Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

Some actual basketball-related news for a change today:

A source with knowledge of the deal said Samuel Dalembert will be paid approximately $7 million in the first season and the Rockets have a team option worth approximately $7 million in the second season that includes a $1.5 million buyout if it is declined.

Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/sam_amick/12/21/sam.dalembert/index.html#ixzz1hDiOI9IN

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/sam_amick/12/21/sam.dalembert/index.html

For the same price I'd so much rather have grabbed Dalembert than Kwame Brown. He's a better player in almost every single way, and Houston has a relatively cheap buyout for next year if they find something better or it doesn't work out. Why can't our front office be creative like this?

Man...just another case of our GM(s) being outfoxed by Daryl Morey yet again....

5 months ago Shaq_ferry_tiny Lacob's Ladder 31 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Alot of GMs get outfoxed by Daryl Morey

by JustSomeName on Dec 21, 2011 4:59 PM PST reply actions  

Alot of GMs get outfoxed by Daryl Morey

Especially our GM. We are the bottom feeder.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Dec 21, 2011 6:21 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Daryl Morey

could probably convince Larry Riley to trade Steph for Thabeet

by jpees on Dec 21, 2011 5:03 PM PST reply actions  

Is Bob Myers ready yet?

The Autumn wind is a Raider
Pillaging just for fun
He'll knock you 'round and upside down
And laugh when he's conquered and won.

by duballers23 on Dec 21, 2011 5:18 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

warriors didnt want to give multiple years to a band aid

Kwame took one year. A center like dalembert isn’t looking to sign for one year

by Xtremelink on Dec 21, 2011 6:06 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Did you read the article?

Or even the quote for that matter?

He signed for two years, $14M with a Team Option on the 2nd year that has a $1.5M buyout. Much more flexibility for the team. If he’s great, $7M is a bargain. If he sucks, $1.5M isn’t much to get rid of him.

by Lacob's Ladder on Dec 21, 2011 6:10 PM PST up reply actions  

an agent wont talk to certain teams without an option.

And of course I read it. Get smart someone else.

by Xtremelink on Dec 21, 2011 6:14 PM PST via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

an agent wont talk to certain teams without an option.

And of course I read it. Get smart someone else.

by Xtremelink on Dec 21, 2011 6:14 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

That’s $8.5 million over two years, with the $1.5 million buyout not even counting towards the cap on the second year. And since Dalembert is much less likely to suck than Kwame, he’s still the better value.

by WYK on Dec 21, 2011 6:43 PM PST up reply actions  

No. It's 7 million this year.

It’s 1.5 minimum against next year’s cap.

I can’t claim to have been paying much attention to either Kwame or Dalembert last season. Over their careers, it’s cleaer Dalembert was the better player, but last year is more ambiguous: Dalembert was uncharacteristically awful with the ball in his hands (.509 TS, 2.5 TO/36) while Kwame had one of his better years (.550TS%, 1.4 TO/36). Dalembert was the better rebounder and shot blocker and better according to +/-.

I think Dalembert is probably a better deal … unless that $1.5m against next year’s cap puts you in a position where you can’t make a move you want to make. But the difference is small and not worth fretting over. They’ve both mediocre centers.

by Ronaldinho on Dec 21, 2011 9:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes.

Think about it.

If not, then you would never need an amnesty. You could just tell a player like Charlie Bell, “We’re buying you out for the price of your contact.” Pay him every dollar owed and magically it’s no longer on the cap.

by Ronaldinho on Dec 22, 2011 11:12 AM PST up reply actions  

Sure, but in your example, that isn’t a contractually agreed-upon buyout. You’re just choosing to get rid of a players salary in a contract that you acquired.

I’m wondering if it being written in the contract (just between the organization and player) makes it different. They’re just dangling a carrot for Sam to take a short deal: like, “hey, if we don’t pick up your option next year, we’ll give you $1.5M as a consolation.” Since they would be declining their option, I’m not sure why the buyout would have anything to do with the cap.

by Lacob's Ladder on Dec 22, 2011 12:26 PM PST up reply actions  

In essence, they aren’t buying out that second year at all. They’re just awarding him with $1.5M if they don’t pick up that second year at all. I can’t tell if I’m conveying my point adequately. Is my logic making sense? :)

by Lacob's Ladder on Dec 22, 2011 12:28 PM PST up reply actions  

whew

i’m SOOOOOO glad he’s not back in Sac…he an’t much, but thatd give em too much depth…helps us a lot….whew…SOOOOO glad!

by B Freedman on Dec 22, 2011 12:31 AM PST reply actions  

He wouldn't have gone for 8.5M this year and a team option of 7M next year?

So horrible that we signed Kwame when Sam was still available.

http://nbawarriors.wordpress.com/

by Brownie13 on Dec 22, 2011 12:52 AM PST up reply actions  

Um.... Dalembert is pretty much same level player

There is almost noi difference in quality.

Neither have any offensive game, last year KWame was more efficient. Career wise it’s been Dalembert.

Kwame is a better post defender. Dalembert is a better help defender. We have enough help defenders.

It’s not like we’re talking Chandler and Kwame. It’s Kwame Dalembert. I actually think Kwame fits our needs more.

by tafkasam on Dec 22, 2011 7:21 AM PST reply actions  

Remember...

There is no guarantee that Dalembert wanted to sign with us. In fact there is no sign whatsoever that he wanted to play here. From the sound of it he might have taken less to sign with Houston because he wasn’t happy with the situation in Sacramento.

by olympicmike on Dec 22, 2011 3:20 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

Natehead_small Nate Parham

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

600px-olympic_rings_square olympicmike

Small IQofaWarrior

Shutterstock_10276351_basketball_mind_small Evanz

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Small jae

Gsom_tony_small Tony.psd

Kanji_love_small Sleepy Freud

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Drmlg_logo-gmail_small Poor Man's Commish

Nellie2_small Feltbot