Recap: Warriors 108, Bulls 114- You've Got to Be Kidding Me
The Horri-Bulls come to Oaktown minus their best players Luol Deng, Ben Gordon, and Kirk Hinrich and what do the Warriors do?
Preview/ Open Thread (370+ Comments)

If this were Pictionary, Nellie would be trying to draw horri-bull.
They pick up an inexcusable loss on national TV.
More Horri-Bull-ness after the jump.
No Bull
First of all props to the Chicago Bulls. Make no mistake though, this a pretty bad team and if they were in the West their season would already be over, but these guys played way above their heads tonight. Let's take a closer look:
- Chris Duhon's always been a pretty steady and solid backup PG type (or starting with Ben Gordon off the bench), but he's the one who played like a snubbed All-Star tonight, not Baron Davis. He came out firing and even managed to intercept QB Matt Barnes twice which you rarely see. Monta might've had the highlights of the night, but Duhon won this matchup. That shouldn't be happening... ever.

Occupation: Warrior Killer
- A former Warrior #1 overall pick tore the roof up off the Roaracle dome tonight and it wasn't #4. Joe Smith looked like a superstar out there with 27 points and 8 boards. He also went Corey Maggette on the Warriors going 13 for 14 from the charity stripe. Memo to Warriors: It's not 1996.

Joe wasn't ordinary tonight.
I've always thought Smith was a nice solid player, but what kept him from living up to the hype of being a #1 pick was his softness. Well if he's soft, what does that make the Warriors?
Hey since we're on this whole throwback tip around these parts, you think Mully can hook up Joe Smith too?
- Tyrus Thomas and Joakim Noah, the Knicks gift to the Bulls, also looked pretty good out there. Thomas was pretty savvy down the stretch and Noah brought the rebounding and hustle (plus some incredibly laughable free throw form).

Tyrus Thomas and Joe Smith have trouble seeing where the hoop is.
- How do you let Ben Wallace score 10 points in 18 minutes?
The Bulls should feel proud of themselves for getting this win on the road minus 1/3 of their rotation. Blog-a-Bull's sure loving it.
The Webber Way
Tonight's biggest storyline of course was the return of Chris Webber. CWebb didn't play all that much, but here were a few positives:
- A nice feed to Biedrins a couple of feet away from the bucket from the high post.
- 2 jumpers from the elbow.
- A nice pass to a cutting Monta Ellis which is hopefully something for this team to build on. I would love to see CWebb and Monta work a little two man screen and pop game like the Sac days with Webber and Mike Bibby.
- A steal off a pass from Warrior Killer Chris Duhon.

This could be the start of something beautiful.
Final line: 12:38 minutes, 4 points, 1 rebound, 2 assists, 1 steal, 3 fouls
It's gonna take a little bit of time, but this looks to be a nice addition. Before people jump to irrational conclusions, I'll say this. Chris Webber was NOT the reason the Warriors lost what should've been a freebie at home tonight.

Keep the J's coming big man.
Warrior Worries
Win or lose I always like to spend some time in these world famous GSoM Recaps breaking down what the Warriors did well. However tonight I'm not going to waste your time and my time doing that on this winter Bay Area night. What's the point? This was just a dumb loss. There's no other way to put it.
Here's just a few of the many things that went wrong tonight:
- I really don't have all that much a problem with the 28 three's the Warriors attempted tonight. They were for the most part really good looks. Unfortunately they just didn't go down. I'm not even kidding. A whopping 75% of them were blanks.
- You always like to get off to a good start and finish games off strong. The Warriors did neither tonight and let the Bulls and Duhon run up 32 points against them in the opening period and 37 when it mattered the most.
- The Warriors were really sloppy on D the entire night. They racked up a whopping 31 fouls. To his credit Mickael Pietrus was very active on D and you could tell he was trying, but he still fouled out in less than 12 minutes of play. Andris Biedrns and Al Harrington nearly fouled out as well.
- I rarely question Nellie's coaching decisions. This man has more hoops knowledge in his pinky finger than 99.99999% of people out there including me (shocking isn't it?!). But I will question his substitution patterns near the end of this game particularly with Al Harrington. Al was pretty much the only Warrior with a reliable deep jumper tonight and Nellie seemed really averse to playing him at the most opportune moments down the stretch. Instead Nellie elected to go with Matt Barnes who wasn't in that scoring mode tonight. Very odd.
I'm sure people can fill in the rest of the negatives from this game in the comments, so I'll leave it at this. If the situations were flipped and the Warriors lost to the Bulls without Baron Davis, Monta Ellis, and Stephen Jackson, most of us would probably excuse the loss. Well let's be consistent here and not forget the situation the Bulls found themselves in tonight at the Roaracle.
This Warriors loss was inexcusable. Teams that want to be playing past mid-April win these ones. Teams that want to count lotto balls in May don't.
But Seriously... You've Got To Be Kidding Me
The Roaracle is supposed to be the best and most feared venue in the entire NBA. So why do the Warriors keep dropping silly losses at home? A few weeks back they lost to the Minnesota Timberwolves by 1 and tonight they lost to a MIA bad Bulls team.
That's just inexcusable. It's also very stoppable- yes, I went there.

Sure Mickael Pietrus had 2 stunning swats plus a crazy jam, Baron Davis walked away with some nice numbers (22 points, 8 assists, and 4 steals- although his shooting was awful), Monta Ellis had 25 points on 11 for 12 shooting, and Al Harrington dropped 20 points in under 27 minutes.

MP2 throws it down with his eyes closed!
But I don't think any single Warrior really brought it consistently tonight on both sides of the ball and deserves the honors. However there was one constant tonight and that was Andris Biedrins' amazing rebounding effort tonight. Biedrins inhaled an eye popping 18 boards with 9 of them coming on the offensive end. Just call him Windex. Nice work Andris!
To: Andris

Compliments of the GSoM Crew.
Say it with me now- FREE ARTEST 2.0!

CWebb points up north to Sac where help from a Tru Warier lies.
Photos: Rocky Widner/NBAE via Getty Images
0 recs |
64
comments
Comments
NOOOOOOOOOO!
It makes no sense, you already pointed it out but GOD DAMN, what happened to Nellie's coaching decisions...
Why did we give up so early, and how come we could not make any lay ups or anything!?
Al Harrington was solid tonight, especially near the end, Boom Dizzle killllllled us in the first...
I always got love for the blue and gold, hell i bleed the colors but damn tonight, on national tv, and to say i was going to get fired for almost choking out my co-worker for changing the channel when the game started.
I'm really sad to see us lose tonight to a LAME-BULLS...
and did anyone notice how they kept panning into the Bulls bench to see them laughing and giggling.
God that pissed me off the most!
by itzlilgx23 on Feb 8, 2008 12:39 AM PST 0 recs
Argh...
by sunghan on Feb 8, 2008 1:16 AM PST 0 recs
Looks like...
I cringe at the idea of having to face the Lakers and Suns now. Although maybe it was just a case of us just sucking from outside. It'll happen. But from what i saw, C-Webb wasn't ready yet, and AB was our best post defender. Matt Barnes subbing for AB? WTF? I don't know who is going to handle the front courts of LA and PHX now...We'll get manhandled.
by kenntoe on Feb 8, 2008 1:27 AM PST 0 recs
Well...
by sunghan on
Feb 8, 2008 1:56 AM PST
up
0 recs
just plain Bull-shhh!!!!
CWEBB - I saw my biggest fear about having Webber tonight. His defense. Yes, he was out of condition as he was huffing and puffing while running on both ends of the floor but really, what bothered me is that he's ridiculously slow even at half-court. If you get Ben Wallace putting moves on you, then there's a problem right there. Hopefully, conditioning have something to do with it. In his defense though, he did pretty decent offensively besides some shots he should have made.
FEEDING THE HOT HAND - I looked at the play-by-play of the 4th and saw that Monta, who had 25 pts on 11 of 12 shooting, shot the ball just 3 times and made all of them. His last two buckets were during the last 40 seconds of the game when it was pretty much decided. In comparison, Baron shot 8-24 from the field and 2-10 in Brick City. I know he's our superstar, I know he's trying to get in the game. But did he really need to jack 24 shots when other players were having great games? Also, TEN 3pters?!?!?! I'm pretty sure at least 3 of those were contested and/or ill-advised.
On the contrary, Tyrus Thomas had a couple of baskets down the stretch and next thing you know he's taking all the shots for the Bulls. Maybe we ought to try that out and keep telling Monta to shoot or penetrate until he piles up the misses.
WHERE'S BUIKE & WATSON??? - Unless they were injured or something, there was no reason why they didn't get any court time especially when Baron and Sjax weren't having a good night. Neither MP or Barnes had a good night offensively either. Can anybody tell me why they didn't get playing time?
by lightz0ut on Feb 8, 2008 2:28 AM PST 0 recs
Buike and Watson
I def agree. When BD kept throwing up bricks, I was hoping that Nellie would change something and give Watson a little burn, who could hopefully hit a couple jumpers and get some dimes. Not the case. Buike also could've provided some offensive energy. The whole game, I was hoping that these two could come off the bench, but they were glued to their seats. WHY?
by fryan on
Feb 8, 2008 10:23 AM PST
up
0 recs
I have noticed
by jpgarfunkle on
Feb 8, 2008 9:02 PM PST
up
0 recs
we lost because
48 fts for the bulls
21 fts for us
thats the game changer
by djchuckdeez on Feb 8, 2008 2:38 AM PST 0 recs
come on..
by BD4mvp on
Feb 8, 2008 2:04 PM PST
up
0 recs
true but....
by blkdiemend on
Feb 9, 2008 4:14 AM PST
up
0 recs
Highlight of the game
by MickeyMousefor3 on Feb 8, 2008 3:08 AM PST 0 recs
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by aznwarrior44 on Feb 8, 2008 3:29 AM PST 0 recs
yeah...
i think the focus for the loss should be put towards the starters rather the the 7th/8th man on the bench(aka the low man on the totem pole).
by Krossover on
Feb 8, 2008 1:16 PM PST
up
0 recs
what a waste
by gogomaplata on Feb 8, 2008 4:42 AM PST 0 recs
C'MON NOW...
I have to attribute this loss to being off for too long. They probably did get rest, but they totally lost their rhythymn! Hopefully they get it back before the All-Star break and take it all the way into and through the Playoffs!
IMO, I still think we need another BIG or player that can be an impact! Although, I like the acquisition of WEBBER, I don't think he'll be that much of an impact and definitely not the saviour or answer to our low-post issue!

"S.C. gooooo hooooome!!!"
by scottiepimppen on
Feb 8, 2008 1:08 PM PST
up
0 recs
terrible
CJ Watson. From San Andreas to the Bay!
by tadams1080 on Feb 8, 2008 6:36 AM PST 0 recs
asdf
by WilliamVanLandingham on Feb 8, 2008 6:40 AM PST 0 recs
I stayed up till 1:30...
by Hoopachoo on Feb 8, 2008 6:56 AM PST 0 recs
Horrible lost
by mykelala01 on Feb 8, 2008 7:46 AM PST 0 recs
We need to have a sit down with Nellie
next B)Explain to BARON and the rest of the crew that if they do not feel like playing then give the rock up to who wants to! This was another game I see Baron from tip, just seem like he WAS NOT INTERESTED. Look at his body language, really didn't attack, had no POP in his step, he just called for the ball and tried a few back downs, then up goes a jumper. REALLY LOOK AT THE BODY LANGUAGE, the games he kills, he is all over the place. A lot of the players just seem to have the Pietrus Effect: play Airhead basketball, to concerned about being Cool or something. THIS IS A GRIT AND GRIND TEAM! that how they win.
Finally, C) Monta needs to be told to stop playing like a second class citizen. What I mean by that is he was playing great last night, BUT....He didn't take over the game like he COULD have. Seriously, how many touches was he getting in the 4th? He reverted back to Baron, SJax and Harrington. That is Nellies job to see the hot man, notice Monta is the one that can rack up 15 points himself and TELL him to be selfish and go back to high school mode and dominate. I PLEDGE that every time he does that, Warriors come away with a FAT "W"! It's as obvious as we need ARTEST (had to put that in). Monta needs to step up to Upper Class and become the true ball hog he is destined to be (that is a good thing too...Jordan, Kobe, Lebron...they don't give up the ball when they know they got it going, and neither should Monta. Again Nellies job, and if he needs some help, maybe a few of us can go to a damn practice and spark some insight, PASSION, fire and anger into there minds, because they just don't seem to get it. They MADE the playoffs by ONE game last year. They should KNOW every game counts, but you hear them saying quotes like "we will move on.." They should be PISSED and go on a 10 game winning streak, they need to anyway.
by ineemoney21 on Feb 8, 2008 8:05 AM PST 0 recs
I really agree with your point B.
by flaaron on
Feb 8, 2008 8:13 AM PST
up
0 recs
Soooo Right
For all those that say the Bench ain't ready, how could playing BW, KAZ and Watson have NOT helped last night? (The Bench three -- except for Al's momentary streakiness -- were simply horrible, collecting a single assist among them. We know about MP, but is this the real Matt Barnes?) Who knows? The kids might have actually injected some life into this sleepwalking bunch.
And how could Nellie have allowed BD and Jack to keep on chucking up clangers when Monta was hitting 90%? Nellie seems to be talking one thing, but doing another. He needs to limit BD and Jack to 36 minutes each -- so that they'll stop pacing themselves so much, and play full out like they did last year. Where's the tight man D? Why can't they step in on drives to the hole? Where are the flailing arms? At times last night, it seemed like AB was the ONLY guy trying on D (and he wasn't finishing on offense).
These guys are going in the wrong direction -- becoming less and less like the team that excited us so much last year. They're not nearly as fast -- and they play fast only in spurts. They don't defend -- and they can't even play position or help out (other than AB). BD has become wildly inconsistent. Jack has gone to pacing himself ALL THE TIME. Onlyt Monta continues to shine consistently -- and even then, BD and Jack inexcusably ignore him.
This is simply horrible team play -- and Nellie has to shoulder much of the responsibility. I still love his philosophy. I just don't see it being carried out on the floor -- and I don't see him doing anything about it. Stubbornness CAN be a strength, but stubbornness for its own sake, in the face of increasingly clear reality, is just stupid. And the W's -- from Nellie on down -- played an inexcusably STUPID game last night.
by johnl on
Feb 8, 2008 11:41 AM PST
up
0 recs
so right...
by workz22 on
Feb 8, 2008 2:05 PM PST
up
0 recs
Maybe Nelson learned something last night
by belilaugh on
Feb 8, 2008 6:35 PM PST
up
0 recs
unfortunately he won't
by AJC3317 on
Feb 8, 2008 8:08 PM PST
up
0 recs
pietrus must go
As inexcusable as last night's loss was, the real crime was playing Pietrus during crunch time. I'm going to venture to say playing Pietrus at all is pretty suspect. Troy Hudson has more value than Pietrus at this point. Nellie needs to walk across to the Coliseum and get some advice from Billy Beane: poor offense does not make up for above average defense. And saying Pietrus plays above average D is generous...his D is over-rated. The guy averages almost 3 fouls in 17 minutes. For a little perspective, Bruce Bowen, the league's best, 2 fouls in 30. The bottom line is Pietrus is a bonehead. His dedication to shooting 3's is evidence of that. Yes, his dunk was thunderous, but was it worth the layup he smoked (didn't even draw glass), the technical he drew, or the 3 he bricked in crunch time that could've changed the game? And Tyrus Thomas completely dominated him in the post, so there goes the strong defensive impact.
Matt Barnes...I like the guy. He does a lot of really good things for us. Is he one of our best 5 players? No. Should he have replaced Bieds in the 4th quarter? No. Why Nellie even took Bieds out is irritating. Tyrus Thomas and Joe Smith looked like Barkley and Malone on the same team, so Nellie decides to take out our best defender, the guy who shut down David West when it looked like West might single-handedly beat us on our best night. Again, not smart basketball.
Even more irritating is leaving Harrington, who is one of our 5 best, on the bench when he essentially carried us for the 4th. Harrington said he wanted to do more, and he did...he looked great. Let's reward him by benching him. Even Reggie Miller called Nellie out on this one!
If there is one silver lining to this embarassment, it's that I see where C Webb is going to help. There are times, typically during one of SJax's flurries of terrible shots and/or ridiculous turnovers, when we just can't buy a bucket. And if Baron struggles like last night, we're just stagnant on offense. Webb can hit that elbow jumper, which is huge since we tend to just brick 3's during these dry spells. Maybe more importantly, he can direct traffic, getting the ball to high-percentage threats (Monta) and out of the hands of low-percentage turnover machines (SJax). Webb can also D up, which brings me back to last night. In crunch time, we needed buckets and we needed to stop Tyrus Thomas. Webb played 13 minutes, none in the 4th. Probably would've been nice to play him during those last 5 minutes. He couldn't have been any worse than Pietrus.
by givemontatheball on Feb 8, 2008 8:14 AM PST 0 recs
People bagging on Pietrus are ignorant
Meanwhile everybody just loves Matt Barnes but his shooting percentage is down and he was throwing the ball over the place last night. Barnes: zero steals, zero blocks, 2 turnovers and somehow it's all on Pietrus...? Last year I heard everybody here rave about Barnes "floor game" on a night when had 7 turnovers. You people are suckers for image, and see what you want to see. Quite playin' the gangsta game and start watching the game.
by Dubmanny on
Feb 8, 2008 5:05 PM PST
up
0 recs
r u serious?
by GSwarrior on
Feb 8, 2008 6:00 PM PST
up
0 recs
Pietrus
On offense, i cant understand why he just floats around the perimeter waiting to shoot that corner 3. He's one of the better athletes on the team and should be looking for more slashing opportunities and dive-cuts. He's mistakenly got in his head that he's a 3pt shooter and that's all he pretty much wants to do now.
I pray i never have to use a gun again.
by ssmokinjoe on
Feb 8, 2008 9:52 PM PST
up
0 recs
do you actually cheer when pietrus gets in?
But you can't blame Pietrus for being Pietrus. He didn't put himself in the game. It's on Nellie.
As for Matt Barnes, he shouldn't have been in the game during crunch time, but he has more value than Pietrus. Yes, his numbers are down. His 3P% is atrocious. But, he does average 5 boards and 2.7 assists in about 24 minutes against Pietrus' 2.8 and 0.6 in 17. I'd say Barnes is better for our team game solely based on those stats. The rest of their stats are similar, though Barnes scores and turns the ball over more. You pointed out he throws the ball all over the place, and it's true, he's too careless with his passes. BUT he's still better than Pietrus.
by givemontatheball on
Feb 9, 2008 7:19 AM PST
up
0 recs
Warriors were tired from Webber boot camp
And, Monta was getting abused while on defense. Did you see how many times he hit the floor playing D in the fourth quarter?
It shows that he had tired legs. The 4th quarter is usually GSW time, and against the baby bulls they had nothing. The five day break was too much for the Dubs. It might have been better if they had actually had some time off. I can't wait for the all-star break.
by peteb24 on Feb 8, 2008 8:37 AM PST 0 recs
I think it's the other way around

then we will fight in the shade.
by Swamp Thing on
Feb 8, 2008 9:03 AM PST
up
0 recs
Yup I agree
by mykelala01 on
Feb 8, 2008 10:24 AM PST
up
0 recs
okay okay but WHY?
i DO blame webber. i understand he'll get better and that this game wasn't representative, but our boys bent over backward to get him the first two looks (which he missed) and then feel their way through the first part of the game to see how this albatross hanging around their necks was going to change them.
there was no fire tonight, no rhythm, because everyone was trying to work on the webber experiment instead of play basketball. it's probably an unavoidable conclusion, precisely because they're trying to integrate a limping forward past his prime into the fastest team in the nba. and sure, down the road, webber will be helpful when teams FORCE us into the half court sets. but starting him gave these obvious results.
sure we've had slow starts all season, but we were never able to shake this one. we got off on the wrong foot and sacrificed this game to integrating new players with the old. i hope nellie feels like it's worth it. i don't.
this all became excruciatingly clear when al came back after webber's first dismal 4 minutes and showed why he's still our starting pf.
yet on this board i just hear whining about pietrus, barnes, and others 'not doing their jobs.' they are congenitally incapable of doing their jobs if a game starts with this little intensity and focus. i hope webber integrates soon, but please don't start him, especially against the BULLS. he's our insurance sitting there on the bench for when san antonio and utah force us to play their game.
by Ormolov on
Feb 8, 2008 10:53 AM PST
up
0 recs
otherwise
by Ormolov on
Feb 8, 2008 11:00 AM PST
up
0 recs
I wouldn't agree...
by Zack Vank on
Feb 8, 2008 2:28 PM PST
up
0 recs
Webber was not the problem
This one hurt, but fortunately this is the NBA and there are 82 games.
For us to be only 5 games out of first place in the west with 33 games to play and one of the best road records in the NBA, I like our chances.
We've been doing something this year that we have not seen for a long time and that is WIN games when we dont have our best stuff. Thats going to make a big difference down the stretch.
One thing I dont understand is why we are not winning games at home.
by GreenLightJerky on
Feb 8, 2008 3:04 PM PST
up
0 recs
Yeah but...
by blkdiemend on
Feb 9, 2008 4:27 AM PST
up
0 recs
what do you guys think?
I like the idea of getting artest, especially with the state of our D, bit I don't want to give up Al or B Wright. Not only that, but I don't think that ron ron helps us in a game like last night, where we need buckets down the stretch, because he's just as liable to huck up some bad J's as BD and Jack. Hopefuflly C Webb can help with this down the stretch. I want to be patient here, although I know it's pretty tough when 50 wins might not get the dubs in the playoffs.
by s fingers on Feb 8, 2008 9:43 AM PST 0 recs
sorry-this is what I meant to ask:
What's the deal-are the dubs too "thuggish", or "ghetto"? Is it the headbands? Is it the fact that they take a lot of 3's and don't play the kind of D that everybody else does?
by s fingers on Feb 8, 2008 9:53 AM PST 0 recs
yep
I was having the same feeling at that point. Ridiculous...you could tell they had NO IDEA that the W's had that record past the first 7 games. And even in the face of FACTS they refused to concede any props to the team for having a good season thus far...Chuckles even mentioned Portland as being "Good". Well, chuck last time I checked the W's have a better record. I can't wait for Portland to fall back to earth (which they will) so that peeps just get off their jock a bit.

Let's Go Oakland! Gas, Brake, Dip.
by OaktownFunk on
Feb 8, 2008 10:50 AM PST
up
0 recs
well
by the evil monkey on
Feb 8, 2008 9:09 PM PST
up
0 recs
It's an East Coast Bias,
It's also consistency, the Warriors are gonna have to start winning and continue to do so, for the NBA to show any trust in them.
Most of the popular West Coast teams such as the Lakers, and the Suns, have been consistent for the past 5-10 years. Tt is a safer pick for the NBA, even though we managed to beat the suns every time we met, and are even against the lakers.
Give it some time, the warriors need to take this under-dog role and perenial 8th best team in the West to stride and really start showing people what they really are; A team that's Fun, Exciting, Competitve, and Winner in one of the toughest conference's the league has ever have.
by 3 The Hard Way on
Feb 8, 2008 11:12 AM PST
up
0 recs
I think a lot of people
ON nights like last night I almost have to agree
by Zig on
Feb 8, 2008 11:54 AM PST
up
0 recs
sad
beyond that...if they can't win at home...how will this month that is suppose to be easy wins mixed with rest and freebies do anything but knock them out of playoff contention...
what the hell can they get for pietrus? do they still have any money left over to use?
sorry...i'm babbling because i'm genuinely worried...thanks for listening haha
by saraluvsbaron on Feb 8, 2008 10:22 AM PST 0 recs
Interior Defense
I was at the game, and every time Tyrus Thomas was one on one against Matt Barnes, it was a clear mis-match.
Whenever the bulls gave the ball to one of their PF's the warriors gave them too much space. Instead of closing in and playing hip to hip Defense, the bulls PF were given room to dribble and work the post.
It was so obvious, I was literally screaming at barnes to get closer to his man.
The warriors should of switched up, and put Jackson on the bulls PF, the same way he played Dirk in the Playoff's last year, that way we force them to pass out, and beat us on the 3-point line.
The bulls were without their top 2 3-point threats in Ben Gordon and Kirk Hinrich. It was a total embarassment to lose this game, all because of simple mis-matches.
If the warriors don't win on Saturday, their going to drop to 10th place in the conference, and scrapping towards No-Man's Land heading into their toughest schedule of opponents in March and April.
I "Still Believe" though
One dub one love.
by 3 The Hard Way on Feb 8, 2008 10:59 AM PST 0 recs
hrmm
by ViveAirFrance on Feb 8, 2008 11:10 AM PST 0 recs
Pietrus and CWebb
- I think Pietrus played so much because Mullin and Nellie wanted to showcase him to another GM for trade purposes.
- I'm going to say it now after watching last night's game, and I may be wrong, but I do think Webber was a significant reason why we lost. I don't think he adds significant value to the Warriors, and I think he has disrupted the flow of the team (look at how few points we scored to start the game! With Al in there from the get-go we may have better been able to establish a rhythm.) Just like I don't think we should be risking PT to the young guys because every game counts for the playoffs, I just don't think CWebb adds enough value to make it worth the trouble. UNLESS we are going to trade Al for Artest, I say dump Cwebb immediately (it's a sunk cost at this point) and go back to what we were doing before.
by Bucky on Feb 8, 2008 12:02 PM PST 0 recs
you could be right, but you assertion...
Fitz did finally manage to say something on the radio that didn't sound like fingernails across a chalkboard yesterday, in address this very concept. the starters feel too entitled. they come out flat every game, and there's no repurcussion. the games we've lost recently, we've consistently beat those teams for the last 3 quarters, losing only because the 1st quarter deficit we created could not be overcome by the other 3. if the starters want to keep sleep-walking through the first, let them watch from the bench. better to have the young guys, worst case scenario, rack up the same exact deficit in a way that has an associated benefit (energy, experience, entertainment) than see our starters mail it in nightly.
by 321 IN n OUT on
Feb 9, 2008 8:55 AM PST
up
0 recs
reason buike or cj didn't get any pt
art by jnazaire 07
by disguy on Feb 8, 2008 12:46 PM PST 0 recs
fyi
also, in the OT game against the spurs, pietrus made that bonehead move where parker got to tie the game with the corner 3... nelson replaced him with buike in OT. pietrus and kelenna both had pretty similar PT in that game.
if you want to check the boxscores, the dates for the games were...
spurs game 1/7/08
nets game 1/24/08
by starry night on
Feb 8, 2008 3:58 PM PST
up
0 recs
WAKE UP!
Also, after this game I have decided that trading Monta Ellis is simply not an option. I want this kid for years to come, even if that means not getting Artest this year. I love that he doesn't settle for shots like Davis and Jackson will settle for 3s and fades, like Harrington settles for 3s, like Biedrins settles for shooting the ball the instant he comes in contact with it. When he shoots the midrange shot he sets the D up for when he attacks the rim, and then when he attacks the rim the ohter Warriors follow suit.
by belilaugh on Feb 8, 2008 1:24 PM PST 0 recs
technically
by the evil monkey on
Feb 8, 2008 9:41 PM PST
up
0 recs
technically, it's the only shot Harrington can
you like his midrange shot, where he looks like some invisible force is pushing him out of square every time, or his "strong" moves to the basket?
by 321 IN n OUT on
Feb 9, 2008 8:58 AM PST
up
0 recs
I don't know
by belilaugh on
Feb 9, 2008 1:01 PM PST
up
0 recs
through December 31st...
by 321 IN n OUT on
Feb 10, 2008 12:49 PM PST
up
0 recs
stephen jackson
by bigbenny11 on Feb 8, 2008 1:59 PM PST 0 recs
haha
by workz22 on
Feb 8, 2008 2:17 PM PST
up
0 recs
the game
- W's hadn't played in a week (seemed like a month) and were rusty
- C-Webb shouldn't have started, but whatever.
- the refs were downright awful.
by Kobe on Feb 8, 2008 2:14 PM PST 0 recs
When Baron has a bad game
by garin423 on Feb 8, 2008 3:15 PM PST 0

