Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin And How The Pac-12 Missed Him

Monta Ellis

I just got done watching a video on Monta Ellis from last season and i must say it got me really excited about this upcoming season!

Some Questions i have for everyone:

  1. Can Monta Ellis play with Curry?
  2. Can he share the ball?
  3. Does Monta Just need a real point guard and a real team around him, and not a bunch of rookies, or d league players?



Star-divide

  1. I think Monta Ellis and Curry can indeed play together. It made no sense for Ellis to complain as much as he did last season about playing alognside curry because he was so called to small. Ellis had to play with watson, crawford who are all small gaurds. I think Ellis just wants to win just as bad as us fans want the warriors to win, and he felt like brining in a rookie just wasnt it. He knows what curry is capable of now and i think these two will begin to get along becuase they have created names for themselves.
  2. Monta Ellis looked like a ball hogg last season, but i wouldnt blame him. Ellis is the franchise player unless he is traded then this will officialy be curry's team. I think Monta ellis didnt feel comfortable with the team he had places around him. He wants veterans and NBA experince around him! After watching this video i see that Monta only passed to players like Corey M, Ronny T. andris B.. These are all veteran players who have been in the Nba and he knows can play and put the ball in the basket. He didnt pass much to morrow or curry even though they were our best shooters, because his comfort with them. I feel this year will be different. I feel Ellis will allow Curry to run the offense and he will hit ellis for the easy lobs and jump shots.
  3. I kind of asnwered this already. I think Ellis just wanted real Nba players to play with and we will see him play more like a team player. If he doesnt do this, then he will just make a complete fool of himself, becuase this team will go nowhere if he plays 1 man game and not a team game. He cant make excuses anymore because he has real players now, and not a bunch of backups.

Finally i would just like to add in, Monta Ellis is a beast! Im going to post a video of him from last season, and he was just unstopable. He was fearless going to the basket and was probably our 2nd best post up player. He has great foot work and i feel he will be an all star this year. I really hope ellis just isnt kicking it back waiting for a trade to happen, and is taking good care of ellis Jr.. I hope we begin to see Ellis and Curry both doing things for the fans and getting some chemistry together. I watched a video on curry and ellis posted a few days ago and id hope they arent B*S*ing the fans, but they both put out there they want to play together and prove everyone wrong. I feel if we are going to be succesful it starts with those 2. I dont see Ellis wanting to be traded anywhere else becuase teams are already set the contending teams that is. If Ellis wants to go to a new team itll be a rebuilding team and that just wouldnt make any sense because itll be more rookies around him and he will just be a guard who never made a real name for himself. I hope he uses his head this year because we can really go places with curry, ellis, lee, and i will include andris, but really its curry, ellis, and lee!

 

 

Heres the video i watched:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0glex4hU3g

This is why we really shouldnt trade Ellis because if we do he will just do this to us and we will look very dumb when hes an all star on another team. Oh  and when we got rid of jrich to resign ellis a few seasons ago !

This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!

Comment 179 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

check this video out..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9ZYlOQNSTM

yes our team hanging with the dfending champs…. and we only have one big man in the lineup! cough cough add lee in there.. we would have won this game..
Ellis is a keeper..

by CurryandMonta on Jul 23, 2010 11:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Yeah dude, he shot like 5-25 that game.

And Kobe shot 50% against him. He’s a keeper if we want to suck.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 23, 2010 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wrong game, but the point remains.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 23, 2010 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

boston celtics..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJXaCipHjt0

curry to ellis! ellis thanks buddy were going to do good.. even though we got crushed this game..

by CurryandMonta on Jul 23, 2010 11:43 PM PDT reply actions  

1st question: Is this CurryandEllisEqualBestBackcourt?
2nd question: How can the way Ellis played last year make you feel great? It was the worst season of his career. He played pretty badly.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 23, 2010 11:44 PM PDT reply actions  

Can Monta Ellis play with Curry? Yes

Can he share the ball? Yes, we saw last year that when people moved he found them. But people often just sat around and watched him with the ball not doing anything. MT2 said something like he was the fresh prince where people just gave him the ball and just got out the way

Does Monta Just need a real point guard and a real team around him, and not a bunch of rookies, or d league players? Curry is a real PG and he needs less injuries around him.

This is my sig, what do I do with it?

by dubzfan on Jul 23, 2010 11:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Can he share the ball? Yes, we saw last year that when people moved he found them.

Sorry, can’t take your comments on Ellis serious because, they aren’t.
He played 1v5 basketball last year with some incredible shooters open from his drives, yet he couldn’t or the better word wouldn’t pass to them. He played selfishly all year. He better play like he did before, or we got to ship him out soon.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 23, 2010 11:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

i agree

maybe im taking it out on the d leaguers to hard, but maybe if he had a consistent lineup. we maybe would have won a few more games and he would have gotten alot less turnovers.

by CurryandMonta on Jul 23, 2010 11:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Consistent lineups were a huge issue for us

Also most of the year we didn’t even have a center. It’s near impossible to rebound when you have that situation. When it comes to the TO’s it shows he just is not an on ball player but in a way he had to have the ball since Jack left and Curry for a good half of the 1st half of the year was playing mostly off the ball.

In the 2nd half of the year it was more 50/50 between Curry and Monta but that is still too much for Monta. Curry should have the ball probably around 70% of the time

This is my sig, what do I do with it?

by dubzfan on Jul 24, 2010 12:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

i agree 70:30 ratio sounds good.. curry 70 monta 30.

i dont think we should give up on ellis just yet is all im saying.. he belongs on our team sumwhere…. hes that scorer that we need.. we just need to figure out how to use him and what it is that he wants to make him happy..

by CurryandMonta on Jul 24, 2010 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sending positive vibes to Monta

Enough of the negativity. He is part of our team, support him.

by turbulence24 on Jul 23, 2010 11:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

when we support monta...

he will play like the warrior we want him to be.. if we keep this accident on his chest for the rest of his carrear with us hes just going to try and average alot of points and play like a 1 man guy and want to be traded where fans will appreciate him more..

by CurryandMonta on Jul 24, 2010 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Who keeps bringing up the moped thing? It’s not the reason people hated how Monta played last year. That’s a ridiculous way to dodge actual criticisms of his game.

heart of a champion, will of the warrior.

by cap'n hack on Jul 24, 2010 12:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Monta

last season i think wasnt a season to see how many games we can win. i think it was to get ellis into the all star game. I dont think ellis is this bad of a player. He was asked to do alot of things in 1 in a half years, and i think not this year, but next season we will really see our team.we are stll a few signs away.. but that means we need to keep what we have now. Or build around our big 3. ellis. curry. and lee.

by CurryandMonta on Jul 24, 2010 12:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the new sigline!

My inner 3 dollop horse-head is grateful to the both of you.

play like a 1 man guy

by bloodsweatndonuts on Jul 24, 2010 7:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Just a warning

Mods don’t like it when people start posting tons of comments with links in them, some have gotten warned/banned for “littering the site”. My advice from someone who has been banned before, post it all in 1 fanshot/comment

This is my sig, what do I do with it?

by dubzfan on Jul 24, 2010 12:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

One defensive play makes him a good defender?

That’s really poor logic. He has to learn to stay in front of his man and contest shots night in and night out before we proclaim him even an adequate defender. DRose makes plays like this sometimes, but he’s also one of the worst defenders at his position.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 12:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

So why did you hate Monta?

Hate is such a strong word btw. Is it just based on last season’s stats? Starting to sound like a “what have you done fore me lately” attitude. It wasn’t long ago that we were saying this was Monta’s team when BD left.

by turbulence24 on Jul 24, 2010 12:13 AM PDT reply actions  

It wasn’t long ago that we were saying this was Monta’s team when BD left.

Yeah, and last season showed that this line of thought was misguided.
It’s funny- if you look at Monta’s career, he has one good year, one okayish year, and the rest are either bad or at least below average.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 12:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

I see what you did there

When you talk about the rest of his seasons you mean his rookie year where he was a scrawny 18 year old second round pick who rarely played, ’08 where he missed most of the season due to a major leg injury and was never really back to full speed, and last year. Very sneaky of you to make it seem like he has a pattern of underperforming when really it was just one bad year last season.

by OkayJay81 on Jul 24, 2010 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

When you talk about the rest of his seasons you mean his rookie year where he was a scrawny 18 year old second round pick who rarely played, ’08 where he missed most of the season due to a major leg injury and was never really back to full speed, and last year.

Try again.

(You can use your thumb if you have a hard time counting to five).

by Ronaldinho on Jul 24, 2010 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

… or all ten fingers and toes to calculate that Monta was 20 when he played his first NBA game.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 24, 2010 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ok so I didn't bother to look up his age

I guess I blew it by assuming he was 18 getting drafted out of high school but I still think my main point is valid. Lumping his rookie year and the injured season in with last year isn’t really a fair assessment of Monta’s career.

by OkayJay81 on Jul 24, 2010 4:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

So only looking at 2 years of a 5 year career is fair?

I don’t think so.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 24, 2010 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

He was bad as a rookie. He was okayish as a sophomore, but not very good, maybe even a little below average. He was good in 08, then very bad in 09 and 10. So he’s had one good year in his career. He was still coming off the injury in 09 and he was asked to/tried to do too much last season, so maybe he can get back to his 08 form.
For some reason, I actually thought he had one more year in there, so that was a mistake I was making.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with your assessment, I just disagreed with the way you phrased it

I think it’s more accurate to suggest that he was an improving young player who had developed into a pretty good player in ‘08 then he blew out his knee pretty much ruining his ’09, then he struggled last year. I just felt it was disingenuous to characterize him as having only two worthwhile seasons and lumping all the rest together can calling them awful. I guess technically you might be correct but I don’t think it provides an accurate representation of Monta’s career up to this point.

by OkayJay81 on Jul 24, 2010 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Fair enough

I agree to an extent. I’m just worried that he’ll never get back to 08 because it was such a specific set of circumstances.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

… at scoring points.

Whether you’re good at helping your team win games is a totally separate question. Last season, Monta wasn’t.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 25, 2010 6:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

I know this

I also know that there are players out there who couldn’t score 25 ppg if their lives depended on it.

Goal: 8 seed!

by dso on Jul 25, 2010 6:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well, sure. If your point is just that Monta is good at scoring a bunch of points, I don’t think anyone would disagree. On the other hand, I think most Warriors fans would rather watch the team win than watch Monta rack up a bunch of points in a loss.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 25, 2010 6:28 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

in fairness to Monta, there are very few players we could substitute for him from any team in the league that would have made last year’s GS team a winning team much more often – we simply did not have enough talent. We had the second most missed games to injury in the NBA (over 500). With Lee and a healthy AB (he hasn’t gotten hurt yet has he? I lose track of wounded warriors when they approach double digits annually) and a seasoned Curry we’ll be better and so too, hopefully, will Monta.

by hardcore on Jul 25, 2010 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

in fairness to Monta, there are very few players we could substitute for him from any team in the league that would have made last year’s GS team a winning team much more often – we simply did not have enough talent.

Nonesense. We almost certainly won more games without Monta missing so many shots.

We had plenty of talent. We just didn’t use it.

All the available evidence – and it’s imperfect evidence, but wow, is it unanimous – says that we were a worse team with Monta on the floor.

by Ronaldinho on Jul 25, 2010 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

sorry, not nonsense at all, and no, we did not have plenty of unused talent

this site is full of herd-following sheep – because one or two long established GSoM posters take a position that Monta made us worse (and use stats to show it) all too many follow the pied piper’s whistle in the dark over the cliff of rationality. Stats do tell what happened; they are much less useful explaining WHY what happened occurred as it did. Monta’s vilification this off-season is no more or less irrational as his hero-worship in earlier summers.

I’m not a Monta fan-boy; anyone who’s ever followed my fanposts will know that on more than one occasion I’ve promoted trading him for value. Monta has a roller coaster track record, just like our whole roster over the past couple seasons, and averages & cumulative stats don’t tell the whole story for him. Paired with good players on a fairly balanced team, he performed his role very well; injured or paired with injury fill-ins, D-League call-ups, and the likes of DGeorge he struggled and no, could not will his team to victory.

During the last weeks of last season the entire roster played over their average against teams either already in the playoffs and coasting or who had been eliminated themselves. Anyone who watched those games saw our guys playing over their heads – and Curry’s play was extraordinary to be sure, the culmination of a great rookie year.

To remind those who might have forgotten, our esteemed roster was:
R. Williams – a pleasant surprise who would be a backup on a decent team
A. Tolliver – another fan favorite that was so good we didn’t tender him a contract (yet)
C. Hunter – a poor man’s center, in the D-League not the NBA
M. Ellis – a legit SG trying to score more than he should on a team devoid of options while the defense knew he would have to
S. Curry – even nonGSWfans realized how good he was by season’s end but it took him a season to reach that level
D. George – our return in the Belinelli trade, who’s contract we didn’t have to pay for (you get what you pay for)
R. Turiaf – fan favorite that is at best a fourth big on a decent team and who was injured
A. Morrow – a largely one-dimensional player who’s productivity rollercoastered
C. Maggette – a scorer who should come off the bench as a 6th man on a decent team at SF who started at PF all too often
A. Randolph – sometimes erstwhile, injured and flash of potential that never provided much hint of consistency
C. Watson – SG in a PG body that couldn’t be more than a backup PG on a decent team

And less we forget BWright & Andris, out most all of the season – with rebounds and fouls to give inside not to mention some defense and scoring potential gone with them. We had >500 games lost to injury with a thin roster to begin with. This roster does not have plenty of talent – NBA talent – and given that Nelson told hime to try to maximize his scoring in an effort to offset the talent differential, and the fact that we had to outscore rather than outdefend or outrebound our opposition, what was Monta to do precisely? Who on that roster could he have made better, given his skill set and the skill set of the healthy bodies on the floor? The answer is, not much at all – that the GSW won as many games as they did was amazing and got Nelson his cherished record. That should be the crowning achievement of 09-10, and if Nelson sails off into a island sunset either this July or next we all should be grateful yet pleased to begin again with a new coach.

Yes, Monta’s percentages were down as he tried to carry an undermanned squad, that should not come as a surprise to anyone who understood the context of what happened. Yet, he is vilified by number-crunching fans and sheep who read an article about stats and think they understand what happened.

Monta is a quality SG and should rebound to have an better campaign with more talent around him next season. That too, should come as no surprise, and is common sense.

by hardcore on Jul 25, 2010 7:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yet, he is vilified by number-crunching fans and sheep who read an article about stats and think they understand what happened.

And championed mostly by drooling adolescent fan-boys weaned on five-second YouTube clips. What makes you so sure you’re not a sheep, o wise free-thinker? Baaa.

What you call “common sense” (in bold type, wooh) most people would call, you know like, your opinion, man. Get over yourself.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 25, 2010 7:59 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Rec.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 25, 2010 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

To elaborate a bit, hardcore: what swayed me personally even than Monta’s detrimental numbers was — gasp — watching him play the last third or so of the season. Recapping a bit … By that point, Curry had blossomed into a borderline all-star, Morrow, Reggie and even George were shooting lights out, Maggs was having a career year, and the team had started to develop a nice mojo. Every time Monta killed that mojo by putting his head down, ignoring his four teammates, and taking a low-percentage shot (a depressingly frequent occurence) my affection for him subsided a little.

I think there’s a decent chance Monta’s still on the chopping block this offseason, but if we’ve really decided to commit to him long term, I think he may well need a radical attitude adjustment. I’m not nearly as sure as you seem to be that new teammates is the simple answer. Curry and Williams, for example, played with the same teammates last season, and managed to rotate the ball, play within the offense, and score super-efficiently. Somehow someone really needs instill in Monta a new spirit of UBUNTU — make him understand that he can score 15 or 16 ppg and still do a ton to help his team win games.

Which naturally raises the question … is there any way Doc “TRUST YOUR TEAMMATES!!!” Rivers could be lured to the Bay? Talk about the ultimate coaching cure for what ails Monta. I could be back on Monta’s bandwagon pretty quick if Rivers could really get in his head. Hey, Mr. Lacob…?

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 25, 2010 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sleepy, I’d expected a bit better from you.

Rather than addressing any substance you mischaracterize me in such a pithy fashion that the esteemed little gov couldn’t help but baaaa ck you up with a rec. Perhaps you relish the role of shepard, perhaps not, either way it is unbecoming. Suffice to say you and many others see Monta’s character as selfish to a fault while I am trying to place that observation in a wider context. We disagree, which is perfectly fine as I’ve never feared swimming against the tide, but what is unseemly is the immature level of discourse so many of the sheep here have fallen into.

As for Rivers, he is no more coming to the Bay than Shaq, the suggestion of an earlier fanpost since hidden by the mods – ostensibly for its preposterousness.

by hardcore on Jul 25, 2010 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

the immature level of discourse so many of the sheep here have fallen into.

Add yourself to that list of immature, hardcore. The call for some maturity rings hollow when you wrap it with a charge that people here are “sheep” and imply that those who cite numbers don’t actually understand them.

by jae on Jul 25, 2010 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

sorry if I hit a raw nerve with the sheep reference, though far worse has gone unaddressed hereabouts so I’m a little surprised by the reactions -

as for stats, you know better than most that the numbers never tell the whole story, and you yourself are a prolific responder to stats poorly used on this site, so again I’m a little surprised

both points taken

by hardcore on Jul 25, 2010 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well...

Calling people who disagree with you sheep is pretty lame. You are basically discrediting the ability of others to think critically. Frankly I found the part of your comment that Sleepy quoted flat out insulting, and I’m guessing his sharp response was simply because he too was insulted.

Petty bickering aside, I appreciate a well reasoned counter argument. If you feel you’ve presented a good one then there is really no need for you to toss out cheap shots. You are better than that.

Golden State Warriors '10-'11 Season: The Return of ^^^^

by olympicmike on Jul 25, 2010 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

you’re right, we’re all better than that

I appreciate you upholding those levels across the board

by hardcore on Jul 25, 2010 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

sorry if I hit a raw nerve with the sheep reference, though far worse has gone unaddressed hereabouts so I’m a little surprised by the reactions -

Well, to your credit, I think the reason you got the reaction you did is because you are a respected contributor that people are actually interested in having a conversation with. So take it as a compliment… if you can. Haha.

you’re right, we’re all better than that

Or at least we should be anyway. We all still seem to take things personally or take swipes at others from time to time though (myself included). This conversation which was actually between two of my favorite posters here was characterized as a debate between sheep and drooling fanboys (yes, I know I’m leaving all the nuance out of this). It happens to everyone now and then.

I do appreciate that discussions like this one can go basically unmoderated thanks to the fact that you both made an effort to quickly return this to a civil discussion and clarify your meaning to each other. So props to both of you on that one.

Golden State Warriors '10-'11 Season: The Return of ^^^^

by olympicmike on Jul 26, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sleepy, I’d expected a bit better from you.

Yeah … I’ve tried to be better about not taking such obvious bait. At the same time, if you’re going to bait people, you shouldn’t be surprised if a few fishies start snapping. In the case of your post, I probably took the bait because you’re a longtime poster here and should know better. Full disclosure: though you’ve written many a great post here, I’ve grown a little weary of your “I’m special / my [stuff] doesn’t smell” act. IIRC, the last time you addressed me directly it was to infiltrate yourself in the middle of a rather lengthy (but not uncivil) back-and-forth between me and another poster, to say something to the effect of “what kind of nerd has time to spend so much time debating trivial things on the internet?” I let it slide at the time, but man, talk about textbook internet hypocrisy. We’re all internet nerds and Warriors fanatics here — you included.

Rather than addressing any substance you mischaracterize me

I don’t think I characterized you at all (at least not till this post). I did feel a little bad about posting something so devoid of substance, hence the more substantial follow-up that you replied to.

in such a pithy fashion that the esteemed little gov couldn’t help but baaaa ck you up with a rec.

Gov’nah’s his own person. You want to take a swipe at him, feel free; you certainly wouldn’t be the first to do so. I’ve had my issues with his posts, but one thing you have to give him props for is his ability to take criticism without getting huffy and bent out of shape. I think both you and I could probably learn from him in this respect.

Perhaps you relish the role of shepard [sic], perhaps not, either way it is unbecoming.

Meh. I don’t relish it or not relish it (to the extent that it exists). It is what it is. Since I don’t ask for it, I’m not sure how it’s “unbecoming” of me. For you to call it out is a little weird … if anything, it makes you sound a little jealous. Maybe you’d have more groupies if you had a sexier and more youthful webpin? ;-)

I’ve never feared swimming against the tide

Nor have I, nor (I suspect) have most of the posters here, at least when it comes to having an opinion about the Warriors.

but what is unseemly is the immature level of discourse so many of the sheep here have fallen into.

Fair enough. And as OM and jae have pointed out, this applies equally to your recent posts. If you actually want to have a civil debate on the subject, it helps not to characterize everyone with a different take from you as “sheep.”

As for Rivers, he is no more coming to the Bay than Shaq, the suggestion of an earlier fanpost since hidden by the mods – ostensibly for its preposterousness.

Well, yeah, probably not, which is why I posed the idea in question form, with the softer “any way” and the conditional tense. Not sure whay the diary on the subject was deleted (probably lack of content), but I think the standards for a new diary here are a bit higher than they are for thinking aloud within the context of a discussion. Musing is still acceptable, no? Do you not agree that, in a hypothetical ideal universe, Doc Rivers could teach Monta a thing or two about teamwork?

Anyway … peace.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 26, 2010 7:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

fine, I get it – every reply has focused on the hurt feelings of those who took umbrage at the sheep references, point taken, again and again and again

of interest, to me anyway, notice that none of the replies have addressed the substantive point about the roster, season, etc. and in doing so we are vulnerable to mistakenly reducing the analysis of Monta’s value to numbers taken out of context

secondarily, you did characterize (championed mostly by drooling adolescent fan-boys weaned on five-second YouTube clips); fwiw I wasn’t trying to bait anyone and my original reply to you was pretty civil – my reply to being told that was nonsense is what piqued.

most poignant is your reminder for us all not to take ourselves too seriously, and as with olympicmike’s reminder not to devolve to cheap shots, we agree.
Peace, Your fellow internet nerd,

by hardcore on Jul 26, 2010 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

All good, man. One point of clarification:

you did characterize
Obviously, the words you cited weren’t meant to characterize you. I guess you’re probably not as old as the dude in your webpin, but I’ve never remotely thought of you as an adolescent or a drooler. Still … they’re obviously not very kind words. I guess my intent was to “show you what I did there” by disparaging a whole group of people based on the fact that they have a similar opinion. But two wrongs don’t make a right.

There certainly have been a couple of “droolers” (speaking figuratively) among Monta’s supporters, but then there have been a few among his critics as well. Anecdotally, I have my feelings about which group, broadly speaking, tends to write more thoughtful posts here, but voicing those feelings tends to lead quickly to the kind of hurt feelings that just happened. As you suggest, it’s always best to stick to substance and specifics and avoid generalizing and “characterizing.”

“1Dub,” as we used to say back in the day…

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 26, 2010 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Monta is a quality SG and should rebound to have an better campaign with more talent around him next season.

Should is the operative word. I agree that he absolutely should, because there was reason last year for him to play like “Cory Maggette meets the last basketball on earth”. Whether or not that was a good reason is not the point. What is important is that reason no longer exists.

Does that mean he was good? Of course not, but I see your point when you say “but why was he that bad?”. My optimistic side hopes that by taking away that “reason” (lack of surrounding talent), he will play in a way that doesn’t involve jacking up a bunch 20’ jumpers early in the shot clock.

Again, the road to hell is paved with “should” so we’ll see how he reacts to having some other players to shoulder the load. Hopefully he really cares about winning and realizes that he’s really good at driving to the basket and not too horrible at shooting threes and will stick to those two options.

On the other hand, this is the dude who claimed that Kobe, master of the ill-advised 20’ jump shot, is the only player better than him, so maybe I’m hoping against my better judgment. But that’s why we’re “fanatics” no not “the objective surveyors of all we behold”.

play like a 1 man guy

by bloodsweatndonuts on Jul 25, 2010 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Re:On the other hand, this is the dude who claimed that Kobe, master of the ill-advised 20’ jump shot, is the only player better than him, so maybe I’m hoping against my better judgment.

This is what truly scares me. This is the definition of an out of control ego.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 25, 2010 11:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Last year was not Warriors basketball btw...

I’m amazed we weren’t dead last in the league. We were watching the likes of Mikki Moore, Acie Law, D-Leaguers, etc. I say we take a mulligan for last season.

by turbulence24 on Jul 24, 2010 12:15 AM PDT reply actions  

I say take a mulligan for every injured season

Do we have a limit of mulligans? Lol

This is my sig, what do I do with it?

by dubzfan on Jul 24, 2010 12:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Leave.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 24, 2010 12:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Stay

No doubt

This is my sig, what do I do with it?

by dubzfan on Jul 24, 2010 12:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

Leave.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jul 24, 2010 12:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

Leave

too small to guard 2s in this league night in and night out. I also like my 2s to be able to play 3 and not the 1.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 12:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

I also like my 2s to be able to play 3 and not the 1.

Who’d you have in mind? Those are pretty rare other than guys like Kobe and Iggy who have the size. Maybe Evan Turner as well

This is my sig, what do I do with it?

by dubzfan on Jul 24, 2010 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Actually

they’re pretty common. Almost any SG above 6’5" or 6’6" can do it for stretches. Even Reggie Williams at 6’4" can do it a little.
You mentioned Kobe and Iggy. JRich, Joe Johnson, BRoy a little, Ariza can do both, Stephen Jackson, Buike, Vince Carter, Caron Butler, John Salmons… almost any 2 with size, really. On some nights it creates a mismatch at the 3 (against the Melos, Grangers, Durants), but their primary position would be the 2 anyway. I just like players with some size.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't really say Ariza is a 2 but that my opinion

Yeah your probably right I just wouldn’t classify some of these guys as a combo player

This is my sig, what do I do with it?

by dubzfan on Jul 24, 2010 12:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ariza played a lot of 2 this season

starting along side Battier. He’s more of a 3, but he has the quickness to play 2.
The problem I have is that if we get a very good perimeter defender at the 3 to play alongside Monta, and we play the Lakers or something, Monta would have to guard Artest. Or if we played the He-… oh wait. Nevermind.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well DW can defend

And Monta shows flashes of great defense, he did on Kobe a few times but it’s a bad comparison when bringing up LA since our goal isn’t to go and win a title as much as it is just get to the playoffs. Against a team like Denver size wise were good to go for example

This is my sig, what do I do with it?

by dubzfan on Jul 24, 2010 1:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

What I mean is

If their best perimeter player is a 2, we would probably put DW on him. Or we wouldn’t, and we’d have Monta guarding Joe Johnson and DW on Marvin Williams. The Nuggets is actually a better situation for us. DW could guard Melo and Monta could guard Afflalo.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 1:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Even teams like the Spurs size wise were fine

Maybe the Blazers, Houston (there bigger but not much of an offensive threat), and OKC

This is my sig, what do I do with it?

by dubzfan on Jul 24, 2010 1:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

The reason some of these teams work is that they have the 1 perimeter defender, 1 perimeter scorer thing going on. The problem arises when that defender is the small forward and not the shooting guard.
We can’t infer too much about the Spurs lineup at this point. Will Pop stick with Parker/Hill/Manu or will he play RJ more? Who knows, man.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 1:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sounds good

who do you have in mind, and how do the Warriors get them?

by turbulence24 on Jul 24, 2010 12:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

We don't know Monta's value around the league

I suspect that it’s low, so I don’t have any one really in mind.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 12:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I think we could do well with having Monta show his stuff for another season. Maybe taking most of the offensive load off of him will get him some renewed interest around the league.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think we could do well with having Monta show his stuff for another season

I think that is the wise move. See how it works this season with an eye on trading(draft as well) for the right defending 2 who has some balance of talent related to monte.

by Only In Fairfax on Jul 24, 2010 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

Kobe wanted Bynum and Odom traded for 35 year old Jason Kidd

And he said Turner should be the number one pick. Based on this, i don’t think he’s a good talent evaluator.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 24, 2010 1:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Stay

Unless we can get someone better. And obviously better not arguably better.

Warriors.

by jonathannn on Jul 24, 2010 12:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

leave

but only for something of real value not just another salary dump

by mekanikal on Jul 24, 2010 1:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Fresh start...

Last time Riley was asked about Monta, he said that Monta was excited for the season and was liking the team that was being put together. Yeah that could be total BS, but let’s just say I’m a “glass is half full” type of guy. Let’s wait and see what happens. I’m hoping alot of people in this site are going to feel real stupid for wanting to trade Monta half way through the season.

by turbulence24 on Jul 24, 2010 12:19 AM PDT reply actions  

Which shooting guard is available?

1. Who is better than Monta. 2. Would want to play for the warriors

by turbulence24 on Jul 24, 2010 12:26 AM PDT reply actions  

Dude

cut back on the posts.
Unless you’re trying to use the reply button. If that’s the case, you should use the reply button.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

This season is his shot to prove that he can be who we need. If he goes back to the offensive player he used to be, plus his better 3 point shooting, and goes hard every night on the defensive end to contain his opponent, then he should stay. If he continues playing like he did last year, then he should go.

by duballers23 on Jul 24, 2010 12:27 AM PDT reply actions  

What cracks me up is that the people who say he had a bad year last year would want to get rid of him after just that year, while he’s clearly still developing and just coming into his prime. He’s not Durant people its not going to happen overnight.

http://www.youtube.com/user/HANDSOMElifeOFswing - Cal Football Highlights+ More Bay area sports

by 4Ever Golden on Jul 24, 2010 12:39 AM PDT reply actions  

Monta?

He’s going to be 25 before the season starts. He’s pretty developed. Most of a player’s development happens early on and if you ask coaches, they say the NBA prime is around 26-27. He could get better at defense and shooting, but he’s not going to be da supastah ever. If he was, he would have showed us more.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 12:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

But the point being he’s game will still develop. He’s not done growing as a player, his shooting will get better and so will his D and that will make him a better player, and i don’t think any of us fans expect him to be a superstar. Just a key piece of this team.

http://www.youtube.com/user/HANDSOMElifeOFswing - Cal Football Highlights+ More Bay area sports

by 4Ever Golden on Jul 24, 2010 12:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

and my point is simply that

he won’t develop that much. And he will never grow 3" and gain 30 lbs.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 12:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

and gain 30 lbs

Charles Barkley disagrees. Lol

This is my sig, what do I do with it?

by dubzfan on Jul 25, 2010 1:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

Haha — always the wrong answer!

I mean, if you insist on posting blatant falsehoods on this site, I guess it’s better that you do so in easily ignored soundbites, rather than wasting people’s time trying to come up with spurious evidence for your claims. At the same time would like to see how many NBA players you can think of who were significantly better at age 28-29 than they were at age 25. Do your worst!

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 25, 2010 4:18 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I guarantee he brings up Nash.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 25, 2010 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

The tide has turned.

Meh. Tides turn all the time. We get two high ones and two low ones every day. That’s roughly the same number of new semi-literate Monta fanboys we get every day on this site (though I suspect a lot of them are banned former posters under new user names).

The thing is, I like Monta. I think there is a small but non-zero chance he performs next season at a level closer to his solid 2007-08 than his wretched 2009-10. Part of me is OK with keeping him around and seeing if he can focus on rebounding better, playing tough D, taking better care the ball, deferring to Steph, and not playing so much like a “1 man guy.” It’s just hard to take the case for keeping him around very seriously when 99% of the posters making it seem to have the writing level and analytical ability of a three year-old.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 24, 2010 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Question to your post Sleepy: did Monte actually play tough D in 2008, rebound and pass more etc. than in 2009?

A lot is said about his horrible reversal from his “solid 2008” to his wretched 2009-2010 season. My memory of 2008 is that everyone was just surprised and estatic about the way this second rounder blew up outa nowhere and did wonderful fast moves to the basket when coming off the bench but did he really do things like great D that he didnt last year?

It seems to me that most of the criticism is more based on the fact that a lot of money was thrown at Monte and he was instantly expected to take over the team and be “the man” as well as the primary scorer( I think he was actually stunned when the team disappeared around him). It was the new role for him that was wrong. I am not so sure that his ability or primary play has changed from 2008 but he was thrown into a position that wasnt right for him and perhaps he was simply paid too much as well. His response was that ok I will just do more of what I do best. Understandable to me.

So that is a great coaching/management mistake. He was taken out of position and made a quarterback without a real analysis of his developent needs and now he is burned-which by the way set back his development I feel—no wonder that he clung to Jack and Maggs then “boom” they are gone too-he has handled this non functional situation better than I would have guessed. That is why I feel that we should play him to his talent rather than throw him out. And he does have rare talent and skills. If he does not improve on defense then he probly should be a 6th man off the bench(unfortunately he is paid 10 mill a year like Maggs) or be swiched out frequently with a role player with great D.
 It does seem often that we tend to use our analytical ability to point out the problems more than we consider the circumstances have how things go wrong. Its not always such a mystery why players thrive when given the right opportunity on another team.

It seems to me that talent is so hard to come by for a loosing team in our position that it it behooves the Warriors to look at all options for trying to make it work before just taking a quick “throw the bum out” stance. We never seem to get equal talent back when we do that, yet many are so quick to pull the trigger then complain when we end up with garbage back.

by Only In Fairfax on Jul 24, 2010 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

It seems to me that most of the criticism is more based on the fact that a lot of money was thrown at Monte

Who is this “Monte” character?

by jae on Jul 25, 2010 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

For all the complaints I heard about Monta not sharing the ball, I don’t hear any equal amount of praise for when he DOES kick the ball to an outside shooter

The problem is that he just wasn’t doing it enough. Every time he didn’t kick it out was another 1 on 3 iso that was more likely to result in a missed shot or a turnover than just about anything else on our team. It’s good that he was getting 5 assists a game. It’s bad because he was still making really really bad decisions along the way. Even Allen Iverson was a better passer than Monta.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 12:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

I've been trying to think of an analogy for this

but all of the ones I can think of are really offensive for some reason.
Oh, it’s like if you were late to work or school every day, but showed up on time or even early one day. Should you expect praise because you were on time? Probably not. That’s your job.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 1:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think I see what you're saying

But the difference is that showing up on time for work is not a decision. It’s a requirement. When to pass or shoot is a “decision” that’s based on what the opposing defense is doing. Monta (any player, actually) has to make the decision on whether he CAN pass, whether he SHOULD pass, whether to finish it himself, or whether to pull back and try again, all based on what the opponent’s defense is currently doing. Did Monta make bad decisions last season? Sure he did. He had some ugly misses and turnovers that made me pull my hair. But he also made some GOOD decisions too that were usually more subtle and don’t get any attention, but were good decisions and good play attempts nonetheless.

When I hear people complain about Monta being “selfish”, they make it sound as though his entire game is all about being selfish, that he doesn’t look to pass to other players, that he’s only looking to score for himself. But what I’m saying is that there is a side to Monta where he DOES look for teammates and DOES pass. He might not be as good as Curry about it, but I don’t see him as a selfish ballhog that people are making him out to be.

by IQofaWarrior on Jul 24, 2010 1:20 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

The decision in the analogy

is that you choose to sleep in and show up late. The day you choose to make the right decision, you do not deserve praise. You were only doing what you were supposed to.

When people say Monta is selfish, they mostly mean that he is overly willing to finish over 3 defenders instead of pass out to the open man. That’s pretty much always the wrong choice.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 1:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't call that selfish

I would call that stupid, idiotic, bad decision making, but not selfish. To me, selfish implies that it’s a characteristic of his game, meaning that all of his decision making is based on himself being the first option. But Monta DOES make plays for others, so he doesn’t have a “selfish” style of play.

As for “praising” someone when they make the right decision, I mean, maybe “praise” isn’t the best word. Maybe “recognition” is the better word. In order to make a complete analysis of someone, you have to recognize all the good decisions they made along with the bad ones. There’s a difference between someone who is 100% late for work, someone who is 50/50 late for work, and someone who is 100% on time for work. It would be unfair to judge the 50/50 employee as being as bad as the 100% late for work employee.

The people who complain about Monta being selfish or doesn’t share the ball only mention it when he doesn’t, and it makes Monta sound like a 100% selfish ballhog. They don’t make any recognition of when he does make a pass and share the ball. So what I’m saying is that Monta is not the 100% selfish ballhog, or a 100% bad decision maker. Instead, what I am saying is that Monta has made some ugly decisions, but he also has made some good ones too, and those good decisions have to be taken into account when judging Monta’s playing making abilities.

by IQofaWarrior on Jul 24, 2010 2:03 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I agree

I don’t see him as a selfish player either. I also wouldn’t demote him to the league of morons just yet. I think he forgot himself with all the distractions last year and was really riding the tips of some destructive waves that were stirred up by storms in the front office that bled into every fabric of the team from coach, to player, to fan.

It must have been frustrating for him to only be able to defer to Maggette, as everyone else was either injured or just plain sucked and could not succeed with the ball. Curry was his whipping boy and it was obvious that Monta did not like the idea of giving him the ball. We forget some times that these are people with feelings.

Let’s hope these are feelings of the past. From what I’ve heard, Monta has a had a very good off-season health wise, both physically and spiritually. Emotionally he should feel more grounded, heeding to holy matrimony and the hatchet that is Robert Rowell’s ugly head should be buried soon.

This is something to look forward to in terms of Monta making adjustments to his game and returning to playing team basketball.

by lilboots on Jul 24, 2010 2:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I’ve given Monta the benefit of the doubt last season as it being his first season learning how to make plays, and that his ugly decisions were the result of his learning curve. I am eager to see if he’s refined his game next season to see if he’s improved his decision making when facing 3 defenders, or if he’s still the same.

by IQofaWarrior on Jul 24, 2010 2:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good thoughts monk. Rec'd

With the stronger team that we have this year including fingers crossed on Beans renewal, I am hoping that Monte will be in a much better comfort zone and will respond and develop rather than the alternative. He does have awsome talent that just needs to be channeled in the right direction and I could be wrong but I think that he is mature enough now to make this happen for himself and for the Wattiors as a team.

by Only In Fairfax on Jul 24, 2010 6:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Once again rec for Monk.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 24, 2010 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Are you judging Monta's pass attempts based on assists made?

I wasn’t referring to Monta’s plays that resulted in an assist in the box score. I saw quite a few times where Monta executes a play where he passes out to a shooter and the shooter misses, or he executes the pick and roll which ends in a foul, or the receiver simply misses the put in, or the receiver passes it to someone else. Monta should get credit for those play attempts, but nobody ever makes notice it of those.

by IQofaWarrior on Jul 24, 2010 1:03 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I'm doing both
Monta should get credit for those play attempts, but nobody ever makes notice it of those.

It affects everyone who passes to teammates. The people who are willing passers are usually the same people who get a lot of assists.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 1:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Rec'd

This is my sig, what do I do with it?

by dubzfan on Jul 24, 2010 12:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Your concerns

about David Lee should not keep you throughout the night. I’ve always been a Lee guy and have watched him play a lot throughout his career. He always gets his rebounds even if he’s not having the best offensive game. As of now, his offense disappears a lot less than it has, and his impression on the game in this way rarely strays from within its element. He’s a very hard working reliable player that brings it every night. I’m more than happy to have him on the team. Go to a Knicks forum and check out what the fans have to say about him. You will have difficulty finding fans who are happy of his departure, and even more difficulty finding those who share mutuality.

Wright on the other hand, I know absolutely nothing about, except what I’ve read from Heat fans, seen on youtube, and observed from very few games. I say the jury is still out on our wing situation until proven otherwise. He is capable of being spectacular though, Jim Barnett has always been a big D-Wright fan.

by lilboots on Jul 24, 2010 5:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Monta Turnovers!

I feel that if your a good basketball player you can make any1 around u better. Monta got to the basket with ease, but when he got shut down, the players he had around him werent an Amare s. or a david lee. or an al harrington or andris b. or a baron davis.. he had ppl like chris hunter in. ppl who get nervous when the ball touches there finger tips.. which added to his turnover rates.. People like nash and cp3 and other great pgs in the league all were around 2-3 turnovers a game.. monta was 1 more then them i thnk. at least when you go to hoopsworld or hoopshype it shows u the top 5 in each category. Montas turnovers would have deftnly gone down if he had the lineup he has now.. or if he had the big brothers he had around him a few yrrs ago. when we upset dallas.!

by CurryandMonta on Jul 24, 2010 1:16 AM PDT reply actions  

He also played with guys like Morrow and Stephen Curry

who were among the best 3 point shooters in the league last season.

People like nash and cp3 and other great pgs in the league all were around 2-3 turnovers a game.. monta was 1 more then them i thnk.

A:TO ratio isn’t a totally accurate stat, but it’s really worth mentioning here. Nash had an A:TO ratio of 3 or so. CP3 of 4. Monta had an A:TO ratio of 1.4. Comparing their TO totals without looking at the rest of the stats isn’t fair.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 24, 2010 1:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

kinda hard to not like that video when MJ is playing in the background

by q00pster on Jul 24, 2010 1:56 AM PDT reply actions  

Ellis

I think that Ellis’ role has been defined this year and he knows that he’s playing second banana to Curry with the ball, going into the season he should see that he has more help and wouldn’t be asked to do as much.
Ellis isn’t my big concern, at his worst his effort will make for more good then bad.
I’m concerned about the 5 this could be a disaster, I don’t think you can just
roll the dice and hope that Biedrins turns it around. W’s have got to get more help.
Ratliff just signed with LA, McGee from the Wizards is in team USA camp so you can’t steal him. W’s might have to go back to Tolliver or Hunter for help. But please get someone.

by lrus on Jul 24, 2010 7:43 AM PDT reply actions  

1st thing Ellis needs to do is communicate with Curry more on the court

many times it looks like he didn’t even acknowledge that Curry was on the court

by GoldenSt8OfMind on Jul 24, 2010 8:20 AM PDT reply actions  

remind me

Watching these highlights….how did Kaman goto the allstar game over Ellis?

by GSWeri on Jul 24, 2010 12:00 PM PDT reply actions  

That is still a mystery

I remember Stern was asked about it at a press conference and got really defensive and was getting really mad at the reporter. Stern got to choose that one

This is my sig, what do I do with it?

by dubzfan on Jul 24, 2010 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because Kaman deserved it over Ellis.

Kaman still didn’t deserve a spot, but over Ellis he did.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 24, 2010 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Watching those highlights makes me not want to even think about trading Ellis! If he was like 4-6 inches taller, we wouldn’t even be complaining about him!

99.9% of the highlights were of Ellis taking it to the rim! He’s got to continue to do that and not get too comfortable shooting a 3! He’s gotten better from that range, but it seems like that’s when the offense goes stale, when he settles for a jumpshot! He’s a great finisher, he needs to attack the hoop more and learn how to kick out once in a while too!

Geeez Louf*ckingweeez!!!

by scottiepimppen on Jul 24, 2010 12:18 PM PDT reply actions  

Watching those highlights makes me not want to even think about trading Ellis! If he was like 4-6 inches taller, we wouldn’t even be complaining about him!

Monta makes a lot of highlight-reel plays.

The problem with his game has very little to do with his height. It has to do with all the plays that DON’T make the highlight reel – when he charges into traffic, doesn’t pass to the open man, and throws up a circus shot that misses.

Low-percentage shots tend to make for great highlight reels, because for some reason the highlight reals never include a proportionate number of the missed shots, and wow, they sure are pretty when they go in.

by Ronaldinho on Jul 24, 2010 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

he's got to become a better jumpshooter

can’t rely on those drives as he gets older and loses a step or two

by Evanz on Jul 24, 2010 5:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Three words: pick and roll

Read Curry’s tweets and think about that “two-headed point guard” concept, with two bigs to play catch with. With four ways to run it, it’s a high-percentage nightmare to defend against.

Potential is what you pitch when you have low current value.

by Rasputin10 on Jul 25, 2010 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

The question that should be asked is What is the most effective role for Monta Ellis to play?

To answer that question, we must think back to when Monta Ellis had his most successful season. I think everyone here would agree that it was 07-08. Sure he had better numbers last year, but he wasn’t the most effective we’ve seen him.

A few more important questions

What made Monta so effective in that season? Simple answer

Playing off the ball.

BD, Jack, Barnes, all of these guys allowed Monta to play off the ball more.

Why is that important?

Monta has shown that he is most effective when he’s is allowed to use his speed and quickness to either open up a lane to drive in or to shed a defender for the open jumper. I don’t think anyone is going to argue that point. He shot 62% in february of 08 because he had Baron and Jack handling the ball and finding him when he was open.

Do our offseason moves make Monta better?

Absolutely, by aquiring David Lee and Dorell Wright, you have simplified Monta’s role tremendously, thus making him more effective.

How do Wright and Lee help Monta?

Monta is no longer our first offensive option, he’s no longer our second offensive option, he is now third. Just like he was when Jack and Boom were here. When Monta Ellis is your third option offensively you are in good shape.

From a defensive standpoint we aquired Dorell Wright, who we are hoping plays like a 6’9’ Matt Barnes. Which means we have another ball handler on the floor and some one other than Monta to guard players like Durant.

Does that mean picking Dorell Wright over Morrow is a smart move?

Absolutely! It’s all about roles in Nellie’s system. Morrow’s only roll was to spread the floor and shoot. Which means he relies on the creativity of others to be effective, just like Monta. Dorell Wright is a creative player with a high bball IQ and handling skills to match. Plus he can play defense against any wing man in the league. Dorell Wright makes Monta bettter, more importantly he makes our team better.

Will Monta have the reverse effects on DLee and DWright?

Monta and Curry will have a tremendous effect on these players. David Lee has never played with players as good as Monta and Steph. He is used to being double teamed and being the primary focus of the other teams defense. Now he is part of an offensive force instead of being the only offensive force.

The Warriors have given DWright a chance to play and blossom. Wisely they have surrounded him with players like Lee, Curry, and Ellis, thus Wright is only asked to do the things he is good at. Move the ball, play solid d, knock down open shots. Hopefully he takes advantage of this opportunity.

What makes this lineup different from last years?

Gave myself a loaded question. Obviously there is a lot that’s different. But the most important difference is that everyone on the team now has defined roles. This makes Nellie a better coach and the players better players.

Last year Monta didn’t know what his role was, worse is that Nellie didn’t know either. Is he our point? We know now he is not. Is he our best player on the floor? No. What should Monta’s role be? That question is answered.

A scorer. That’s it. That’s really all Monta is, a pure scorer. He can fill up his ppg like few other in this league.

Monta is a scorer, so how do we make him the most effective scorer he can be?
Now we’re going in a circle. He is most effective off the ball when the defense isn’t focusing on him. Which is why signing Dorell Wright and David Lee were genius moves.

Monta has a simplified role. Just score, effectively.

Monta should be able to average about 25 ppg accept this time he should be shooting well over 45%. We’ll see though

by myk on Jul 24, 2010 4:26 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Gave myself a loaded question.

Though you make some solid points, I think this pretty much applies to your entire post.

I mean, I appreciate the optimism — I’m kind of a brightside guy too — but in the cases of Monta and Dorell Wright I think you really need to allow for a bit more uncertainty. Their career paths are all over the place. We could be looking at a poor man’s DWade and Kirilenko; or a poor man’s Lou Williams and Julian Wright; or (most likely) somewhere in that rather vast range.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 24, 2010 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Of course there is always uncertainty and as well it is not a certainty that your fears for them to have a bad season will come true.

But with Monte at least it is a “Bird in hand” discussion rather than fantasy trade speculations. Meaningful thoughts myk.

by Only In Fairfax on Jul 24, 2010 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well my point is basically that the front office realised they need to give Monta a simpler and better defined role. They analyzed him as a player and determined that he is most effective as an off the ball player whose primary role is to score. So they aquired Lee and Wright. Lee to give Monta a veteran who he has full confidence in relying on to get things done, and Wright to be another ball handler as well as our defensive stopper on the wings.

Truthfully, I don’t know Wright’s game all that well, but based on what the FO and heat fans have said you can get a pretty good idea. He handles the ball extremely well for his size, he’s a superior athlete with a high IQ, he prefers to shoot over driving in the lane, and he puts emphasis on the defensive end. That’s pretty much exactly what we need at the 3.

Riley’s pitch to Wright was probably along these lines. “Dorell, we think that the uptempo style would benefit your athleticism and basketball IQ. We have a hole in our starting lineup at SF and we think you could fill it. We need you to do what you do. Play smart, play fast, shoot well, and play defense. We don’t need you to score 20 ppg, we need smart players and good defenders, we believe that’s you.”

Wright being 24 is probably relishing at the chance to blossom in this new role in his native golden state. The hope is for him to turn in to AK47 (my dream SF for this team for 4+ years) but the realistic desire is for him to perform like a taller more athletic Matt Barnes.

Play smart. Move the ball around using your !Q and skills. Knock down open corner 3’s, there’ll be plenty, and play scrappy. Hustle for loose balls close down on D,

If DWright performs like Matt Barnes this year I’ll give him an A for the season. If he plays like AK47 I’ll buy his jersey.

Either way if the hype about Wright is true and he performs like a poor man’s matt barnes he is still providing something this team has lacked since the departure of jack. A scrappy SF with heart, skills, and brains to match. That’s why I believe taking him over Morrow was a wise decision.

Reggie v Morrow? Reggie, but mostly cause of the money.

How do you feel about DWright over Morrow?

by myk on Jul 25, 2010 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Reggie v Morrow? Reggie, but mostly cause of the money.

Reggie, easily. And not because of money. Because of every single aspect of the game that doesn’t rhyme with “tree-joint-mooting.”

How do you feel about DWright over Morrow?

Wright – if he remains healthy – is a much, much better choice to run at the 3 with this team than Morrow. His rebounding and defense are much more relevant to this team than Morrow’s 3-pt shooting.

by Ronaldinho on Jul 25, 2010 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

"playing off the ball"
Monta should be able to average about 25 ppg accept this time he should be shooting well over 45%.

FG% is an 80s stat.

anyway, Monta was effective in 07-08 not b/c he was off the ball, but b/c he shot ridiculously well from mid-range at 43.9% that season. other than that season he has never had a season at even 40%. guy shot over 60% for a month. as rare as that is in NBA history, you’d think it’d be common sense that that probably would never happen again. on the other hand, NBA history is littered with guys who had 1 or 2 seasons of insanely hot shooting outliers that stick out compared to their career #‘s. one way to circumvent this is to take more 3’s & less mid-range jumpers (since 33% from 3 is like shooting 50% from 2 which is much more preferable than 36-39% from mid-range).

Monta also was a much better finisher pre-moped than post-moped. he finished at a ridiculous 68% & 66% in his 2 seasons before moped. while his 08-09 season was marred for the most part, we saw him finish at at a 60% clip that season & at a 61% clip this season.

07-08, a contract year, was the only season Monta rebounded like a SG at a 7.1% clip. excluding that season, his rebound rate is in the 5% area.

the one area it helped him in was his TOV rate.

it also keeps his usage rate down so 25 ppg is unrealistic. if he’s truly off the ball in the sense he was with Baron that is. his usage rate was at 29.4% this season. it was at 21.7% in 07-08. his assist rate should also decrease.

Basically Monta needs to drop the # of possessions he uses by 1/3, shoot more 3’s in place of mid-range jump shots & get his rebounding rate up like it’s a contract year. unfortunately the moped accident has probably cost him the explosiveness that made him an elite finisher, but there’s nothing he can do about that.

by the evil monkey on Jul 25, 2010 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with most of that, especially about the moped. Really knocked him down a peg. Who knows maybe he'll be back this year.

But even if he’s not. He still has a solid jumper and he goes to the rim better than most people in this league.

I didn’t look at stats, I just sort of thought about this for awhile and realized that making Monta make less decisions was crucial this year. For the teams success and his. The way you do that is by taking the ball out of Monta’s hands as much as possible.

Aquiring DLee and DWright is a really smart way to do that.

With the D having to focus so much attention on Steph and Lee, Monta will have more room to work to get quality shots. Should make him more efficient

by myk on Jul 25, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

my bad. for some reason i lumped you in with the “if Monta is off the ball, he’ll return to 07-08” form.

Should make him more efficient
yeah, getting the ball out of his hands 1/3 less appears to help his TOV rate, which should make him more efficient. but w/o a change in shot selection (which is very abnormal according to the stat geeks), it’s hard to see how his shooting efficiency will improve unless there is some evidence that Monta is a better spot up mid range shooter and the majority of shots he took in 07-08 were spot up attempts (making the 43.9% less of a hot shooting fluke & more a result of good shot selection created by the situation of playing off the ball) vs other seasons where the majority of shots were of the pull up variety. intuitively, i would say that isn’t the case, but maybe Monta will take more 3’s.

by the evil monkey on Jul 25, 2010 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

i was just looking at his stats too

I wrote some of my conclusions at the bottom of this page. I agree with a lot of your conclusions; he needs to lower his USG rate, shoot less, etc. Hopefully he could shoot a higher FG% from midrange if he shot it fewer and chose his jumpers more judiciously. But in terms of advice I actually think he needs to shoot less 3pointers, and instead increase his ATRIM FGM% and his FT%. TS% is all about getting that extra point, and even though 3pointers are an obvious way to get that extra point, in Ellis’s case he appears to be more efficient at getting that extra point through And-1s (for lack of a better term). Of course, in a dream scenario he would be able to do both — increase his interior conversion rate/FT% and his 3pt%. But if I had to choose between the two I’d prefer the former, just because we still have a lot of good 3pt shooters (hopefully DWright is as good as they say) and because it’s more in line with his tradtiional shot selection

Goal: 8 seed!

by dso on Jul 25, 2010 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

nice highlights

Looked good in the highlights but I nevver saw Monta pass once !!! I am looking forward to Monta and Steph !

Dr. Jeff

by JEFFSJAZZ on Jul 25, 2010 5:43 AM PDT reply actions  

Yeah well with DLee and Curry, Monta isn't supposed to pass all that much.

His role is now to just get open and score. Get open and look for Curry, DWright, or Lee to find him. These offseason moves have allowed Monta to be our 3rd wheel like he was in 07-08. Smart decision

by myk on Jul 25, 2010 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

just watched the video

someone that short with that short of arms shouldn’t get as many layups as he does.

Interesting stat: At-Rim field goals made for guards only:

1. Tyreke Evans, 5 per game
2. Dwayne Wade, 4.9 per game
3. Monta Ellis, 4.0 per game.

Goal: 8 seed!

by dso on Jul 25, 2010 6:19 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Interesting stat: At-Rim field goals made for guards only:

1. Tyreke Evans, 5 per game
2. Dwayne Wade, 4.9 per game
3. Monta Ellis, 4.0 per game.

Too bad it doesn’t tell us how well they converted on their shot attempts.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 25, 2010 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

This kinda kills the theory that he doesn't go to the rim as much anymore

And the %‘s below shows that he still one of the better finishers at the rim which some have said he isn’t. Rec’d

This is my sig, what do I do with it?

by dubzfan on Jul 25, 2010 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Look up something once in awhile.

61% at the rim is nothing special.
I believe the average is 60% at the rim for the league.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 25, 2010 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well

he gets to the rim A LOT LESS compared to himself in the past. That’s what people mean- he takes a lot more bad jumpers than he used to.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 25, 2010 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

you mean in relation to his FGA totals

he still goes to the rim the same amount, (6.0 2008 vs 6.6 2010) he just also shoots a lot more jumpers as well.

Goal: 8 seed!

by dso on Jul 25, 2010 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

He gets to the rim at the same volume

only because he handles the ball so much more. Look at his FGA at rim ratio to then and now, and they aren’t close.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 25, 2010 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Monta Ellis is the Randy Moss of the NBA

By this I mean the unselfish non quitter Randy Moss!
he doesn’t do enough things well – but what he does well he does better than most. As a result, defenses have to plan around stopping him which opens things up for other players – especially if they are as good as Steph and Lee.
The problems with Monta’s game imo are as follows:
1. too small to guard some 2s
2. gets tunnel vision at times and forgets to involve other teamates
3. turns ball over too much
4. isn’t efficient as a scorer

3 out of 4 of these all seem likely to improve next season because (in order)
1. this may not change much, hopefully having Reggie working on his Defense and having Wright will help us in this area on the wings
2. having teammates as good as lee and curry will motivate him to not feel he has to do it all – we saw this alot last season – especially the first half (you remember that – when we all loved him?)
3. Won’t handle as much with Curry, will play off the ball like he did with Baron
4. Again, with Lee and Curry this will change, being the second or third option may mean less points but more efficiency.

I’m really excited about Monta next season. I know its easy to imagine trading him for a bigger guy, but like Randy Moss – he poses too much of a threat to other defenses to let him go for the likes of OJ Mayo

by tjmax on Jul 25, 2010 7:06 PM PDT reply actions  

4. Again, with Lee and Curry this will change, being the second or third option may mean less points but more efficiency.

I think this is possible, but I don’t think it’s 100%. It’s what I hope happens for sure. I’d like to see David Lee taking most of our shots.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 26, 2010 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yes Monta and Curry can play together IF

they use the distraction/attraction ball movement it requires unselfish play however
depending on the team we match up against one of them who can draw a double against there matchup eats the double “distraction” thus leaving one of them open “attraction” You do this up the court and add in the forwards and center into the equation and our speed will be killer up the court and someone will always be open to cut to the hoop. Let’s try it Nellie, jacking up shots all day ain’t going to get it done baby.

by Marksman43 on Jul 26, 2010 1:33 PM PDT reply actions  

Just want to thank you, CurryandMonta for citing my video as your source!!

Seriously, it took me an entire month to create the tribute and I’m sooo flattered by the outpouring of support it’s gotten up to this point. Ellis will improve next season and I will document it with an even BETTER video next Summer.
- Christien23

by Krazee max on Jul 26, 2010 3:08 PM PDT reply actions  

Haha. Somehow this thread wouldn’t have been complete without a cameo by the Krazee one.

Can you remind us again when Monta will fulfill his promise as the second coming of Jordan? ;-)

Also: can your next video showcase some rebounding and passing, assuming he does some of it this year?

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jul 26, 2010 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Also: can your next video showcase some rebounding and passing, assuming he does some of it this year?

You forgot about defense too.

"We didn't win our independence from the British to watch Aaron Rowand hit this bad,"-KNBR caller.

by GovernorStephCurry on Jul 26, 2010 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Give him a chance this year

If he doesnt fall in line behind Curry and get more effecient at scoring, then…
trade him for value.
There, 3 lines to sum up pages and pages of bickering :)

by WestCoastWarrior on Jul 27, 2010 9:25 AM PDT reply actions  

sigh...another Monta bromance post.

He’s clearly all about Monta and not about the team. Name 3 instances where he’s shown leadership and making his team better? Yeah, they had a sh!tty season, but that doesn’t give you the green light to be Mr. Selfish on the court! I’m not a Monta hater, but I know he’s not a franchise player the way he’s been since joining the league. Yeah, he can score in bushels and get to the bucket at will, but what about making your team better? Lacob has already indicated in big red letters during his KNBR interview that Monta isn’t who they plan on building around. Steph and D Lee have been anointed as the 2 stars they want to build a championship team around.
I’ve been a big proponent on trading away Monta while his stock is still high and get that 3rd big piece in there that will lead us to the promise land deep into the playoffs.
I’m sorry to say Monta is not the answer. Bring on Granger!!!

We Believe!!!

by crossphaded on Jul 29, 2010 4:37 PM PDT reply actions  

Totally disagree...

I dont think many people are saying to keep Monta BECAUSE he’s THE franchise player.

So your attempt to shoot down the validity of keeping Monta Ellis fails, because your whole arguement seems to center around Monta being THE leader and franchise player to build the team around (which is not the case).
Monta was TRYING to be the leader and decision maker last year and we all learned that he is no good at that role. But he is good at scoring, especially when someone else decides when and where.
Guys can be HUGE contributers without being the decision maker, leader, or franchise player on a team.
There are so many examples but look at Artest for the Lakers last year for example. Not the decision maker, and not the team leader, but an addition which may have landed them a Championship. (Look what JRich did for Pheonix last year)

The reason to keep Monta is that he is a scoring machine. During our WE Believe year Baron made the decisions and was the leader, and scorers like Jackson, Monta, and Harrington were successful. After Baron left, making those guys the leaders and decision makers was a disaster.

But with a great sigh of relief we are past that now. With Lee and Curry the clear leaders and decision makers, it’s ABSOLUTELY worth seeing how Monta fits in with them. He may not be the right piece, but we wont know until we allow him a chance to be that piece. Heck, his stock could even go higher playing winning ball with these two, and we may be able to trade him for even more value than we can now.

by WestCoastWarrior on Jul 30, 2010 2:55 PM PDT reply actions  

The reason I mostly want to trade him is that

even if his scoring gets back to 08 form, his defense will always be below average

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Jul 30, 2010 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Monta was TRYING to be the leader and decision maker last year and we all learned that he is no good at that role.

I fear that we did not all learn that. It seems some fans are willing to post that he had to be a ball-hog and the idiotic approach he was taking to his shot selection was somehow the reasonable thing to do. I fear that the person who most needs to learn that he was not good as a leader and decision maker is Monta Ellis. If he hasn’t learned this (and that his game stayed the same all year long suggests that he hasn’t) it doesn’t matter what the rest of us have learned.

But he is good at scoring, especially when someone else decides when and where.

More accurately, he’s good at scoring when someone else decides when and where. When left to his own, he scores more points, but not in a way that’s helpful to the team because he takes more points away from teammates than he can produce with those poor decisions. When a top decision maker handles the ball most of the time and the team can effectively use its defense to generate early offense attacks for Monta, few guards are more successful.

by jae on Jul 31, 2010 8:45 AM PDT reply actions  

+1
When a top decision maker handles the ball most of the time and the team can effectively use its defense to generate early offense attacks for Monta, few guards are more successful.

Very true. Monta was very good with Baron there to guide him on offense, and that scrambling gambling defense to create turnovers. Monta really had that killer instinct on offense back then. There was no hesitation. When the other team turned the ball over or missed a shot he was instantly streaking down the court looking back for a pass that came his way more times than not. Now he comes back for the ball and has to collect himself and figure out what play is coming, and that role just doesn’t work for him. Even with Curry coming into his own as a PG as the season moved on, Monta was still calling for the ball in the backcourt and bringing it up himself far too often.

I would love to see Monta back in attack mode. Leave the thinking up to Curry, and let the team help to create his opportunities. Run, slash, drive, and when the defense is on their heels and pulling back in the paint use the mid-range jumper. He was so good in that role. There’s two very big questions hanging out there though. Is Monta willing/able to accept that role again? Is Curry a good enough PG to be that ‘top decision maker’? I’m still open to the idea that a Curry/Ellis backcourt could work, but I’m not holding my breath. I would love to see the old Monta again though. He was such an exciting part of those teams.

Golden State Warriors '10-'11 Season: The Return of ^^^^

by olympicmike on Aug 1, 2010 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

You guys sound like cranky Cavs fans

Why r yall hatin on Monte, he has been playing with almost no bench last year, no rest, playing 48mins a game and you expect him to be a leader when we had baron and stephen jackson for that. He is barely stepping up for that responsibility.
He is getting all the blame for almost everything here.
He is a SG not a PG, that is why things didn’t go well last year…

He took at least 25 plus shots last season bcs there wasn’t that many options for this warriors team. Trust me i watched almost every game last year.

by macdreboi on Aug 1, 2010 7:19 PM PDT reply actions  

I guess we're "hating" on him because he was really bad last season
Trust me i watched almost every game last year.

Hey, I’d imagine that’s true for just about everyone here. You’re not telling us anything we haven’t heard before.

Pro-Skub for life

by Reverend_Randy on Aug 2, 2010 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ringnovember1981_small
Klay Thompson, a bust?
Small
Why Steph Curry is the Warriors most important player, and why they should heavily consider trading him
Warriors2_medium_small
Tom Abdenour... Where is he now?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Lessons Learned from the Linsanity
Small
A little off topic: does GOM sell t-shirts?
Small
Warriors @ Nuggets Preview
Monta_small
Warrior Wonder Standings (December/January)
Angel_beats__logo_small
Looking at the Late-Game playcalls
Ringnovember1981_small
Should Andris Biedrins be sent to the D-League?
Angel_beats__logo_small
An Alternative Explanation to why the Warriors let Lin, Williams and Bell go
Small
Now's the time to trade Curry to Charlotte

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

Natehead_small Nate Parham

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

600px-olympic_rings_square olympicmike

Small IQofaWarrior

Shutterstock_10276351_basketball_mind_small Evanz

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Small jae

Gsom_tony_small Tony.psd

Kanji_love_small Sleepy Freud

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Drmlg_logo-gmail_small Poor Man's Commish

Nellie2_small Feltbot