Recap: Warriors - 105, Kings - 102 - Cause for Concern
Seriously, I don't know if my heart can take it anymore. Our inability to break a lead open and run away with a game (aside from the Bobcats game of course) is really starting to become a concern.
Are we spoiled? Should we be this cynical about our team when we just hit 10 games above .500?! Well, yes. Yes we should.
A shining star.
The Warriors have developed a talent for playing to the exact level of the team that are facing. It's this talent that has handed us losses to Minnesota and Chicago, and it's this talent that has allowed us to beat San Antonio. Simply put, any team can beat us, and we can beat any team. This statement has been proven time and time again for this Warriors team. We are by far the most irregular team in the league.
In the end, it leaves a fan wondering whether he/she should be celebrating this volatility or fearing it.
I think after a game like last night's, I can confidently say that I fear it. Our 48 minute streakiness has left us with more bad than good so far and we are in desperate need of the one element that always seems just out of our reach.
Control.
Take a jump with me and let's open this Pandora's Box.
Last night's game served as a textbook example of the lack of control that has been plaguing this Warriors team. Incidentally, in case you haven't figured it out, this isn't going to be a champagne cork-popping recap celebrating our close victory. I love that we were able to put tonight in the W column (shameless plug) but like a proud parent, I want the best for this team. I think most of you can agree that there is some cause for concern.
Right now, when the team has a good record, discussions on this topic will yield clear and somewhat rational analysis of what can be done. If this style of play continues, all it will take is a few hard road trips to whittle away our record. At that point, rationality will be out of the window and rash moves will be taken to slap band-aids on bruises that have been around for a long time. No one wants to see that happen.
Okay, that's all I'll say about that. I'm not Nellie and I have no solutions. In fact, the only thing I have in common with Nellie is my love for cheap domestic beer. So if I ever meet him, I have a conversation starter. I imagine our interaction would go something like this.
Me(slapping Nellie's back): "Hey Nellie! So how good is Bud Light, huh?!"
Nellie: "Don't touch me."
One thing I'll give our boys tonight was that they overcame the slow start. Monta, Boom, and Jax were all on point offensively, with each of them slipping in a cool 6 points. It was clear from the start, however, that Baron's shooting touch was off, but his quick hands weren't. He walked away from the 1st with 3 jacks.
His steals combined with the fact that the Kings dipped their hands in Crisco before the game led to 7 turnovers for the Kings in the first, a stat that allowed us our 9 point lead despite dismal shooting (both from the field and the charity stripe.)
It was after the 1st quarter that things started to get a little sloppy. Free throws were missed, Baron's poor shooting continued, Salmons started filling out a Warrior Killer application, and the Kings went on a 12-2 run that whittled down our lead.
No clue coach! They just keep letting me score!
2nd quarter bright spot: Monta Ellis's midrange jumper is butter. He has got to be turning heads all over the league with the way he has been playing.
2nd quarter dark spot: Evidently getting crowded and smacked in the face is now grounds for a technical foul. Shame on you Biedrins. Crappy call by the blue. That's all I'll say about that.
3rd quarter bright spot #1: Artest makes a steal, dunks the ball, starts beating his chest like Donkey Kong after nailing Mario with a well timed barrel... and gets a T. Look at the bright side Ron Ron, at least it wasn't a close game! Oh wait...
"SCORING GOOD!
3rd quarter bright spot #2: Jackson, you are a BEAST. After a nasty roll of the ankle (seriously, did they have to keep showing that?!) you hobbled off to the bench, rubbed some `Tussin on it, and continued your reign of terror.
3rd quarter dark spot #1: Take your pick. We had to fight at the end just to walk away tied. The Kings owned us this quarter.
3rd quarter dark spot #2: Mp2. Out of bounds. `Nuff said.
So the 4th began just as the game did. Even footing. The Warriors responded like, well, Warriors, getting 4 key steals and 9 offensive boards in the 4th alone. Baron (playing with 5 fouls) and Ellis were clutch on the glass, giving us valuable 2nd and third chances that allowed us to balloon our lead. In the meanwhile, Monta was on another planet, putting down 16 points in the final quarter. He literally carried the team. In the end, however, we were all treated ulcer inducing free throws as the Kings strategically whittled themselves within striking distance as the game clock wound down.
The Kings are not a bad team by any means. They are most certainly not in the same realm of poor quality teams like the Wolves or the Bulls. But there were opportunities last night for the Warriors to run away with the lead and never look back. I love that we got this win; but I think we'll all be able to rest a little easier when they figure out how to control a game for 4 quarters rather than 1 or 2. Only then can they truly be unstoppable. Baby. And yes. That was yet another shameless plug.
Can there be any doubt? Monta was everywhere at once last night! I love watching this kid grow up. I love his mid range jumper. I love his speed. I love his incredible finishes at the rim. Most importantly, I love that he's ours.
I also love Lucky Charms. Little off topic, but whatever.
0 recs |
30 comments
Comments
monta all day
So anyone else having trouble watching the game on demand?? I keep getting an error.
art by jnazaire 07
by disguy on Feb 10, 2008 11:00 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
The Warriors will never control the game
by theblackpearl on Feb 10, 2008 11:10 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Part of the basic Nelson philosophy
That's basically what Andris and Monta do and we're all very happy with that.
From a "watchability" standpoint, it's stressful because it doesn't look like "smart" offense, but they are scoring 109.5 points a game, so it's not the offense that's causing them to lose, it's the defensive intensity/consistency. They go through stretches where they just don't play defense very hard.

by bloodsweatndonuts on Feb 10, 2008 3:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Montayyyyyy
Dude is shooting *81 PERCENT FROM THE FLOOR* for the month of February. And 80% from the line. 26.7 ppg/ 5.7 rpg / 4.0 apg, and only 2.0 turnovers.
OK, it's only three games, but even his season-long numbers are starting to look sick. How many 6'3" scoring guards shoot 53% from the field?
The kid's blossoms are blossoming. In his honor, I think it may be time to break open the old flickr vault and repost the high-res versions of these....







by Sleepy Freud on Feb 10, 2008 11:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for inducing an acid flashback.
Seriously, from a spectator's standpoint, there is nobody more enjoyable to watch than Monta right now. He's a low stress, high reward player. He's the equivalent of watching Randy Johnson pitch at his best.

by bloodsweatndonuts on Feb 10, 2008 3:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
0 - 6 start...
This is really the first FULL season for the Warriors. It was easy to run for 20 plus games last year...Harder to mature to a full season team. The Warriors are still learning and adjusting.
by streetballer on Feb 10, 2008 11:39 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Caution:
http://www.nba.com/statistics/sortable_team_statistics/sortable1.html?cnf=1&prd=10
by streetballer on Feb 10, 2008 8:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good Post
First, as far as BD's "off" night, he almost went for a triple double, so that's a pretty great off night. Second, Baron may have to guard the 2 a lot to help Monta, but be honest, BD is built like a 2 and Monta is built like a 1, so that's really not a consideration. Monta is only 22, his defense will get better. Offensively, he's clearly a threat. Jackson didn't have an off night, I don't know where that came from. He played Artest tough all night, sustained a high ankle sprain and still dropped 26 on the Kings. Harrington is free to drive the lane when he gets the ball, and he did a couple of times last night and hit some open jumpers. If he would rebound and defend better in the post, he might play there more. We can all probably agree Al is not spectacular at either. When he proves he can hang in the low post with the big(ger) boys, he can play there more. I don't fault Nellie for that.
The W's problem is not on offense, that is clear. Compared to Phoenix, they allow about four more points a game, but they have more possessions per game too (about four). The Warriors have trouble with big men who can score. That's why they lost to Minnesota, and Houston, and Chicago . . . The point is, they're 30-20, and the only reason we're worried is they play in the West and that is just good enough for an eighth seed tie w/ Houston.
by sfwarriorcvg on Feb 10, 2008 8:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
as we all strive for perfection...
Play with the sorting tool. Interesting facts and figures emerge.
by streetballer on Feb 10, 2008 9:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A good analogy
The Suns struggle with less quality teams as well, as they've lost to Minnesota, and Chicago, etc. just like the W's. I think it's mostly a consequence of how the Warriors play. There's no telling what would change if the W's slowed things down and stopped shooting so much. What if they didn't score as much? They'd lose more! I agree, the W's have been one of the top teams in the league since 0-6, and 1-7, so worrying about close wins might be an overreaction. After all, this is the NBA, like Barnett said on the radio before the Bulls game, "They all belong here, and they'll beat you if you don't take them seriously." Every night looks to be a dogfight in the west, and the W's just have to be ready to scrap.
Jax was the epitome of that fight last night. The word splashed across his chest, "Warrior" doesn't lie, that was as courageous a performance as I've seen from a Warrior. Not only did he stay in the game, he shut DOWN Artest down the stretch, forced his mishandle on what could've been the first game-tying three, and hit a big three to put the Warriors ahead. As long as they can turn in performances like that consistently, the W's will make the playoffs and do some damage.
by sfwarriorcvg on Feb 10, 2008 12:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Ron Artest
Monta on the other hand is just pure fun to watch. This dude can fly!!!!!!!!
by warrior510 on Feb 10, 2008 1:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Jax
Don Nelson is so adament. I listened to the Don Nelson show on KNBR and he said he would not play rookies unless there is a 20 point lead....
by warrior510 on Feb 10, 2008 2:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
monta
(quietly cuz my roommates are studying...)
by singha on Feb 10, 2008 2:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
It's getting worse
But this team's in REAL trouble. And it all starts with Nellie and BD. Nellie painted himself into an even bigger corner last night, saying not only will he not play his youngsters like BW (a HUGE idiocy), he won't even be playing KAZ (who, even slowed by injury, is better than anyone on the Bench). His stubbornness is getting tedious.
Nellie's coaching strengths have always been two-fold: first, he want fast, up-tempo guys who can handle the ball and play multiple positions; second, his is traditionally a meritocracy (Adam L's fine term), where those who play well stay in the game and those that don't, sit. The twp parts necessarily go together.
This year, though, he's thrown the second component out the window -- keeping both BD and Jack in EVEN WHEN THEY'RE STINKING THE JOINT OUT. And it's getting worse. I was complaining when he played these two 80 minutes a game -- forcing them to pace themselves and rob themselves of their real talents (when was the last time BD took it strong to the hole?); now he's playing them 85-90 minutes (88-89 last night), even when they're 13-39 shooting. Silly, stupid, stubborn coaching. (And you can talk about how good their record is, but it ain't staying that way if Nellie keeps this up. Their play the last two weeks makes this painfully clear.) These two don't have to perform because they know they won't get yanked. So we get games just like those we've been seeing, where Monta or AB have to be super-hot if we're going to win, because BD and Jack can only bring it in short, isolated spurts -- and even those are increasingly missing at crunch time. (Last night's silver lining for this was watching Monta just take over the game in the 4th Q. It'd be nice to see Nellie cut the other young guys -- including AB, who needs to be on the floor more -- some slack, and let them play while the old guys get a blow.)
BD's clearly lost it this past month. Though playing over 40 minutes a game, he's actually getting too heavy, looking a bit like he did two years ago. He's lost a step. He rarely drive the hole, and never with the passion of last year. He's back taking too many bad shots. And, worst of all, too often he's just sleep-walking through games -- something we never saw last year. He's the leader, our straw, and yet he's not been the BD we know -- and he's certainly no all-star in 2008, having been schooled by DWilliams, Chris Paul and even Duhon. I think he's tired; Adam guesses a minor injury, some think he's bothered by Nellie ragging on him. Whatever it is, if he doesn't get more rest -- and VERY soon -- we're either missing the playoffs or it's one and out.
Jack's problem is easier to spot. Though he played an OK game yesterday, and showed some "life" in Q4, he's not played well in the last two months. He still shoots far too much. His defense has become mediocre, at best. His hands look tired and slow -- and they're his strength. Maybe it's his toe; who knows? But he, too, needs rest.
It's too early yet to tell about CWebb, but thus far it looks pretty bad: he's slow, out of shape, and he's going to be playing the five (keeping AB off the floor) -- which he hates and which puts him down low, where he's uncomfortable and eminently beatable. Plus, he slows the whole team down -- when they really need to speed things up. (Hello BW, Watson, Marco, et al.)
This is most strange. Not only are the W's playing down to their opposition, their leaders -- Nellie, BD and Jack -- are playing down their incredible BBall smarts. There's an easy way for these guys to get better, but time's running out. The answer: have Nellie go back to playing guys that deserve to play. It's that simple. BD and Jack could go all out when they're on the floor. The kids could pick up the speed. CWebb could be good in spots. The W's would be fun again.
Monta and AB are pointing the way, blazing the trail to the future. But they need a fresher game from BD and Jack. And they need Nellie to swallow his pride, admit bhe's been wrong, and get his younger players involved. Now.
by johnl on Feb 10, 2008 2:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
agree 100%
by AJC3317 on Feb 10, 2008 2:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well Said
by gswLLBatman on Feb 10, 2008 3:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
is nellie really giving pietrus more pt?
Great point on Nellie never playing Al and AB together...it's senseless. Also senseless is putting Buke in after Baron fouled out. I like Buke, but at that point, we were protecting a lead late in the game. We needed defense and rebounding...we needed AB. Instead, AB stayed on the bench, Buke came in, and Barnes was left to play center. AB finally came in with 15 seconds left, at which point the Kings had cut the lead to 2.
There's a lot of Buke love here, so let me just start by saying he does do a lot of good things, and I'd love to see him in instead of Pietrus on pretty much every occasion. A lot of people knock his D but, for me, his weakness is in his decision making. Case in point, the airball he chucked up with 45 seconds left, 6 seconds left on the shot clock, and a 5 point lead...just not smart.
by givemontatheball on Feb 10, 2008 3:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Buke's weaknesses
"Pietrash"'s weaknesses are poor decisions and offense (outside of corner 3's and occasional strong drives).
In the Bulls game, Pietrus earned the playing time he got, and if people were defending his D in that game, they were right to do so. I distinctly remember him making 3 great defensive plays in a row (including one good foul that saved us from a layup).
I remember him being rather invisible in the Saturday game, the only major damage being from his out-of-bounds catch, which he does from time to time. Then again, it was that terrible lady referee so I'm not sure if he really was out of bounds (I was at the game, so I didn't see a replay).
by 61st Amendment on Feb 11, 2008 12:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Completely agree
It probably is a case of tiredness, but I don't see how Nellie can rest him. February was supposed to be an "easy" month, but the Warriors still haven't shown the ability to consistently put away inferior teams and let Baron rest. Nellie's almost 100% refusal of playing the "young players, including Azubuike" doesn't make things any easier, and neither does the next 4 games against playoff contenders.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't, I guess.
by Caught Backcourt on Feb 10, 2008 3:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I would have written this but you beat me to it
For some unknown reasons Nelson has really lost it by insisting on doing it "his way" a la the old blue eyes he is. I have to give Harrington a lot of credit by publically commenting on Nelson's philosophy twice now in print: first by saying he would prefer to be able to drive to the hoop more often than shoot from the perimeter and then saying the team needs to have a regular rotation so the players feel comfortable with their roles.
I too am afraid, very afraid. Baron is so burned out, BD and Jax won't get the ball to our best two shooters (Monta and Harrington) and yada yada yada. Your comments are so right on!
CWebb is undoubtedly the answer but I forgot the question.
by commish on Feb 10, 2008 5:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well done
Don't get me wrong, I love Nelson, but just like every other Warrior he is confounding, he has a lot of worth but at the same time a lot of easily solved deficiencies. And he worries me more because the player's deficiencies can be solved by him and other players, but who will help him with his own problems?
Damn that was a long rant. Once again, very good post.
by belilaugh on Feb 10, 2008 7:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i partially agree
Jackson on the other hand probably does intangible things that we as fans do not really see that warrants his presence. Its most likely his defense. Look at it this way. How are warrior killers born? because jackson shuts down the stars letting some other player have a chance at shooting.
by saintdee on Feb 10, 2008 11:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
so does anyone realize
by gswLLBatman on Feb 10, 2008 2:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather
by 61st Amendment on Feb 11, 2008 1:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ya
by warrior510 on Feb 10, 2008 3:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
agreed
by shootda3 on Feb 10, 2008 5:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Why do I have this uncomfortable feeling that.....
May become the next edition of.....

And leave the team after this season. I fear the ridiculous offer of another team that the Dubs don't match.
OakFoSho
by Sneaky275 on Feb 11, 2008 12:13 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I don't think
by 61st Amendment on Feb 11, 2008 1:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I actually see...
being more like...
by lightz0ut on Feb 11, 2008 1:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 























