Recap: Warriors 103, Lakers 108- It Just Doesn't Add Up
This might be the toughest loss of the season so far for the Warriors. Not because so many things went wrong, but because so many things went right.

So close, but not close enough.
What went right:
- For the most part the Warriors played a very entertaining brand of hoops tonight featuring some very active defense which led to some exciting buckets in transition. They picked the Lakers 18 times and rejected 6 of their shots. Credit BD (5), Andris Biedrins (5), Mickael Pietrus (3), Al Harrington (3), Stephen Jackson (1) and Sarunas Jasikevicius (1) for the interceptions. This is the second game in a row where we've seen the Warriors force so many turnovers at a stunning rate. If they keep this up, in the long run they'll run a lot of teams out of the building. For the first time in several years we can finally say this team is athletic.
- Everyone out there was trying hard on both sides of the ball. That's something that we haven't been able to say much this season. Al Harrington, Stephen Jackson, and even Josh Powell are major upgrades defensively over those two softies the Warriors sent to Indy. Ain't nuthin' Charmin soft about the Warriors' D tonight.
- Al Harrington really struggled putting the ball in the hole in his Warrior debut, but tonight he was money scoring with post up moves, points in the paint, and treys. Let's hope he reverts back to his rebounding ways that he displayed this past Saturday because 1 board in 43 minutes of play is bad- Mike Dunleavy bad.
- Mickael Pietrus never looked so good on the glass and finished with 14 boards. Sure he made a mistake or two, but overall MP2 played a very effective game. No major complaints here.
- The Warriors actually outshot the Lakers in their own building. If I told you that the Dubs would shoot 47.7% from the field tonight to the Lakers' 43.0% would you say the Warriors were going to lose? What killed the Warriors tonight was the huge discrepancy at the charity stripe and the huge rebounding margin.
- Baron Davis put out his finest defensive effort of the season. He's had better numbers in the past and 2 of his turnovers tonight could've easily been avoided, but he still had a nice night. If he didn't go down with leg cramps in the closing minutes of the 4th quarter, we might be enjoying a Warrior win in LA. But no excuses. He went down and the Warriors lost.

Al was scoring at will.
What went wrong:
- It's understandable since these guys haven't played together that much, but this team looked out of sync at times. They're still learning each other's strengths and weakness and how to play as a cohesive unit. The problem is that the Warriors don't have any time to figure these things out as they're fighting for their lives to make the final playoff spot in the West. Time is running out.
- The refs messed up badly on two calls on Andris Biedrins, but he still needs to be more careful about with his fouling. The fouls severely limit his effectiveness and cost the Warriors dearly by forcing Nellie to go extremely small. With Andris on the bench the Warriors can't hang with other squads on the glass. Tonight the Lakers dominated the battle of the boards inhaling 51 rebounds to the Warriors' 36. Ouch!
- The Warriors have to find a way to reduce the ridiculous free throw disparity. Tonight the Lakers went to the line 41 times, while the Dubs only got there 20 times. Kobe alone had 19 trips. Whatever it takes for the Warriors to get a more balanced number of free throw attempts, they need to do it. I suggest baking brownies for the refs and giving them Warrior Girl calendars before each game. How can the refs possibly not show the Warriors love with that kind of pre-game treatment?

Cover your mouth! If you breathe on Kobe, it's a foul.

Even Kobe couldn't believe the foul calls the refs were giving the Lakers.
What needs to change:
- First and foremost the Warriors need to play smart and keep up the intensity for 48 minutes. The Warriors will start winning close games once they do that. Until then, there will be nothing but heartache for Warriors Nation.
- The long scoring droughts need to stop. Maybe Nellie needs to call time outs faster to calm down the team and draw up a play for them to get an easy score. This team is not good enough to go on those long droughts and play catch up.
- I'm all for the trade, but let's hope Nellie, Mully, and Higgy aren't done dealing. This team needs another rebounder or two badly. I'm really curious why Matt Barnes didn't play tonight. Think something's brewing on the trade block?

Opposing players shouldn't look like WR's when they grab rebounds against the Dubs.
It just doesn't add up my friends. The Warriors should've won this one in LA, but they didn't. For the first time this season the Warriors are 4 games below .500, putting them in 10th place in the West. They're going to need a big winning steak in the second half of the NBA season if they're going to make the playoffs. Playing .500 ball from here on out isn't going to cut it.
Warrior Wonder
You could easily make a case for Mickael Pietrus and his efficient 14 and 14 with 3 steals and a block. You could easily make a case for Al Harrington and his 30 points on 13 for 19 shooting. You could easily make a case for Baron Davis and his great defense (5 interceptions and 1 block). But I'm going to make a case for GSoM favorite Jessica Alba. Miss Alba made her presence known on the FSN Bay Area telecast and waived a friendly hello to the entire GSoM community. If she can rebound or make good decisions in the clutch, the Warriors should seriously think about adding her to this squad. I think everyone in Warriors Nation would be down. Hey, maybe the Warriors would get more calls from the refs if she was on the team.

UPDATE: Thanks to the sharp eyes of loyal GSoM community members Poopoojoe and GSDubz, we have a great game pic of tonight's Warrior Wonder...

Photos: AP Photo/Danny Moloshok and Andrew D. Bernstein/NBAE via Getty Images
0 recs |
51 comments
Comments
Great post
About those Dubs--I'm enthusiastic about this team's potential. A little more gellin' (just like Dr. Scholls') and we might be runnin' nicely in the Bay. Interesting remark about Barnes you made, who knows, maybe a deal really is in store? Who would it be for though? I don't know if there are any great rebounding bigs on the market currently...? Gasol wouldn't want to come here, Garnett is out of the picture--who do you guys have in mind?
by Adonalmao on Jan 23, 2007 12:31 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I agree
by GreyMurphy on Jan 23, 2007 7:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I seriously doubt
by Zig on Jan 23, 2007 9:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah.

If you take a look out of your windows, you can now see Dallas, TX. Quite the site, no?
by coma on Jan 23, 2007 12:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Barnes Plus
by johnl on Jan 23, 2007 4:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
not possible
by jae on Jan 23, 2007 6:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Im not sure
by Psion on Jan 24, 2007 10:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
About Biedrins
Maybe if we had a back up center who could get us around 6-8 boards if needed we could afford it, but not in this situation.
Of course, we all know that the refs don't help with any of those calls.
By the way, what happened in the last minutes of the 4th? Poor shooting selection and TOs?
by Jaime Novoa on Jan 23, 2007 12:33 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
eek
by Adonalmao on Jan 23, 2007 12:40 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
hope...
by wander7 on Jan 23, 2007 1:00 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
You said it...
As for the trade talk, I agree with Atma (and just about everyone else) that we need another big body down low. AB is still learning and we can't expect him to play 40+ minutes every night. With no Murphy or Diogu (POB and Foyle hardly deserve mentioning), we're being forced to depend on Beans way too much. When he was forced to the bench with foul trouble tonight (and when he eventually fouled out) we were flat-out awful in the paint. Andrew Bynum looked like the second coming of Shaq at times. I see no way Warriors management doesn't make a move before the deadline. In my opinion, they don't have a choice. Maybe it's MP2 for McDyess (we'd have to throw in someone like Zarko to make the deal work). Dumars is telling local media McDyess isn't on the trading block, but they'd be out of their minds not to make the deal if they're looking for an athletic swingman. And if we're not planning on re-signing Pietrus anyway, then why not? Yes, McDyess is far past his prime and actually listed as the exact same size as one Al Harrington, but their games are completely different. Plus, McDyess is in the last year of his deal, so it's smart for salary cap purposes as well (unlike that Nazr guy everyone's been clamoring about, who's a salary cap nightmare and, oh by the way, can't even get a start in Detroit over 37-year-old Dale Davis). We've got plenty of trade bait, so if not McDyess, fine. Actually, he's just the first name that popped into my head (after KG, of course). But there's no excuse for not getting a deal done. Heck, I'd even take ol' Dale right about now. I bet he could block out Luke freaking Walton...
by Epicurious Cowboy on Jan 23, 2007 1:04 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Is Alba...
by MVP on Jan 23, 2007 1:40 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Is Alba...
Looks like she's got a crush on Baron?
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 23, 2007 7:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If I remember right
by Atma Brother ONE on Jan 23, 2007 8:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"Baron's boy from high school"
by Caught Backcourt on Jan 23, 2007 2:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
did we have an inside presence?
i really hope mully isnt done dealing, (no i am not saying nazr is the answer) but the team needs someone who can play good solid D, rebound the ball and catch it when baron or jackson drives and dishes
one guy that has a rising trade stock, at least for a while, was matt barnes, i personally think we can live without him and if we can package him with adonal or zarko to get something, it wouldnt be a bad idea to consider.
i think maybe mullin is working on something, because i dont think barnes played at all last night. i hope mullin can do something, he has been good with trades, the baron trade, this latest trade, then i remember a useless one for tskitsvilli, but that was a garbage trade, it didnt really have any impact, we did get eddy naruraja in it though
biendrins really needs to step up his play, i was really impressed by him in the first part of the season, but lately, he has reverted to his one minute man days, nellie is good with young guys, hopefully he can help him get it going
just my couple cents
by badnamedwarriorfan on Jan 23, 2007 7:05 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Big Al had only one rebound
by Kobe on Jan 23, 2007 11:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the #'s don't show it, but
and he usually picks up fouls b/c of the warriors guards propensity to reach in and let their guys drive by them instead of moving their feet - also the reason they pick up so many cheap fouls. the w's can't do anything about superstar calls and guys jumping into beans to draw calls, but they can do something about their own defense.
another part of it is that when he's playing against guys who have 40 or 50 pounds on him he wears down.
the one thing that beans does need to learn is when to go for blocks and when not to. he needs to have a better feel for what the offensive player is going to do so he can avoid body contact - because sometimes changing a shot is just as good as blocking it.
by the evil monkey on Jan 23, 2007 5:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Forgotten D
by GreyMurphy on Jan 23, 2007 7:52 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
alba haha
by gsdubz on Jan 23, 2007 7:52 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
This might be the toughest loss of the season
You know, it was a loss but I feel good about the team now. The new guys have only been here for two games, it's gonna take a few more before they know the system. The reason I'm upbeat is the team has shown some excellent defense at times and runs where we out score good teams for a quarter or two. By the end of the season with Jason healthy we might surprise some folks if we can get into the playoffs.
by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 23, 2007 8:12 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
on the cusp
by tadams1080 on Jan 23, 2007 8:26 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
don't hang your heads too much
my optimism is bolstered by that blistering first half. the new guys look hungry and fired up and that's infectious. i'm glad harrington brought his game but what happened to jax? let's hope jax will bring his game back for wednesday and we can see some of the same production (plus boards!) from al.
monta looks good with the new line up, seems like less pressure to score. andris needs some big bodied help for sure.
by redape on Jan 23, 2007 8:50 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Brought his game?
by jae on Jan 23, 2007 6:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Three Quarters of Fun. . .
Oh. And you've got to love the "major upgrade defensively" Harrington has brought. While he went off (except for the fourth quarter, of course), his counter-parts did pretty well, too. And ONE REBOUND in 43 minutes? And worse, NO DEFENSIVE REBOUNDS? Gee.
Bottom line. Street ball is a lot of fun to watch. . .until your opponents turn on the defensive screws -- which both the Cavs and the Lakers did, almost effortlessly, these last two games. Then, the joy dissipates as fans ask themselves: "How did we lose that game?" I know, I know. I complain too much when I see collapse after collapse at crunch time; I should enjoy more "highlight" play during the first three quarters. But I guess I'm too old school: I still like to win games, rather than just put on a show until crunch time.
by johnl on Jan 23, 2007 9:26 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
1 board in 43 minutes of play is bad-
I don't recall Dunleavy ever playing anything close to 43 minutes and pulling only one board? That is the weirdest stats of the night
by Zig on Jan 23, 2007 9:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
"Harrington Bad"
Rebounding isn't something Harrington's been good at and is the single biggest reason he's not more of an impact player. It is almost impossible to have effective defense without the ability to rebound the ball. Even if you can force bad shots, if you cannot secure the rebound, the missed shot is essentially erased and the offense gets another go at it. While good rebounders may not necessarily help the defense as a whole (see: Murphy, Troy) I am suspicious of anyone considered a good defender who is not at least an average rebounder for his position.
by jae on Jan 23, 2007 10:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Three Quarters of fun
Don't get too down on Al, he was huffing hard in the 4th quarter. You have to remember we play at a frenetic pace and he needs to catch up in terms of conditioning. And the 4th? If Koby got hurt with the game tied and three minutes left we would expect the full strength warriors to win. Why is it any different when our playmaker goes down? Its not an excuse, but we shouldn't get down on them for it either.
Just a vision. Baron, Richardson, Jackson, Harrington, and Biedrins. Name a more athletic 1-5 in the league. I dare you.
by garin423 on Jan 23, 2007 10:08 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I can name a lot of
by Zig on Jan 23, 2007 10:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
johnl's right though that the 4th quarter collapses have to stop. I'm not the least bit interested in highlight plays right now. I want wins. And lots of them.
by Atma Brother ONE on Jan 23, 2007 10:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ditto
during the tmc days, we had fun AND we won. now, we're having fun for a while, which i love, but that feeling turns to pain as we lose the games. the thing this team doesn't seem to have right now is the ability to finish. now, nellie is my favorite coach in the world, but he's got to take a chunk of responsibility for that. i'll give him some time with the new guys...but he's got to figure it out. like others have suggested, we need a different game in the final minutes than we play the rest of the way. i would argue the warriors don't even have to practice their "first three quarter" game...and they should just work on their "2 minute offense".
by TMC Forever on Jan 23, 2007 4:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What did Montgomery say?
I mean, I hate to say it, but that's Nellie ball.
It's exciting, it's fun, it fills the arena.
It never wins championships.
We need a big PF that can intimidate and score and rebound. Harrington is a small PF that can score.
We can see what the team looks like without Baron. Pretty bad. We'd better be looking for a better backup than Sarunas in the draft next year. I think with our pick we should get someone good, and maybe an elite point guard to develope. Unless there's a stud PF to be had.
We don't need another 7' beanpole. We have one on the floor, one in the D league, and one in Europe.
We don't need another SG/SF combo guy.
We need a 6'10" PF that can rebound and bang and pass, and we need a better backup to Baron than Ellis, though the return of JRich might ease that a bit.
The confusion in games should go away in two weeks. Give them time.
But some of the Pacers fans were right. Harrington can't Board much and has not great "D" overall, but he's quicker than Murphy.
He's not the bulk and sheer size of Murphy, so it's just a different skill set, the two are pretty evenly matched. I think Harrington is better, but not by that much.
The roster can at least be tweaked easier now due to better salary structure overall.
We are going the right direction!
by Gain on 10 on Jan 23, 2007 10:13 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
One of BD's worst IQ games of the year
Baron has been playing great all season. Some critics feared him reverting to last year's "And 1" ball. Thankfully he hasn't (much)!
But...I don't know how BD's HORRIBLE decision making last night could be left off the "What went wrong" list. BD was taking TERRIBLE shots (7/18 FG). He was making more bad decisions than normal (5 TOs only 7 asts). Honestly, it looked like he was pumped up about the suspension, and wanted to show off for the new guys. Are you serious? From a 9 year, allstar, vet? It's nights like these that have me scratching my head about BD. He is a great player, and could be incredible. I'm sending him better basketball videos by Steve Nash for his Valentines Day.
by jgodoski on Jan 23, 2007 10:15 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Good Points
But, you know what? Despite his poor offense last night, he's still the glue for an otherwise untrained team. And his absence in the last four minutes was particularly telling, when once again the offense stalled and, more important, the defense completely broke down. (Kudos for the Dunleavy-like Walton, who quickly saw the holes and took advantage of them -- while the W five just watched.
These guys need some toughness -- mental and physical -- at game end, and BD HAS to lead the way, as he's shown he can this year. One suggestion: Flip your tendencies, and go BIG at the end of the game: run two of the BD-Monta_Jackson trifecta in the backcourt (likely BD and Jax at this point), play Harrington at the three (giving him freedom and protecting against his apparent inability to rebound), and use Powell with AB (or Foyle, if necessary) down low. This five could play man or zone, and BD, Jax and Harrington can pester and trap on the perimeter while Powell and BD hold the low posts. On offense, there's enough fire-power and speed to open things up. What dya think, Nellie?
by johnl on Jan 23, 2007 11:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
going big
by AJC3317 on Jan 23, 2007 6:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
or josh powell, he looked to be a tough rebounder and he might be another in house answer, he also seems pretty athletic and can run, maybe nellie will use him
by badnamedwarriorfan on Jan 23, 2007 6:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
getting better
Although Biedrins fouled out I love way he's playing. He's aggressive on D and snatches key boards.
I love watching the progression..this is the most exciting time in my eyes.
by ViveAirFrance on Jan 23, 2007 11:12 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
i thought
No more projects please! Jrich better come back soon or else it'll be too late to climb back into the standings. Even as it is right now, the Warriors are close to having their backs against the wall.
by kenntoe on Jan 23, 2007 12:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Why we lost the game
During the first half, we were more active on the defensive side of the ball. We were able to get steals and force turnovers; thereby, leading to the fast break and optempo style of play that Coach Don Nelson likes to run. The first half was emblematic of what Golden State Warrior Basketball COULD be as long as we put pressure on the ball and run off of long rebounds, steals, blocks, and turnovers.
In the second half, the Lakers were able to control the tempo of the game by running a lot of isolation sets primarily through Kobe Bryant, and we played right into their hands. What we should have done was double team Kobe Bryant off of Smush Parker or Sasha Vujacic.
Had we done this, a couple of things would have happened. One of those things would have been that we would have dictated the tempo. Doubling down on the ball puts pressure on the ball handler and could possibly force him into making turnovers which translates into transition baskets going the other way.
The second thing that would have happened is that we would have forced Parker or Vujacic to beat us from the perimeter. Vujacic never plays well against the Warriors. He was 1 of 6 from the field. Parker was 4 of 6 from the field but 1 of 3 from 3-point range. He did not prove that he could hit that outside shot with regularity. I would much rather run at Parker and Vujacic on the perimeter than Walton and Radmonovic because those two players are paid to hit the open perimeter shot even though they shot 2 for 10 and 0 for 4 respectively.
Since we did not elect to go to this strategy, Bryant was able to pick us apart against 1 on 1 coverage and get to the line; therefore, leading to stopages in play and the obvious free throw disparity. I understand that this is only the second game that our newly acquired players have played in a Warriors uniform, but the Warriors have to realize that we are more athletic now. Consequently, we can take more risks on the defensive side of the ball because our players are athletic enough to recover on defensive roations and can run out to shooters.
We need to think more like the Phoenix Suns and run at every opportunity. If you play defense at a frenetic pace, you're liable to give up some open shots both on the perimeter and in the lane because of the amount of risks you take; however, you force the other team to play at your speed. You force them to make quicker decisions against the defense and any change in possession is being run in the other direction. The Warriors are lethal when they get out in the open court. It's when the tempo slows down that the Warriors go through scoring droughts because they don't have enough half court options that can consistently get points.
Knowing this, they need to run at every single opportunity. The less we see Baron Davis, Monta Ellis, and Sarunas Jasikevicus walking the ball up the court, the better. We need to push the ball and throw the ball ahead every single time down the court, including off of made baskets.
I know it's difficult to play at such a fast pace for 48 minutes, but that's why you have substitutions, and no one is better than Coach Nelson at utilizing the entire roster. Bob Fitzgerald has said that we are a team with depth. It's time to start using it, and you can do that if you run all of your players hard on both ends of the court for the entire game.
The Suns are adept at doing this. Granted, it's the third year they have been in the system with Coach Mike D'Antoni and point guard Steve Nash, but we need to start having the same mindset of running as much as possible in order to consistently win games.
by friscoballer415 on Jan 23, 2007 2:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Amen!
Enough of this stultifying fourth quarter slowdown crap -- the Warriors' equivalent of the hated "prevent defense" in football. And no more pounding the ball (by BD or anyone else) unless you're already in the low post.
by johnl on Jan 23, 2007 5:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
that's why
by the evil monkey on Jan 23, 2007 5:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Was watching
by Zorgon on Jan 23, 2007 7:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
does alba look photoshopped?
by dj fuzzylogic on Jan 23, 2007 8:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
as in..
by dj fuzzylogic on Jan 23, 2007 8:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No, she was there
by Zorgon on Jan 23, 2007 9:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Naw she was there dogg
by Atma Brother ONE on Jan 23, 2007 9:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Warrior fan
by Psion on Jan 24, 2007 10:35 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You know, its been 2 games
I can't believe the stupid "MVP" chant for Kobe. They were chanting during his free throw. Laker fans are the worst.
One thing getting old is watching Baby Al post up and forget to control the ball. We should have better options than that. Overall, his game is so much better than mrphleavy. i'm optimistic.
by eshock on Jan 23, 2007 7:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Dubs new in Sacto Bee
by pyro on Jan 24, 2007 1:28 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















