the rantings of a madman...
Of course I'm referring to... me. This diary rests its laurels on the idea that the playoffs are conducted within a bracket structure. If they aren't this diary is completely, as opposed to partially, pointless.
Here goes, as I see it, if the dubs can secure the 8th spot, they have a decent chance of making it to the finals. That's right, the finals. Here's why.
1) I think they have a very good chance of eliminating the Mavs.
2)Their "new improved" play has seen them destroying Phoenix, Houston, and Utah.
The "dubs in finals" scenario, IMHO, rests mainly on the Suns ability to defeat the Lakers and the Spurs (this is where the bracket structure comes into play). As it stands now, the dubs would have to beat the Mavs and then either Utah or Houston before meeting the winner of the other side of the bracket and I like our chances against the Suns.
Please, if there is no bracket structure to the playoff schedule break it to me gently...
This FanPost is a submission from a member of the mighty Golden State of Mind community. While we're all here to throw up that W, these words do not necessarily reflect the views of the GSoM Crew. Still, chances are the preceding post is Unstoppable Baby!
0 recs |
29
comments
Comments
I'm sweating the 8th spot
by sfhand on
Apr 13, 2007 1:50 PM PDT
up
0 recs
lol
by Yoyo on Apr 13, 2007 1:19 PM PDT 0 recs
lets look at the "leastern conference"
by sfhand on
Apr 13, 2007 1:47 PM PDT
up
0 recs
errrrp

Playoffs in '07, baby!
by coma on Apr 13, 2007 1:24 PM PDT 0 recs
I never said it wasn't
by sfhand on
Apr 13, 2007 1:48 PM PDT
up
0 recs
he knows he knows
but does anyone know what the structure for the playoffs are? Is it highest seed faces lowest seed no matter what? Or is a bracket structure?
anyone got the info? I haven't been able to find it.
thanks!
by myron on Apr 13, 2007 1:53 PM PDT 0 recs
I don't think they re-seed
The winner of #1-8 plays the winner of #4-5 in the second round. That's the way it's always been.
So our opponents, in order, would likely be the Texas trio...
- Dallas
- Houston (the way Utah's playing lately, they should advance pretty easily)
- San Antonio
by Sleepy Freud on
Apr 13, 2007 2:21 PM PDT
up
0 recs
By "decent" chance, you mean...
25% chance of beating the Mavs
40% chance of beating Houston or Utah
20% chance of beating San Antonio
Wow, an 85% chance!!!! ;-)
Seriously: 25 x .4 x .2 = .02. A two percent chance, maximum. And that's being about as generous to us as humanly possible. I'd say the only realistic way that would happen would be if Dirk and Duncan both got injured.
But yeah: cart before the horse .
by Sleepy Freud on Apr 13, 2007 2:17 PM PDT 0 recs
I disagree
And my main point was that they would need the Suns to dispatch the Spurs because I feel the dubs aren't likely to beat the Spurs in any scenario.
In my opinion the Suns present a much stiffer challenge than the Mavs, yet I think the dubs have a 50/50 chance against the Suns (which I base on their last game).
by sfhand on
Apr 13, 2007 2:30 PM PDT
up
0 recs
50/50?
Dude, you are a madman. ;-) I'm as inspired by this team's recent play as anyone -- and I admit I have fantasized about them making a real playoff run. But if you're talking serious chances, you gotta imagine you're putting money on it. Your REAL, hard earned money -- say, a year's salary. Who are you picking, Warriors or Suns?
The Warriors' odds in Vegas will be MUCH longer than any of ones I posted. If you're that confident, why not put your money where your mouth is?
by Sleepy Freud on
Apr 13, 2007 3:27 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I've got no problem putting up some green
by sfhand on
Apr 13, 2007 5:00 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I have to turn down your $40
But if I didn't, and I had a bunch of other people putting similar bets on the Nets, Lakers, Wizards etc., I'd gladly take your money. ;-)
by Sleepy Freud on
Apr 13, 2007 5:11 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Lol,
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/basketball/playoffs/2004-06-15-stars-problem_x.htm
http://blogs.marinij.com/brucemacgowan/2007/03/cinderella_nba_champion_warrio.html
What really made those games exciting was the way they came from behind to beat "superior" teams.
by sfhand on
Apr 13, 2007 5:37 PM PDT
up
0 recs
sleepy
But...
Every warrior fan would be lying if they said they've never dreamed of us winning it all! Although this should be lumped together with the
jessica alba/biel dream.
Kudos to the madman for actually articulating what we only dream about. And with that said let me go out on a limb and say that obama will be our next president.
by VonteegoCummings on
Apr 13, 2007 4:49 PM PDT
up
0 recs
The real odds
1% -- Edwards
3% -- Hillary
2% -- McCain
2% -- Giuliani
91% -- The Chimp cancels the elections and declares himself Deciderer-in-Chief in perpetuity, or until we "win" the "war" on "terror" -- whichever comes first.
In other words: impeach the bastard. ;-)
by Sleepy Freud on
Apr 13, 2007 4:58 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Now this analysis is...
by sfhand on
Apr 13, 2007 5:03 PM PDT
up
0 recs
hahaha
by RubberDubDubs on
Apr 13, 2007 7:05 PM PDT
up
0 recs
dude
by travisl212 on
Apr 14, 2007 12:36 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Dude
- If you're talking about my presidential odds, it was a joke
- You have no fvcking clue what you're talking about on the question of percentages
- Stop pissing on other people's diaries when you have no fvcking clue what you're talking about. I'm not just speaking for myself here. I never once called you out on this board, even though 90% of what you write is totally idiotic (I mean, when I can even figure out what you're talking about).
by Sleepy Freud on
Apr 14, 2007 3:03 PM PDT
up
0 recs
i wonder what the vegas odds are
if its lets say 10,000 to 1 which it probably was a few weeks ago id put 10 dollars on it
"whenever some one gives you 10,000 to 1 odds, always bet 10 bucks"
hahahaha some guy said that on The Office hella funny
by travisl212 on
Apr 18, 2007 10:36 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Actually
Warriors= NBA Chmapionship!
by Zorgon on Apr 13, 2007 2:40 PM PDT 0 recs
Talk is cheap
by Sleepy Freud on
Apr 13, 2007 3:30 PM PDT
up
0 recs
i'd rather be wrong
then be right by saying they won't
by travisl212 on Apr 14, 2007 12:38 PM PDT 0 recs
So you're saying
by Sleepy Freud on
Apr 14, 2007 2:40 PM PDT
up
0 recs
D'oh
I think what you're saying is you'd rather predict them to win than predict them to lose. Well, duh. Me too. But I wasn't talking about predicting, I was talking about betting. And at even odds, I'm guessing you'd rather have a million bucks riding on the Warriors not winning it all than on them winning it all. Is that safe to say?
That said, the way this team is looking lately, I think they do have serious chance of knocking off Dallas ... or really, anybody.
by Sleepy Freud on
Apr 14, 2007 3:16 PM PDT
up
0 recs
hahaha
by travisl212 on
Apr 18, 2007 10:33 PM PDT
up
0 recs









