Who's Top 10 Pure PG in NBA now??
I believe we need a pure PG, someone who can pass the ball well, and can do pick and roll for our bigs. Just like Knicks, Warriors has many "good" players but we just can't win because we don't have a pure point guard. This is why Knicks is loosing also, even when they have Melo. Amare and Chandler. This also proves that having a good center won't help much if we don't have a good point guard. So who are the top 10 pure PG in the league right now, and I think we can make our team a wining team if we can trade Monta for a pure PG.
4 months ago
ILoveWarriorsGirls
67 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
NY is very different then us
Having a center does make a huge difference it is just that Melo and Amare are a simply terrible fit . They are not losing for the same reasons we are. And Monta likely can’t get us a pure PG seeing as though he is a man who some see as a player without a position . Also pure PG’s are rare in todays NBA. Guys like Rubio, CP3, Kidd, Nash and Rondo are rare. There are lesser guys like Calderon who are pure PG’s but aren’t that good and Ramn Sessions
RIP Al Davis
PS3 - agentpoop (dont ask why the name... tell me if your from a blog)
twitter - @nateoak5
"No difference maker in this draft taf. Sorry to be the 1 to break it to you." J-Ridah 1/23/12
in today’s game, PG is very important, especially a PG who can bring the team together. I mean Gortat is having a career year, it has something to do with Nash. And DeAndre Jordan looks way~ better than last year, pretty sure it has something to do with CP3.
by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 28, 2012 8:52 PM PST up reply actions
Gortat was always really good he was just behind Howard
Jordan doesn’t look that much better, he’s just getting more minutes without Kaman , sure they both are better with these guys but it’s not like they are performing miracles
RIP Al Davis
PS3 - agentpoop (dont ask why the name... tell me if your from a blog)
twitter - @nateoak5
"No difference maker in this draft taf. Sorry to be the 1 to break it to you." J-Ridah 1/23/12
On the other hand, the Bulls and Thunder have been doing some very nice things with PG’s that are the opposite of “pure PG’s”. There is no single formula to winning. Building a successful team can happen in many different ways. Neither the Warriors nor Knicks are close to building a contending team with their current squads.
by Missing Barry on Jan 29, 2012 2:39 AM PST up reply actions
Who’s the Miami Heat’s “pure point guard”? Who were the “pure point guards” on Duncan’s Spurs, Shaq/Kobe’s Lakers, Jordan’s Bulls, or Bird’s Celtics?
The Warriors need elite talent, at any position. The more elite the better. To the extent that position matters, big man is almost certainly the biggest need, since it’s the position at which we have the least talent.
Are you suggesting you’d rather flip Monta for Nash, KIdd or Ricky Rubio than for Dwight Howard?
There will be no extra point!
Bingo
But also Curry would have to be dealt for those guys ;)
RIP Al Davis
PS3 - agentpoop (dont ask why the name... tell me if your from a blog)
twitter - @nateoak5
"No difference maker in this draft taf. Sorry to be the 1 to break it to you." J-Ridah 1/23/12
yeah... but we are no Heats.
.. and Monta is not Jordan. Having Nash with Curry as SG, I think it will help a great deal.
by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 28, 2012 8:46 PM PST up reply actions
Having Nash with Curry as SG, I think it will help a great deal.
will help the other team score a great deal more
Mirror on the wall
Here we are again.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 28, 2012 8:49 PM PST up reply actions 6 recs
It is not like we are stopping other team from scoring with Curry and Monta.
by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 28, 2012 8:53 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Definately better then most expected
And definitely better then Nash and Curry
RIP Al Davis
PS3 - agentpoop (dont ask why the name... tell me if your from a blog)
twitter - @nateoak5
"No difference maker in this draft taf. Sorry to be the 1 to break it to you." J-Ridah 1/23/12
It is not like we are stopping other team from scoring with Curry and Monta.
now we are just garden variety bad but Nash with Binky could set epic never to be broken records for defensive futility.
Mirror on the wall
Here we are again.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 28, 2012 9:23 PM PST up reply actions
I don’t think there was a more perfect response than this. Rec.
by Missing Barry on Jan 29, 2012 2:40 AM PST up reply actions
if anything
it shows me that that it takes more than just “elite” talent to win; coaching matters greatly and the organization as a whole, denver and utah gutted their teams but yet are still pretty decent teams. nets and knicks still seem to suck hard. trading/signing amarie/deron/carmelo did not make their new teams winning teams. Indiana also does not seem to have any “elite” talent but they get wins.
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
by HUNGRY HUNTER on Jan 29, 2012 11:42 PM PST up reply actions
Eh, I don’t think any of those examples say that much. Heat still made it to the Finals…sometimes you hit a team that’s playing better. Happens. Denver actually kept it’s main players in place, all they really lost was Melo taking other players shots. Not too hard to replace. Utah made some good moves for their long term future – like their strategy – but they aren’t that good right now. Knicks struggles were sooooooooo predictable. NJ has Deron….and a whole pile of crap around them. Kris Humphries and Anthony Morrow are #2 and #3 on that team in minutes, followed by a rookie who was taken #25. Indiana is a solid team for the East, but not a real contender…
by Missing Barry on Jan 30, 2012 9:48 PM PST up reply actions
Rondo and Curry would be better than Monta and Curry
J-RIDAH: Its not 1 player in this draft better than Monta or Lee. Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu. Andre Drummond could be good but he is not impressive at this point at all besides his size. This draft is hella overated.
(JaVale) Mcgee is better than anybody in this draft.
i think it would be the other way around.
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
by HUNGRY HUNTER on Jan 29, 2012 11:43 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
I say we need Bigs
Our back court is fine and dandy. What we need is a dominant center. That can score, rebound and defend. Something like Dwight Howard or a Bynum. A big body that can defend the lane. Whenever Curry and Ellis got beat on the defensive side. No wonder that we miss Kwame he is the biggest center that we got, since Adonal Foyle. Who can body up other bigs and can clogged up the lane.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
mykelala01 is like the bouncer with the red rope for GSOM. You’re good to come in now.
by TheSoundOfHockey on Apr 24, 2011 9:24 PM PDT
If you watch this
this is the reason why we need a Bigs’ , someone who can body up other bigs’
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
mykelala01 is like the bouncer with the red rope for GSOM. You’re good to come in now.
by TheSoundOfHockey on Apr 24, 2011 9:24 PM PDT
I you are to lazy to watch I GIF it for you
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
mykelala01 is like the bouncer with the red rope for GSOM. You’re good to come in now.
by TheSoundOfHockey on Apr 24, 2011 9:24 PM PDT
Something like Dwight Howard or a Bynum.
Well let’s see, there’s Dwight Howard … and then there’s Bynum…
Er, that’s the complete list of guys like Howard or Bynum.
Howard’s not signing here. Bynum is marginally less of a pipe-dream , but only marginally. Any ideas how to get him here?
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jan 29, 2012 2:14 PM PST up reply actions
Er...
Any ideas how to get him here?
I say like a Bynum and a Howard. With big body and a basketball IQ around the basket. You literally want Bynum and a Howard? is like you literally want a D Rose and a Chris Paul as our PG. As the original poster suggest that he want a top 10 PG on our team. Even that, I have no Idea how we can acquired a D Will, Rondo or CP3. But we got more chance of getting a dominant center. For we don’t need him to score, we got enough scorer on our team. We just need a big body that who can defend rebound and hustle. Like a Kwame but he got injured.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
mykelala01 is like the bouncer with the red rope for GSOM. You’re good to come in now.
by TheSoundOfHockey on Apr 24, 2011 9:24 PM PDT
Like a Kwame but he got injured.
Yeah, we had that guy. We were 2-6 with him before he was injured. He might have looked like a half-decent player relative to the shell of Biedrins, Chris Hunter, or Jeremy Tyler, but he’s been pretty crappy throughout his career. How many wins do you actually think a Kwame is worth? 1? 3?
It always amazes when fans think some journeyman medicocrity at [position X] will make a significant difference in this team. The position where this team most needs an upgrade is the position of Best Player. Until that happens, we’re doomed to mediocrity at best.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jan 29, 2012 3:50 PM PST up reply actions
You got a point
so you are suggesting that our team need a revamp a facelift a change off a franchise player. When you say an upgrade to our best player. So let me ask you this if you are given a chance to fix our franchise. And you have a choice between upgrading the “PG” position or the “Center” position… who you rather upgrade. just one it can’t be both.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
mykelala01 is like the bouncer with the red rope for GSOM. You’re good to come in now.
by TheSoundOfHockey on Apr 24, 2011 9:24 PM PDT
And you have a choice between upgrading the "PG" position or the "Center" position… who you rather upgrade.
Well, it kind of depends on how much of an upgrade we’re talking about. I think an upgrade from Curry to CP3 is probably worth more than an upgrade from Biedrins to Kwame or even Deandre Jordan.
Generally speaking, I agree that big man is by far our weakest link. Problem is, it’s also probably the hardest link to upgrade significantly. At this point, I’d take an upgrade to any of our five starters.
Ideal case… I dunno, how about something like this?
Orlando gets: Pau Gasol, Monta Ellis
Warriors get: Bynum, Ryan Anderson, QRich
Lakers get: Dwight Howard, David Lee, Chris Duhon
The way the Magic are playing lately (horribly) I could see a Howard trade happening sooner than later. The way the Lakers are playing (nor especially well) I could see them going in all in right now on Howard (with an implied nudge-wink extension). Not sure exactly how we fit in, except for the fact that Otis Smith has said he wants established vets and probably covets Monta.
Curry / Nate / Jenkins
Rush / Klay
Dorell / McGuire
Anderson / Udoh
Bynum / Biedrins / Tyler
Make it happen, Mr. West!
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jan 29, 2012 5:56 PM PST up reply actions
That is a really good trade
Like… Really good
RIP Al Davis
PS3 - agentpoop (dont ask why the name... tell me if your from a blog)
twitter - @nateoak5
"No difference maker in this draft taf. Sorry to be the 1 to break it to you." J-Ridah 1/23/12
Ha, thanks. For us and the Lakers it’s good … for the Magic, not so much. If they can pry both Bynum and Gasol loose from LA, I can’t really come up with any compelling reason why they wouldn’t just take them both for themselves. The whole thing really hinges on Otis Smith being a fool. Based on the Rashard Lewis contract and the Bass/Davis trade, that may not be that far from the truth, but it’s always a shaky foundation on which to build a realistic trade proposal.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jan 30, 2012 8:29 AM PST up reply actions
Ok let me re phrase my question
In a perfect world you need to choose between CP3 or Dwight Howard.
who will you pick?
If we pick CP3 then you got Beans at the Center
If we pick Dwight, you got Curry at the point
which one do you think the Warriors will benefit?
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
mykelala01 is like the bouncer with the red rope for GSOM. You’re good to come in now.
by TheSoundOfHockey on Apr 24, 2011 9:24 PM PDT
If you're gonna ask to pick either CP3 or Dwight, at least make the sidekick they come with be somewhat comparable.
Imo, CP3 is in the same league as Dwight. Top 5 players. Now with Curry and Beans, there’s no question who’s better.
"Monta is the MAN." -Bob Fitzgerald
by WarriorForLife on Jan 30, 2012 9:00 AM PST up reply actions
Like dubzfan commented, That trade is really good.
Without a doubt, the Lakers pull the trigger with the way they’re playing.
It’s a trade the Warriors should do. We get a franchise center, a guy who can stretch the floor at the 4, and unload our two largest contracts. Bynum is a player who will attract free agents (I’m thinking a nice 4 this offseason) and maybe he helps develop our other big men (looking at Udoh and Tyler).
Orlando would be happy getting Gasol, but somehow they would need to be convinced that Ellis is worth it. If they are convinced, they end up with the veterans they’ve been asking for to stay competitive. Unfortunately, Orlando’s is likely to stop this deal. They need one more piece to approve.
Serving it up night in and night out -Steph "The Chef" Curry
by dont_stop_believin' on Jan 29, 2012 11:03 PM PST up reply actions
Or, perhaps, Orlando gets to keep Anderson and his Howard-induced PER. They could be very competitive with Nelson/Ellis/Hedo/Anderson/Gasol and a rejuvenated Ellis and Gasol.
Who am I trying to kid?…That team is awful.
Serving it up night in and night out -Steph "The Chef" Curry
by dont_stop_believin' on Jan 29, 2012 11:14 PM PST up reply actions
That would work great for Warriors not sure if Lakers would go for it though.
Lakers should be feeling pretty confident that they’ll get Dwight in the off-season so I doubt they’ll bite @ David Lee’s contract. Landing Dwight through FA and trading Gasol for quality players (or keeping him) and they’re in much better shape.
Curry / Nate / Jenkins
Rush / Klay
Dorell / McGuire
Anderson / Udoh
Bynum / Biedrins / Tyler
I would make that trade in a heartbeat….Riley blew it last year in taking Udho ahead of Monroe, I was almost as high on Monroe as people were on Cuz and i think we have the verdict on that genius move right now….
Is there any possibility that we could trade either Monta or Lee or both for unprotected draft picks for the upcoming draft, the Clips did it last year just to get rid of BD and the Cavs are on their way to a better future.
I would love 2 or 3 chances with the ping pong balls in this draft…..I would extend Curry secure Rush develop Klay and look to trade Lee and or Monta for unprotected lotto picks if possible…
What says you !!
obviously we would make that deal
it’s a joke of a trade
J-RIDAH: Its not 1 player in this draft better than Monta or Lee. Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu. Andre Drummond could be good but he is not impressive at this point at all besides his size. This draft is hella overated.
(JaVale) Mcgee is better than anybody in this draft.
Hah, yeah. See my response to dubzfan above.
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jan 30, 2012 8:30 AM PST up reply actions
Why would Orlando settle for an old Pau and inefficient Ellis, when they can basically trade Bynum for Howard straight up and keep Anderson?
J-RIDAH: Its not 1 player in this draft better than Monta or Lee. Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu. Andre Drummond could be good but he is not impressive at this point at all besides his size. This draft is hella overated.
(JaVale) Mcgee is better than anybody in this draft.
Short answer: they wouldn’t, unless Otis Smith is as foolish as he’s made out to be.
Glimmer of hope (on a less grand scale): why would they trade Brandon Bass for a shorter, fatter, less athletic, less productive version of Brandon Bass with a worse contract?
There will be no extra point!
by Sleepy Freud on Jan 30, 2012 8:37 AM PST up reply actions
that's true
J-RIDAH: Its not 1 player in this draft better than Monta or Lee. Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu. Andre Drummond could be good but he is not impressive at this point at all besides his size. This draft is hella overated.
(JaVale) Mcgee is better than anybody in this draft.
Why would Orlando settle for an old Pau and inefficient Ellis, when they can basically trade Bynum for Howard straight up and keep Anderson?
I agree, like Sleep said, you would have to bank on Otis being a moron…..
I would trade away both Lee and or Monta for unprotected lotto picks this year and start to build all over, also I would throw in Riley for good measures in one of those deals…as far as I’m concerned he stuck out….we had a future big that could be one of your top 3 guys in Monroe and then pulled another bone head move….send him back to da Don and let them sip margaritas over in margarita land.
I would trade away both Lee and or Monta for unprotected lotto picks
It would have to be lotto picks and expiring contracts. Not gonna happen unless Christmas come early.
J-RIDAH: Its not 1 player in this draft better than Monta or Lee. Anthony Davis is no different than Al Farouq Aminu. Andre Drummond could be good but he is not impressive at this point at all besides his size. This draft is hella overated.
(JaVale) Mcgee is better than anybody in this draft.
Santa came early for the Cavs last year and look what he left under their tree….unless Stern orchestrated all that…
Another thing Riley just did was use up our amnesty wild card…It’s time to relieve him of his duties…
If we can’t move Monta or Lee for drafts picks and expirings then we’re in for a long overhaul…
Yeah, Kwame is not helping the team much.
and after seeing Chandler in Knicks, it doesn’t look like Warriors can get any better even if we have Chandler in our team.
Chicago Bulls is successful with Rose, so maybe a better route for Warriors is to make Monta a PG, and Curry a SG? Noah is no doing anything on the offense, similar to Beans. I know, Rose > Monta, Noah > Beans, but it is not that far off. If we play like Bulls, at least it will give us few more wins, 8 seeds?
by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 30, 2012 1:12 AM PST up reply actions
I have no Idea how we can acquired a D Will, Rondo or CP3. But we got more chance of getting a dominant center.
We actually had the chance to get CP3 but we turn it down
But we got more chance of getting a dominant center. For we don’t need him to score, we got enough scorer on our team. We just need a big body that who can defend rebound and hustle. Like a Kwame but he got injured.
Beans actually can defense and rebounds better than Kwame.
And, I think it is easy to list out top 10 PG, but it is hard to even list out top 5 center. Howard, Bynum… and that’s about it. We thought Chandler is a great deal, but it doesn’t look like he is helping Knicks even when he plays better than last year.
by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 30, 2012 1:18 AM PST up reply actions
And, I think it is easy to list out top 10 PG
Yup I was referring to your original post. That I agreed having top 10 PG on our team will make us better. But our team should aim at getting a center than a PG. We already have one of the best PG in the league. His name is Stephen Curry if wasn’t for that ankle.
Then if you want a pass first elite PG who can run pick and roll to perfection. then it is hard to come by, like an all star center. Because there is CP3,Nash, Rubio, Rondo, Dwill on top of my head right now. Damn I can’t even think of top 10 pass first PG.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
mykelala01 is like the bouncer with the red rope for GSOM. You’re good to come in now.
by TheSoundOfHockey on Apr 24, 2011 9:24 PM PDT
Stockton… oh, he is dead already.
Lin… oh, forgot he is an Asian.
Yeah, Curry is great. If he dosen’t wanna do PNR, fine, then don’t turn the ball over. Can’t believe a PG who doesn’t pass much has this many TOs, and I am pretty sure TO has nothing to do with his ankle.
Or just let Monta do the drive and kick, like how Rose does it. The problem with Monta is that he is an inside player who does not get any foul calls. What’s up with that? Not to mention he is competing with Curry to see who has the most TO every-single-game.
by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 30, 2012 3:14 PM PST up reply actions
The problem with Monta is that he is an inside player who does not get any foul calls
Well like I said our backcourt is fine and dandy. What we need is a bigs. TO is given but having other team with 2nd chance point is a b!*#(h. Rebound and defense is the key to successful team. Scoring is not problem with our roster right now.
And about Monta not getting to the line much often. I feel your pain, either the ref and the whole NBA is against us. Or Monta is just a finesse player that can avoid contact in mid-air. I think the latter. Even Bob and Fitz said it “How wonderful when Monta drive to the rim he is like a ballet dancer.” Well that’s why we love Monta all his circus lay up and move.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
mykelala01 is like the bouncer with the red rope for GSOM. You’re good to come in now.
by TheSoundOfHockey on Apr 24, 2011 9:24 PM PDT
Synergy Report
If the images is too small for you here is the link:
http://i41.tinypic.com/hvrqe1.jpg
OKC 16-3
GSW 6-12
OKC Points per game 100.36
GSW Points per game 96.22
OKC Turnover rate 16.52 per game
GSW Turnover rate 15.22 per game
OKC Rebounding per game 43.10
GSW Reb per game 39.94
Offensive rebound almost the same OKC 9.78 GSW 9.88
Block per game OKC 6.78 GSW 5
OKC got more turnover than GSW. but still they are the no#1 team in our conference or even the whole NBA. They beat us on rebounding by +/- 4 and Points Per game by +4. But why are the Warriors bottom feeder and they are the top team.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
mykelala01 is like the bouncer with the red rope for GSOM. You’re good to come in now.
by TheSoundOfHockey on Apr 24, 2011 9:24 PM PDT
Sounds like we need to give Beans more minutes
Beans played more minutes earlier in the season, much higher rebounding and block shots per game.
As far as points, I think we are start to catching up on that as DW and Klay start getting the shooting going.
by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 30, 2012 9:00 PM PST up reply actions
and don't forget about the FT.
Is Warriors way down at the bottom at FT attempt?
by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 30, 2012 9:01 PM PST up reply actions
I know
we suck at free throw attempt and percentage. Imagine if we made like 90% of our free throw we could win more than 6 games
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
mykelala01 is like the bouncer with the red rope for GSOM. You’re good to come in now.
by TheSoundOfHockey on Apr 24, 2011 9:24 PM PDT
My 2k trade!
Bynum, Murphy and Walton for Curry, Klay,Udoh, a 2nd and Kwame’s expiring
RIP Al Davis
PS3 - agentpoop (dont ask why the name... tell me if your from a blog)
twitter - @nateoak5
"No difference maker in this draft taf. Sorry to be the 1 to break it to you." J-Ridah 1/23/12
Any ideas how to get him here?
Southwest offers over 12 flights a day from LA to SF/Oakland
by tafkasam on Jan 30, 2012 10:25 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I wouldn’t say our backcourt is fine and dandy until we acquire us a Wade/Lebron combo. I wouldn’t ignore any chance to make a meaningful change to this team. Signing guys like Kwame? Meh, they might bump us a seed, but in the grand picture of things, it’s completely meaningless. To really change the direction of the franchise, we need to get someone who’s really, really good. Those guys are hard to get. You take them at whatever position you can manage to acquire one at.
by Missing Barry on Jan 30, 2012 9:53 PM PST up reply actions
I wouldn’t say our backcourt is fine and dandy until we acquire us a Wade/Lebron combo. I
I thought it was Chalmer and Wade Heat backourt combo. And Lebron on a SF position which is consider a frontcourt. Unless you put Lebron as a Point Forward. But tecnically it wasn’t a backcourt combo.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
mykelala01 is like the bouncer with the red rope for GSOM. You’re good to come in now.
by TheSoundOfHockey on Apr 24, 2011 9:24 PM PDT
Yeah, I don’t concern myself with dumb technicalities. The position Lebron plays is much closer in responsibilities to Wade than Bosh. A wing is a wing is a wing, and calling some wings “frontcourt” and some wings “backcourt” is stupid and makes no sense whatsoever.
by Missing Barry on Jan 31, 2012 10:18 AM PST up reply actions
Whoa a lot of hostility, point well taken
I wouldn’t say our backcourt is fine and dandy until we acquire us a Wade/Lebron combo
We are talking about backcourt combo. If you say Rondo/Allen, Fisher/Kobe or Westbrook/Sefolosha. I would not call you on it. Come to think of it we got one of the best back court combo in the league.
But if you want to compare our SG and SF combo ala Wade/Lebron… we got Ellis/Dwright. Lakers got Kobe/ I guess Barnes these days. Celtics got Allen/Pierce.
OKC Sefolosha/Durant.
so yes if we have Wade/Lebron on the roster other position on our team does not matter. Damn we don’t even need a Center for all I care.
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
mykelala01 is like the bouncer with the red rope for GSOM. You’re good to come in now.
by TheSoundOfHockey on Apr 24, 2011 9:24 PM PDT
so yes if we have Wade/Lebron on the roster other position on our team does not matter. Damn we don’t even need a Center for all I care.
Yeah, that’s kind of my original point – that our backcourt isn’t good enough to overcome a subpar frontcourt. Given that, I hardly think we should be ignoring the problems our backcourt has and ONLY looking to upgrade at other positions. We’ll take an upgrade wherever we can find one, because right now, not a single position on our team is strong enough to lead a contender.
by Missing Barry on Feb 1, 2012 9:47 AM PST up reply actions
I hardly think we should be ignoring the problems our backcourt has and ONLY looking to upgrade at other positions. We’ll take an upgrade wherever we can find one, because right now, not a single position on our team is strong enough to lead a contender
Rec up
I definitely agree with you!
Win Or Lose Warriors For Life.........
mykelala01 is like the bouncer with the red rope for GSOM. You’re good to come in now.
by TheSoundOfHockey on Apr 24, 2011 9:24 PM PDT
Curry is very suitable as a starting PG for this team
he actually needs the ball more. We need better defense and someone who can draw fouls, our best player is our PG. Heck Monta can even play point fairly effectively. PG is not our problem. Our problem is that we have a insanely constructed team. We have basically no center and two small guards, neither of which can guard big guards in our back court.
Curry and Lee’s deficiencies could be mitigated with a balanced roster, but instead they are accentuation by having the opposite of a balanced roster. Also we have a coach that wants us to slow the game down and be better defensively… yet we have no big man who can play defense.
I think we need Center and Small Forward
And we need players at Center and Small Forward who are very physical and play defense very well. Also need to let the youth develop, jenkins, tyler, klay. They should get more minutes so they can come along faster.
agree on the coaching part with no defensive big.
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
by HUNGRY HUNTER on Jan 29, 2012 11:48 PM PST up reply actions
Jeremy Tyler!!!
He has potential and could be used as a trade piece for lets say Bunum, howard, etc. Make it happen if you want to win now, or just develop Tyler.
I was thinking that may have been a reason why he was not playing more often as the warriors did not want to show him to other teams of what he can do so that they do not demand him in any trade. just a thought.
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
by HUNGRY HUNTER on Jan 29, 2012 11:49 PM PST up reply actions
I’m intrigued by Tyler, I didn’t like the tape I seen of him in practices, but that was such a small amount of footage it’s not fair to him to base to much on it…I like the way MJ is easing him in, he’s a project but I can keep my fingers crossed and hope like the dickens he’s a stud and not a dud..
Tyler is not bad.
But so far he seems like he can play a good 8 min. Anything pass that he doesn’t look good at all.
by ILoveWarriorsGirls on Jan 30, 2012 3:15 PM PST up reply actions
He has potential and could be used as a trade piece for lets say Bunum, howard, etc. Make it happen if you want to win now, or just develop Tyler.
Ha. Tyler as a major piece in a trade for Bynum or Howard? Yeah, right. 38 times in this past draft a team chose to take someone else – some rookie, most of them who aren’t particularly good – rather than Jeremy Tyler. That should say something about his trade value, no? Even if he shows the draft undervalued him, you have a looooooonnnnnnnnnnggggggg way to go before he becomes a serious trade chip.
by Missing Barry on Jan 30, 2012 9:56 PM PST up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
"UNSTOPPABLE BABY!"
Golden State Warriors rookie Marc Jackson to the Mavericks' bench, after hitting a lay-up during a 29-point loss (2000)
NBA Playoffs Content Module
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
Featured Stories
Most Commented
In Association With
Ball Don't Lie - NBA - Yahoo! Sport
- Shaquille O’Neal is in a Chinese beer commercial, too (VIDEO)
- ‘Deep Thoughts’ and Cheap Thoughts: San Antonio Spurs vs. Oklahoma City Thunder
- C-a-C: This is probably as close to LeBron James working with John Waters as we’ll ever get
- Dwyane Wade’s hot pink pants: The kind of thing you can get away with when you drop 41
- Lamar Odom to New York? Dwight Howard on the move? For now, it’s all talk
