Rumor: Jason Richardson for 5th Pick (Yi Jianlian), Theo Ratliff, and Sebastian Telfair
Rumour-monger Sam Smith shared these "insights" on the Warriors under the "original" section heading "Golden State of mind" in his piece today for ChicagoSports.com:
I seriously doubt Smith has really done his homework on the Warriors (or else he'd at least know about the mighty GSoM community), but hypothetical trade scenarios like this one make for an interesting discussion. There's no doubt in my mind that the Dubs are interested in trading up for The Movement (although I could be fooled just like most of the hoops media), but I'm not sold at all that they're looking to move Jason Richardson at the first chance they get.
This deal which Smith probably just concocted to generate some traffic from the Bay Area is just silly. You don't move a fan favorite in JRich who was just on the cusp of being a Western Conference All-Star for a prospect (unless it's someone uber-talented like Greg Oden or Kevin Durant) and two players of little basketball consequence. Swap out JRich with Monta Ellis and forget about trying to swing a move to simply open up cap space (no Ratliff although in his prime the guy was a shot blocking machine!), rather than making an on-court improvement, and we have a deal Boston.
Also check out Pree's diary Sam Smith at it again - says JRich is the "odd man out" for more great community discussion on this topic.
Would you trade Jason Richardson to the Celtics for the #5 pick (Yi Jianlian), Theo Ratliff's expiring contract, and Sebastian Telfair?
Past JRich trade rumors:
- Rumor: Warriors Likely to Deal Richardson, Ellis, or Pietrus and O'Bryant
- Rumor: Jason Richardson Wants to Go to the Pistons or Bulls
- Sam Smith is Messed Up
- Rumor: Jason Richardson, Baron Davis, and Mickael Pietrus All on the Trading Block
- Rumor: Jason Kidd for Jason Richardson + Adonal Foyle / Warriors Shopping JRich
- Rumor: Jason Kidd for Jason Richardson, Mickael Pietrus, Monta Ellis and Patrick O'Bryant
- Rumor: Warriors Would Move JRich If They Could
- Rumor: Mike Dunleavy, Troy Murphy, and Jason Richardson All Available on Trade Market
99% of rumors never happen, but 99% of them are fun to talk about!
0 recs |
48 comments
Comments
one word
The warriors need to get that #5 and use their own #18 on talented big men who can play, and play right now. if all they want is Jrich instead of Baron, then this is a steal.
by kenntoe on
Jun 11, 2007 10:36 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
If you see Monta as a two guard
by dprodigy19 on
Jun 11, 2007 11:47 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
its a good deal for both teams
by eshock on
Jun 11, 2007 12:23 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
just read
heard that the initial offer of marion was turned down by the celtics, then the counter offer was turned down by the suns. the C's want to add sebastian telfair while the Suns want Delonte West. Although there are multiple teams that have made offers. the poster suggested that the suns deal might be a smokescreen to up the ante from another "better" deal for the C's...i wonder who and what team is offering a better deal than the suns...hhmmmm.
hopefully its the warriors, but i doubt it because everyone is worried about Baron's injury history.
by kenntoe on
Jun 11, 2007 12:39 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
....uh
by coma on
Jun 11, 2007 12:55 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
make the trade with JR...
by dallaswarrior on
Jun 11, 2007 1:06 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Gun?
by jae on
Jun 11, 2007 2:19 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
maybe
by Caught Backcourt on
Jun 11, 2007 2:23 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bassy Telfair
by Sleepy Freud on
Jun 11, 2007 3:42 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
2 Cents
I also heard that the Warriors would look to add Rasheed Wallace? Is this possible? I am not sure if we can but if they could send Harrington to Detroit for Rasheed, I would do it. I am not sure if the salary matches up or if we might have to throw in a draft or additional player. Imagine a starting line up of:
Baron, Ellis, Ajax, Sheed and AB.
Bench,
Yi, Barnes (Re-sign), Telfair, Ratliff.
Add what can we get in the draft and FA???
Man, I hope Mully is inquiring on any possible angle this off-season. This is shaping up to be a very interesting and exciting off-season.
I would also enjoy seeing Marion on our squad although there is no way in heck that Phoenix would trade him to us. KG will probably go to Lakerland so that will be a formidable team in LA. Along with a possible veteran pick up by the Clips would give us a double dose of "BEAT LA" chant in the Coliseum. Phoenix is looking to turn their team upside but they have Nash, so they will still be good. Last but not least; let's jus wave to Sac in our rear view mirror, Bibby to Orlando would leave nobody in Sac to be desired. Face it, they will be rebuilding around Martin and Salmons. Who??? Exactly!!
Come on Mully, stir that pot and make us a feast to remember!!
Does anyone have the link to ESPN TRADE MACHINE? I want to do some research and possible trade scenarios.
Thx
by KillaCrossOver on
Jun 11, 2007 1:41 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
jrich
by lowchi on
Jun 11, 2007 3:32 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
oof
by Nooob on
Jun 11, 2007 3:45 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
great deal!
by ballin on
Jun 11, 2007 4:43 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Telfair great?
Sure, he's young and could get better, but saying he's not had a chance isn't quite right and banking on him getting better--much better--at virtually ever aspect of the game, which is what he'd need to do to be good, let along 'great', is a fool's bet.
by jae on
Jun 12, 2007 1:22 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Here...
I understand that telfair has been given a chance with other teams, but hes never had a guide like Baron to teach him. Baron will be a great coach one day if he decides to do that!
Dont hate on Telfair, he is something special!
by ballin on
Jun 12, 2007 6:44 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It comes down to Baron?
Huh?
I realize Telfair came right out of HS, but he still hasn't shown that he's going to be "great" in any way shape or form.
by jae on
Jun 13, 2007 2:01 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sorry, no
by AJC3317 on
Jun 11, 2007 5:52 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
i would move richardson
im not sold on yi, as he looks soft and floats on the perimeter to much but losing jrich's contract would be an added bonus.
by teamdi on
Jun 11, 2007 5:53 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
that trade don't cut it i think
jason richardson may have hit his ceiling but he's a very large reason the warriors made the playoffs and had major success against the mavs.
granted that having no big man was a weakness for the team against any other team besides dallas, but it was also the greatest strength of the team.
i really don't see how this would really be all that beneficial to the celtics.
it's true that j rich is signed thru 2010/11 but he is also overpaid. ratliff is overpaid moreso but only has 1 season left on contract.
i don't like a pierce/richardson pairing for long term (pierce is signed thru 2010/11).
telfair is signed thru the next 2 seasons at bargain bin price...he's a keeper at his salary.
vin baker just came off the books. olowakandi is gone. they are in good position salary cap wise and i think if i were a celtic fan, i'd want Yi or Joakim Noah (probably Yi)in the draft.
would try to get 2 of these free agents: Anderson Varejao, Devean George, Eduardo Najera, and Matt Barnes.
then again...the celtics are one of the worst managed teams and the warriors know that they can't get anywhere further with their current roster so anything is possible.
by gossamer on
Jun 11, 2007 6:59 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Attention: ATMA BROTHER ONE
- Complete salary relief of Richardson's contract, since both Telfair and Ratliff expire.
- The off-chance Ratliff can provide even 10-15 minutes of shotblocking before he vanishes into cap space heaven for us.
- The ability to RE-SIGN ELLIS AND BIEDRINS! You're not trading for Telfair, Yi, and Ratliff. You're trading for Telfair, Yi, Ratliff, Ellis, and Biedrins. Yeah, I think Richardson is worth that, he can take his dunk trophies with him.
- 4 years of Yi Jianlian, potentially a stud at the 4 on a ROOKIE CONTRACT. That's how you come out ahead in the salary cap world: productive rookies. If you have VERY extremely productive rookies, then you're just swimming in gravy.
- Instant mass revenue stream. Think of the cash that'll be rolling in from Yi jersey sales man! Cohan's tax problems will be solved and he might even be willing to go over the cap to re-sign Baron in a couple years! W00t w00t! We can sign Arenas, and even Kobe and Garnett!! We'll be UNSTOPPABLE, BABY!!!
...
All that said, this deal won't happen. At all. #5 pick (potentially Horford, Brewer, B. Wright, or NOah, not just Yi), PLUS a shitload of expiring contracts is probably enough to land Jermaine O'Neal (if the Pacers were bright, they'd send O'Neal for that package and a couple extra youngsters like Gerald Green or Rajon Rondo or even Delonte West and Tony Allen)...it's probably going to be enough to land Marion...if the T-Wolves ever grow a pair, it'd be good value for Garnett, or Gasol, or...well...
boston should be able to trade for any established star, they have the pieces to get it done. There's no reason for them to settle for Richardson, especially when their biggest needs are point guard (Jason Kidd!) or center (Jermaine).
by OptionZero on
Jun 11, 2007 7:07 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
ATTENTION: JRich is not a scrub
Cap room in itself is meaningless. It's only useful when you get the rare opportunity to bring on a key free agent. In this current day and age to get most players to leave their teams in free agency it takes a little overspending. I doubt you're going to get much more bang for your buck than JR. You try to create cap room to sign guys like JRich.
by Atma Brother ONE on
Jun 11, 2007 8:59 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
side comment
by hardcore on
Jun 11, 2007 9:09 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Excellent point
by Atma Brother ONE on
Jun 11, 2007 9:18 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
build around?
If building around him means mortgaging everything to give him a max contract, then no, I wouldn't build around him, but I think people tend to underestimate his contributions because it doesn't start with his scoring, the most conspicuous, but not necessarily most important part of a player's game.
Nice role players are really important. Since the odds of getting a center who can score efficiently is real low, the next best thing is to get a guy who does everything else. (And in some cases, like Eddy "I'm 6-11 but I rebound like I'm 6-5" Curry, I'd take what Biedrins gives you more than what the scorer who can't do anything else does.)
The Warriors will regret it if they don't keep Biedrins around or get rid of him without getting a very good player back for him.
by jae on
Jun 12, 2007 1:33 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well
by FoyledAgain on
Jun 11, 2007 7:27 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd Do It But
Regardless, it is time to move J-Rich to create salary savings to extend AB and or Monta if one or isn't moved over the summer or before the trade deadline in February.
This is the first draft "trade-up" that does make sense to me. Dollars and cents. Because I agree with what many folks wrote that J-Rich has contributed about as much as he can.
by commish on
Jun 11, 2007 7:39 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
At Number 5
by ballin on
Jun 12, 2007 6:47 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Amazing how little love JRich is getting
I don't buy the idea that he's "hit his ceiling". If getting knee surgery is hitting your ceiling, then sure. He is a bit overpaid, that argument I can live with. But we're simply not going to be nearly as good without him. Whatever project player we would select at #5 is not going to step in and replace him, and Monta isn't ready to be The Man. JR's proven that he already is.
by ffgolden on
Jun 11, 2007 7:48 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
the bandwagon card
I've seen many posts about the business end of sports, obviously including basketball. When people suggested J-Rich had reached his "ceiling", I assume they were referring to his salary and the role it could play in meeting some of our longer range needs. In other posts J-Rich has been discussed as the centerpiece to getting AK47. In fact, there are many discussions about J-Rich being our most expendable asset to address unmet needs.
But what all of that has to do with 'bandwagon' I have no idea. Can you explain the relationship between playing the bandwagon card and having a good discussion of how our team can potentially get better. J-Rich is a critical part of that discussion and that doesn't mean he is deeply valued and "loved" by the Warrior Nation.
by commish on
Jun 11, 2007 8:11 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Knew I shouldn't have said "bandwagon"
I took the "ceiling" talk to mean that people were of the opinion that he'd reached his maximum potential skill-wise, and that he was just going to be a growing salary, nothing more. You yourself stated you thought that he'd "contributed about as much as he can". I just don't believe that's the case, looking back at his career before this injury-hampered season. He worked hard to improve different aspects of his game each and every year. And he did get his big contract a bit early, but I think he can still live up to the money he's getting paid.
My point was that maybe because of his off year, the year that the W's got more publicity and fan-following than ever, that maybe some of us forgot how GOOD he is, and how he'll probably just keep getting better. Sure, we all love his spirit and his dedication to the Warriors, but I for one still love his game. I think he's worth more than a prospect.
by ffgolden on
Jun 11, 2007 11:18 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
J-Rich is a critical part of that discussion
You are correct it doesn't mean he's deeply valued, it means he's NOT by many. Apparently he's not even loved as much as some far away chinese rookie! Those of us who appreciate Jason's loyalty to the bay area fans are not the ones posting this "trade him" for a draft pick blitz crap . I've said all along I want Jason to retire a warrior or leave when he wants to leave not when the fairweather fans want to dump him.
I trust Jason and think he has too much pride to stick around if he thinks he is not contributing 100%. You are not gonna get that kind of loyalty from new guys if you dis-respect your existing guys! and if you treat them this way you don't deserve any loyalty from them!!
by Skeptic con Urquell on
Jun 11, 2007 8:56 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
i want jrich
i hope the people that want him, want him because he is asian. i want him because i beleive he can ball, not better then jrich though
by stevenro59 on
Jun 11, 2007 9:24 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
i meant
by stevenro59 on
Jun 11, 2007 9:27 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Too many long responses
Tony aka Drawlz600 is AWESOME!!!!
by Zorgon on
Jun 11, 2007 9:32 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Splitter
And he'll be there at 18 or so.
by OptionZero on
Jun 11, 2007 10:17 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
not telfair
by linfengx on
Jun 11, 2007 10:40 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That's the point
by Sleepy Freud on
Jun 11, 2007 10:47 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
FOLLOW THE FREAKIN MONEY
Telfair is an expiring contract. Not a big one, but a necessary one none the less, and nice to have.
Delonte is a useful player on an small contract. He therefore has value.
Rondo is a good defender and full of upside at the PG spot...on a rookie contract. He therefore has lots of value.
by OptionZero on
Jun 11, 2007 11:46 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Since I can imagine Monta being a servicable SG
by sadleavy on
Jun 12, 2007 2:41 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
has a
by djchuckdeez on
Jun 12, 2007 3:37 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I hope your right
by RubberDubDubs on
Jun 15, 2007 3:32 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i doubt...
i like richardson..loyalty is nice and all, but im still an advocate for getting the best player available while improving on team needs. I just don't understand the love for Jrich as a basketball player. He clearly has numerous holes in his game. The love as a person, i get. If we can rid ourselves of his contract while making the team better, then we have to do it. If we can't then we should keep him. the only thing i regret with richardson is that he wasn't our second round pick in 02' instead of, what was his name?...Gilbert something??
by kenntoe on
Jun 12, 2007 6:27 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I only do this if...
by Town Bidnezz on
Jun 14, 2007 5:10 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs















