Couldn't the Warriors buy out Bell instead of using the amnesty clause on him like they did with Troy Murphy? Or with the new CBA is that against the rules until after we use our amnesty clause. I do not know why Tim Kawakami and Matt Steinmetz have not brought up this point. I am aware Bell has to agree with the buyout and will probably not accept a penny less. If we buyout his contract is it used towards our cap??
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!