SB Nation Bay Area Editor's Pick
Some GSW Win Estimates
Jeremy Britton's WoW article that predicted 50+ wins for the Warriors via WP48 (actually 57.6 wins, to be exact) got a lot of play around here. I think those numbers are inflated, because WP48 fails to account for a player's influence on his team's defense. If a team gives up 110 points per 48 minutes with a certain guy on the floor, and 100 points per 48 minutes when he sits, I think it's fair to ding his defensive numbers. You can't do so perfectly, of course -- there's a lot of noise in these numbers -- but an imperfect adjustment strikes me as a better solution than no adjustment at all. So for funsies, I figured I'd do some rough estimates of the Warriors' '10-'11 win total using a couple other metrics that make those defensive adjustments.
Methodology
I estimated the minutes allocation thusly...
PG: Stephen Curry (36), Charlie Bell (12)
SG: Monta Ellis (36), Reggie Williams (12)
SF: Dorell Wright (30), Reggie Williams (18)
PF: David Lee (30), Brandan Wright (18)
C: Andris Biedrins (30), David Lee (6), Dan Gadzuric (12)
...and then factored in each guy's '09-'10 results via Basketball Prospectus's Win Percentage, Basketball Reference's Win Shares, and Basketball Value's Adjusted Plus-Minus. (In the case of Brandan Wright, I used his '08-'09 numbers.) I go into the gory details here, for those (few to zero) who are curious.
Results
By Win Percentage, the above lineup would total 42.5 wins.
By Win Shares, the above lineup would total 40.5 wins.
By Adjusted Plus-Minus, the above lineup would total 38.6 wins.
All three metrics peg a healthy Warriors team right around .500.
In What Ways Might These Estimates Be Pessimistic?
Lee might be a more effective player alongside a center. Several players -- Curry, Biedrins, maybe Monta -- seem like good bets to play better. Other players -- Lin, Udoh, Amundson, someone else -- could factor into the rotation and remove weak links Bell and Gadzuric. With good coaching, the defensive weaknesses of guys like Curry and Monta might be reduced.
In What Ways Might These Estimates Be Optimistic?
A couple guys -- Reggie and Brandan Wright spring to mind -- might not perform as well as their early career numbers suggested they would. Nellie (or whoever) might resort to more smallball than the above lineup accounts for. Other players -- Lin, Udoh, someone else -- could factor into the rotation and stink. Most importantly, the Warriors' top seven will not play nearly as many total minutes as these estimates suggest... we are not likely to get 82 games of work from Curry and Monta and Lee and Biedrins and Reggie and both Wrights. And as things stand, any missed time by a top-seven guy will result in increased minutes for a pretty bad player.
Conclusion
Well, "conclusion" is a strong word... this is just a fun silly exercise. But to me, 40 wins sounds like a more reasonable estimate of the Warriors' potential than 50+, and injury issues would make even 40 wins a tall order. This is a bad defensive roster, a far worse one than WP48 can account for, as most of the guys who had a positive impact on team defensive performance last year -- Turiaf, CJ, Morrow, Tolliver -- are now gone. The offense will be good, but terrible defense and a terrible bench is a tough combo to overcome. I think the Warriors will be a good bit better. I still don't think they'll reach .500 this season.
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
75 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
team chemistry
i think if our teams chemistry becomes solid then we could play .500 ball. i can see our starting 5 get some serious chemistry going. they have never all played together before. it will be interesting to see it..
actually i think better than 500 ball this year
i think if we do get good team chemistry and create a bunch of nice designed plays that will exploit other teams and score clutch points when needed we will be in the upper 40’s maybe low 50’s and take it to the second round of the playoffs. i think we will have some injuries which could lower my numbers but nothing like we had last year..
So thinking about this a little bit, if you were to go through each team and create a projection like this for it, would the average team win more than 41 games in the projection beause of the unrealistic expectation of all key contributors playing so many more minutes than they will?
Yep — it’d create an unrealistically rosy situation for everyone. Shallower teams like the Dubs would probably get a bigger boost than deeper teams, though, because injuries will produce a bigger dropoff in production for a team like this one.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
D: at least as good as last year
Certainly, we’ll miss Turiaf. But I’m not sure I’d put Morrow, CJ and Tolliver down as defensive players.
At first glance, I’d say defense is improved if all stay healthy.
- An improved and stronger Curry with some Charlie Bell minutes should be better than the average PG D last year.
- Monta and Reggie I’d expect about the same from. I hope for better with Monta refocusing his efforts toward SG and Reggie having some experience under his belt.
- Wright should be a huge improvement over whatever wings we were throwing into the mix at 3 last year. If we sign George, he will bring a few minutes of good D every night.
- Lee minutes should be better than Maggette / Tolliver minutes. I thought Randolph showed some good D last year but his inconsistency (and lack of rebounding) makes his minutes compared to Lee’s a toss-up. Wright might be weak defensively. Overall, I think we’ll see an upgrade at the 4 if Nellie plays big ball.
- A healthy Biedrins backed up by Amundson is likely better defensively than the injured Andris, injured Turiaf, injured Hunter mix.
Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
and lack of rebounding
Except he was a top 25 rebounder in the NBA
" Only build on positives , don't stack the negatives...Instead of criticizing , what was a positive?" - Donavin Darius
"There is nothing like a wise phrase or quote to help convince others that your decision makes sense." - Anon
you're right
I take that back. I was thinking he could and will do better in that dept this year. But he WAS pretty good last year.
Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
Around 48 wins if healthy
All-star level PG
All-star level PF
Solid Scoring SG
C = consistent double/double starter but he’s coming off injury year & we don’t have lots of depth @ this position. However, most team in NBA are looking for big man talent.
SF = Solid defender & has athleticism to take advantage of Warriors uptempo game.
===
If Monta/Curry can play well together the Warriors will have one of the most explosive guard combinations in the league. Also two double/double guys in the front court.
I consider
Monta an All-Star level SG
Golden State Warriors Fan 4 Life!!!
Owner: Joe Lacob, Peter Guber
GM: Kevin Prichard
Coach: Brian Shaw
Over 1,000 wins online with GSW in 2K10
..............SC30..............
by GSW9 on Aug 24, 2010 5:55 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Overrating him
I wouldn’t even call Curry an all-star level PG, at least not yet.
Sick of fighting with my computer
by Reverend_Randy on Aug 24, 2010 6:41 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Curry might never be an all-star level PG as long as Paul and Deron stay in the West.
by Missing Barry on Aug 24, 2010 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah
maybe after Kobe and Nash retire he’ll have a shot, especially if his stats get huge.
Sick of fighting with my computer
by Reverend_Randy on Aug 24, 2010 8:07 PM PDT up reply actions
onlxn
Nice work. Without knowing anything about how you came up with these numbers, 42 wins sounds optimistically right.
Thank you for including the links. I bookmarked all of them, including your detailed blog post, for future perusal. While the gist of this FanPost makes sense to me, I’m confused how you came up with these numbers:
[I] factored in each guy’s ‘09-’10 results via Basketball Prospectus’s Win Percentage, Basketball Reference’s Win Shares, and Basketball Value’s Adjusted Plus-Minus
What results are you referring to exactly? I skimmed through Basketball Prospectus, for example, and couldn’t find any sort of formula that allowed you to come up with 42.5 wins as stated above.
I refer to your blog post where you state “if we weight each player’s ‘09-’10 results by their playing time, we ought to be able to get a reasonable estimate of the win total each system would predict” and want to know what math you are referring to.
I understand you left all of that out for simplicity’s sake, but it’d be nice to see how it all works. Am I off in asking this?
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
Ode to Tim Kawakami
To clarify
couldn’t find any sort of formula that allowed you to come up with 42.5 wins as stated above.
I know that Weighted Total Win %: .518 × 82 resulted in 42.5 predicted wins. But, where did .518 come from? It’s not the average of all the players’ listed winning percentages. And how was the players’ winning percentages calculated if you weighted each player by estimated minutes played?
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
Ode to Tim Kawakami
by Doctor Kajita on Aug 24, 2010 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions
No, it’s a fair question, and I apologize for not walking through my methodology more clearly.
In a regulation NBA game, there are a total of 240 player-minutes per team… 48 minutes at each of the five slots. If Stephen Curry plays 36 minutes, he accounts for 15% of the total player-minutes… ditto Monta and Lee, and so on down the line. So the aggregate team Win Percentage would be (.15 x Curry’s Win %) + (.15 x Monta’s Win %) + (.15 x Lee’s Win %) + (.125 x Biedrins’s Win %) + etc etc.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
it’s a fair question, and I apologize for not walking through my methodology more clearly.
How do you adjust the win% results their old team to reflect the future win% with a new group of players?
Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Aug 24, 2010 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions
I didn’t… this is just a rough, cocktail-napkin-style guesstimate, and I’m not sure how you’d go about doing that, anyway. Win Percentages are primarily based on a guy’s individual production, so in most cases a team change shouldn’t affect their numbers all that much.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
Win Percentages are primarily based on a guy’s individual production, so in most cases a team change shouldn’t affect their numbers all that much.
I guess it depends on how similar their new team is to their old team. I can see guys playing whole different positions or different roles depending on their team mates and coach.
Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Aug 24, 2010 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Thanks for clarifying. A lot to digest for this noob (me).
Confident Marco Belinelli supporter
Ode to Tim Kawakami
by Doctor Kajita on Aug 24, 2010 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions
Rec
Nice post. I think that’s about as well as you could do estimating the success of this team somewhat scientifically. The problem I have with this and any other attempt to do this kind of analysis for this particular team is how many question marks there are hanging around. The biggest being will there be any major roster moves once the sale of the team is final and all restrictions on combining our expiring contracts are up (did this happen yet? I haven’t been paying that close of attention lately)? Shortly after that you have the question of who will be coaching the team, and how that coach will choose to allocate minutes.
Also the things you mention in your article could be pretty big factors, like the expected production of Andris, Monta, Curry, Lee etc. There are more than a couple guys that will likely have a significant shift in their production, and a few more that could have less pronounced shifts.
I think all of that, combined with injuries make any predictions pretty tricky. Having said all that, I’d say you did a pretty good job. Personally I can see this team finishing anywhere from the low 30s (if we have similar struggles and injuries as we have had recently) all the way up to 48 or so if everything clicks and we make one or two moves to fill some holes. So yeah, IMO high thirties or low forties is probably a pretty smart prediction.
Golden State Warriors '10-'11 Season: The Return of ^^^^
Personally I can see this team finishing anywhere from the low 30s (if we have similar struggles and injuries as we have had recently) all the way up to 48 or so if everything clicks and we make one or two moves to fill some holes. So yeah, IMO high thirties or low forties is probably a pretty smart prediction.
Sums up my thoughts well.
by Missing Barry on Aug 24, 2010 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions
The problem I have with this and any other attempt to do this kind of analysis for this particular team is how many question marks there are hanging around.
Totally agree. This far before the season, with a roster and franchise in this much flux, there’s no actual way to predict anything. There are scenarios (great new coach and a 2004-Baron-style trade acquisition) where I can see 50+ wins… there are scenarios (Nellie, drama, lots of injuries) where I can see a record every bit as bad as last year’s. These predictions are for entertainment purposes only.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
These predictions are for entertainment purposes only.
So this isn’t your stone cold lock of the week? I already put money down… ;-)
Seriously though, I’m not a gambler, but if the mainstream sports media is a reflection of what the odds-makers might think about this team then the over might be a good bet. Of course who wants to wait all season to collect your money. Is there an early line anywhere for W’s wins?
Golden State Warriors '10-'11 Season: The Return of ^^^^
Betting lines have relatively nothing to do with what odds-makers think will happen and everything to do with trying to get half the betting money to go on one side, the other half to bet the other side. Opening lines are attempts to find something psychologically reasonable that encourages equal betting and lines move when one side receives too much money to try to balance. Bookmakers make money with the house’s cut.
Good formulas (or at least the ones I track) outperform Vegas lines (especially the late line, once people start betting with their hearts) to a reasonable tune of anywhere from 5-10% over random chance for season win totals. That’s very, very significant, but at the lower end of that, it’s not a particularly good investment. Betting in Sept to collect in March and making 5% on your money? Right now that’s better than an FDIC account, but it’s rarely better than dumping your money in a managed mutual account. It’s tough to make a living on it, even if it winds up being reasonably safe money.
There’s other ways to play it without a formula, simply looking at the psychology of bettors. They’re a dumb lot for the most part who even when they think they’re being ‘smart’ use heart and emotion. Knowing this, knowing who bets and which way the line is likely to move based on these sorts of things it’s possible to do reasonably well simply by countering the larger number of bettors who let emotion make choices for them. Unfortunately, internet betting has changed many of the predictable patterns so this margin seems to be decreasing. And it’s a marginal return in the neighborhood of 5% over chance. Many ‘systems’ claim to outperform this and they do, short term, but over the long haul, most perform no better than random chance.
Betting in Sept to collect in March and making 5% on your money? Right now that’s better than an FDIC account, but it’s rarely better than dumping your money in a managed mutual account.
And that’s not even factoring the house cut, taxes, etc. The tax system is setup to encourage investment by low taxes on capital gains (15%) and against gambling, which are treated as normal taxable income. So… yeah, unless you’re really, really good at picking winners (nobody is, some have just been lucky for a long, long time), you’re not going to make any money betting on sports.
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Aug 25, 2010 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions
trying to get half the betting money to go on one side
which is why Vegas takes Southern Episcopalian Prep vs. Alabama off the board, because you can’t set a line that is simultaneously large enough to attract interest in the underdog and reasonable enough for people to bet on ’Bama.
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
Monta could be better, Amundson could take Gadzuric’s minutes, Lee’s defense at the 4 will be better, Curry will be better, Biedrins will be better, Wright could be better, Wright could be better….honestly you can’t really account for these things in your numbers, so i would say 42-47 is my estimate.
"Everybody loves Basketball-Reference.com. Except the Kobe fans".- DubsFan408
by GovernorStephCurry on Aug 24, 2010 3:28 PM PDT reply actions
And some guys could be worse and/or get hurt, too. Can’t just look at the room for upside without also looking at the downside risk!
by Missing Barry on Aug 24, 2010 7:46 PM PDT up reply actions
I just can't think anything can go worse than last season in terms of play (Monta) or injuries (Biedrins).
"Everybody loves Basketball-Reference.com. Except the Kobe fans".- DubsFan408
by GovernorStephCurry on Aug 24, 2010 8:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Really?
You had to play the “It couldn’t get any worse” card? Really. Thanks. If Curry’s knee explodes in preseason, I’m blaming you.
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Aug 25, 2010 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions
The biggest question marks:
1. Is Andris Biedrins among the top third of NBA centers, as his performance in 2007-2008 indicated?
2. Is Brandan Wright good enough to warrant the lion’s share of backup minutes, and be a force against other team’s reserves?
3. Do we sign Amundson (or some other good defensive/rebounding big)?
It all comes down the frontcourt, folks. If we are at least competitive there in terms of defense and rebounding, and the backcourt remains roughly equal, there is no real way we won’t be markedly (20+ wins) better.
Sittin in my scraper watchin Oakland goin wild, ta-dow!
Accurately Imprecise
Nice post, but there is too much uncertainty for this to be a reliable methodology. I do applaud your attempt to go by more than gut feelings, and I tend to agree with the optimistic 40 win prediction.
That said, stats may help in predicting a players performance. But there are just too many unknowns (on the individual as well as team level)
Not saying that I have any better system though, just casting stones around
Remember:
A Warriors fan with low expectations is a happy Warriors fan
Uncertainty doesn’t make a methodology unreliable. It just means there are large error bars. Not necessarily a problem – just might not tell you as much/be as certain as you hoped.
by Missing Barry on Aug 24, 2010 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Large error bars
thats exactly my point!
let’s say we are looking at a range of +/-10 wins.
Puts the results at somewhere between 30-50 wins…that’s not really any new information
Remember:
A Warriors fan with low expectations is a happy Warriors fan
by Duby Dub Dubs on Aug 27, 2010 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions
“30 wins would be new for the team we’ve seen out there these last two years.”
The team we’ve seen out there two years ago no longer exists. So what’s your point?
by WestCoastWarrior on Sep 3, 2010 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions
I think the key is staying healthy
With Curry/Ellis/Wright/Lee/Andris we have a very solid, potentially great starting 5 as well as good player in Brandan, Reggie and possibibly Lin. With Dorell Wright and David Lee plus Andris coming back to form hopefully, our biggest weakness is now probably a strength as far as rebounding goes. Lee and Biedrins could possibibly both average 10+ rebounds and Dorell Wright rebounds at a high rate. Then Curry is a good rebounder for a point guard so I think our rebounding should be solid at worst. I think with a very good front court our backcourt of Curry and Ellis will be able to play even better than last year. Curry should have a great 2nd season and hopefully Monta can defer some I think we may have a chance at the playoffs. But if I had to give an honest guess I would say anywhere between 39-43 wins. If we get alot from our bench we could really contend for the playoffs but we really only have about 2 guys who are any good and 1 in Brandan Wright has to prove he can stay healthy
Golden State Warriors Fan 4 Life!!!
Owner: Joe Lacob, Peter Guber
GM: Kevin Prichard
Coach: Brian Shaw
Over 1,000 wins online with GSW in 2K10
..............SC30..............
I don't see us getting past 36 wins.
We have an uninspired coach, and a somewhat shallow roster. David Lee was an All-Star last year, but that was after injuries and other things kept other players from participating. Nowhere in our top 8 rotation do we have a legitimately above average defender. Not even talking about great. Just above average. Wright has never seen consistent minutes on an NBA team, so he’s not a proven defensive commodity. Biedrins does work on the defensive end, put he’s not a particularly good post defender. Curry is a question mark, and probably improved, but I wouldn’t bet on above average. Lee and Monta have nice steal numbers, but I think we all know they are below average defenders. I really don’t know much about Reggie’s defense, and Brandon has never been healthy enough to be a good defensive player. I’d say Bell and Gadzuric are perfectly average defenders, and we can’t really know anything about Lin or Udoh’s defense yet. We’ll be decent offensively, and do an okay job rebounding, but our defense is going to be terrible, and there’s no overcoming that. Too many good teams in the West also. We’ll finish pretty low.
Is Don Nelson going to Hawaii forever now?
Wright has never seen consistent minutes on an NBA team, so he’s not a proven defensive commodity.
No, but when he plays he’s an above average defender. Minutes played seems like a weird stat to rate a players defense on.
Biedrins does work on the defensive end, put he’s not a particularly good post defender.
Biedrins is pretty average-y on defense, maybe above average.
Brandon has never been healthy enough to be a good defensive player
When healthy, Greg Oden is a good defensive player. He, like Brandan Wright, is rarely healthy. They aren’t any less good when they’re healthy because of their injury proneness. When healthy, he is a weak man defender, but a strong shotblocker.
Sick of fighting with my computer
by Reverend_Randy on Aug 24, 2010 7:19 PM PDT up reply actions
This isn't something that he's proven consistently.
His rookie season, he didn’t get enough minutes to show he can come in and play defense on good offensive players. His sophomore season wasn’t much better. He didn’t play AT ALL last season. We have NO IDEA what we’re going to get from him.
Is Don Nelson going to Hawaii forever now?
We have a very good idea of what he is when healthy (dominant).
"Everybody loves Basketball-Reference.com. Except the Kobe fans".- DubsFan408
by GovernorStephCurry on Aug 28, 2010 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions
Brandon Wright...
is not dominant. Period. What kinda drugs have you been taking?
Pick either definition:
1. Exercising the most influence or control.
2. Most prominent, as in position; ascendant.
Just no.
Is Don Nelson going to Hawaii forever now?
Disagree. Agree on our defensive weakness, and it is probably going to be what prevents us from making the playoffs, but we should be a real strong offensive team with good rebounding. That’s a good combo. Just look at what we did last year – as horrible as we were, we still had the point differential of a 32 win team despite a historically bad performance on the board. We’re better offensively. We’re better defensively. We’re likely to have a better injury situation. Most importantly, we’ve made a HUGE upgrade on the boards. Absolutely enormous. I don’t see it being difficult at all to get past 36 wins, and could see quite a bit more than that if things go well.
by Missing Barry on Aug 24, 2010 7:50 PM PDT up reply actions
We’re better offensively.
I gotta say — and this isn’t based on the exercise above, just on my gut — I’m not totally sold on this.
David Lee is an excellent offensive player, and will help us a lot. Having said that, on a strictly offensive level, Corey Maggette was a pretty damn good player, too, scoring both more often and more efficiently than Lee. Maggette also created beneficial teamwide effects, increasing the number of free throws everybody shot. Maggette shot 9.5 free throws per 36 last year… Lee shot 3.9.
Don’t get me wrong: Lee is the better offensive player. He’s a better offensive rebounder (although, in his new jumper-heavy phase, not by as much as you’d think) and a vastly better passer, and Maggette’s not likely to equal last year’s numbers again; moreover, Lee plays many more minutes. If we’d simply swapped Maggette for Lee, our offense would be significantly ahead of last year’s. And the addition of Dorell Wright, a really polished complementary guy, helps even more. The starting lineup looks pretty solid offensively, even if Monta keeps gunnin’.
But the Warriors made some other swaps, too. As things stand, Ronny Turiaf and Anthony Randolph’s minutes will be taken by Dan Gadzuric and TBA… C.J. Watson and Anthony Morrow’s minutes will be taken by Jeremy Lin, Charlie Bell and TBA. Those are brutally bad downgrades on the offensive end. If we rank all the players the Warriors either added or subtracted by Basketball Reference’s Offensive Rating, we get a list that looks like this — newcomers in bold:
1. David Lee, 116
1. Corey Maggette, 116
3. Dorell Wright, 114
3. Kelenna Azubuike, 114 (<— his ‘08-’09 Rating, as last year’s number was fluky high)
5. Anthony Morrow, 113
6. C.J. Watson, 112
7. Anthony Tolliver, 111
8. Ronny Turiaf, 110
9. Anthony Randolph, 106
10. Charlie Bell, 100
11. Dan Gadzuric, 96
- Jeremy Lin, ???
Offensive Rating’s a sorta wonky stat, but you get the basic idea: Bell and Gadzuric are miles worse on offense than all the guys we lost. We don’t know about Lin, but he’s not likely to be as much of an offensive asset as CJ. (And if anyone’s curious, Jannero Pargo had a mind-bogglingly horrible Offensive Rating of 89.)
The offense certainly could be better — if our bigs stay healthy, Curry and Lee develop chemistry and Monta reins it in a little, we could have one of the better offenses in the league. But the bench is really, really, really bad past Reggie and Brandan, and in a post-Maggette world, there won’t be quite as many free throws to go around. We had the 14th-best offense in the league last season… unless we scrounge up some bench help, I’m not sure we’re gonna do much better than that.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
If we get Amundson, will this make you feel better?
"Everybody loves Basketball-Reference.com. Except the Kobe fans".- DubsFan408
by GovernorStephCurry on Aug 24, 2010 9:59 PM PDT up reply actions
It will help a good bit, but the backcourt bench is still looking mighty ugly.
Not to beat a dead horse, but I really, really, really don’t get why the front office decided not to match the Bulls’ offer for CJ. $7 million over two years is nothing for a solid third guard. He’s not a star, but he was an underrated and steady hand. We will miss that guy badly.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
We will miss that guy badly.
We already do .
Lights please, lights please, turn off the lights.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Aug 24, 2010 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions
if Lin turns out to be a good passer than i will have no problem with losing CJ.
by PIRATEWARRIOR on Aug 24, 2010 11:28 PM PDT up reply actions
im a bit cared the warriors are trying to straddle both sides of the fence with their manuevers (again): be successful now by getting Lee; build for the future by preserving cap space. Not re-signing Watson and Morrow fall in the latter philosophy. I wish they’d just aggressively approach just one of those philosophies, not try to do both. If they really wanted to make the playoffs next year, I think they keep Watson and Morrow, not roll the dice with unknowns.
Goal: 8 seed!
I completely agree with this: if you’re going to pay a lot for David Lee, you ought to be willing to pay a little to keep a good bench unit intact. This franchise is just incapable of seeing one game plan through all the way.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
I still do think we’ll be better offensively. Better Curry, adding David Lee, healthy Biedrins + Wright, and better Monta is enough to more than offset the losses. That said, I don’t think the difference will that great – it won’t be the primary factor in our improvement.
by Missing Barry on Aug 25, 2010 7:28 AM PDT up reply actions
When you look at the minute break down at the two big man spots, you can see where the offensive improvement is going to come:
Last year, here’s the minute breakdown for bigs:
Tolliver – 1423
Turiaf – 872
Hunter – 783
Biedrins – 763
Randolph – 749
Moore – 406
That’s a total of ~61 MPG over 82 games. The 35 remaining big man minutes went to the likes of Maggette, VladRad, and George. Ignoring those 35 minutes for now, the weighted by minute offensive rating of our big men is 110.7.
This year, we’re replacing those minutes with Andris, Lee, Wright, Gadzuric, and Udoh.
Let’s assume those 61 minutes are distributed as 25 for Lee, 20 for Andris, 10 for Wright, and 6 between Gadzuric and Udoh. Using the same Offensive rating numbers onxln used and assuming Udoh’s as bad as Gadzuric on offense for now, that averages out to a weighted offensive rating of 113.4. That’s almost a 3 point improvement down low, any improvement from Biedrins back to his career average of 119. As an aside, if our bigs are more effective offensively, there’s a much higher likelihood of Nellie deigning to actually play them more than 61MPG.
At the 4 & 5, we can readily expect to see a big improvement in offensive efficiency. Not surprising because we’ll be going from Tolliver, Turiaf, Hunter, and Moore to Lee, Wright, and more Biedrins.
When you look at the guards and wings, basically Maggette’s, Morrow’s, and CJ’s minutes are going to be split between D. Wright, R. Williams, and Bell. We may suffer slightly with Bell on the floor, but not significantly. Aggregating last year’s minutes to Offensive rating gets you an average of 114. Assuming Wright and Williams each play 2500 minutes and Bell plays 1000 minutes, with the leftover 700 of Maggette’s power forward minutes getting sent to bigs, you get a drop off of 1.5 offensive rating points.
So, if everything from last year holds true, we should see a big bump in big man offensive play, a small drop in guard/wing play, and overall a small improvement. However, this does not factor in any player growth at all. Neither Monta or Biedrins can feasibly play worse than they played last year. There’s a possibility that they could play as bad, but not worse. Curry is very likely to improve. Reggie Williams may have a tough time keeping his offensive production up, but Brandan Wright is a very effective offensive player who saw zero playing time last year.
If last year’s performance levels are a baseline, we stand to improve a little. The extenuating circumstances surrounding the team and the players as I mentioned in the last paragraph suggest that more improvement is very likely.
Can we start the season already?
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Aug 25, 2010 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions
I neglected to list Brandan Wright’s rating… as you say, he’s an effective offensive player who’ll help a good bit.
I think some improvement is a reasonable expectation. A ton depends on Monta, and Nellie’s (or his replacement’s) willingness to try to rein him back in. If he’s in sync, the ball should move very nicely when the first unit’s on the floor.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
Seriously
Monta is the biggest wild card vis a vis the Warriors offensive performance. When healthy, he plays 36-40 minutes a game. When effective, he had a 117 offensive rating. When uneffective, he had an offensive rating of 99. Even if he brings his offense back up to 108 or thereabouts, it’ll have a huge impact on the Warriors’ offense as a whole. This cannot be understated. I’m confident that Biedrins will return to form barring injury. I’m confident that Lee will be quite capable on offense and that he’ll get the PT from Nellie. Monta is the question mark… and the place where we could possibly see the biggest improvement. I just hope he’s happy scoring 18-20 PPG efficiently instead of 25PPG horribly inefficiently.
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Aug 25, 2010 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Can we start the season already?
Seriously, I actually somewhat look forward to watching this team. D will still be brutal to watch, but much better without all the easy putbacks, and overall, we should be a decent squad.
by Missing Barry on Aug 25, 2010 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions
I say this team is currently a .500 team if healthy
We could be better if… Andris Biedrins rebounds to have an excellent year
Lin is way better than expected
Ellis goes back to his 2006-2007 production
We pick up Amundson to soak up some of B. Wright’s and Gadzuric’s minutes.
Udoh comes in and is better than expected.
If most of the above criteria prove true we could make the playoffs.
Wins are the last thing on my wishlist
I’d like to see the Warriors to take things slow at the start of the season and slowly come out hot at the end of the season. Wins won’t matter more than the players understanding their roles and get a feel for the team game. Even if we don’t get 30 wins, a lottery pick to add to a budding team is a lot better. If the new owners do make a trade, I feel like something’s on the cusp, make one that adds a new dynamic to the team and not one that breaks up what’s already working.
The King of the East shall move his kingdom to the West. 2010.
If everything does come back to an even keel
Battier and Caron are free agents. Either would be awesome, but I’d like to get Battier. Depending on how Yao asks for his contract, we could outbid Houston for him. Some other free agents we could consider around the 2-6 million range are Kendrick Perkins, Tayshaun, Chuck Hayes, Kelenna & Turiaf, Przybilla, and Landry.
The King of the East shall move his kingdom to the West. 2010.
I seriously doubt Perkins or Landry would be available for the 2-6 million range. Big men are expensive.
by Missing Barry on Aug 25, 2010 7:29 AM PDT up reply actions
This is true
I know Landry would easily be resigned by the Kings with their chasm of cap space next year. Perkins could only be done through some kind of trade.
The "Hot Pot" City
I am guessing what you are trying to say you just want competitiveness and you want the team focused on the guys they plan to stay with the Warriors for awhile.
This is personally how I feel about my Kings. I just want them to compete every night with the guys we plan on having for a long time.
Because talent? You want to add a guy like boozer because hes talented? I’m sorry i just don’t see that as a valid reason. -- fffindeed
by wallywagon11 on Aug 25, 2010 8:36 AM PDT up reply actions
Last year I would have bet the house...
that the team would have had more than 29 wins. Wrong.
So while I read all these comments with interest, my mind just can’t come up with a wins number. The injury to Udoh has me spooked.
Great post
To be honest, Owen, when I saw that this was posted by you, I expected some doom and gloom… Dare I say some Golden State Worrier-ing (I’ll be here all week). Yet, though I’m optimistic and you’re pessimistic about the upcoming year and offseason acquisitions, we’re both realists and recognize our optimism and pessimism for what they are: hopes and worries.
The Warriors have the potential to win more than 50 games if Curry starts banging on the door of the all star conversation, Lee is an all star, Biedrins is healthy, Nellie recognizes these things and plays reasonable line ups, and Monta accepts his second banana role and stops taking the other team one on five.
The Warriors equally have the potential to lose 50 games if Monta keeps trying to convince the world he’s the second best basketball player alive, Biedrins keeps getting injured, Nellie keeps playing smallball, Wright gets injured again, Lee can’t defend a telephone pole, and Curry doesn’t take the next step.
What’s going to happen? Something in the middle.
Can we start the season already?
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Aug 25, 2010 12:46 PM PDT reply actions
Agreed on all of this.
I will say: I don’t think there’s a scenario where Nellie smallballs all year, as I just don’t think Lacob’s going to give him a very long leash. He’ll be on thin ice if the team starts slow, and doubly so if the lineups are quirky. My guess is that Nellie will be replaced some time around Christmas, but if he’s not, it’ll probably be because he’s doing some competent and sensible coaching.
One thing I’m sure of is that this team will need some competent and sensible coaching in order to compete. There’s real talent here, but to make it gel properly, a lot of tweaks (most involving Monta’s offensive attack and team defense) will be needed. Guys need to be more disciplined about avoiding whistles, Biedrins needs to be re-involved in the offense if his head’s back on straight, Lee needs to be hidden defensively as much as possible, and the “Monta drives into three defenders” play needs to be retired for good. These things can be done, but they won’t just happen automatically. And if Nellie doesn’t show interest in making those adjustments, I don’t think the franchise will hesitate to show him the door.
Golden State Worriers: Angst & Analysis
I just don’t think Lacob’s going to give him a very long leash.
I worry that this is a fact. I worry what will happen if Lacob tries to pull on that leash. I do not forsee Nellie heeling. I see him tearing the leash to shreds and running circles around his owner until Lacob is forced to disown him.
I do wholeheartedly think that the last two years have been rather trying on Nellie. Between the Monta fiasco and the team not having a point guard two years ago to the injury fiasco this past year, as well as the Randolph issues both years. No amount of coaching was going to lead either of these two teams anywhere near the playoffs. The talent wasn’t there. Now, before the season starts and our front line goes down with injuries, the talent appears to be there, whether it manifests remains to be seen. But I’m willing not to give up on Nellie just yet because he at least has excuses for not pushing the right buttons the last two years.
Trust me, learning english isn’t a waste of time. It is actually sort of useful.
-randolphforpresident
by Dubs fan in Boston on Aug 25, 2010 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions
I also agree
that Monta needs to understand that he isn’t the only option on offense. He needs to slow things down and work that open space that Lee and Curry will give him. I don’t believe that he is the second banana, however. He is hands down the best scorer we have when he’s not over-thinking things. He will be the player that teams set their watch to (saying this with the highest optimism).
The "Hot Pot" City
over-thinking?
I think it’s quite the opposite. Last year he just shot the ball without any regard for efficiency, which indicates a shoot-first, think later or maybe-not-at-all mentality. Not over-thinking by any means. In fact, I venture to say that we are thinking more about his shooting than he is.
Lol
Now that you mention it, there is the not-thinking-at-all in his shooting, but I was talking about how he was frustrated while running an offense or when his number was called to do something with the ball. He was trying to figure out his identity and role on the fly.
The "Hot Pot" City
True how you said we got worse defensively..i don’t how’s that possible cause we were the WORST at it last season..Unless Players like Curry,Monta, Wright(s),Biedrins, Reggie,Lee our main guns start PLAYING DEFENSE. It’s possible to improve after one season.
I hope so but it’s not likely with a coach like Nelly, it’s all Run n Gun, then get gunned down 2x worse.
Especially with many teams improving..it’s gonna be really tough and we’re gonna need a lot of luck too.
Can’t wait for opening day.
7
i don’t how’s that possible cause we were the WORST at it last season
Oh, it’s definitely possible.
/points at Toronto
by Missing Barry on Aug 30, 2010 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions
great post
I’m starting to think Win Shares is a better metric, too. Amundson should push those wins up a bit, and hopefully Curry improves in his sophomore season.

by 





























