Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Right now, the Mavericks are positioned to have enough cap space to make a run at one max-salary unrestricted free agent in the summer of 2012. If they can move Marion, who has a player option worth $9 million for next season, in exchange for a player or players who come off the cap after this season, they will have room to go after two max players. That is their ticket for recruiting both Howard and Deron Williams.

More on Dwight Howard and the Clippers

How about KBrown and Jeremy Tyler for Marion?

4 months ago 00_avatar_medium_tiny ILoveWarriorsGirls 160 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Why would you want to trade a rookie big man with potential for a veteran on the decline?

by iHypeTV on Jan 18, 2012 9:24 AM PST reply actions  

You mean Jeremy Tyler?

Boy… don’t tell me you think Jeremy Tyler is better than Marion…

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 18, 2012 9:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Um...no, that's not what anybody's saying

We’re saying we haven’t even seen what Tyler’s capable of yet, he’s been in the league for a couple months. Marion, on the other hand, has at most a couple years left in the league. He’s not even close to what he used to be. Also, we have Dorell, Klay, Rush, and McGuire at the position that Marion plays.

by misterho on Jan 18, 2012 9:57 AM PST up reply actions  

to add to that , we are not needing any one two or even 3 year rentals of a declining player

seeing as how we will not possibly be championship caliber for a minimum of 2 or 3 years (best case scenario)

by PIRATEWARRIOR on Jan 18, 2012 11:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Marion will turn 34 this season.

WIth one exception, his above-average efficiency seasons were all playing off of an elite point guard.

Yes, Marion is probably better than Dorell and Rush (the guys whose minutes he’d take). By a small margin. On the other hand, he’s not part of our future. And he’s not really that good. He’s a complementary player who gives you great rebounding from the 3, but he’s not a game changer.

And, did I mention he’s 34?

Next season – when Kwame comes off the books – we’re again going to need a big man, especially if Tyler doesn’t develop. Making this trade would put us in the position of needing a big man and a) not having a young one who might develop and b) not having much cap room to go get one.

In exchange for what? What, exactly, does Marion give us that we don’t have?

by Ronaldinho on Jan 18, 2012 10:07 AM PST reply actions  

Think of this way… We get Marion this year and it is definitively an upgrade on our defense, not to mention our offense (compare to Mr. DWright).

Then next year, Marion will be a great sign and trade chip for us because of his expires. I know we have been talking about Kwame’s expires so we can sign a FA. Base on the past experiences, we can’t get any FA star player to join us, so sign a trade (like DLee) gives us way better chance to sign a star.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 18, 2012 10:28 AM PST up reply actions  

We get Marion this year and it is definitively an upgrade on our defense, not to mention our offense (compare to Mr. DWright).

Except that he’s not necessarily an upgrade. Again, really look at who Marion has been: he’s been a great offensive player (high volume, high efficiency) when playing next to Steve Nash. Otherwise – he’s been so-so. High volume, moderate efficiency. That’s not an upgrade.

Defensively:
RAPM on defense, last three full seasons (positive is good):
Marion: .3, 1.5, 1.8, 2.0
Dorell: 1, 1.3, .7, .3

That’s not a great trend for Marion, is it? Yet it’s entirely consistent with a player getting older.
Also bear in mind that the two years before that Dorell wasn’t healthy.

Then next year, Marion will be a great sign and trade chip for us because of his expires.

If you can’t get a player via free agency, you can’t get them via sign-and-trade because a player has to agree for a sign-and-trade to happen. As far as other trades, you know what Marion, as an expiring, will be valuable for?

Exactly what Kwame is valuable for, now: some other team’s declining, overpaid player, so they can get under the cap.

If you’re lucky, you can squeeze a pick out of them. If we were talking about taking Marion in exchange for getting Dallas’s pick, well … if except that Dallas is really good and therefore their pick will suck, it’d be an interesting discussion. But so long as you’re talking a bottom-10 pick, that’ snot really worth much.

by Ronaldinho on Jan 18, 2012 12:36 PM PST up reply actions  

I would love a player 'like' marion who is younger on this team

A cometent wing who can slot to the 4 effectively.

But the actual Marion? Not interested in this move unless we turn Monta into a better player and are in playoff contention to point where Marion could help us.

by tafkasam on Jan 18, 2012 10:31 AM PST up reply actions  

A big awww hell naw!

"That was very funny about the old man basketball skills. One is lucky to escape injury when playing against those crafty, crusty sumbitches. And it’s just demoralizing when they demonstrate yet again how to use the backboard from range." - Charlie Custer

by SmittytheCutman on Jan 18, 2012 10:15 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

how about clearing cap space to do the same thing as them?

that sounds better

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Jan 18, 2012 10:33 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

how much is needed for two max contracts?

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Jan 18, 2012 10:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Dont the Mavs still have their amnesty?

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 11:57 AM PST reply actions  

i think so

http://hoopshype.com/salaries/dallas.htm

it would show if they did amnesty someone

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Jan 18, 2012 12:13 PM PST up reply actions  

So they could easily amnesty Marion and have space. The rich get richer.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 12:18 PM PST up reply actions  

is jkidd still on contract?

wouldnt they just amnesty him so they can get deron too. i think marion is easier to trade so that is why his name has popped.

damn if mavs get both deron and howard it would be insane.

curry & iggy TEAM USA buddies.

by bimmercirem3 on Jan 18, 2012 12:22 PM PST up reply actions  

It will be insane if the Clippers get a true shooting guard. If J.R Smith goes there like he indicated he would, they become the most dangerous team in the league even if DH and Deron go to Dallas.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 12:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Since there is only 1% chance we can have a blockbuster trade like how Clippers or Dallas can, maybe we can take advantage on whatever they throw it out to free up their cap space, like how Minny got Beasley with a 2nd round pick.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 18, 2012 12:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Taking on any contract thats not a upgrade 3 on a expiring contract or a 5 is moving backwards imo. Every cent of our cap space this summer should go to Dorell’s upgrade or Biedrins’. Taking on more money now will set us back. I see 4 Centers that will be on the market come july. 3 of them are restricted and the other is Kaman. Our bread should be aimed at netting 1 of those guys.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 12:47 PM PST up reply actions  

true

Only if Warriors can make it happen, that will be the first choice, of course. But so far Warriors FO cannot close the deal!

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 18, 2012 12:52 PM PST up reply actions  

And you guarantee that they can't close a future deal by throwing away the cap space.

You have to keep trying. DJ signed the offer sheet – so really it was only Tyson who said no. 0/1 is technically “can’t close a deal” but its pretty absurd to draw big conclusions from it.

by Ronaldinho on Jan 18, 2012 1:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I expect alot of amnesties after the season.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 1:22 PM PST up reply actions  

If J.R Smith goes there like he indicated he would, they become the most dangerous team in the league even if DH and Deron

You’d take Paul, JR Smith and Blake Griffin over Deron, Dirk and Dwight?

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jan 18, 2012 12:50 PM PST up reply actions  

don’t forget Mo & Billups

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 18, 2012 12:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Right, but they’re more or less offset by some combo of Terry, Kidd, Beaubois and Delonte.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jan 18, 2012 1:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Why not? Those two are very forgettable at this point in their careers.

by Missing Barry on Jan 18, 2012 1:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Meh, he’s ok, but he keeps getting slower and slower…

by Missing Barry on Jan 18, 2012 2:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Yessir, in a 7 game series I would. Blake is playing better than Dirk this season. The X Factor is DJ, Dwight is not gonna be able to get that running hook off of DJ like he does most C’s. Deron wont win the matchup against CP3. J.R would go bananas.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 1:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Ha, sure. Let me know when DJ learns to play fundamental defense, or the Clips in general start playing some D. And Dirk might be playing down right now, but he’s still Dirk. Don’t expect it to continue. That would be one scary Mavs team.

by Missing Barry on Jan 18, 2012 1:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Eh…a team to be taken seriously? Sure. The most dangerous team in a league where Dwight and Deron are playing with Dirk, and the Heat trio is still together? Absolutely not. Let me know when the Clippers start playing defense.

by Missing Barry on Jan 18, 2012 1:29 PM PST up reply actions  

That Clipper team would take away Dwight strenghts.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 1:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Defense and rebounding? Finishing passes from Deron? Dude, Dwight is the 3rd option on that team.

by Missing Barry on Jan 18, 2012 1:36 PM PST up reply actions  

And my point to you is that the 1st 2 options will have a hard time scoring.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 1:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Against the #23 defense in the NBA? Like I said – let me know when the Clips give anyone a hard time scoring.

by Missing Barry on Jan 18, 2012 1:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Why would Deron or Dirk have trouble scoring? Deron has historically played very well against CP3, and Dirk would be guarded by … what, some combo of Blake Griffin and Caron Butler?

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jan 18, 2012 1:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Dirk is having a hard time scoring period right now. Deron would not have it easy with CP3 on him.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 2:02 PM PST up reply actions  

A hard time scoring? By Dirk standards, sure. By NBA standards…well, let’s just compare:

2011-2012:
Player A: 21.2 points per 36, 2.5 assists per 36, 2.7 turnovers per 36, 54.2% TS%
Player B: 21.3 points per 36, 2.9 assists per 36, 2.0 turnovers per 36, 55.4% TS%

Can you guess which player is Dirk and which is Blake Griffin?

by Missing Barry on Jan 18, 2012 2:09 PM PST up reply actions  

They're my second favorite team right after this one!

I’ve always loved Dirk, and the Mavs are always overlooked

by GSWarrior1818 on Jan 18, 2012 5:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Cool... if they amnesty Marion that's even better.

So we can pick him up cheap, maybe at Billups range, $2.5mil?

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 18, 2012 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

It would go to the highest bidder

Billups was $2.5 mil only because he threatened people into not claiming him off wavers, therefore there was no bidding.

by G-State on Jan 18, 2012 12:41 PM PST up reply actions  

and instead, Billups stay. See players don’t know what they are talking about. Bring the stars in and then convince, trick them to stay!

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 18, 2012 12:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I still don't understand why you're so excited by him.

He’s not, at this point in his career, a clear upgrade over the guys we have.

If he was a free agent, I wouldn’t be inclined to bid – period. Even at the minimum, this offseason. Why? How does it fit with our plans? How does it make us better in a meaningful way?

What is the long-term upside for the franchise over, say, signing one of those hyper-athletic d-league wings and seeing what he can do?

by Ronaldinho on Jan 18, 2012 1:23 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

You didn't answer my question.
How does it make us better in a meaningful way?

The Warriors history with D-league players is not an answer to that question.

I get the feeling you’re remembering the player of five or six years ago who scored a ton of points at high efficiency, and don’t realize that:

a) Marion isn’t that guy anymore physically
b) A lot of that efficiency came from Nash.

It’s not like that’s the only example of Nash turning a wing into a high-volume, high-efficiency scoring machine. He did the same thing with Richardson, who was a moderate-to-low efficiency guy except when playing alongside Nash.

by Ronaldinho on Jan 18, 2012 1:45 PM PST up reply actions  

I would love to get Howard, or CP3

I have been saying Warriors most stupid move is not accepting CP3 trade. Even when CP3 said he is not signing extension, I still would go for the trade. It is Warriors responsibility to convince CP3 to sign extension afterwards.

But since Warriors has been playing safe, so Marion level player is the best we can do. Else we are talking about KBrown, Barron, or D-league player like you mentioned.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 18, 2012 1:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Or the guys we already have on the roster.

Like Dorell, who may already be better than Marion.

Adding players who are not significant upgrades and who are old does not make you a better team.

Marion is closer in value – on the floor – to Kwame Brown than he is to CP3. Quite frankly, given our roster, I’d rather have Kwame.

by Ronaldinho on Jan 18, 2012 2:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Marion is the ultimate role player. Strictly a finisher on offense, plays D. Only now he’s old, and we need more than that.

by Missing Barry on Jan 18, 2012 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Off topic but is there anybody that wanted Lee amnestied still standing by that?

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 1:09 PM PST reply actions  

yes

Specifically in a few years when he’s really not worth the money he will be making

by jpees on Jan 18, 2012 1:30 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

What part of his game do you think will fade in a few years?

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 1:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Ugh, imagine his defense getting even worse!

by Missing Barry on Jan 18, 2012 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

I see his defense getting better in age not worse. I see no reason Lee cant play as long as Malone and Barkley did. He dont rely on athleticism to be effective.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 1:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I hope you’re right. Defense does peak later than offense. On the other hand, declining footspeed is a real thing…

by Missing Barry on Jan 18, 2012 1:50 PM PST up reply actions  

I see no reason Lee cant play as long as Malone and Barkley did

Both those guys were offensively far superior to lee and much stronger, so it was hard to bully them

by tafkasam on Jan 18, 2012 2:25 PM PST up reply actions  

They were not offensively superior late in their career. Lee is crafty enough to keep scoring.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 2:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Better comparisons would be someone more like Brad Miller. Lee isn’t as tall as Miller, though. I’m having a hard time thinking of good comparables – the guys I think of are the likes of Barkley/Malone, Miller, Vlade, Webber…maybe AC Green or Otis Thorpe? It’s going to be a problem for Lee that he isn’t taller and/or stronger as he slows down…

by Missing Barry on Jan 18, 2012 2:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Webber is a good comparison. I make the Malone comparison because of Lee’s jumpshot. Not many 4’s have had 1 as good. That jumper is wet.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 2:55 PM PST up reply actions  

. Not many 4’s have had 1 as good. That jumper is wet.

Bosh, Dirk, ZBo, Gasol, LMA to highlighta few. Here is organized list of PF’s shooting % from 16-23 feet-
http://www.hoopdata.com/shotstats.aspx?team=%25&type=pg&posi=PF&yr=2012&gp=0&mins=0

Lee ranks #17, granted a handful ahead of him are attempting super low volume, but disregarding him it’s still 10-12 on similar volume who make more.

And here’s last year-
http://www.hoopdata.com/shotstats.aspx?team=%25&type=pg&posi=PF&yr=2011&gp=0&mins=0

Not top 50.

Let’s not overrate Lee. He’s good, but their are better.

by tafkasam on Jan 18, 2012 3:08 PM PST up reply actions  

zbo's jumper is ugly

and which gasol are we talking about. i dunno if either one qualifies as a ‘wet’ jumper

It's lonely being the only Warriors fan at UMass :(

by j-spliff415 on Jan 19, 2012 6:52 AM PST up reply actions  

Dirk's jumper is 'ugly'

Doesn’t change the fact it’s good

ZBo has been 55% on 16-23 footers this year and around 40% (same as lee) for his career.

Pau’s 52% on 16-23 footers and 50+% for his career (specifically that baseline J stands out in ny mind, about 17 feet out).

Marc’s career total is about 42%, same as Lee.

I don’t really care who’s is prettiest, truth is Lee’s isn’t pretty. Their are a lot of players who have more consistent mid-rangers, including guys lik Brandon Bass who’s hitting 54% on good volume and is near 50% for his career from 16-23 feet, while being 50% from 10-15feet as well.

by tafkasam on Jan 19, 2012 7:27 AM PST up reply actions  

This is false. Most of them get paid less.

There will be no extra point!

by Sleepy Freud on Jan 19, 2012 9:53 AM PST up reply actions  

I think you mean beef

And no , we are not supposed to have Humphries, I refuse to have him

RIP Al Davis
PS3 - agentpoop (dont ask why the name... tell me if your from a blog)
twitter - @nateoak5

by dubzfan on Jan 19, 2012 1:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Fesenko is a pig

and we almost signed him. I said any meat is fine, not just beef.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 19, 2012 1:27 PM PST up reply actions  

I think it depends on how you define shoot.

Lee is a better jump-shooter than most PFs.

The issue with Lee on offense is that the sneaky, smart, slip-between-the-cracks way he plays on offense can sometimes be neutralized by a highly-athletic defender.

The truly elite offensive players can’t be consistently stopped by anyone – but David Lee was rendered completely ineffective by Josh Smith, for example.

That’s going to stop him from every being a player you can completely rely on as the focal point of your offense.

by Ronaldinho on Jan 19, 2012 10:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Agreed

Lee is kind of a high production garbage man.

You can run some PnRs, let him use his mid-range jumper to keep teams honest, but he gets a lot of his volume in clean up type of cuts and put backs.

Still useful of course, but not a guy you build an O around like Dirk or Zbo for ex.

by tafkasam on Jan 19, 2012 10:12 AM PST up reply actions  

Seriously are you asking that question?

There’s this game called basketball. Perhaps you’ve watched it?

Dirk has that elbow post-up game which is almost unstoppable, since he can shoot over shorter players with that fallaway or get around bigger players with his speed. It’s his bread-and-butter. If you’ve watched Dallas play in the last couple of years you’ve seen it.

The book on it used to be that you get up in his grill and make him uncomfortable, and he’ll resort to being a jump-shooter. That was the “We Believe” team’s strategy. Doesn’t really work anymore. He plays through physical play now.

Dirk also has an effective three-point shot, so even when he does turn into a jump-shooter, he’s more dangerous.

Dirk is orders of magnitude better than David Lee. He’s an elite player, one of the best five scorers in the game (who’s better? LeBron maybe, Durant maybe … who else?). Lee is a very good complementary player who does a lot to improve your offense.

Dirk has also turned into a very effective defensive player. Lee may be improving with effort on that front, but he’s still below average. Dirk isn’t.

I’m less sold on Randolph than some people. I think he’s pretty reliable, but just not good enough to be the focal point of the offense. You love to have players like him because they help you in a lot of little ways and don’t hurt you in any.

But really – what does Dirk do much better than Lee? Have you seen the two play?

by Ronaldinho on Jan 19, 2012 10:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Dirks back to basket, post game is a big reason he’s near un-guardable now.

If you stick a smaller guy on him, like we believe did, he’ll take them in the post and just do his variety of turn moves all day. If you put a bigger guy, he’ll go to elbow and make them uncomfortable.

Real pain to defend.

by tafkasam on Jan 19, 2012 10:50 AM PST up reply actions  

Dirk can shoot 3s

but Lee can rebounds. Lee can do a lot of different things at elbow too. Lee can shoot, drive, spin, create foul or pass the ball. Plus, Lee is at $12mil. I said at this price, Lee is a bargain.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 19, 2012 1:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Actually, you asked what area Dirk was better than Lee.

In the post I was responding to, you didn’t say a thing about price.

Dirk is a better scorer and better defender. He’s every bit as good a passer.

Lee, I’ll grant you, is a better rebounder.

Dirk is better at every other phase of the game.

If you want to talk about salary, you have to put it like this:

Dirk is underpaid. If there were no max salary, he might easily be making more than he is now.

Lee is overpaid. Not by a lot, but his defensive liabilities and offensive limitations mean he’s probably a few million a year overpaid.

So, no, talking about salary doesn’t make Lee look better in comparison.

by Ronaldinho on Jan 19, 2012 2:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Lee, I’ll grant you, is a better rebounder.

I don’t even know how sure I am of that…

by Missing Barry on Jan 19, 2012 2:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Interestingly

Career per 36-

Offensive rebounding-
Lee- 3.3
Dirk- 1.2

Defensive rebounding-
Lee- 7.8
Dirk- 7.1

A function of three things, 1) Dirk is generally far away from hoop on offense.
2) Dirk takes far more shots, rarely does shooter get his own offensive board. (Lee’s worst year on offensive rebounding was also his highest volume shooting/scoring year)
3) Dirk makes a hell of a lot of shots. No need for an offensive rebound :)

by tafkasam on Jan 19, 2012 4:02 PM PST up reply actions  

only if we have $20mil to sign Dirk… which we don’t, and he won’t come if he is FA unless Warriors is already a solid team.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 19, 2012 5:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Don't change the subject.

You expressed doubt that Dirk was actually better than Lee.

Hopefully you’ve been disabused of that notion.

it’s not close.

by Ronaldinho on Jan 19, 2012 7:10 PM PST up reply actions  

no, I am saying Lee is not a bad player. I never said Lee is better than Dirk. I am tire of people keep complaining about Lee’s D and his price tag.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 19, 2012 10:31 PM PST up reply actions  

I complain about his price tag because I think he’s pretty much the definition of the average NBA player. What he really is is a solid backup role player.

by Missing Barry on Jan 20, 2012 12:45 PM PST up reply actions  

POST GAME

I repeat: POST GAME

Plus, in Dirk’s case, he’s a much better scorer overall

http://nbawarriors.wordpress.com/

by Brownie13 on Jan 19, 2012 11:28 PM PST up reply actions  

I heard dub fans talk about how much of a beast Lee was back when he was a Knick. The second he signed with us he became overated to those same dub fans. The same would happen with Dirk, if he signed here most of the usual negative posters who shall remain nameless would talk about nothing but Dirk’s weaknesses and how we coulda gotten a better player. I dont feel like searching for it but if you were to search what was said about Lee on this board before he became a dub you’d be surprised he gets the hate he gets here.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 20, 2012 9:13 AM PST up reply actions  

you really believe people would complain about having dirk?

stop making ridiculous claims

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 9:36 AM PST up reply actions  

The way the slobbered over DLee when he was a Knick I would say yes. Your ridiculous if you think they wont. A guy loses his appeal around here the moment he signs with us. I never thought they would complain about a guy coming off a allstar 20 and 12 season but they did. I never thought they would complain about getting rid of AR for said allstar but they did. I dont put nothing past this fickle online fanbase. The moment a guy signs here he becomes less good in the eyes of these fans.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 20, 2012 9:59 AM PST up reply actions  

You're right

A lot of people superficially got excited over Lee before he signed.

My problem with Lee is more about context of entire team though, not him personally

by tafkasam on Jan 20, 2012 10:04 AM PST up reply actions  

if you actually bothered to go back and look

the people that are critical of david lee now are the same people that were critical of him back then. you see a lot of “i wouldn’t mind having david lee if his contract isn’t too expensive” people complain about his contract because it ended out being expensive. you can’t pay that much for a player that is such a liability at one end of the floor unless they are completely dominant on the other end. no one would be complaining about dirk (proven capable of being the top option on a championship team) having a max contract.

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 10:05 AM PST up reply actions  

you can’t say “i don’t feel like searching for it” and then definitvely tell me what people were saying. yes, some people thought lee was all that, but those are the same people that to this day still like david lee on his current contract. i didn’t see anyone whose opinion completely changed about lee just because he became a warrior.

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 10:10 AM PST up reply actions  

still, $12mil is not much at all for someone like DLee.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 20, 2012 10:26 AM PST up reply actions  

Depends on what you think “someone like DLee” means…

by Missing Barry on Jan 20, 2012 1:00 PM PST up reply actions  

A guy loses his appeal around here the moment he signs with us.

You’re putting causation on this correlation, when it may not be wise to do so. Essentially you’re saying the reason people soured on David Lee was simply because he signed with the Warriors. Speaking for myself, I can tell you I definitely misevaluated David Lee. I thought his D would be a lot better – I didn’t expect good by any means, but I didn’t expect completely incapable, either. Now I’ve seen how bad it is. He was a pretty high volume, efficient scorer, while also being a passer. I thought he’d be able to do more on offense. I still haven’t figured out how he scored so much without any post game. I’ve also been extremely disappointed with how he fits in with other big men (so far, not well). Lastly, I’ve gotten to see for myself how his rebounding is overrated. So yes, I thought a lot more of David Lee before watching him play consistently myself. I was wrong in my evaluation of David Lee before he came to the Warriors. I don’t see why that suggests it has anything to do with him signing with the Warriors, or that it would apply to a big time superstar like Dirk. Amazing that I would actually let watching someone play often affect how I think of him, huh?!

by Missing Barry on Jan 20, 2012 12:59 PM PST up reply actions  

So whoever signs here you would see on a more often basis and you would be more critical of their game aswell. So my point is right. My problem with Warriors fans is that they magnify the flaws and shun the positives. Lee should get way more props than he does around here.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 20, 2012 2:18 PM PST up reply actions  

lee would get more props if he was more than an average player

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 2:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Name the power forwards that are above average right now to you and ill compare their numbers.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 20, 2012 2:28 PM PST up reply actions  

what are you gonna do, compare per game stats?

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 2:46 PM PST up reply actions  

dirk, aldridge, kg, nene, duncan, bosh, millsap, aldridge, pau, josh smith, zbo, love…we’ll just stick with that for now.

bring on the per game stats while completely neglecting defense!

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 2:54 PM PST up reply actions  

can't believe i forgot blake

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 2:58 PM PST up reply actions  

and amare

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 3:00 PM PST up reply actions  

So how many of those guys would you say Lee is playing better than this season?

by J-RIDAH on Jan 20, 2012 4:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Name the power forwards that are above average right now to you and ill compare their numbers.

let’s see it.

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 5:02 PM PST up reply actions  

So whoever signs here you would see on a more often basis and you would be more critical of their game aswell.

Or alternatively, I might see some aspects in them that are undervalued. Depends on the player.

by Missing Barry on Jan 20, 2012 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

wasn't me

i don’t care what you heard from dubs fans who drooled over his rebounds, TS%, and WP (the wonderful catch-all statistic of the time)

I watched him play too much to have ever wanted him on the contract we gave him. now that he’s here, I’ll live with it and hope that he contributes in the best way he can, but he has never had even an acceptable post-up game. for a long time, dirk didn’t either, but he’s always been a better scorer and shooter, as well as defender anyway. adding a post-game finally got him to an elite status.

http://nbawarriors.wordpress.com/

by Brownie13 on Jan 20, 2012 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Lee was brung here to be the 3rd option. When the golden child returns he’ll go back to being that.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 19, 2012 10:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Zbo, Pau and Marc all get paid more than DLee as far as I know.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 19, 2012 10:11 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, I was generally trying to name big guys with jumpers that could pass a bit, too – high post bigs, basically.

by Missing Barry on Jan 18, 2012 3:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes they were.

Malone averaged 25.5 ppg on high efficiency at 36, 23.4 ppg on high efficiency at 37. Lee hasn’t touched that in his prime.

Barkley averaged 19.2 pp at 33, 16+ at 35. Very efficiently.

Completely different class of players. In their primes they were miles better than Lee’s best year.

by tafkasam on Jan 18, 2012 3:04 PM PST up reply actions  

min rookie contract will be $15mil in few years

After Google, facebook, twitter and Apple all own a NBA team.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 18, 2012 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Hmm…Warriors – 5 wins, 8 losses, 10th place in the West. Where is this franchise headed, exactly…?

by Missing Barry on Jan 18, 2012 1:41 PM PST up reply actions  

With its best player injured. Well according to you guys Steph is the best.

by J-RIDAH on Jan 18, 2012 1:43 PM PST up reply actions  

even if Curry comes back its hard to imagine him doing THAT much better than Jenkins and Robinson

But amnestying Lee would have all but guarunteed our chances of landing a TRUE stud in the draft AND give us so much flexibility to give howard AND deron wolliams here..

by PIRATEWARRIOR on Jan 18, 2012 3:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Curry is infinitely better than Jenkins OR Robinson.

by Anonymous1337 on Jan 18, 2012 3:31 PM PST up reply actions  

combined

"Monta is the MAN." -Bob Fitzgerald

by WarriorForLife on Jan 18, 2012 3:38 PM PST up reply actions  

possibly two years down the line

did not want him amnestied coming into this season

http://nbawarriors.wordpress.com/

by Brownie13 on Jan 19, 2012 11:23 PM PST up reply actions  

I see "The Cavs-Mavs Connection" coming to play here

First I don’t see Howard getting traded….
Second…

Cavs have a lot of expiring contracts and are without a doubt still in love with Mavs for beating Lebron and the Heat.

I see Haywood, Marion, Odom, Beaubois and Jones all getting traded to the Cavs for Jamison’s expiring 15 Mil and change (Hollins, Parker, Gibson).

With that trade the only remaining contract Dallas has on the books next year is Dirk leaving the door wide open for Howard and for DWill, to join up.

Those three together will bring Terry, Odom, Kidd, Carter and/or really anyone to the Mavs at a Premium price.

by Dro50 on Jan 18, 2012 5:20 PM PST reply actions  

I'd take Marion...

but only if they threw in 2 of Beaubois, Mahinmi, and Jones

otherwise it’s a pretty pointless move. He’d obviously accept his player option if still with Dallas, but I’m not sure that’d be the case if he was traded here. We could potentially get absolutely nothing but a month’s worth of Marion.

He’s obviously a better player at the 3 than anything we have and a better player than anything we’d give up in a trade, but he wouldn’t solve our problems. Kind of a pointless move, unless we’re actually in the playoff hunt at the trade deadline, which is looking more and more unlikely.

http://nbawarriors.wordpress.com/

by Brownie13 on Jan 19, 2012 11:22 PM PST reply actions  

We could potentially get absolutely nothing but a month’s worth of Marion.

At same time, we are getting nothing out of Kwame.

I’d love Mahinmi but I don’t see Dallas balking unless they think Kwame can recover by playoffs.

It’s an interesting proposal. Marion + Mahinmi + something.

by tafkasam on Jan 20, 2012 7:37 AM PST up reply actions  

At same time, we are getting nothing out of Kwame.

Haha, very good point. Not to mention Tyler is basically just warming up seat for DLee.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 20, 2012 10:21 AM PST up reply actions  

I just wouldn't get the point.

It has nothing to do with expecting something from Kwame. If we’re not headed anywhere, Marion makes no sense. And if we’d be giving up Tyler to get him, possibly to take (or not, it would be very unclear) up our cap room next year, I’d need some youth back. I’ve always thought Mahinmi had some potential, and I like both Jones and Beaubois.

So I’d take him as an upgrade if we’re still chasing the playoffs, or if we got something else back. Otherwise, it doesn’t really help us, and could potentially hurt us.

http://nbawarriors.wordpress.com/

by Brownie13 on Jan 20, 2012 4:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Mahinmi type of player is easy to find

He plays okay in Dallas because of Jason Kid and… he is playing for Dallas. I think he might turn out to be similar to Hunter once he join Warriors.

Having Marion is great. He can be the vet in the team for Warriors, we are the second youngest team in the league. And he is expiring soon so that gives us a lot of flexibility next year.

With Marion, I can see we are in hunt for 8 spot this year. Our SF spot is the weakest point, even weaker than center spot.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 20, 2012 10:25 AM PST up reply actions  

we are the second youngest team in the league

no, we really aren’t

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 10:32 AM PST up reply actions  

we werent before we signed barron

and if you weight age by minutes played, we are middle of the pack. all of our “young” guys play very limited minutes

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 5:04 PM PST up reply actions  

i mean a team could have 5 good starters with an average age of 20, and then fill out the bench with 20 year olds that never play

sure your average age is low, but just because you’re a young team doesn’t mean you have a bright future.

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 5:05 PM PST up reply actions  

that should read 30* for the starters

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 5:06 PM PST up reply actions  

and how many minutes do those "young" guys play?

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 5:06 PM PST up reply actions  

not sure what you are going with this...

I am saying that’s what I heard on the TV for more than 10 times. Who cares how many minutes those young guys play? Will we get fined by “playing” “young” “guys” too many minutes???

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 20, 2012 5:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, the TV people are kind of invested in getting your hopes up…

by Missing Barry on Jan 20, 2012 5:26 PM PST up reply actions  

marion does not make us a playoff team

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 6:18 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m not sure what age has to do with anything in this conversation anymore…

Why do we need an old guy, exactly?

by Missing Barry on Jan 20, 2012 6:22 PM PST up reply actions  

just because a team is young doesnt mean they have a bright future

it’s just a way of getting around the whole “this team sucks right now” statement

"Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu." - J--Ridah

by bigkino217 on Jan 20, 2012 5:38 PM PST up reply actions  

never said young team has a bright future. Been saying we need a vet. or an impact player since no star player wanna come here. Also I have been saying tanking, waiting to get a good draft is not the answer neither. Other than #1 pick, all picks are 50-50 chance to get a player even at Marion-2012 level.

by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 20, 2012 6:14 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Mahinmi type of player is easy to find.

Maybe. Mahinmi is a more apt version of BWright. He did it in france. No reason to think he can’t do it here. Good combo of length and athleticism. Very quick and a good finisher. Defensively he’s nothing special other than a nice weakside shot blocker.

Actually they are quite similar……

Player A-
996 minutes
15.3 pp36
9.4 rp36
1.0 steal per 36
1.3 blocks per 36
.658 TS% (.603 fg%)

Player B-
1496 minute
15.6 pp36
8.7 rp35
1.0 steal
1.9 blocks
.569 TS% (.534fg%)

(hint to figure out which is which, BW has played more minutes in in NBA ;)

Considering both are more or less same age as Udoh (BW is actually youngeR) I’d trade EITHER for Udoh

Surely it helps that he plays for Dallas, but what we know about him. He scores efficiently and on decent

Our SF spot is the weakest point, even weaker than center spot.

No, but really every position needs an upgrade. PF potentially the ‘least’

by tafkasam on Jan 20, 2012 12:53 PM PST up reply actions  

The idea though, is Dallas wouldn't even consider that trade until the deadline.

He’s one of their starters, and they’re still trying to position themselves for another championship, even though they let Tyson walk so they’d have money next off-season. If they don’t seem like a championship team going into the final month or so of the season, they might look to move him. Or if they found a better, cheaper option to fill his role.

But if we’re 16-24 and 8 games out of the playoffs with 26 to play (how many games we have after the trade deadline), is Marion really enough to turn us into a 18-8 team (would put us about 2 games over .500) down the stretch? Probably not. So unless we’re very close to the playoffs at that point, how would he help us? He’d only serve to lose our young big man we purchased for his potential YEARS from now and/or take up our cap room next year.

Dumb trade, unless for the two reasons I cited above:

So I’d take him as an upgrade if we’re still chasing the playoffs, or if we got something else back.

http://nbawarriors.wordpress.com/

by Brownie13 on Jan 20, 2012 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"

Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)


GSoM Crew -------------------------

Atma-160_small Atma Brother ONE

Gw090_small Fantasy Junkie

Natehead_small Nate Parham

--------------------------------------------------------

Small Hash

Small dj fuzzylogic

600px-olympic_rings_square olympicmike

Small IQofaWarrior

Shutterstock_10276351_basketball_mind_small Evanz

--------------------------------------------------------

We_still_believe_small R Dizzle

Small Adam Lauridsen

Small jae

Gsom_tony_small Tony.psd

Kanji_love_small Sleepy Freud

Japan_by_miaumi_small YaoButtaMing

Drmlg_logo-gmail_small Poor Man's Commish

Nellie2_small Feltbot