Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

This part kind of scares me...
"I’m tired of missing games. I said I was going to wait, but I didn’t say how long I was going to wait."

4 months ago Warriors_arco_arena_tiny Headaek 28 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

He also said he wants his ankle at 100%. The Warriors won’t let him come back until he’s fully back. No worries.

by Slightly Hyphy on Jan 16, 2012 2:00 PM PST reply actions  

The 100% Myth

If he waits for it to be 100% we could be looking at Fall 2012. Seems to me about 3 weeks resting the ankle ,then limiting to 25 min/game for 2 weeks would be the best schedule and see how it goes.

Sorry to say, but I don’t think 100% is an option for Curry this year. It’s going to be about being smart and managing it.

by joegiant on Jan 16, 2012 2:42 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

He was 100% coming in to this season, but he still has ankle injury issues. He just needs to keep playing

by Slightly Hyphy on Jan 16, 2012 3:31 PM PST up reply actions  

What else can he do?

What I mean is are there any possible treatments available while he’s playing but resting on the bench? Some kind of stretching or exercises to scaffold the ankle through the rest of the game?

I’m really curious about Steph’s ankle now. He never had any serious ankle problems in college (never followed his career though), and I don’t remember him having ankle issues while playing for Nelly.

by David Leezy on Jan 16, 2012 4:27 PM PST up reply actions  

I think he is just susceptible to ankle sprains because of the way he runs / moves laterally. I suspect that the way he distributes his weight on his feet has to do with why he sprains his ankles often.

by Slightly Hyphy on Jan 16, 2012 5:51 PM PST up reply actions  

He did have a major ankle sprain at Davidson.

It wasn’t a chronic issue, but I do remember him going down with a nasty sprain in college.

by G-State on Jan 16, 2012 6:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Which ankle though

If it’s the same one… sigh

RIP Al Davis
PS3 - agentpoop (dont ask why the name... tell me if your from a blog)
twitter - @nateoak5

by dubzfan on Jan 16, 2012 11:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Im glad hes hungry to play

thats a good thing. However he shouldn’t rush it back. If he wants to come back come back on a slow time table gradually so that he can build strength back in that ankle (even a little) before he plays in an actual game.

by Nith on Jan 16, 2012 2:43 PM PST reply actions  

We won’t draft Davis….he’s a freshman. If we get a #1 pick, Davis is the guy to go with IMO. If the management decides to draft Barnes instead, I can live with it but if they draft a junior for the 4th year in a row with the #1 pick and go with Thomas Robinson, I’m calling it quits as a Warrior fan.

by DubsFan408 on Jan 16, 2012 4:51 PM PST up reply actions  

I can totally see us passing on everyone for Robinson

Sadly

RIP Al Davis
PS3 - agentpoop (dont ask why the name... tell me if your from a blog)
twitter - @nateoak5

by dubzfan on Jan 16, 2012 4:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I know, the management must be pretty damn stupid to pass on Davis with a #1 pick. At the very least, select Barnes.

by DubsFan408 on Jan 16, 2012 5:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh god. That just means Lacob is going to want to keep one or the other even more.

by DubsFan408 on Jan 16, 2012 6:20 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Just shut him down

It’s the best thing for the team for two reasons:

1. We aren’t going anywhere special with this team this year. Tanking and keeping our pick is about the best we can hope for.. Having Steph not play is the best way to ensure we hang onto the pick.

2. Having him sit out an entire year will give us a stronger bargaining position once it’s time to sit down and negotiate his contract extension. Missing a year will make him cheaper.

by Lacob's Ladder on Jan 16, 2012 3:37 PM PST reply actions  

It also takes him out of all trade scenarios. It’s a non-starter to shut him down for many reasons. One being that rest isn’t going to cure him, only allow further testing. If he has really bad ankles that threaten his career, I’d like to know about it sooner than later.

by Doctor Kajita on Jan 16, 2012 3:42 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

After seeing the clip at which these ankle injuries occur/reoccur, I have little faith in his ankles at all. If he’s shut down now (and maybe opts for another surgery), it’s easier to trade him to another team in the offseason by billing his ankles as “fixed” and “rested” than if we were tp bring him back soon only to watch him sprain the ankle a few more times on the way to pushing us nearer to a .500 and further from our top-7 protected pick.

In my mind, bringing him back only brings us the worst of both worlds: mediocre record (aka – no pick, no playoffs) and the potential for further injury and lower trade value. Where’s the upside?

by Lacob's Ladder on Jan 16, 2012 5:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Actually...

Crazy as it sounds, but I think that this team still has a chance to make it to the playoffs. The Warriors have had one of the toughest, if not THE toughest schedule in the NBA. The only game I thought they should have won when they failed was the Charlotte game. Phoenix and Utah was also pretty questionable but they proved that they could win against high-caliber teams. They’ve made the games close in pretty much every game and they are already playing without Steph. Getting these hard games out of the way, means that the Warriors are facing more lower record teams coming up.

Since he’s not going to get any better with just rest, I think they should let him play once he’s 100%. Remember, this recent injury is not the one that part of the ankle that he had surgery on.

by Headaek on Jan 16, 2012 4:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Crazy as it sounds, but I think that this team still has a chance to make it to the playoffs.

But we don’t want to make the playoffs with this group as we’d lose our draft pick and management would also then think they have a good thing going and wouldn’t make the necessary changes to make us a powerhouse. Losing enough to retain the pick and to show the management what needs to be changed would be ideal.

Mirror on the wall
Here we are again.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 16, 2012 5:05 PM PST up reply actions  

we dont want them to make the playoffs?

You mean you don’t want them to make the playoffs. I’m not attacking you or nothing just making a point that the team I’m sure still has a goal to make the playoffs.

by Xtremelink on Jan 16, 2012 8:43 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

the team I’m sure still has a goal to make the playoffs

they have short term goals and I have long term. I’ll be here long after these players are gone so I don’t care about their immediate stats I’d rather gather assets and get better next year.

Mirror on the wall
Here we are again.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 16, 2012 8:52 PM PST up reply actions  

tank to get a better draft pick

we have been doing that every single year. So far it is not helping.

seriously, draft a star is a cheap shot way to get better. College players are cheap, but at the same time it is like 1% chance to get a star player. Only #1 pick has god chance to get a star. All other picks are pressing your luck.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 16, 2012 10:23 PM PST up reply actions  

We never tank, we just suck

Getting Lee was not any attempt on tanking, signing a contract with the fans is not tanking and overpaying Dunleavy and Murphy was not tanking. We just suck and are stupid, thats why were in the lottery, if we really tanked we would have a top 5 pick

RIP Al Davis
PS3 - agentpoop (dont ask why the name... tell me if your from a blog)
twitter - @nateoak5

by dubzfan on Jan 16, 2012 11:16 PM PST up reply actions  

DLee is one of the best thing happen to Warriors

guess you are right on the sucking, not tanking. Who knows, maybe Warriors overpaid and still sucks, so they need to tank?? It is a chicken/egg thingy. Still, tanking does not help. I want Warriors to tank too because there is no other choice but tanking and try to get lucky, which take us back to Cohan era, always been a below average team. I know what OKC did but that’s the only team made it happen. With Warriors luck, I said no chance at all. With Lacob and all his big promises, The way to get better is to overpaid the proven stars.

No idea why people don’t like DLee. Marc Gasol gets bigger pay than DLee, so is Boozer, Joe Johnson and Rashard Lewis, and they don’t play any better than DLee.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 17, 2012 12:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Getting snubbed by the Olympic committee will put a chip on his shoulder

I like

Read my Advanced Stats Primer

J-RIDAH: Its not 1 player in this draft better than Monta or Lee. Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu. Andre Drummond could be good but he is not impressive at this point at all besides his size. This draft is hella overated.

by Evanz on Jan 17, 2012 5:37 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

Natehead_small Nate Parham

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

600px-olympic_rings_square olympicmike

Small IQofaWarrior

Shutterstock_10276351_basketball_mind_small Evanz

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Small jae

Gsom_tony_small Tony.psd

Kanji_love_small Sleepy Freud

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Drmlg_logo-gmail_small Poor Man's Commish

Nellie2_small Feltbot