Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why Hockey Fans Should Root For Devils Vs. Kings

Udoh or not Udoh - The long way of saying "not Udoh"

Okay so I was checking out the fanposts earlier today and came across lightz0ut’s post “Udoh or not Udoh.” Lightz0ut wanted to hear everyone stance on the pick. Here were the basic rules

Take your current stance and post it here. In other words, let's pretend that the Warriors are on the clock right now and you are tasked to make the pick. What would be your play?

Here are the rules:

1. The first 5 picks went exactly who it went on draft night.

2. No trade scenarios of any kind were available, be it moving up, down or out of the draft.

3. Post your pick as the title of your reply

4. State your case as to why you think Udoh is a good or bad pick. Then make the case for your pick if it's not Udoh. (This is the part that will make you sound like a genius or an idiot later on. Don't you want to find out which of the two are you?)

5. Show us how the top of your board would've look like. That is, if you didn't go with the player your picked which 2 players would you have picked instead.

 So I went on to list my thoughts and the darn thing got way too long. So I thought, what the hell, why not just make it a fanpost? If you don't like someone continually complaining about the draft pick, this is not the post for you. You might be better just avoiding it (heck I am not even sure if it even makes sense to be honest). This will be my final comment about the pick. I think it’s still relevant considering it has only been two days. Plus, I would prefer to have all my thoughts on one specific post.  But having said that ... you can’t keep looking back in the past, so this will be it for me. Udoh is a Warrior and that is just the way it is. I threw in some pictures for a little humor (given that my writing lacks it). So, with that in mind, on to the argument!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Star-divide

 

 

PART I. "Who did the Warriors just pick? Whaaaaaaaa?"

 

I think Udoh was a bad pick.  Why do I think Udoh is bad pick? For starters, I have a hard time seeing him as being anything more than a bench player and not anything more than a 6th man. I don't know, maybe he could be a fringe starter but I wouldn't want to bet on it.

 

First off, this is probably my weakest point, but I do think age matters because we judge player's value by how they stack up against their peers. After all, Udoh will be playing with players his own age and younger for the next 10 years and only so many young guys get a shot to make something of themselves.  When I look at Udoh, I want to know how good he is compared to other players who graduated from high school between 2006 and 2009. I don't want to compare him to just college players. I want to look at Kevin Durant, Thaddeus Young, Earl Clark, Brandon Wright, Brook Lopez, Darrell Arthur, Taj Gibson, Speights, Ryan Anderson, Oden, Hawes, Robin Lopez, Anthony Randolph, Bill Walker, Austin Daye, Beasley, J.J. Hickson, Blake Griffin, DeJuan Blair, Love, DeAndre Jordan, Koufos, and B.J. Mullins. All of these guys graduated high school either in the same year as Udoh or after.  These are some of the best of the kids his age and below and they are not in college.

 

I know that is an insanely large list (I picked SF, PF, and C just because I keep hearing people say Udoh can play all three) but when valuing what Udoh brings I think you need to compare him with these guys in mind. When comparing him to all the guys who graduated and all the guys who left early, I just don't see him having a strong presence in this league, but who knows, maybe this a historically phenomenal batch of young players coming into the league all at the same time.

 

But of course I have no idea how directly compare Udoh’s 2009/2010 statistics in a way to where I can compare what he did to what NBA players were doing in 2009/2010. But I can see how Udoh did with his peers in college. After all, these are the guys he is competing with to get drafted.  The thing is, I just don't see how he stood out compared to other options that were left in the draft.

 

Udoh per 40 minutes his junior year (PF/SF?/C?)

15.8 points (off of 12.3 shots); 11.1 rebounds; 3.1 assists; 0.9 steals; 4.2 blocks; 49% FG; 26.9% 3Pt (off of 0.2 3PtA); 68.5% FT (off of 5.1 FTA)

 

Monroe per 40 his sophomore year (PF/C)

19 points (off of 13.2 shots); 11.3 rebounds; 4.4 assists; 1.4 steals, 1.8 blocks; 54.5% FG, 25.9% 3Pt (off of 0.2 3PtA); 66% FT (off of 6.4 FTA)

 

Cole Aldrich per 40 his sophomore year (C)

16.9 PPG (off of 11.0 FGA); 14.7 rebounds; 1.3 assists; 1.1 steals; 5.2 blocks; 56.2% FG; 67.9% FT (off of 6.6 FTA)

 

Aminue per 40 his sophomore year (SF/PF?)

20.2 points (off of 15.4 shots) 13.7 rebounds; 1.7 assists, 1.4 steals, 1.4 blocks; 44.7% FG; 27.3% 3Pt (off of 2.5 3PtA); 69.8% FT (off of 8.2 FTA)

 

Ed Davis per 40 his sophomore year (PF)

19.2 PPG (off of 11.9 shots); 13.6 rebounds; 1.4 assists; 0.6 steals; 4 blocks) 57.8% FG; 65.8% FT (off of 8.2 FTA)

 

I have a hard time judging defense so maybe Udoh is better than everyone else, but he better be really darn good to pass up everyone else on this list.  From what I can statistically see, I really like his ability to get blocked shots compared to the competition and I like his assist rate, but that is about it for me.

 

When it comes to big men coming into the league, the two stats that are very important if you want to be a successful are rebounding and scoring efficiency (particularly rebounding though).  If you can’t rebound, you better be quick enough to guard small forwards or at the very least score efficiently.  If you can’t put the ball in the bucket at a decent rate, then you have no other option but to be a very good rebounder. You can’t just say “Hey the guy is a jump shooter, that’s why his shooting percentages are low.”  Just because you take a lot of jump shots, it does not mean you are a good jump shooter. You better actually be able to hit those mid range shots at a good rate or else you are in real trouble. 

 

So yea, with this in mind I am not the biggest Udoh supporter.  For one, his shooting percentage is pretty bad for someone throwing up over 12 shots a game. I know Aminu’s is lower but I was under the impression that Aminu is a very good defender himself, plus he is a much better rebounder.  I’ve read people arguing Udoh is a jump shooter and that’s why his shooting percentage is that low. I just don’t buy it as a strong argument. Monroe is a jump shooter too but his shots go in at a much better rate. Also, his rebounding rate is not great. I don’t see how Monroe is known as a bad rebounder yet Udoh supposedly is a good one (I know one gets more offensive rebounds and the other more defensive but they have the same rate. If you want to start talking about Monroe’s rebounding rate the year before then we will have to talk about how Udoh’s stats were lower across the board as well). There is just nothing else that jumps out for me.

 

Udoh’s rebounding statistics for his position, nor his shooting percentages, don’t really stand out compared to the other guys who were available at the 6th spot in the draft. But I also want to know how does Udoh stack up historically? I don’t think he does all that great.  I looked at players who were drafted for their defensive presence (I got guys who were busts, guys who busted out in a big way, and guys who are so-so) and also some other power forwards and just thrown in there for fun. For the players who have actually made an impact in the league, their per 40 rebounding numbers while they were in their last year of college were often better than Udoh’s. What really struck me though were the offensive stats. Even players that we don’t associate as having much offensive game were, not only better rebounders in college, but were also much more efficient scorers who were also able to put points up at a higher volume.

 

Per 40 last year of college

Player A - 18.5 PPG (off of 11.1 FGA); 13 rebounds; 3.5 assists; 1.8 steals; 3.9 blocks; 60.5% FG; 73.3% FT (off of 8.3 FTA)

Player B - 17.0 PPG (off of 10.7 FGA); 10.7 rebounds; 1.6 assists; 1.0 steals; 2.9 blocks; 60.1% FG; 65.9% FT (off of 3.4 FTA)

Player C - 10.9 PPG (off of 7 FGA); 15.1 rebounds; 0.6 assists; 2.3 steals; 3.5 blocks; 64.7% FG; 37.8% FT (off of 5 FTA)

Player D - 15.8 PPG (off of 12.3 FGA); 11.1 rebounds; 3.1 assists; 0.9 steals; 4.2 blocks; 49% FG; 26.9% 3Pt (off of 0.2 3PtA); 68.5% FT (off of 5.1 FTA)

Player E - 20.7 PPG (off of 15.8 FGA); 10.7 rebounds; 0.9 assists; 1.2 steals; 4.1 blocks; 52.9% FG; 33.3% 3Pt (off of 1.9 3PtA); 52.5% FT (off of 6.3 FTA)

Player F - 23 PPG (off of 16.1 FGA); 15.6 rebounds; 1.3 assists; 2.2 steals; 2.1 blocks; 57.1% FG; 35.7% 3Pt (off of 0.5 3PtA); 62.3% FT (off of 7.2 FTA)

Player G - 5.9 PPG (off of 18.6 FGA); 13.9 rebounds; 2 assists; 0.7 steals; 6.8 blocks; 51.7% FG; 48.8% FT (off of 9.9 FTA)

Player H - 20.3 PPG (off of 11.4 FGA); 9.7 rebounds; 1.6 assists; 0.7 steals; 3.7 blocks; 67.1% FG; 68.6% FT (off of 6.3 FTA)

Player I - 22.6 PPG (off of 13.7 FGA); 12.8 rebounds; 1.1 assists; 2.0 steals; 4.6 blocks; 57.8% FG; 74.4% FT (off of 9.0 FTA)

Player J - 20.8 PPG (off of 12.9 FGA); 12.3 rebounds; 0.9 assists; 0.9 steals; 2.0 blocks; 60.5% FG; 68.9% FT (off of 7.5 FTA)

Player K - 22.6 PPG (off of 16 FGA); 13.4 rebounds; 3.0 assists; 1.2 steals; 3.0 blocks; 56% FG; 58.1% FT (off of 7.4 FTA)

Player L - 21.8 PPG (off of 14 FGA); 14.2 rebounds; 1.2 assists; 1.2 steals; 5.0 blocks; 59.9% FG; 51.8% FT (off of 7.5 FTA)

Player M - 16.4 PPG (off of 12.4 FGA); 11.9 rebounds; 4 assists; 1.1 steals; 4.4 blocks; 47.1% FG; 58.6% FT (off of 6.9 FTA)

Player N - 16.9 PPG (off of 10.5 FGA); 11.5 rebounds; 0.7 assists; 1 steal; 4.6 blocks; 60.2% FG; 57.4% FT (off of 6.2 FTA)

 

Okay so I cheated, Player D is Udoh.  I just wanted everyone to see how low his FG% and especially how his rebounding does not stand out in this group.  As far as offensively speaking, he seems way and above Player CPlayer C had some beastly rebounding and block stats but his offensive ability was definitely worse than Udoh and because of his offensive deficiency’s he is struggling to even stay in the league (by the way Player C is my good friend Joey Dorsey). Player M is very similar in the offensive.  Actually they both are real close. When it comes to rebounding, Player M and Player N are about the same with Udoh.

 

The only players with lower rebounding rates are Player B, Player E, and Player HPlayer B is Taj Gibson. I think Udoh can beat out Taj Gibson and his stats reflect it (except for the shooting percentage).  The only other guys with lower rebounding rates are Player E and Player H and they both have yet to show the ability to rebound in the NBA. Not the biggest fan of those two players but I think I would rather have Player E and Player H (but it’s very very close) just because I think they will be able to maintain their ability to block shots at a high rate given they are over seven feet tall.  By the way, Player E and Player H are JaVale McGree and Roy Hibbert.   Not sure if they will be as good as Udoh in the defensive department but I would rather trust them given their height advantage and the fact they can score at an efficient rate.  Maybe Udoh is more versatile defensively then those two but at the end of the day I would trust them to be just as good at defending at the rim.  Even though they both have rebounding deficiencies, Udoh hasn’t exactly shown he can do much better.

 

What about Players A, F, G, I, J, K, and L? I think coming out of college they were superior to Udoh. They were better rebounders, although Player I beats out Udoh by a fairly small amount. I think Player A, Player G, and Player L really separate themselves from the pack.  Player F is not as good a shot blocker but his scoring and rebounding keep him above Udoh. To be honest Player J looks like a better player in my eye (He had a mid range shoot in college. And was a senior when he graduated. And was known for his defense and hard work.  And is known as a good character guy.).

 

Overall though, Player M and Player N are the closest comparisons to me. Particularly Player M. He’s about an inch shorter than Udoh and has played the SF and PF position in the NBA, although he usually only plays the SF (not the best rebounder in the world). He also transferred schools in college (from the Pac 10 to the WAC) and went pro around the same age.  Player M was known as an athletic forward with impressive passing ability and the tools to be a lock down defender. He still has a ways to go.

 

[Before I jump onto the next point, here’s the list of players I was talking about.]

 

A:  Noah

B: Gibson

C: Dorsey

D: Udoh

E: McGee

F: Millsap

G: Foyle

I: Shelden Williams

J: D. J. White

K: Jason Thompson

L. Emeka Okafor

M: Want to save this one for later

N: Etan Thomas

 

UPDATE: I looked up players largely based on looking up NCAA stats by blocked shots with players that are already in the league and then by combing over about 8 different drafts and picking guys randomly that I was just interested in looking at.  When I did that I was largely looking for seniors.  The only guys who I picked that I excluded were Sean Williams (it was the pot not the talent) Eddie Griffin (it was the porn, addition problems, craziness, and dying not his skill) Boozer (that was dumb) Thaddeus Young and Julian Wright (just one year and I felt the list was getting too long.) In retrospect, I wish I used Artest and Battier but oh well. Oh, and I really wish I thought of Luc Richard Mbah A Moute but I didn't).

 

Picture Break: WATERMELON SHARK!!!

Photobucket

Now, about Udoh’s shooting percentages.  Of course, there is always the argument that Udoh can’t be compared to low post players offensively because “Udoh is a jump shooter.” This doesn’t explain away his shooting woes.  Simply put, his lower percentage isn’t because he is a polished jump shooter but it’s because he doesn’t have much of a NBA ready offensive game, period.  Here are some other forwards (including Udoh) who were known as jump shooters coming into the NBA.

 

 

D.J. White - Senior

20.8 PPG (off of 12.9 FGA); 60.5% FG (didn’t shoot 3s but was a mid range jump shooter); 12.3 rebounds

 

Jason Thompson - Senior

23.6 PPG (off of 16.7 FGA); 56% FG; 57.8% 2Pt (off of 15.5 2PtA); 32.4% 3Pt (off of 1.3 3PtA); 13.4 rebounds

 

Channing Frye - Senior

20.3 PPG (off of 14.3 FGA); 55.4% FG; 57% 2Pt (off of 13.7 2PtA); 17.6% 3Pt (off of 0.2 3PtA); 9.8 rebounds

 

Ike Diogu - Senior

24.9 PPG (off of 13.7 FGA); 57.5% FG; 59.8% 2Pt (off of 12.1 2PtA); 40% 3Pt (off of 1.5 3PtA); 10.7 rebounds

 

Ekpe Udoh - Junior

15.8 PPG (off of 12.3 FGA); 49% FG; 50.5% 2Pt (off of 11.5 2PtA); 26.9% 3Pt (off of 0.8 3PtA); 11.1 rebounds

 

Ryan Anderson - Sophomore

25.8 PPG (off of 17.3 FGA); 49% FG; 53.0% 2Pt (off of 11.6 2PtA); 41% 3Pt (off of 5.8 3PtA); 9.9 rebounds

 

Charlie Villanueva - Sophomore

19.9 PPG (off of 14.4 FGA); 52.1% FG; 52.2% 2Pt (off of 13.8 2PtA); 50% 3Pt (off of 0.6 3PtA); 12.9 rebounds

 

Brandon Bass – Sophomore

20.7 PPG (off of 12.7 FGA); 56.7% FG;  57.7% 2Pt (off of 11.6 2PtA); 46.2% 3Pt (off of 1 3PtA); 10.9 rebounds

 

Donte Greene - Freshman

17.7 PPG (off of 14.9 FGA); 41.8% FG; 49.2% 2Pt (off of 8.3 2PtA); 34.5% 3Pt (off of 7.5 3PtA); 8 rebounds

 

Lou Deng - Freshman

19.4 PPG (off of 15.4 FGA); 47.5% FG; 51.4% 2Pt (off of 11.5 2PtA); 36% 3Pt (off of 3.9 3PtA); 8.9 Rebounds

 

Anthony Randolph

19 PPG (off of 15.5 FGA); 46.4% FG; 46.6% 2Pt (off of 14.8 2PtA); 10.5% 3Pt (off of 0.7 3PtA); 10.4 rebounds

 

Out of the seniors, Udoh stands out as the worst shooter (I wish I had shooting percentages from 15 feet away).  Out of the sophomores, it’s much closer.  Although Udoh is still at the bottom, it is pretty close and he has company with Ryan Anderson there; however, when looking at Ryan Anderson’s stats he shot the ball a heck of a lot more and shot a lot more 3 pointers.  Only the Freshman stick out as being as bad or worse than Udoh (players who had more raw talent when they graduated college. How is Udoh a polished shooter again?).  Udoh is the King of the freshman, beating out Deng, AR, and destroying Donte Greene.  Randolph (and definitely to a lesser extent, Donte Green) both have shown potential but are still raw when it comes to shooting. Lou Deng is interesting here though because he turned out pretty darn good so maybe there is some hope for Udoh (even if Deng was 18 at the time).

 

But there is a reason I threw up the rebounding number.  These guys were good shooters coming but if they can’t rebound or play defense, they are going to have a hard time finding anything more than a 6th man’s role in this league.  Deng is able to play small forward so I think he is okay in regards to his rebounding, and has always been able to defend okay (plus he has gotten pretty good offensively.  Again he was 18 at the time he graduated but who knows, may Udoh can do the same). Donte Green’s rebounding and his lack of a decent shot are killing him (again, just because you shoot a lot of jumpers doesn’t mean you are a good jump shooter).  Charlie V can never be a starting power forward on a good team because of his rebounding and defense (his defense hurts him from playing SF too). Same problems with Frye (I know he was on Phoenix this past year but I don’t see him working out long term and that system was basically built for him. I still think he’s a role player). Jason Thompson was a starter on a 25 win team last year. He’s an okay rebounder but I am not sure if his defense is enough for him to ever be a starter on a good NBA team. Randolph has improved his rebounding but, like Deng, he was 18 years old when he put up his college stats (same with Deng).

 

Simply put, Udoh’s defense must be pretty amazing or he better work on his rebounding if he is going to ever be a staring PF or C in this league.  I personally don’t think he is a great shooter for a big man NBA prospect.  But that might be okay because I’ve read that it’s okay if he isn’t much of a scorer because he is a smart offensive player. Yeah I get it, he can distribute the ball okay but he needs to be able to score somehow in the NBA in order to be some sort of threat on the court. If he can’t score down in the post and can’t consistently hit his jump shots he is in trouble. He can obviously improve his rebounding and shooting but we don’t know yet.  Maybe he will be able to improve one of those two areas.  If he can’t find a move that will allow him to get the ball in the hole (whether by a jump shot or in the post or cutting to the basket) PLUS he can’t rebound … I’m sorry but that’s just not very good.

 

Here’s another way of looking at it.  If you’re a forward coming out of college and you can shoot the ball, but can’t rebound or play defense, you’re looking at an upside of Charlie V, Channing Frye, or Ryan Anderson.  If you’re a forward coming out of college and you can rebound but you can’t play much defense and don’t have much of a post game, at best you are Jason Thompson (decent jump shot) and at worse you are Reggie Evans (horrid jump shot).

 

And finally, if you’re a forward coming out of college who can only sort of shoot, can’t score down low, don’t rebound much, but you are good at defense? Well then you better be able to play small forward or learn how to at least rebound better. If you don’t you are looking at an upside of … Boris Diaw? I don’t have college stats of his but he sure seems to fit the bill.  In fact the closest college player I could find was Player M.  I really hope Udoh improves the rebounding or the jump shot because I would hate to see him turn out like … Dominic  McGuire

 

[UPDATE #2: For some reason I didn't think of Luc Richard Mbah A Moute and I think it warrants special mentioning here.  He is about 3 inches shorter than Udoh and his Per 40 numbers his last year of college were: 12.1 PPG (off of 10.2 FGA); 8.3 Rbs; 2.1 assists; 1.4 steals; 0.6 blocks; 47% FG; 68.9% FT (off of 3.1 FTA).

 

It's funny how the Camaroon Prince is viewed as not being much of a jump shooter yet Udoh apparantly is one. Personally I think they are fairly similar in that regard (especially when looking at their percentages for their college careers). Either way, the UCLA product has shown he may very well fill a role in this league as a defensive stopper. He has played some power forward but I see him being a small forward long term given his lack of a post game and lack of rebounding ability. The only reason I bring this up is that he is a pretty good example of someone with worse stats than Udoh  who in fact has a pretty good role in the NBA. Might not be a starter in this league unless he adds a jump shot or rebounds a bit better (although still pretty short for a PF) but another good example for comparison. So I am revising a little here at the end. Maybe Udoh has the upside of Diaw, perhaps with a bit more potential than Luc Richard Mbah A Moute and the downside of McGuire.]

 

Picture Break: CATS ARE EVIL!!!

Photobucket

 

PART II. “Wow that first part was way too long.”

 

Okay, so who would I rather have over Udoh? I think Monroe was the BPA and Ed Davis is somewhat underrated. It was a real hard choice but in the end, I would go with Aminu. I know he has holes in his game (particularly the shooting) but he is young and when I looked at young guys who couldn’t shoot (Deng, Randolph, Greene) I at least had one guy on that list who turned out alright and one other who looks like he can at least score fairly decently close to the hoop. Plus, I like the fact Aminu can defend at the small forward position and his rebounding rate is fairly high. I know Udoh had a much better block shot rate but I would rather have a higher rebounding rate from a prospect.

 

Of course, all anyone remembers of Aminu is this darn picture.

Photobucket

However, when this guy is on the court he is flying everywhere. This guy has a ton of energy on the court but just because he looks bored out of his mind on media day everyone seems to think he is lazy. I don’t get it. Every time I saw him play he was running all out.

 

Part III. “That was better.”

 

I would have personally picked

Aminu first

Monroe second (sorry but the offense is too good to pass up.)

Ed Davis third

Aldrich fourth

Udoh fifth

 

Yes Udoh fifth. Kind of brutal but I think all the guys above him on this list showed a little more in my opinion. I would go into detail but I am afraid I would waste your youth.  You can stop reading now. Congratulations, you just aged 3o years. If you have kids, in the time you read this, they already moved out, graduated college, and got real jobs. Sorry about losing that chunk of your life.

 

THE END!!! Sorry for the length. Lightz0ut made me do it.

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

Comment 108 comments  |  11 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Rec'd

Good post, but for me the watermelon shark was epic beyond belief. Now my desktop background

When I get older, I will be stronger.
They’ll call me freedom, just like a Waving Flag

by dubzfan on Jun 26, 2010 11:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Also cats are evil , proof:

When I get older, I will be stronger.
They’ll call me freedom, just like a Waving Flag

by dubzfan on Jun 26, 2010 11:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Link fail!

I failed…. http://pw0nd.com/2008/11/26/how-to-tell-if-your-cat-is-plotting-to-kill-you/

Obviously Pw0nd doesn’t want there stuff elsewhere……

When I get older, I will be stronger.
They’ll call me freedom, just like a Waving Flag

by dubzfan on Jun 26, 2010 11:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wow, not even linking to there site works with them

Forget it ……

When I get older, I will be stronger.
They’ll call me freedom, just like a Waving Flag

by dubzfan on Jun 27, 2010 12:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Really?

That site must hate me

When I get older, I will be stronger.
They’ll call me freedom, just like a Waving Flag

by dubzfan on Jun 27, 2010 1:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Worked for me too.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

Maybe we should adjust our stats to per36 years of age? -- ElRonToro

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jun 27, 2010 2:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

give the guy a chance

i think he’s a good pick. he fills the holes on the warriors. he’s a dale davis or udonis haslem type of player. a lot of people didnt think paul milsap or serge ibaka were going to be any good but look at them now.

by Manok on Jun 29, 2010 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am going to use the same stats as I did with the post (wish I did rebound percentage but this will have to do)

Millsap per 40 last year in college
21.88 PPG (off of 16.07 shots) – 15.6 Rbs – 1.29 Assists – 2.29 Steals – 2.25 Blocks – 57.7% FG – 62.3% FT (off of 7.27 FTA) – 35.7% 3Pt (off of 0.47 3PtA)

Don’t have Ibaka

Dale Davis per 4020.63 PPG (off of 14.76 shots) – 13.95 Rbs – 1.5 Ast – 1.5 Stl – 3 Blk – 53.2% FG – 58% FT (off of 8.41 FTA)

Haslem per 40 (should be noted he didn’t break 30 minutes)

22.61 PPG (off of12.86 shots) – 11.73 Rbs – 2.26 Ast – 1.27 – 1.84 Blk – 56.2% FG – 69.4% FT (off of 11.59 FTA)

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I got you Wally

Ibaka per 40, Rico Manresa:

17.4 PPG (13.5 shots)— 11.0RPG – 0.5 APG, 2.5 BPG,
55% FG 58 TS% …played 16.0 MPG for Rico Manresa…

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 29, 2010 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah I have zero clue how to transfer Euro stats

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah I have zero clue how to transfer Euro stats

 multiply them by .82 to get dollar stats.

Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jun 29, 2010 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

lol, well played Sir

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

I hear the rebounding numbers are really hard to figure out

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

So I just stay clear from using them. I don't think I can get much of an educated opinion from them. At least not at this time.

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Here

• Scoring rate decreases 25 percent
• Rebound rate increases by 18 percent (there are more missed shots in NBA play)
• Assist rate increases by 31 percent (Euro scorers are tightwads with assists)
• Shooting percentage drops by 12 percent
• Overall, PER drops by 30 percent.

So apparently Ibaka should have a low shooting %, higher ast rate, higher rebounding rate, higher …etc etc etc.

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 29, 2010 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hollinger as usual thinks he has figured it out

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 29, 2010 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah so does he basically alter the EURO numbers using that formula AND then treat it like they are NCAA numbers?

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I also am not really sure if your numbers are right

17.4 points a game while playing 16 minutes? Or is it a 17.4 Per 40 minutes where he played 16.0 minutes a game?

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

brainfart see where you got them. Thanks

Busting out the calculator

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just from looking at this

Millsap was definitely a better player. Looks like he probably had a better jump shot but either way he was a much more effective scorer and he even scored more often. He was a much beter rebounder and his steals and blocks are solid.

Dale Davis was also a better scorer. Didn’t shoot 3s and I have no information saying his jump shot was better but he was much better at scoring. Not sure if down low or jump shot but, again, it was more effective. Better rebounding and his blocks and steals were good

Haslem is interesting here. I wish I had his rebounding rates from college but I don’t. Either way, it looks like his rebounding did improve in the pros and were around where Udoh’s are today.He was still a much better scorer than Udoh and at a more effective rate (not sure if it was his jump shot or post game. I know he has a jump shot now but don’t really remember back then). His block shot numbers aren’t great. Not really known for his defense. Either way, he looked to have about a lower level of college success than Udoh so Udoh has an advantage over him.

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hat Tip to Larry

Using Hollinger’s random analysis thing this is what Ibaka’s comparative stats in Europe look like compared to the other prospects here.

Ibaka’s straight up per 40 in Europe before applying Hollinger’s analysis
17.4 PPG (13.5 shots) – 11.0RPG – 0.5 APG – 0.3 Stl – 2.5 BPG – 55% FG – 72.1% FT (off of 3.5 FTA)

Ibaka after using Hollinger’s Analysis
13.5 PPG – 12.98 Rbs – 0.5 APG – 0.3 Stl – 2.5 BPG – 48% FG – 72.1% FT

I must admit, I am a bit skeptical of Hollinger’s field goal percentage correctin (only because I can’t see why he would apply the same calculation for guards and players who play in the post). I guess Udoh is about as good a prospect numbers wise as Ibaka but I would caution that (a) Ibaka is a true center so his value is largely based on that and (b) Ibaka really over performed scoring efficiently wise jumping from Europe to the NBA (again, not a huge fan of how Hollinger does the percentage thing. Now I want to look up Biedrins shooting percentages in Europe but would probably be worthless considering how young he was at the time).

• Scoring rate decreases 25 percent
• Rebound rate increases by 18 percent (there are more missed shots in NBA play)
• Assist rate increases by 31 percent (Euro scorers are tightwads with assists)
• Shooting percentage drops by 12 percent

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

lol

With all seriousness, I do hope he makes me eat my words.

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would have selected Xavier Henry

but of course i would have traded down to get him. But I’m okay with Udoh

Fear is the Mind Killer

by dubzero23 on Jun 26, 2010 11:56 PM PDT reply actions  

My intent wasn't really to convince anyone else to look at it the way I did

I was just doing the thing Lightz0ut suggested. I wanted to write down why I wasn’t the biggest fan of the pick and who I would have selected just to look back at it in a few years and see if my thoughts sounded utterly stupid in retrospect or if they were pretty accurate. Considering I ended with a Dominic McGuire reference, I have a feeling I might be more wrong than right but oh well.

Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.

by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 12:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Lots of stuff there :>) Good stuff I think?

    Nice post . I din’t read all the details cause that kinda stuff gives me a headache but I like the effort you put in it.
   After Cuz was gone I lost interest in anyone left but if I had to pick one of the rejects I’d go with Paul George cause we already have forwards similiar to UppyEdoh and with maggette gone we could use a true SF. George’s mechanics also remind me of kobe and Tmac so I’d enjoy watchin him more.
    Who knows maybe EpohUpke will turn out fine and him and BrokenWing can play a in twin antenna alignment? We’ll just need to make sure they don’t get anywhere near PauGasol’s jersey.

Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jun 27, 2010 12:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Yeah Wally

I didn’t understand the Udoh pick either. I don’t like his TS% at all, and his DReb% was a paltry 17%. Not great by any stretch. Even worse cuz he was the real big on the Baylor roster.

On the other hand, I like Udoh’s personality and his journey to overcome a slow start to a very promising career at one point. Maybe the little signs show he’s ready for something that maybe wasn’t shown at Baylor cuz of the Zone or the system Udoh played in at Michigan.

Good fanpost mayne.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

Maybe we should adjust our stats to per36 years of age? -- ElRonToro

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jun 27, 2010 2:33 AM PDT reply actions  

Even worse cuz he was the real big on the Baylor roster.

I guess you missed Baylor’s seven-foot starting center by the name of Josh Lomers.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 27, 2010 3:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Guess you missed the part where I said only real big on Baylor's roster.

I was referring to NBA level bigs. But I guess you knew that right? Right.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

Maybe we should adjust our stats to per36 years of age? -- ElRonToro

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jun 27, 2010 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think you have finally found your outlet to argue that Whiteside is in fact, not an NBA big.

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

No I think he will be. I'm working on that very point now.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

Maybe we should adjust our stats to per36 years of age? -- ElRonToro

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jun 27, 2010 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Unless I am mistaken

You just directly contradicted yourself…
Udoh is the only NBA quality big on Butler
Udoh plays with Whiteside
And Whiteside is an NBA quality big

huhhhhh?

by freerandolph on Jun 27, 2010 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Uh

You mean Baylor? Matt Howard was the big on Butler. I’m pretty sure he’s a pornstache type like Adam Morrison with more low post game. Also Howard is white guy.

I didn’t contradict myself. I don’t see the contradiction. I’m not arguing that I hate Udoh or don’t want him to succeed; I’m offering my reasons why I don’t see him turning out well. If he does? Good for the Dubs and yall. Happy for ya. There’s a lot to like about Udoh personally anyway.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

Maybe we should adjust our stats to per36 years of age? -- ElRonToro

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jun 27, 2010 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry my stupid mistake muddled it up

For some reason in my head I was thinking we were talking about Marshall. No clue why. Udoh and Whiteside didn’t play with each other at Marshall. Thus, Pookey didn’t contradict himself.

Sorry. Big time fail on my part.

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Okay that makes sense too.

I thought you were talking about something different with Whiteside. Strike my last comment away then as well.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

Maybe we should adjust our stats to per36 years of age? -- ElRonToro

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jun 27, 2010 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think he has one of my most favorite bizarre stats I've seen in awhile, his Per 40 in assists.

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the Baylor offense showed he can pass. But you're right it does seem bizarre.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

Maybe we should adjust our stats to per36 years of age? -- ElRonToro

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jun 27, 2010 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

cuz he was the real big on the Baylor roster?

   Nope, I think cuz he was the real big on kentucky’s roster?

Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jun 27, 2010 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Kentucky had a pair of great starting big men.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 27, 2010 11:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Udoh is a better rebounder than his numbers suggest

People forget that Udoh played with a 7 footer and two other players above 6-9. He’s a very good rebounder, but I feel like too many people on this site haven’t really seen him play and are too quick to write him off. I would have preferred Monroe, but if a trade comes this summer to reduce our redundancy then I like the pick.

by Pino on Jun 27, 2010 2:53 AM PDT reply actions  

Not sure about that

When he played at Michigan St. without Whiteside next to him, his rebounding numbers were significantly worse, at 8.4 and 8.1 rebounds Per 40. Plus, in the NBA he is likely to be playing with a 7 footer. I think Udoh has a better shot at working at his jump shot than getting the rebounding numbers up more.

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

When he played at Michigan St. without Whiteside next to him,

He played at Michigan without Whiteside, but at the same time- Michigan played a monotonously slow pace and he played limited minutes. Then again, maybe he benefits from playing with bigger teams. We may never know if LaceDarius was boxing out for him unless
A) we watch every baylor game and watch every michigan game and draw conclusions
B) Udoh plays with the Warriors and then gets traded to the Kings.

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 27, 2010 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

sorry for some dumb reason I kept thinking Whiteside was at Baylor

even though at the same time I knew he wasn’t. Sorry

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah that’s all fine. Just mixed up words.

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 27, 2010 5:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

People forget that Udoh played with a 7 footer and two other players above 6-9. He’s a very good rebounder, but I feel like too many people on this site haven’t really seen him play and are too quick to write him off.

Thank you! Finally someone will admit that a player rebounding with bigger players is a better rebounder than someone rebounding at the same rate with smaller players.

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 27, 2010 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

That 7 footer rebounded AT A WORSE RATE than Udoh did.

Udoh had the highest rebounding rate of anybody on Baylor. And it was ugly.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

Maybe we should adjust our stats to per36 years of age? -- ElRonToro

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jun 27, 2010 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

This arguement will get you now where

Udoh was by far their best rebounder. They had a non NBA talent player who is taller who couldn’t rebound and that is it. Plus, weren’t you the one who did a fanpost saying how rebounding has little to do with height?

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Plus, weren’t you the one who did a fanpost saying how rebounding has little to do with height?

Yeah, it explained how better rebounding did not correlate to size as much as good rebounding did. But playing on a team with tall, bad rebounders does not necessarily mean that because Udoh does not get the rebound that his teammates got it. It could just means that his teammates blew a box out or get a board. If Baylor was really that bad a rebounding team, and Udoh was their best rebounder, it means he did enough work on the offensive glass to make them a better rebounding team.

According to Pookey’s data:

Baylor had 78.0 inches of height vs the average Div 1 team with 76.5 inches of height.
So, Baylor, a bigger team, is not going to rebound as well as a good rebounding team was my point.
But what I am saying here is that because Udoh is playing with bigger overall players, in that not only are they bigger than Udoh but in conjunction bigger than most teams in Div-1 NCAA basektball. The Yao Ming (see below) argument does not apply unless Yao was playing on a team with a 7-9 guy at C and his teammates were around 6-11 to 7’. Aaron Brooks would have to be bigger than Scola right now for that to apply. I’m saying that if your team is bigger than the team you play, and you are the best rebounder but not the biggest guy on your team, it is harder for you to rebound the ball than if you had relatively smaller guys and you were the best rebounder on your team.

Imagine if Cousins played with 5 guards against a normal-sized team, which he did not, and then played on big Baylor against the same team and grabbed about 1 or 2 rebounds per 40 less.

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 27, 2010 5:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is giving me a headache. It's really hard to argue stats with you Larry because you aren't very careful.

Pookey’s data said little about height and was just about rebounding percentages

You said
bq. Thank you! Finally someone will admit that a player rebounding with bigger players is a better rebounder than someone rebounding at the same rate with smaller players.

He responded
bq. That 7 footer rebounded AT A WORSE RATE than Udoh did. Udoh had the highest rebounding rate of anybody on Baylor

Essentially he was saying that Udoh rebounding with a bigger player does not necessarily mean he is a better rebounder than someone rebounding at the same rate with a smaller player. He is saying that the height difference doesn’t really matter because that seven footer can’t rebound very well. In summary, height doesn’t matter very much statistically. It is probably harder to rebound next to someone with a high rebounding rate but to say it’s harder to rebound next to someone who is taller doesn’t really mean anything. His data didn’t focus on 78 inches versus 76.5 inches. It just focused on rebound rates and Udoh’s was the highest although still low for a big man prospect.

Now I am all kinds of confused because when you talked about your post about rebounding and height you said

Yeah, it explained how better rebounding did not correlate to size as much as good rebounding did.

So better rebounding correlates more with good rebounding than size? I get what you are saying I suppose, but it comes off as sort of a circular arguement. Essentially it sounds like you are trying to say that a player who rebounds at a strong rate, regardless of height, is likely to get more rebounds.

(Look, obviously height helps or else 6 footers could get 10 rebounds a game. The thing though is that players get up to around 6-7 or 6-8, then then it seems like height isn’t really a deterent anymore and they can rebound at rates similar to seven footers. At this point it is much better to look at rebounding rates and if you don’t you will think Roy Hibbert is a great rebounder and Gerald Wallace sucks. Look to the rebound rate).

But then I get really confused when you say.
bq. If Baylor was really that bad a rebounding team, and Udoh was their best rebounder, it means he did enough work on the offensive glass to make them a better rebounding team.

Well yes his offensive rebounding helped the team. Still though, his defensive rebounding and overall rebounding numbers are very low for a pro prospect big man. Just because he helped his college team doesn’t mean he does it well enough in the pros.

Now I am not sure what the Yao Ming arguement is but you ended your comment with
bq. I’m saying that if your team is bigger than the team you play, and you are the best rebounder but not the biggest guy on your team, it is harder for you to rebound the ball than if you had relatively smaller guys and you were the best rebounder on your team.

Now I am completely confused. Earlier you said better rebounding correleates more with good rebounding than size. Yet apparantly size matters now. But I thought we all ready established that rebound rates didn’t really correlate with height? Listen if Udoh played college with Ben Wallace he would probably get less rebounds versus going to college with Spencer Hawes. Again height shouldn’t matter. You know this but you keep throwing it back in there.

Imagine if Cousins played with 5 guards against a normal-sized team, which he did not, and then played on big Baylor against the same team and grabbed about 1 or 2 rebounds per 40 less.

But what if those big Baylor players rebounding at the same exact rate at those guards? This isn’t about height, it’s about rebound rates. You keep interjecting height into it, then saying height doesn’t matter, and then interjecting height again.

So let me change your example a little. Let’s say that Cousins played with 4 guards who all had a 16% rebound rate and the opponents (the normal sized team) all magically had the exact same rebound rate of 16%. Now replace Cousins 4 guards with a bigger team where all his teamates had a rebound rate of 16%. Guess what, Cousins is likely to get the same number of rebounds, regardless of whether he is playing with guards or a regular size team.

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

block quote fails

Thank you! Finally someone will admit that a player rebounding with bigger players is a better rebounder than someone rebounding at the same rate with smaller players.

That 7 footer rebounded AT A WORSE RATE than Udoh did. Udoh had the highest rebounding rate of anybody on Baylor

If Baylor was really that bad a rebounding team, and Udoh was their best rebounder, it means he did enough work on the offensive glass to make them a better rebounding team.

I’m saying that if your team is bigger than the team you play, and you are the best rebounder but not the biggest guy on your team, it is harder for you to rebound the ball than if you had relatively smaller guys and you were the best rebounder on your team.

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Guess what, Cousins is likely to get the same number of rebounds, regardless of whether he is playing with guards or a regular size team.

Yes, and I this may get ugly, as I am the king of hypotheticals…that would never happen. What are the chances that the smaller team rebounded better than the larger team? Very slim. Even if the Rockets had to rebound vs. the Kings with Cousins instead of whoever they had at C, what are the chances they could outrebound the Grizzlies, or for that matter, any team (discluding the w’s). Pretty low, I say. I don’t think there are many cases where that team would play a smaller team that rebounded better, and even if that were the case, how many teams out of the total of games were like that. For sure, there are exceptions to that rule, but for now we have to assume that the majority of teams that Baylor played weren’t that good on the offensive glass and at the same time weren’t so sized.

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 27, 2010 9:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

And this is why you need to stop doing so many hypotheticals. The point was to show you that percentages are what matters, not what is likely to happen with a four guard lineup in real life.

Yes, and I this may get ugly, as I am the king of hypotheticals…that would never happen. What are the chances that the smaller team rebounded better than the larger team? Very slim

Okay I am not sure what you mean here so I am going to break it down several ways.

Meaning #1 (this is the harder one because it’s a bit theoretical but this is what I truly thought you were trying to say. You might want to skip to the second part first): My hypothetical where 4 guards and Cousins play together and the guards have the same rebounding rate as a replacement bigger team, is very unlikey to happen

The point of this hypothetical wasn’t that it is likely to happen. Yes I would agree that this would unlikely happen in the way I wrote it (I also felt like I made that pretty clear), but the fact is that if those guards had the exact same rebounding rate as the replacement bigger players (I know you that is unlikely to happen but you are going to have to assume for me here) well then basically Cousins is likely to get the exact same number of boards regardless of which team he plays for. I know it’s unlikely to happen but if the rebound rates hold and those guards have super rebounding percentages for their size, well then nothing changes.

Heck look at it another way. Say the 4 guard lineup is full of guys who have a 8.2% rebound rate. Awful. Now you replace it with average sized players at every position but they all have a lousy 8.2% rebounding rate. I know, not likely to happen but guess what? Technically it could very well happen. Westbrook has a 8.2% rebounding rate. So does Donte Greene. So does Danny Granger. Heck, Kyle Lowry is an 8.6%.

So yeah, technically Cousins would have a harder time getting rebounds from Kyle Lowry than with Donte Greene or Granger. You have to look at the rebound rates. Trust me, Roy Hibbert (who is 7-2) sucks compared to David Lee or Troy Murphy when it comes to rebounding. There are plently of examples of shorter players being able to rebound better than taller ones.

Meaning #2: That the chance that a smaller rebounding team can out rebound a smaller team is very slim.

Not true at all, and this actually was proven a few months ago.

http://www.hardwoodparoxysm.com/2010/05/12/nba-hd-does-effective-height-have-an-effect/

Tom Haberstroh of Hardwood Paroxysm weighted team heights by minutes played for the year. The tallest team on average was the Kings at 79.85 inches. By your logic they would be the best rebounding team in the league or at least near the top.

So how did the Kings do? The Kings finished 18th out of 30 teams in DRR (Defensive Rebounding Rate) with a 73.48% DRR. The Kings finished 6th at ORR (Offensive Rebounding Rate) with a 27.8% ORR. The team’s total rebounding rate was a blistering 15th place at 50.4% TRR. The so-so rate is largely because of Donte Green, Carl Landry, and Spencer Hawes, three guys who are fairly tall but simply can’t rebound very well for their position

Teams that were shorter than the Kings but rebounded better? Cleveland, Memphis, San Antonio, Orlando, Utah, Oklahoma, LA Lakers, Chicago, Charlotte, Miama, Detriot, LA Clippers, and Phoenix.

Another tall team that didn’t do too hot was New Jersey was the 8th tallest team in the league at 79.17 inches yet had the 4th lowest rebounding rate at 47.4% (trust me, it’s a much larger list than the one I just listed). Meanwhile the short Bucks (78.30 inches) were the 17th best rebounding team in the league (50.1% TRR). I would throw up that list too but I am getting a bit tired.

I really hope you didn’t really mean that, in general, the chances of a smaller team rebounding better than the larger team is slim. I say that because the information I used from the Hardwood Paroxysm article was information that you actually used in a fanpost a few weeks back.

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 11:07 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Final Point (please read the comment above this one first)

Okay, I am going to attempt to bring it all home. We are now going to apply what we talked about. So when talking about whether Udoh’s rebounding was better or worse because of his teammates, we shouldn’t be using height as a determining factor. Up above you said.

Thank you! Finally someone will admit that a player rebounding with bigger players is a better rebounder than someone rebounding at the same rate with smaller players.

From what we have already discussed, that arguement doesn’t hold up because you are assuming that the taller player is a better rebounder. Ben Wallace ang Gerald Wallace are better rebounders than Spencer Hawes or Roy Hibbert. It’s nice to be taller, but that does not mean you are a better rebounder.

What if I said “Finally someone someone will admit that a player rebounding with players with bigger asses is a better rebounder than someone rebounding at the same rate with teammates who have smaller asses?”

Or what if I said “finally someone will admit that a player rebounding with players with broad shoulders is a better rebounder than someone rebounding at the same rate with teammates who have smaller shoulders?”

Doesn’t having broader shoulders and a bigger ass tend to help with boxing people out and rebounding? To me, those are qualities that will help someone rebound just as much as height does yet don’t my examples sound kind of stupid? There are plenty of fat players who could rebound just as there were plently who couldn’t. It isn’t a determining factor, it doesn’t say you are for sure a better rebounder. These are features that can help a player become a great rebounder but if they don’t have a high rebound rate, than obviously they did something wrong. They aren’t using these advantages.

So basically what you really want to say is

“Finally someone will admit that a player rebounding with teammates with good rebounding rates is better that a player rebounding with teammates with poor rebound rates at the same rate.”

This shows exactly how good a player is when he has teammates who can in fact rebound. Height doesn’t mean you can rebound.

Now I have no idea what you are going to do with this information. I know you have a tendency to skew information to fit the arguement you already had. I personally wouldn’t be shocked if you came back with “Yeah but Udoh’s teammates only have lower rebounding rates because Udoh got all the rebounds. He is that good.” This wouldn’t make sense and I really really hope you don’t take it down that road.

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 28, 2010 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Whoah dude, not my point. I’m aware of that better rebounders> worse rebounders + size.

Now I have no idea what you are going to do with this information.

I’m just trying to say when translating Udoh’s numbers to the NBA- namely the Warriors, his stats may become a bit skewed. Randolph was the only NBA-calibur big on his LSU team, yet look at his #s. (10.r40 PA). I guess you could argue that he improved, by a lot, to be a dominant rebounder his rookie year.

Udoh isn’t going to fit in this system unless he can rebound and defend.
It just so happens that this team is bad enough that, even with their sized players being bad rebounders, we are really a worse rebounding team than Baylor is. Sure, we have a couple good rebounders- but it doesn’t seem to help our TRB%.
My guess is that Udoh will flourish in this system, and dare I say, he may be a little inflated.

"Finally someone will admit that a player rebounding with teammates with good rebounding rates is better that a player rebounding with teammates with poor rebound rates at the same rate."

I guess you could say that. But in the NBA, more sized rebounders are usually better. There are always exceptions like Landry, but then again- do you expect Udoh to be a better rebounder in the NBA than he was with the Warriors? I think it’s possible.

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 28, 2010 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

the Warriors?
Baylor. Sorry

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 28, 2010 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Udoh isn’t going to fit in this system unless he can rebound and defend.??

Nellie has built an un-rebounding/un-defending nightmare so anyone sub par in those skills should fit in just great.

Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jun 28, 2010 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

I just saw Udoh's workout video on Sactown and I thought he rocked on both offense and defense.

Actually the workout is labelled Whiteside workout and Whiteside was rockin for a 18 yr 33 pick—-watta steal.

Aldrich and Orton were in tha video and did not shine in my opinion but check it out—in 2 parts—Udoh was kicken.

by Only In Fairfax on Jun 28, 2010 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

The trade you refer to would have to include Wright or Randolph? Both of whom have proved that they can produce with playing time.

Do you believe Udoh would have to be traded? Or do you believe he will be better than Wright or AR?

by caseycheesecake on Jun 29, 2010 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Monroe

He was the value pick at 6. The consensus pick. Sure, sometimes the consensus pick is a bust. But I think most often, it’s the reach pick that is more of a bust.

Gives me an idea for some research…what is the draft history/success/failure rate of so-called “reach picks”?

by Evanz on Jun 27, 2010 6:55 AM PDT reply actions  

The consensus pick for the Warriors last year was Jordan Hill

Only a few websites had Curry going to the Dubs and even fewer proclaimed he would be starting PG in the NBA and be good at it.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jun 27, 2010 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

not sure about that one...

Consensus pick does not necessarily equal most common online mock draft pick from bleacher report or nba “experts”

by freerandolph on Jun 27, 2010 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

So who is the "consensus" that Evanz is speaking about?

I assume he is talking about the online mock and NBA expert community unless Evanz has direct info from NBA sources.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jun 28, 2010 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

until a few days before the draft

Monroe was considered to be in the 4-6 range. The mock drafts that the various websites have are all influenced to a large extent by what is heard from NBA “sources”, which can include scouts, GM’s, etc.

by Evanz on Jun 28, 2010 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I feel yah that's why I was wondering what freerandolph meant.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jun 28, 2010 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

only b/c no one thought Curry would drop past Minnesota.

prevailing thought was Rubio would be taken by the Kings and that Reke & Curry would be the picks in Minny, thus leaving the dubs with Jordan Hill.

by homer simpson on Jun 28, 2010 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

This

That is a pretty huge point that I’m surprised FLAxwless missed.

Golden State Warriors '10-'11 Season: The Return of ^^^^

by olympicmike on Jun 28, 2010 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

If I remember correctly most mocks had Curry going to NY at #8.

That’s why NYK fans were so sad when we drafted Curry one pick ahead of them.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jun 28, 2010 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

to add more:

Most mocks saw that Curry and Monta were to similar as combo guards (remember most people questioned Curry’s ability to be a PG) so they had us drafting Hill.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jun 28, 2010 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

here's the link

NBA.com 2009 consensus mock draft

Curry was kind of all over the place from 3-10, but not a single mock had him going to the Warriors.

by Evanz on Jun 28, 2010 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good link...

I seem to remember a weird NY media push having Curry going to the Knicks even though he seemed like a lock at #6. I think a lot of those mocks started to buy into the idea that because NY wanted him he would end up there. It turns out that it wasn’t as clear cut as I remember it, but I think that most people were pretty excited that he slipped a spot to us. I know some people were worried that we would take Hill anyway, but that never seemed like a good choice to me, even if Curry was off the board.

I guess we all color history with our own feelings on things. I’ll say one thing to your original point though, Curry was certainly not a reach. Even if you totally bought into the idea of him going to NY #8 (which a few of the mocks did), picking a guy one spot ahead of where he was expected to go is hardly a reach IMO.

Another point to make is that earlier mocks tend to line up more with the broad consensus of who is the better player. As it gets closer to the draft though the mocks start to factor team needs and leads they get from inside sources. It seemed like that happened with us this year, as the stories about Udoh and his sweet suit surfaced he started popping up on all the mocks as the W’s pick.

Golden State Warriors '10-'11 Season: The Return of ^^^^

by olympicmike on Jun 29, 2010 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

I never said or meant to imply Curry was a reach, but it was meant as a comment that Monroe is the better selection because he was the “consensus pick.”

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jun 29, 2010 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Really?

I’ll be honest, I thought it was Flynn and Reke. But now that I think about it, I suppose the Warriors were shocked Curry landed at their spot because they had plans to move the pick to Phoenix to get Amare.

By the way if the Kings went with Rubio, I do wonder how much smarter people would think Kahn is. Although, when Rubio dropped I am just shocked that Kahn didn’t go Curry and Rubio just because everyone knew the Knicks were willing to trade up for Curry.

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 28, 2010 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

The only reason Hill was a consensus pick was because no one thought Curry would drop.

This had nothing to do with making a smart pick, as much as Curry falling into our laps because Minnesota picked two point guards in a row.

by TheDaydreamer on Jul 7, 2010 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

If we didn’t luck into Curry last year, we would be so screwed right now.

Kobe sucks
"Frankly your desire to be a seller is just proof of how blinded you are by your hatred of Sabean"-giantsrainman..LOL

by GovernorStephCurry on Jun 27, 2010 10:54 AM PDT reply actions  

wally, you didn’t say who player L is? nice to read, btw.

by DomoKun on Jun 27, 2010 11:22 AM PDT reply actions  

shoot sorry

It’s Okafur

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Who’ player H

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 27, 2010 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Okafor.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 27, 2010 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah I corrected it with the right spelling in the post about 2 or 3 hours ago

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good read, Wally

"Even the Swedes are getting mad."-Randy Hahn
"It's very cozy in the sin bin."-Randy Hahn

by 49er16 on Jun 27, 2010 4:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Here are players born in 1987 in the NBA last year....

Do you think Andrew Bynum still has potential? How about Greg Oden? McGee? OJ Mayo? Thabeet? Jordan Hill? Mareese Speights, Marcus Thronton, Darren Collison?

I find it interesting that people are down on Udoh as not having potential but would say that the guys listed above still have potential and they were born the same year as Udoh.

Click the link and take a look at that list.

2009-2010 NBA players born in 1987 sorted by WS

Just because these guys enetered the NBA before Udoh they are perceived to have more upside, but in reality they are on the same growth path. Playing 1 year as the man on an Elite 8 team is worth more than riding the bench on the Suns and playing in the NBDL like Earl Clark did last year.

Udoh improved himself enough to become the #6 pick and was in consideration as a late lottery pick if the Warriors didn’t pick him. So he is a legitimate lottery talent.

I don’t find it hard to believe that Udoh can be better than Dante Cunningham, Thabeet, Pendergraph, Earl Clark, and Josh McRoberts.

Check out Goallineblitz - Free Football MMORPG
Build players, Build teams, watch games...

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=4892220

by FLAxwless on Jun 27, 2010 4:32 PM PDT reply actions  

the guys you mentioned probably aren't getting much better

the question is whether Udoh produces in year 1. If not, I don’t see him lasting too long.

by Evanz on Jun 27, 2010 5:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think it’s more of a question on the effect he has on the organization more.

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 27, 2010 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

like what do you mean?

like he’s a good guy? Like an Adonal Foyle type?

by Evanz on Jun 27, 2010 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

The reason people are quick to say a player at 23 doesn't have much upside, is because the athletic decline begins around 24 for 99.9% of the NBA population.

That .1% being Steve Nash. Players start to decline ever so slightly at 24, and then generally fall off multiple cliffs after 30. It’s hard to improve while your body is becoming less effective.

by Spider Jerusalem on Jul 1, 2010 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Steve Nash is the large exception in most of these cases.

Kobe sucks
"Frankly your desire to be a seller is just proof of how blinded you are by your hatred of Sabean"-giantsrainman..LOL

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 1, 2010 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Baylor Played Zone

Its so typical of the Warriors to blow smoke about another stupid pick. They keep talking about what an excellent defensive player he is. How can you say that when he played in a zone defense at Baylor.

More smoke and mirrors about a 23 year old with not much upside. Randolph is still THREE YEARS YOUNGER than Udoh and has infinitely more upside than this guy.

I think Udoh at six is a much bigger reach than Henry, Aminu, or Monroe.

Udoh will be nothing more than a seventh man. They also keep saying that he can hold down the middle for the Warriors. He is 6’9". Guys that size don’t scare anyone around the basket.

What you have here is a guy who should have been drafted around 20, then the expectations for this limited player would be realistic.

by robyn k on Jun 27, 2010 5:23 PM PDT reply actions  

Just because they played zone doesn’t mean he was just standing there. You have to play man-to-man defense down low in a zone in terms of you having to be on the guy with the ball.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jun 27, 2010 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes. Exactly. The way to traditionally break down a one is to feed the ball to the high post. After that, it’s up to your big man to bail you out. Of course, how many teams have a high-low option where you can make the right pass from high to low and then still have a legitimate low-post option?

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 27, 2010 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I cant help but wonder how Udoh compares with a guy like Patterson.

Patterson is a quality player but was considered not a possibility as high as 6 pick. He is 6-9 all muscle and high BBall IQ, great focus….in what way does Udoh rate as a much higher pick than Patterson?

by Only In Fairfax on Jun 27, 2010 11:42 PM PDT reply actions  

Well if you were to look at the same stats I looked at, Patterson isn't really that impressive compared to Udoh

You can see them at draftexpress. The only place where he stands out positively is his shooting percentage. He has a better mid range jumper and some better low post moves but it’s not exactly high quality NBA stuff from what I can see. His rebounding is pretty scary low for a power forward.

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 27, 2010 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

From what I have seen, he’s not such a good defesive player. He just gets lost at times. He’s strong though, and has the tools, other than his awarenss.

"The Warriors, who are the most dysfunctional organization in the NBA, were, of course, the team that screwed up the draft."
-Chad Ford, ESPN, 2010 on Ekpe Udoh

by LarryLegendofOracle on Jun 28, 2010 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

yeah I have a hard time seeing Patterson as a better prospect

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 28, 2010 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

OK great ,glad to hear it so unless Monroe becomes a star what big would have been a better pick than Udoh?

Udoh does have have about 3 or 4 inches in wing span on Patterson. I am feeling better about him day by day.

by Only In Fairfax on Jun 28, 2010 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was impressed by Patterson's intellegence, mental focus, leadership and grit but....

..thats not to say that Udoh could not bring some of that as well. I love his versitality and more multi deminsioned game including deeefeeence!

by Only In Fairfax on Jun 28, 2010 2:54 PM PDT reply actions  

Reddit?

Do you guys go on reddit? I’ve seen the shark and cat picture from that site. Than again reddit just links random stuff from the internet.

Jo Koy Laffapalooza 7:08-9:01 funny as hell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe-mfjz2m_o

by StephenO4 on Jun 29, 2010 1:08 AM PDT reply actions  

That's not where I found it but that is where it came from originally

should i provide links?

Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

by wallywagon11 on Jun 29, 2010 6:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

No its fine

I was just hoping to find redditors on GSoM.

Jo Koy Laffapalooza 7:08-9:01 funny as hell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe-mfjz2m_o

by StephenO4 on Jul 1, 2010 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

Natehead_small Nate Parham

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

600px-olympic_rings_square olympicmike

Small IQofaWarrior

Shutterstock_10276351_basketball_mind_small Evanz

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Small jae

Gsom_tony_small Tony.psd

Kanji_love_small Sleepy Freud

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Drmlg_logo-gmail_small Poor Man's Commish

Nellie2_small Feltbot