretty high bar. Not to mention that Tony Parker was still a few years away from hitting his peak… thus a bad example for a “worst case scenario.”
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 29, 2010 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions
Sorry if I said trade, I meant sign
Well I think they actually decided not to force it just because they knew a few years down the line they would regret it.
I am just going to drop it at this point. This is straight up a silly arguement about semantics.
Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?
by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions
Post Draft Hype
I basically agree with Flaxwless conclusion. However, I would like to say that the average basketball fan gives excessive importance and conclusion to the annual draft results, in either a positive or negative way. No team is going to be instantly changed in a super dramatic way just because an all star college player was selected by certain team. Unless you change more than 2/3rds the number of players on one team, plus coaching and other intangibles, each team is basically what it was at the end of each season. The trick for improvement and success is for a team to consistantly change and improve during the course of the season. Consider the following probabilities:
- The supposedly 5 very best college prospects in the draft went to Washington, Philadelphia, New Jersey, Minnesota and Sacramento. Yet, neither one of these teams will get in the playoffs this coming year. I actually think the Warriors will have a better record than all 5 of them.
- The so called best NBA players who are free agents waiting to sign with whichever team will accomodate them moneywise will not automatically take their teams to the finals unless their teams have a least two very good players as a supporting cast. – Ask LeBron, Bosh, Wade, Duran and company why they watched the championship series at home.
- I think this coming season we will see Lakers, Phoenix, Dallas, Denver, Utah, San Antonio and Oaklahoma City make the playoffs in the west, with Huston, Portland, New Orleans and maybe Golden State fighting for the eight spot. The west will be brutal again this coming season.
As a Warrior fan I would be happy if the Warriors accomplish the following this coming season: 1) Have a better record than last year. 2) Have a winning record. 3) Make it into the playoffs.
I would be pleased with at least the first two accomplishments.
I think this coming season we will see Lakers, Phoenix, Dallas, Denver, Utah, San Antonio and Oaklahoma City make the playoffs in the west, with Huston, Portland, New Orleans and maybe Golden State fighting for the eight spot.
What about Sacto? They should be better than Huston, portland, GS ,and dallas? .
Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jun 25, 2010 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions
We won't be nearly that good
we got less talented this offseason. We didn’t draft an impact player and traded a productive starter away for two of the worst players in the league. We’ll be better than this last season due to injury, but our potential record as a team is worse than going into last season, I think.
Pro-Skub for life
by Reverend_Randy on Jun 25, 2010 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions
+ We will win meaningless games at the end of the season and pick fourth in the three man draft
Nothing new same old Warriors never good and never bad enough to draft a game changer.
We've been plenty bad.... we're just not lucky.
The Dubs haven’t moved up in the draft for how many years?
Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...
http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220
We have an abundance of talent!
We just need health. The players we have now have passion, commaraderie, unselfishness and so on. It’s a great mix of players who will be focused on winning this season. I fully expect us to surprise a lot of people this year as long as we have relative health with our bigs and Steph and Monta.
i really don’t think 23 is that old. it is pretty hit or miss with nba players anyway. look at jermaine oneal who showed nothing his first 4 years or so.
then again i’m a clippre fan, we drafted al thornton who was 23 when he came out and he never got better. though i still dont believe it mattesr. 19 to 23 isnt that huge an age difference and with nba level of coaching it all depends on the coaches. even steve nash didnt light the world on fire when he came into the league and he was an "old " rookie too.
i really don’t think 23 is that old. it is pretty hit or miss with nba players anyway. look at jermaine oneal who showed nothing his first 4 years or so.
Because he was 18 when he was drafted. 23 really is that old. It’s as old as a player can be when they enter the league, unless they come from Europe.
19 to 23 is the equivalent of 25% of a good player’s NBA career. That’s a lot. A very large amount of a player’s development comes in those ages. The fact that NBA players tend to stop most of their development at 25 or 26 really tells you how important age is. If you were just to compare Udoh at 23 to KG at 19, Udoh would look like the better player. 4 years later, you’d be the biggest fool in the history of sports to have drafted Udoh over KG.
Pro-Skub for life
by Reverend_Randy on Jun 25, 2010 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Jermaine O'Neal was getting 10 minutes a game playing behind Brian Grant. Rasheed Wallace, and Sabonis
Plus the Blazers knew he was good. They traded him for Dale Davis. Davis wasn’t spectacular but he had been an All Star and was considered some defensive wiz and they rationalized he could defend Shaq.
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
by wallywagon11 on Jun 25, 2010 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Great movie by the way
you need a peanut gallery to watch it, but it’s a good time
Pro-Skub for life
by Reverend_Randy on Jun 25, 2010 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions
See... Nellie knows front office talent too!
Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...
http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220
Pfft. I guess after Pritchard felt he was done having his head screwed through he decided to call it quits and become an NBA GM.
[Info on Randolph] Would have been valuable at this time... But our management failed.
by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 25, 2010 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions
Random but oh well
that picture of Udoh is pretty awesome
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
FLAxwless is killing the game right now.
I was pretty optimistic about the pick, a day sinks in, I read everyone else’s take, was feeling depressed about how a screw up at this crucial juncture in the Warriors’ development (barring injuries, the last high draft pick they are going to get, a great pick could launch us, a bad one could put us in basketball purgatory), read a couple reactionary (to the immense criticism) takes, and now…well I’m still a bit depressed. I understand he blocks shots but I also know that does not mean he is a good defender, and judging his defense is damn hard to do at this point of his career (personally, I think a lot of the player’s defense depends on the players around him and the system he plays in). I see you argue that he rebounds but I feel like in one of the less positive posts I read someone argued that he does not. So I am not feeling confident about this pick right now…but will wait to see him play before I say it was a bad one.
But this Fanpost helps.
3 out of the 4 recommended posts are from FLAxwless
Good stuff dude keep up the good work
Fear is the Mind Killer
I am kind of new here
but I have admit, whenever I see an article by FLAxless I have to read it.
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
by wallywagon11 on Jun 26, 2010 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions
good stuff
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
by wallywagon11 on Jun 26, 2010 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions
Rec'd
Thank you for providing everybody a breath of fresh air.
I don’t understand why almost everyone on GSOM has been labeling Udoh as a bust before he even suits up for the summer league.
I think what we need to keep in mind here is that Randolph and Wright are not proven players yet. The argument against Udoh is that we have two similar players. Well, if Udoh turns out to be better than one or both of those players we just made a good pick didn’t we?
by SnakesOnAPlane on Jun 26, 2010 10:24 AM PDT reply actions
"Randolph and Wright are not proven players yet."
well neither one has played a lot b/c of they are young & prone to assignment mistakes. nothing seems to get a coaches goad more than a freelancer or a player who isn’t where he’s supposed to be or someone who doesn’t follow the game plan. plus young big men tend to foul a lot.
anyway, Randolph has proven he rebounds well for a PF at the NBA level, he’s above average at blocking shots & he’s above avg at drawing fouls. on the minus side, he’s a bit of a ball hog, has poor shot selection & is a bit turnover prone (shudder to think what his rate would be if he didn’t shoot so often).
Wright has proven to have good shot selection, be an above avg shot blocker & is good about not turning the ball over. he’s also shown himself to be a below average rebounder for a PF.
Yet Wright as a freshman at 200 lbs, rebounded slightly better than Udoh did over his career at 8.15 rebs per 36 vs Udoh’s 8.07 per 36. Udoh wasn’t even better than Ronny in college.
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Ronny-Turiaf-61/stats/
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Ekpe-Udoh-1220/stats/
by homer simpson on Jun 26, 2010 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yet Wright as a freshman at 200 lbs, rebounded slightly better than Udoh did over his career at 8.15 rebs per 36 vs Udoh’s 8.07 per 36. Udoh wasn’t even better than Ronny in college.
Oh, boy. Udoh played at an extremely slow pace at Michigan. I mean, pace adjusted- his stats go up. Wright was definitely a bit bigger and played for UNC. And it’s hard to say Ronny was better when he wasn’t the man and perimeter defender Udoh showed he can be and he wasn’t nearly the threat from the low-post, wasn’t nearly the spot-up shooter, and was about half the passer.
[Info on Randolph] Would have been valuable at this time... But our management failed.
by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 26, 2010 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Fact of the matter is that neither is a proven player
And at least Wright has a serious injury history… it’s not remotely a foregone conclusion that he’ll ever stay healthy enough to be in a regular NBA rotation. Furthermore, his should injury is the type that’ll crop up again. Not a good sign.
And Randolph has clashed a lot with the coaching staff, is a ball hog, has an inflated view of his own abilities (and probably gets to the line/turns the ball over so much because he’s trying to score so often), and likes to do his own thing. Will he someday learn that he needs to work with the team? Probably. Will that be in a Warriors uniform? Maybe. Will he learn early enough to still have a productive NBA career? Very unsure.
So, we’ve got one guy who’s got a serious injury history. And we’ve got another guy who’s got a serious attitude problem. We’re far, far from “set” at the position, and it’s a rather important position. We’re at least kinda set at center with Biedrins/Turiaf/Gadzuric.
Look at our depth chart, before drafting Udoh, we had Randolph/Wright/Tolliver/Hunter. Tolliver and Hunter are band aids at best. That there’s a relatively high likelyhood that at least one of Randolph/Wright is going to fail again this season means we need more depth at this position unless we want Tolliver/Hunter/Radmanovic/Azubuike playing significant minutes at PF.
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Jun 28, 2010 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Don't you think the way Serge Ibaka played against the Lakers may have influenced this pick?
If Epke reminds me of anyone it’s Serge. Athletic defensive presence with passable offensive game and great motor. Ya he’s a little undersized but his skill set is perfect for a back up center/pf in an uptempo offense such as ours. You can’t underestimate the importance of a quality bench when it comes to winning basketball games. I can definately see him working fine alongside AR and BW plus he’s great insurance if one of our bigs goes down like usual.
The difference with him and Monroe for us is Epke will be more usefull to us these next 2 seasons instead of having another project in Monroe. I personally believe Monroe will have a better career, although I doubt he’ll be a player to build around, but for our immediate future Epke was the right pick in a very weak class.
At some point all their potential will stop being a positive and instead be a negative.
I think that ship sailed a long, long time ago…
Confront racism: Boycott Arizona
by The Bimbo Coles Experience on Jun 26, 2010 5:16 PM PDT reply actions
If it means
that we finally let go our clutches of “potential” at 4 and live with a hard working, above average defensive minded player, then ill be happy.

by 































