The Ekpe Udoh Quandry
A fantastic breakdown on Ekpe Udoh''s defense and unnoticed value. Brought to you by Warriors World
4 months ago
j-spliff415
35 comments
1 recs |
Comments
Its very obvious
That Udoh is a good defender, especially in one on one situations. What Udoh really needs to work on is a 15-18 foot base line jump shot like Udonis Haslem. He could be a starter in the league if he did that on a good team. If not he could be a first big off the bench on a good team.
The reason people have such an issue with Udoh over Monroe, is mainly due to age. Monroe has the potential to be supposedly much more than he already is due to him being younger and thus a higher trade value.
the age thing is overblown
he’s still very young
just because he has a year or two on monroe doesnt make him physically incapable of being better
It's lonely being the only Warriors fan at UMass :(
Age is important. The research people have done on this suggests NBA development is not a function of how many years you’ve been in the league, but rather of age. Udoh is almost 3 years older than Monroe – comparing what they are right now misses the point on age entirely, because Monroe has 3 more years of growth left before he’s the same age Udoh is now (and Monroe is in the part of his career that players tend to improve significantly).
Anyways, the main problem I’ve had with Riley’s drafting strategy isn’t about comparing who’s better between Udoh and Monroe. “Who’s better” misses the point. The issue I have with his strategy is I don’t think trying to get the better player every time is the right strategy, because it means you take the lower ceiling, safe player every time and miss out on guys with potential. A team like the Warriors needs to hit on a guy with big potential to go anywhere from here. Safe role players are going to keep us mediocre.
by Missing Barry on Feb 2, 2012 8:41 AM PST up reply actions
Riley whiffed on guys with "potential" too.
Anthony Randolph ring a bell?
by Lacob's Ladder on Feb 2, 2012 9:37 AM PST up reply actions
Late lottery pick
Definitely worth the risk
And I think that was Mullin, might be wrong though
RIP Al Davis
PS3 - agentpoop (dont ask why the name... tell me if your from a blog)
twitter - @nateoak5
"No difference maker in this draft taf. Sorry to be the 1 to break it to you." J-Ridah 1/23/12
That was mullin not Riley.
But still it is a cardinal sin to ever draft for need in the lotto. That was the poor decision by our idiot GM.
"I thought it was going in," Warriors center Chris Hunter said. "It looked like the invisible man tipped it away at the last second."
"He's chicken curry right now. He'll become beef curry a little later on."
-Keith Smart
Randolph was a poor decision? Really? I thought it was a very good risk to take. Guys drafted around Randolph:
Bayless
Jason Thompson
Rush
Randolph
Robin Lopez
Speights
Hibbert
McGee
Hickson
Ajinca
Randolph looks like as good a gamble as any to me. Maybe McGee was a better gamble because he was bigger (harder to find!), but I think Randolph had age going for him. Flip a coin.
by Missing Barry on Feb 2, 2012 11:36 AM PST up reply actions
hibbert would have been better in hindsight obviously
but beans looked solid around this time, so its understandable
It's lonely being the only Warriors fan at UMass :(
No I wasn't referring to Rudolph. Our idiot GM who took a young Taj Gibson over young Al Jefferson.
"I thought it was going in," Warriors center Chris Hunter said. "It looked like the invisible man tipped it away at the last second."
"He's chicken curry right now. He'll become beef curry a little later on."
-Keith Smart
And despite how poor of a pick that was
He somehow turned into David lee if you added an expiring contract and a center that didn’t have an offensive game beyond dunks… Yeah I’d say it paid off in the end (though Lee is overpaid yes, but thats not the point).
The book hasn’t been closed on Randolph yet. He’s only 22 and still may turn out to be a productive NBA player.
+1
he’s still got plenty of time.
If he is truly willing to learn, and work on his game, I see no reason to write him off already…hell, I’d even put Broken Wing (to a lesser extent) in the same boat
"I am very worried about the Warriors"
-brutusbrutus
by Duby Dub Dubs on Feb 2, 2012 12:37 PM PST up reply actions
No matter what your draft strategy, there’s always the risk of failure in the draft. Not every prospect works out.
by Missing Barry on Feb 2, 2012 11:33 AM PST up reply actions
No his rebounding is why we like Monroe more
And the fact Monroe can score really well
RIP Al Davis
PS3 - agentpoop (dont ask why the name... tell me if your from a blog)
twitter - @nateoak5
"No difference maker in this draft taf. Sorry to be the 1 to break it to you." J-Ridah 1/23/12
yeah, rebounding
Udoh hasn’t recorded at least five rebounds in back-to-back games this season. He didn’t have consecutive games with at least six rebounds in 58 attempts last season.
"I am very worried about the Warriors"
-brutusbrutus
by Duby Dub Dubs on Feb 2, 2012 10:18 AM PST up reply actions
I love me some Udoh! He’s the one player on this team (aside from perhaps Dom) that plays hard and does the little things that help his team win. I love that he can drastically impact his team in a positive way while only scoring 2 points and grabbing 2 rebounds.
Unlike Udoh, Dom doesn’t have a positive effect on the team while he’s playing. The team is almost always worse off while he’s playing.
by Lacob's Ladder on Feb 2, 2012 9:39 AM PST up reply actions
I disagree
He’s a great rebounder and a good defender on a team that lacks both. He should have more PT then he does now, just don’t put him out there with other guys who can’t score
RIP Al Davis
PS3 - agentpoop (dont ask why the name... tell me if your from a blog)
twitter - @nateoak5
"No difference maker in this draft taf. Sorry to be the 1 to break it to you." J-Ridah 1/23/12
, just don’t put him out there with other guys who can’t score
or against big guys who post him up or middle size guys who jump into him, or little guys who shoot over him?
Mirror on the wall
Here we are again.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Feb 2, 2012 9:52 AM PST up reply actions
He’s literally worthless on offense. He doesn’t do a single productive thing on that side of the ball. I like his rebounding and defense, too, but it doesn’t surprise me that those don’t make up for his offensive ineptitude.
by Missing Barry on Feb 2, 2012 11:42 AM PST up reply actions
Except that his defensive abilities don’t make up for his complete offensive ineptitude.
The only time it makes sense to play Dom is during end of game situations where you have timeouts between possessions that allow you to sub someone in for him on offense. Subbing him for Lee would make sense in those situations, for example. End of quarter situations to get a stop would also make sense. Otherwise, having him in for extended stretches ends up in us being outscored by our opponent more often than not.
by Lacob's Ladder on Feb 2, 2012 1:21 PM PST up reply actions
Well I think Dom does play a lot of 4 in a small set.
Play him more as a 3 and maybe he would be a statistical positive.
"I thought it was going in," Warriors center Chris Hunter said. "It looked like the invisible man tipped it away at the last second."
"He's chicken curry right now. He'll become beef curry a little later on."
-Keith Smart
Hyperbole once again.
Gambino is a mastermind...
by GovernorStephCurry on Feb 2, 2012 6:54 PM PST up reply actions
unless he's into that
which is totally ok too
"I am very worried about the Warriors"
-brutusbrutus
by Duby Dub Dubs on Feb 6, 2012 10:07 AM PST up reply actions
rec'd btw
this is nice work.
interesting to see the contrast between Udoh and Lee…everyone should read this
"I am very worried about the Warriors"
-brutusbrutus
the word is quandary
and it’s revealing that the Strauss article went into detail about only one side of a (supposed) complicated issue that the word ‘quandary’ implies. From the feedback here it looks like the consensus is, the areas where Udoh fails to make positive contributions are so glaring that the matter isn’t really perplexing or problematic. Jackson seems fairly circumspect in his comments about his players to the media, but he hasn’t spared Udoh and the player agreed with the coach about inconsistency and passivity.
Music is the Healing Force of the Universe (a.ayler)
ESPN's David Thorpe doesn't even have Epke as a Top 20 Sophomore...
This is an “Insider” article so you may not be able to click through the link all the way, but Ekpe doesn’t even rank in David Thorpe’s Top 20 for Sophomore Rankings. Sad, sad, sad.
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/page/Soph20-120203/nba-ranking-top-20-sophomores
Of course Greg Monroe is ranked #2 behind Blake Griffin. Unfortunate but true that Udoh and Monroe will forever be linked in my eyes. Seems like Monroe does everything better than Ekpe except block shots.
I still think Ekpe needs to bulk up if he is ever going to be able to hold his own and become a lock-down interior defender. He ends up on his ass way too many times during a game – just watch and you’ll see what I’m talking about.
Oh how I miss Kwame Brown…
I've been really hard on the udoh pick BUT...
Reality is he’s played 78 pro games and had ZERO camp or summer league.
It’s not unrealistic to expect Udoh and Klay to make big strides next season. See Udoh develop the offensive game he has (nothing super impressive, but less of a liability), and Klay to play better.
And what impresses me most, he's a pretty sizeable rebounding plus
Offensive Rebounding
On- 26.6%
Off- 24.3%
+2.3%
Defensive Rebounding
On- 73.3%
Off- 66.7%
It’s too bad we didn’t try for Nene really. Udoh/Nene is a quality combo






















